Antoine/ATOCore
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(R6): fall back to interaction.project when LLM returns empty

Browse Source 
Codex R6: the LLM extractor accepted the model's project field
verbatim. When the model returned empty string, clearly p06 memories
got promoted as project='', making them invisible to the p06
project-memory band and explaining the p06-offline-design harness
failure.

Fix: if model returns empty project but interaction.project is set,
inherit the interaction's project. Model-supplied project still takes
precedence when non-empty.

Two new tests lock the fallback and precedence behaviors.
R5 acknowledged (LLM extractor not yet wired into API — next task).

Test count: 278 -> 280. Harness re-run pending after deploy.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Anto01
2026-04-12 07:37:14 -04:00
parent 7ddf0e38ee
commit 39d73e91b4
3 changed files with 23 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
DEV-LEDGER.md
View File

@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ One branch `codex/extractor-eval-loop` for Day 1-5, a second `codex/retrieval-ha
| R2 | Codex | P1 | src/atocore/context/builder.py | Project memories excluded from pack | fixed | Claude | 2026-04-11 | 8ea53f4 |
| R3 | Claude | P2 | src/atocore/memory/extractor.py | Rule cues (`## Decision:`) never fire on conversational LLM text | open | Claude | 2026-04-11 | |
| R4 | Codex | P2 | DEV-LEDGER.md:11 | Orientation `main_tip` was stale versus `HEAD` / `origin/main` | fixed | Codex | 2026-04-11 | 81307ce |
| R5 | Codex | P1 | src/atocore/interactions/service.py:157-174 | The deployed extraction path still calls only the rule extractor; the new LLM extractor is eval/script-only, so Day 4 "gate cleared" is true as a benchmark result but not as an operational extraction path | open | Claude | 2026-04-12 | |
| R6 | Codex | P1 | src/atocore/memory/extractor_llm.py:258-276 | LLM extraction accepts model-supplied `project` verbatim with no fallback to `interaction.project`; live triage promoted a clearly p06 memory (offline/network rule) as project=`""`, which explains the p06-offline-design harness miss and falsifies the current "all 3 failures are budget-contention" claim | open | Claude | 2026-04-12 | |
| R5 | Codex | P1 | src/atocore/interactions/service.py:157-174 | The deployed extraction path still calls only the rule extractor; the new LLM extractor is eval/script-only, so Day 4 "gate cleared" is true as a benchmark result but not as an operational extraction path | acknowledged | Claude | 2026-04-12 | |
| R6 | Codex | P1 | src/atocore/memory/extractor_llm.py:258-276 | LLM extraction accepts model-supplied `project` verbatim with no fallback to `interaction.project`; live triage promoted a clearly p06 memory (offline/network rule) as project=`""`, which explains the p06-offline-design harness miss and falsifies the current "all 3 failures are budget-contention" claim | fixed | Claude | 2026-04-12 | this commit |
| R7 | Codex | P2 | src/atocore/memory/service.py:448-459 | Query ranking is overlap-count only, so broad overview memories can tie exact low-confidence memories and win on confidence; p06-firmware-interface is not just budget pressure, it also exposes a weak lexical scorer | open | Claude | 2026-04-12 | |
| R8 | Codex | P2 | tests/test_extractor_llm.py:1-7 | LLM extractor tests stop at parser/failure contracts; there is no automated coverage for the script-only persistence/review path that produced the 16 promoted memories, including project-scope preservation | open | Claude | 2026-04-12 | |