9b149d4bfdc392f37adfd06d71842e0618cf4ca7
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fad30d5461 |
feat(client): Phase 9 reflection loop surface in shared operator CLI
Codex's sequence step 3: finish the Phase 9 operator surface in the
shared client. The previous client version (0.1.0) covered stable
operations (project lifecycle, retrieval, context build, trusted
state, audit-query) but explicitly deferred capture/extract/queue/
promote/reject pending "exercised workflow". That deferral ran
into a bootstrap problem: real Claude Code sessions can't exercise
the Phase 9 loop without a usable client surface to drive it. This
commit ships the 8 missing subcommands so the next step (real
validation on Dalidou) is unblocked.
Bumps CLIENT_VERSION from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0 per the semver rules in
llm-client-integration.md (new subcommands = minor bump).
New subcommands in scripts/atocore_client.py
--------------------------------------------
| Subcommand | Endpoint |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| capture | POST /interactions |
| extract | POST /interactions/{id}/extract |
| reinforce-interaction | POST /interactions/{id}/reinforce |
| list-interactions | GET /interactions |
| get-interaction | GET /interactions/{id} |
| queue | GET /memory?status=candidate |
| promote | POST /memory/{id}/promote |
| reject | POST /memory/{id}/reject |
Each follows the existing client style: positional arguments with
empty-string defaults for optional filters, truthy-string arguments
for booleans (matching the existing refresh-project pattern), JSON
output via print_json(), fail-open behavior inherited from
request().
capture accepts prompt + response + project + client + session_id +
reinforce as positionals, defaulting the client field to
"atocore-client" when omitted so every capture from the shared
client is identifiable in the interactions audit trail.
extract defaults to preview mode (persist=false). Pass "true" as
the second positional to create candidate memories.
list-interactions and queue build URL query strings with
url-encoded values and always include the limit, matching how the
existing context-build subcommand handles its parameters.
Security fix: ID-field URL encoding
-----------------------------------
The initial draft used urllib.parse.quote() with the default safe
set, which does NOT encode "/" because it's a reserved path
character. That's a security footgun on ID fields: passing
"promote mem/evil/action" would build /memory/mem/evil/action/promote
and hit a completely different endpoint than intended.
Fixed by passing safe="" to urllib.parse.quote() on every ID field
(interaction_id and memory_id). The tests cover this explicitly via
test_extract_url_encodes_interaction_id and test_promote_url_encodes_memory_id,
both of which would have failed with the default behavior.
Project names keep the default quote behavior because a project
name with a slash would already be broken elsewhere in the system
(ingest root resolution, file paths, etc).
tests/test_atocore_client.py (new, 18 tests, all green)
-------------------------------------------------------
A dedicated test file for the shared client that mocks the
request() helper and verifies each subcommand:
- calls the correct HTTP method and path
- builds the correct JSON body (or query string)
- passes the right subset of CLI arguments through
- URL-encodes ID fields so path traversal isn't possible
Tests are structured as unit tests (not integration tests) because
the API surface on the server side already has its own route tests
in test_api_storage.py and the Phase 9 specific files. These tests
are the wiring contract between CLI args and HTTP calls.
Test file highlights:
- capture: default values, custom client, reinforce=false
- extract: preview by default, persist=true opt-in, URL encoding
- reinforce-interaction: correct path construction
- list-interactions: no filters, single filter, full filter set
(including ISO 8601 since parameter with T separator and Z)
- get-interaction: fetch by id
- queue: always filters status=candidate, accepts memory_type
and project, coerces limit to int
- promote / reject: correct path + URL encoding
- test_phase9_full_loop_via_client_shape: end-to-end sequence
that drives capture -> extract preview -> extract persist ->
queue list -> promote -> reject through the shared client and
verifies the exact sequence of HTTP calls that would be made
These tests run in ~0.2s because they mock request() — no DB, no
Chroma, no HTTP. The fast feedback loop matters because the
client surface is what every agent integration eventually depends
on.
docs/architecture/llm-client-integration.md updates
---------------------------------------------------
- New "Phase 9 reflection loop (shipped after migration safety
work)" section under "What's in scope for the shared client
today" with the full 8-subcommand table and a note explaining
the bootstrap-problem rationale
- Removed the "Memory review queue and reflection loop" section
from "What's intentionally NOT in scope today"; backup admin
and engineering-entity commands remain the only deferred
families
- Renumbered the deferred-commands list (was 3 items, now 2)
- Open follow-ups updated: memory-review-subcommand item replaced
with "real-usage validation of the Phase 9 loop" as the next
concrete dependency
- TL;DR updated to list the reflection-loop subcommands
- Versioning note records the v0.1.0 -> v0.2.0 bump with the
subcommands included
Full suite: 215 passing (was 197), 1 warning. The +18 is
tests/test_atocore_client.py. Runtime unchanged because the new
tests don't touch the DB.
What this commit does NOT do
----------------------------
- Does NOT change the server-side endpoints. All 8 subcommands
call existing API routes that were shipped in Phase 9 Commits
A/B/C. This is purely a client-side wiring commit.
- Does NOT run the reflection loop against the live Dalidou
instance. That's the next concrete step and is explicitly
called out in the open-follow-ups section of the updated doc.
- Does NOT modify the Claude Code slash command. It still pulls
context only; the capture/extract/queue/promote companion
commands (e.g. /atocore-record-response) are deferred until the
capture workflow has been exercised in real use at least once.
- Does NOT refactor the OpenClaw helper. That's a cross-repo
change and remains a queued follow-up, now unblocked by the
shared client having the reflection-loop subcommands.
|
|||
| 78d4e979e5 |
refactor slash command onto shared client + llm-client-integration doc
Codex's review caught that the Claude Code slash command shipped in Session 2 was a parallel reimplementation of routing logic the existing scripts/atocore_client.py already had. That client was introduced via the codex/port-atocore-ops-client merge and is already a comprehensive operator client (auto-context, detect-project, refresh-project, project-state, audit-query, etc.). The slash command should have been a thin wrapper from the start. This commit fixes the shape without expanding scope. .claude/commands/atocore-context.md ----------------------------------- Rewritten as a thin Claude Code-specific frontend that shells out to the shared client: - explicit project hint -> calls `python scripts/atocore_client.py context-build "<prompt>" "<project>"` - no explicit hint -> calls `python scripts/atocore_client.py auto-context "<prompt>"` which runs the client's detect-project routing first and falls through to context-build with the match Inherits the client's stable behaviour for free: - ATOCORE_BASE_URL env var (default http://dalidou:8100) - fail-open on network errors via ATOCORE_FAIL_OPEN - consistent JSON output shape - the same project alias matching the OpenClaw helper uses Removes the speculative `--capture` capture path that was in the original draft. Capture/extract/queue/promote/reject are intentionally NOT in the shared client yet (memory-review workflow not exercised in real use), so the slash command can't expose them either. docs/architecture/llm-client-integration.md ------------------------------------------- New planning doc that defines the layering rule for AtoCore's relationship with LLM client contexts: Three layers: 1. AtoCore HTTP API (universal, src/atocore/api/routes.py) 2. Shared operator client (scripts/atocore_client.py) — the canonical Python backbone for stable AtoCore operations 3. Per-agent thin frontends (Claude Code slash command, OpenClaw helper, future Codex skill, future MCP server) that shell out to the shared client Three non-negotiable rules: - every per-agent frontend is a thin wrapper (translate the agent's command format and render the JSON; nothing else) - the shared client never duplicates the API (it composes endpoints; new logic goes in the API first) - the shared client only exposes stable operations (subcommands land only after the API has been exercised in a real workflow) Doc covers: - the full table of subcommands currently in scope (project lifecycle, ingestion, project-state, retrieval, context build, audit-query, debug-context, health/stats) - the three deferred families with rationale: memory review queue (workflow not exercised), backup admin (fail-open default would hide errors), engineering layer entities (V1 not yet implemented) - the integration recipe for new agent platforms - explicit acknowledgement that the OpenClaw helper currently duplicates routing logic and that the refactor to the shared client is a queued cross-repo follow-up - how the layering connects to phase 8 (OpenClaw) and phase 11 (multi-model) - versioning and stability rules for the shared client surface - open follow-ups: OpenClaw refactor, memory-review subcommands when ready, optional backup admin subcommands, engineering entity subcommands during V1 implementation master-plan-status.md updated ----------------------------- - New "LLM Client Integration" subsection that points to the layering doc and explicitly notes the deferral of memory-review and engineering-entity subcommands - Frames the layering as sitting between phase 8 and phase 11 Scope is intentionally narrow per codex's framing: promote the existing client to canonical status, refactor the slash command to use it, document the layering. No new client subcommands added in this commit. The OpenClaw helper refactor is a separate cross-repo follow-up. Memory-review and engineering- entity work stay deferred. Full suite: 160 passing, no behavior changes. |
