5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
98bc848184 docs(ledger): refresh Orientation from live Dalidou 2026-04-23
The Orientation counts were last refreshed 2026-04-22 and have
drifted materially because the density batch-extract ran between
then and now:

- active_memories: 84 -> 784 (V1-A density gate cleared — 100+ target crushed)
- interactions: 234 -> 500+ (real count pending /stats re-sample)
- entities: 35 -> 66
- conflicts: 0 open
- candidate_memories: 2 (queue drained by auto-triage)

Also added:
- Last nightly pipeline summary (2026-04-23T03:00:20Z): harness
  17/18, triage 3+7+0, dedup 7 clusters auto-merged, graduation
  30-skipped 0-graduated 0-errors — cleanly executed
- active_track now records soak status (day 5 of ~7, all clean)
  and flags density gate as cleared

No code changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 10:12:06 -04:00
69176d11c5 docs: land wiki-reorg supersession record (was in working tree)
- DEV-LEDGER Recent Decisions: the wiki-reorg plan drafted earlier
  2026-04-22 is superseded by a read-only operator-orientation plan
  in the ATOCore-clean workspace. Decision authored by Antoine,
  drafted by Claude in a parallel session.
- docs/plans/wiki-reorg-plan.md: new file, carries a SUPERSEDED
  banner at the top pointing to operator-orientation-plan.md.
  Kept in-tree for historical context; explicitly marked do-not-implement.

Syncing working-tree state — no authoring from this session beyond
committing what was already on disk.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 10:11:22 -04:00
4ca81e9b36 docs: reflect V1-0 landed + V1 completion track active + resume map
- current-state.md: header bumped to 2026-04-22, live_sha 2712c5d,
  547 tests. New "V1-0 landed" section covers what merged, what the
  prod backfill did, and where the next phase stands.

- master-plan-status.md: new "Active - Engineering V1 Completion
  Track (started 2026-04-22)" section between Now and Next.
  Contains the 7-phase table with V1-0 marked done, V1-A gated,
  V1-B..V1-F pending. V1 removed from the "Next" section since it
  is now Active.

- DEV-LEDGER.md Orientation: two new pointers — active_track points
  to the completion plan + resume map; open_branches points to the
  R14 branch still awaiting Codex review.

- docs/plans/v1-resume-state.md (new): single-page "you are here"
  for any future session. Covers state of play, start-gates for
  V1-A, pre-flight checklist, phase map, parallel-safe work, do-nots,
  open findings, agreement protocol history, reference index.
  Designed to be cold-readable — no prior session context required.

No code changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-22 16:01:09 -04:00
22a37a7241 docs(ledger): record V1-0 closure + prod backfill + R14 residual
- Orientation bumped: live_sha 775960c -> 2712c5d, test_count
  533 -> 547, main_tip 999788b -> 2712c5d
- Recent Decisions: V1-0 approved, merged, deployed, 31-row prod
  backfill with zero-remainder follow-up dry-run
- Open Review Findings: new R14 (P2) — POST /entities/{id}/promote
  returns 500 instead of 400 on the new ValueError from legacy
  no-provenance candidate promotion. Non-blocking, follow-up tidy
- Session Log: full V1-0 closure narrative + V1-A gate status

V1-A (Q-001 subsystem-scoped variant + Q-6 killer-correctness
integration) holds until the soak window ends ~2026-04-26 and the
100-active-memory density target is hit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-22 15:17:06 -04:00
2712c5d2d0 feat(engineering): enforce V1-0 write invariants 2026-04-22 14:59:17 -04:00
5 changed files with 449 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@@ -6,23 +6,26 @@
## Orientation ## Orientation
- **live_sha** (Dalidou `/health` build_sha): `775960c` (verified 2026-04-16 via /health, build_time 2026-04-16T17:59:30Z) - **live_sha** (Dalidou `/health` build_sha): `2712c5d` (re-verified 2026-04-23 via `/health`; status=ok; build_time 2026-04-22T18:59:53Z)
- **last_updated**: 2026-04-18 by Claude (Phase 7A — Memory Consolidation "sleep cycle" V1 on branch, not yet deployed) - **last_updated**: 2026-04-23 by Claude (Orientation refreshed from live Dalidou after nightly 2026-04-23T03:00:20Z; counts were stale by ~10× on memories)
- **main_tip**: `999788b` - **main_tip**: `69176d1` (tip after committing wiki-reorg supersession record)
- **test_count**: 533 (prior 521 + 12 new wikilink/redlink tests) - **test_count**: 547 (last verified locally 2026-04-22 post-V1-0; unchanged — R14 fix on branch adds +1 when merged)
- **harness**: `17/18 PASS` on live Dalidou (p04-constraints expects "Zerodur" — retrieval content gap, not regression) - **harness**: `17/18 PASS` on live Dalidou (p04-constraints expects "Zerodur" — known content gap, not regression; consistent since 2026-04-19)
- **vectors**: 33,253 - **vectors**: 33,253
- **active_memories**: 84 (31 project, 23 knowledge, 10 episodic, 8 adaptation, 7 preference, 5 identity) - **active_memories**: 784 (up from 84 pre-density-batch — density gate CRUSHED vs V1-A's 100-target)
- **candidate_memories**: 2 - **candidate_memories**: 2 (triage queue drained)
- **interactions**: 234 total (192 claude-code, 38 openclaw, 4 test) - **interactions**: 500+ (limit=2000 query returned 500 — density batch has been running; actual may be higher, confirm via /stats next update)
- **registered_projects**: atocore, p04-gigabit, p05-interferometer, p06-polisher, atomizer-v2, abb-space (aliased p08) - **registered_projects**: atocore, p04-gigabit, p05-interferometer, p06-polisher, atomizer-v2, abb-space (aliased p08)
- **project_state_entries**: 110 total (atocore=47, p06=19, p05=18, p04=15, abb=6, atomizer=5) - **project_state_entries**: 63 (atocore alone; full cross-project count not re-sampled this update)
- **entities**: 35 (engineering knowledge graph, Layer 2) - **entities**: 66 (up from 35 — V1-0 backfill + ongoing work; 0 open conflicts)
- **off_host_backup**: `papa@192.168.86.39:/home/papa/atocore-backups/` via cron, verified - **off_host_backup**: `papa@192.168.86.39:/home/papa/atocore-backups/` via cron, verified
- **nightly_pipeline**: backup → cleanup → rsync → OpenClaw import → vault refresh → extract → auto-triage → **auto-promote/expire (NEW)** → weekly synth/lint Sundays → **retrieval harness (NEW)****pipeline summary (NEW)** - **nightly_pipeline**: backup → cleanup → rsync → OpenClaw import → vault refresh → extract → auto-triage → **auto-promote/expire (NEW)** → weekly synth/lint Sundays → **retrieval harness (NEW)****pipeline summary (NEW)**
- **capture_clients**: claude-code (Stop hook + cwd project inference), openclaw (before_agent_start + llm_output plugin, verified live) - **capture_clients**: claude-code (Stop hook + cwd project inference), openclaw (before_agent_start + llm_output plugin, verified live)
- **wiki**: http://dalidou:8100/wiki (browse), /wiki/projects/{id}, /wiki/entities/{id}, /wiki/search - **wiki**: http://dalidou:8100/wiki (browse), /wiki/projects/{id}, /wiki/entities/{id}, /wiki/search
- **dashboard**: http://dalidou:8100/admin/dashboard (now shows pipeline health, interaction totals by client, all registered projects) - **dashboard**: http://dalidou:8100/admin/dashboard (now shows pipeline health, interaction totals by client, all registered projects)
- **active_track**: Engineering V1 Completion (started 2026-04-22). V1-0 landed (`2712c5d`). V1-A density gate CLEARED (784 active ≫ 100 target as of 2026-04-23). V1-A soak gate at day 5/~7 (F4 first run 2026-04-19; nightly clean 2026-04-19 through 2026-04-23; failures confined to the known p04-constraints content gap). Plan: `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md`. Resume map: `docs/plans/v1-resume-state.md`.
- **last_nightly_pipeline**: `2026-04-23T03:00:20Z` — harness 17/18, triage promoted=3 rejected=7 human=0, dedup 7 clusters (1 tier1 + 6 tier2 auto-merged), graduation 30-skipped 0-graduated 0-errors, auto-triage drained the queue (0 new candidates 2026-04-22T00:52Z run)
- **open_branches**: `claude/r14-promote-400` at `3888db9` — P2 route fix (ValueError → 400), pending Codex review
## Active Plan ## Active Plan
@@ -143,9 +146,12 @@ One branch `codex/extractor-eval-loop` for Day 1-5, a second `codex/retrieval-ha
| R11 | Codex | P2 | src/atocore/api/routes.py:773-845 | `POST /admin/extract-batch` still accepts `mode="llm"` inside the container and returns a successful 0-candidate result instead of surfacing that host-only LLM extraction is unavailable from this runtime. That is a misleading API contract for operators. | fixed | Claude | 2026-04-12 | (pending) | | R11 | Codex | P2 | src/atocore/api/routes.py:773-845 | `POST /admin/extract-batch` still accepts `mode="llm"` inside the container and returns a successful 0-candidate result instead of surfacing that host-only LLM extraction is unavailable from this runtime. That is a misleading API contract for operators. | fixed | Claude | 2026-04-12 | (pending) |
| R12 | Codex | P2 | scripts/batch_llm_extract_live.py:39-190 | The host-side extractor duplicates the LLM system prompt and JSON parsing logic from `src/atocore/memory/extractor_llm.py`. It works today, but this is now a prompt/parser drift risk across the container and host implementations. | fixed | Claude | 2026-04-12 | (pending) | | R12 | Codex | P2 | scripts/batch_llm_extract_live.py:39-190 | The host-side extractor duplicates the LLM system prompt and JSON parsing logic from `src/atocore/memory/extractor_llm.py`. It works today, but this is now a prompt/parser drift risk across the container and host implementations. | fixed | Claude | 2026-04-12 | (pending) |
| R13 | Codex | P2 | DEV-LEDGER.md:12 | The new `286 passing` test-count claim is not reproducibly auditable from the current audit environments: neither Dalidou nor the clean worktree has `pytest` available. The claim may be true in Claude's dev shell, but it remains unverified in this audit. | fixed | Claude | 2026-04-12 | (pending) | | R13 | Codex | P2 | DEV-LEDGER.md:12 | The new `286 passing` test-count claim is not reproducibly auditable from the current audit environments: neither Dalidou nor the clean worktree has `pytest` available. The claim may be true in Claude's dev shell, but it remains unverified in this audit. | fixed | Claude | 2026-04-12 | (pending) |
| R14 | Codex | P2 | src/atocore/api/routes.py (POST /entities/{id}/promote) | The HTTP `POST /entities/{id}/promote` route does not translate the new service-layer `ValueError("source_refs required: cannot promote a candidate with no provenance...")` into a 400. A legacy no-provenance candidate promoted through the API currently surfaces as a 500. Does not block V1-0 acceptance; tidy in a follow-up. | open | Claude | 2026-04-22 | |
## Recent Decisions ## Recent Decisions
- **2026-04-22** **Wiki reorg reframed as read-only operator orientation.** The earlier `docs/plans/wiki-reorg-plan.md` (5 additions W-1…W-5 adding `/wiki/interactions`, `/wiki/memories`, project-page restructure, recent feed, topnav exposure) is **superseded** and marked as such in-tree. Successor is `docs/plans/operator-orientation-plan.md` in the `ATOCore-clean` workspace: no `/wiki` surface, no Human Mirror implementation, no new API routes, no schema changes, no new source of truth. First deliverables are docs-only: `docs/where-things-live.md` (operator map of source/staged/machine/registry/trusted-state/memories/interactions/logs/backups with explicit edit-vs-don't-edit boundaries) and `docs/operator-home.md` (short daily starting page indexing those docs + a 4-command read-only orientation sequence). README and operations.md link both. Optional future work (`project-overview` and `memory-candidates` CLI helpers over existing endpoints) is gated on the docs proving useful in practice. *Proposed by:* Antoine. *Drafted by:* Claude. *Pending Codex review.*
- **2026-04-22** **V1-0 done: approved, merged, deployed, prod backfilled.** Codex pulled `f16cd52`, re-ran the two original probes (both pass), re-ran the three targeted regression suites (all pass). Squash-merged to main as `2712c5d`. Dalidou deployed via canonical deploy script; `/health` reports build_sha=`2712c5d2d03cb2a6af38b559664afd1c4cd0e050`, status=ok. Validated backup snapshot taken at `/srv/storage/atocore/backups/snapshots/20260422T190624Z` before backfill. Prod backfill: `--dry-run` found 31 active/superseded entities with no provenance; list reviewed and sane; live run updated 31 rows via the default `hand_authored=1` flag path; follow-up dry-run returned 0 rows remaining. Residual logged as R14 (P2): `POST /entities/{id}/promote` HTTP route doesn't translate the new service-layer `ValueError` into a 400 — legacy bad candidate promotes via the API return 500 instead. Does not block V1-0 acceptance. V1-0 closed. Next: V1-A (Q-001 subsystem-scoped variant + Q-6 integration). V1-A holds until the soak window ends ~2026-04-26 and the 100-memory density target is hit. *Approved + landed by:* Codex. *Ratified by:* Antoine.
- **2026-04-22** **Engineering V1 Completion Plan — Codex sign-off (third round)**. Codex's third-round audit closed the remaining five open questions with concrete resolutions, patched inline in `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md`: (1) F-7 row rewritten with ground truth — schema + preserve-original + test coverage already exist (`graduated_to_entity_id` at `database.py:143-146`, `graduated` status in memory service, promote hook at `service.py:354-356,389-451`, tests at `test_engineering_v1_phase5.py:67-90`); **real gaps** are missing direct `POST /memory/{id}/graduate` route and spec's `knowledge→Fact` mismatch (no `fact` entity type exists; reconcile to `parameter` or similar); V1-E 2 → **34 days**; (2) Q-5 determinism reframed — don't stabilize the call to `datetime.now()`, inject regenerated timestamp + checksum as renderer inputs, remove DB iteration ordering dependencies; V1-D scope updated; (3) `project` vs `project_id` — doc note only, no rename, resolved; (4) total estimate 16.517.5 → **17.519.5 focused days** with calendar buffer on top; (5) "Minions" must not be canonized in D-3 release notes — neutral wording ("queued background processing / async workers") only. **Agreement reached**: Claude + Codex + Antoine aligned. V1-0 is ready to start once the current pipeline soak window ends (~2026-04-26) and the 100-memory density target is hit. *Patched by:* Codex. *Signed off by:* Codex ("with those edits, I'd sign off on the five questions"). *Accepted by:* Antoine. *Executor (V1-0 onwards):* Claude. - **2026-04-22** **Engineering V1 Completion Plan — Codex sign-off (third round)**. Codex's third-round audit closed the remaining five open questions with concrete resolutions, patched inline in `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md`: (1) F-7 row rewritten with ground truth — schema + preserve-original + test coverage already exist (`graduated_to_entity_id` at `database.py:143-146`, `graduated` status in memory service, promote hook at `service.py:354-356,389-451`, tests at `test_engineering_v1_phase5.py:67-90`); **real gaps** are missing direct `POST /memory/{id}/graduate` route and spec's `knowledge→Fact` mismatch (no `fact` entity type exists; reconcile to `parameter` or similar); V1-E 2 → **34 days**; (2) Q-5 determinism reframed — don't stabilize the call to `datetime.now()`, inject regenerated timestamp + checksum as renderer inputs, remove DB iteration ordering dependencies; V1-D scope updated; (3) `project` vs `project_id` — doc note only, no rename, resolved; (4) total estimate 16.517.5 → **17.519.5 focused days** with calendar buffer on top; (5) "Minions" must not be canonized in D-3 release notes — neutral wording ("queued background processing / async workers") only. **Agreement reached**: Claude + Codex + Antoine aligned. V1-0 is ready to start once the current pipeline soak window ends (~2026-04-26) and the 100-memory density target is hit. *Patched by:* Codex. *Signed off by:* Codex ("with those edits, I'd sign off on the five questions"). *Accepted by:* Antoine. *Executor (V1-0 onwards):* Claude.
- **2026-04-22** **Engineering V1 Completion Plan revised per Codex second-round file-level audit** — three findings folded in, all with exact file:line refs from Codex: (1) F-1 downgraded from ✅ to 🟡 — `extractor_version` and `canonical_home` missing from `Entity` dataclass and `entities` table per `engineering-v1-acceptance.md:45`; V1-0 scope now adds both fields via additive migration + doc note that `project` IS `project_id` per "fields equivalent to" spec wording; (2) F-2 replaced with ground-truth per-query status: 9 of 20 v1-required queries done (Q-004/Q-005/Q-006/Q-008/Q-009/Q-011/Q-013/Q-016/Q-017), 1 partial (Q-001 needs subsystem-scoped variant), 10 missing (Q-002/003/007/010/012/014/018/019/020); V1-A scope shrank to Q-001 shape fix + Q-6 integration (pillar queries already implemented); V1-C closes the 8 remaining new queries + Q-020 deferred to V1-D; (3) F-5 reframed — generic `conflicts` + `conflict_members` schema already present at `database.py:190`, no migration needed; divergence is detector body (per-type dispatch needs generalization) + routes (`/admin/conflicts/*` needs `/conflicts/*` alias). Total revised to 16.517.5 days, ~60 tests. Plan: `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md` at commit `ce3a878` (Codex pulled clean). Three of Codex's eight open questions now answered; remaining: F-7 graduation depth, mirror determinism, `project` rename question, velocity calibration, minions naming. *Proposed by:* Claude. *Reviewed by:* Codex (two rounds). - **2026-04-22** **Engineering V1 Completion Plan revised per Codex second-round file-level audit** — three findings folded in, all with exact file:line refs from Codex: (1) F-1 downgraded from ✅ to 🟡 — `extractor_version` and `canonical_home` missing from `Entity` dataclass and `entities` table per `engineering-v1-acceptance.md:45`; V1-0 scope now adds both fields via additive migration + doc note that `project` IS `project_id` per "fields equivalent to" spec wording; (2) F-2 replaced with ground-truth per-query status: 9 of 20 v1-required queries done (Q-004/Q-005/Q-006/Q-008/Q-009/Q-011/Q-013/Q-016/Q-017), 1 partial (Q-001 needs subsystem-scoped variant), 10 missing (Q-002/003/007/010/012/014/018/019/020); V1-A scope shrank to Q-001 shape fix + Q-6 integration (pillar queries already implemented); V1-C closes the 8 remaining new queries + Q-020 deferred to V1-D; (3) F-5 reframed — generic `conflicts` + `conflict_members` schema already present at `database.py:190`, no migration needed; divergence is detector body (per-type dispatch needs generalization) + routes (`/admin/conflicts/*` needs `/conflicts/*` alias). Total revised to 16.517.5 days, ~60 tests. Plan: `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md` at commit `ce3a878` (Codex pulled clean). Three of Codex's eight open questions now answered; remaining: F-7 graduation depth, mirror determinism, `project` rename question, velocity calibration, minions naming. *Proposed by:* Claude. *Reviewed by:* Codex (two rounds).
- **2026-04-22** **Engineering V1 Completion Plan revised per Codex first-round review** — original six-phase order (queries → ingest → mirror → graduation → provenance → ops) rejected by Codex as backward: provenance-at-write (F-8) and conflict-detection hooks (F-5 minimal) must precede any phase that writes active entities. Revised to seven phases: V1-0 write-time invariants (F-8 + F-5 hooks + F-1 audit) as hard prerequisite, V1-A minimum query slice proving the model, V1-B ingest, V1-C full query catalog, V1-D mirror, V1-E graduation, V1-F full F-5 spec + ops + docs. Also softened "parallel with Now list" — real collision points listed explicitly; schedule shifted ~4 weeks to reflect that V1-0 cannot start during pipeline soak. Withdrew the "5070% built" global framing in favor of the per-criterion gap table. Workspace sync note added: Codex's Playground workspace can't see the plan file; canonical dev tree is Windows `C:\Users\antoi\ATOCore`. Plan: `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md`. Awaiting Codex file-level audit once workspace syncs. *Proposed by:* Claude. *First-round review by:* Codex. - **2026-04-22** **Engineering V1 Completion Plan revised per Codex first-round review** — original six-phase order (queries → ingest → mirror → graduation → provenance → ops) rejected by Codex as backward: provenance-at-write (F-8) and conflict-detection hooks (F-5 minimal) must precede any phase that writes active entities. Revised to seven phases: V1-0 write-time invariants (F-8 + F-5 hooks + F-1 audit) as hard prerequisite, V1-A minimum query slice proving the model, V1-B ingest, V1-C full query catalog, V1-D mirror, V1-E graduation, V1-F full F-5 spec + ops + docs. Also softened "parallel with Now list" — real collision points listed explicitly; schedule shifted ~4 weeks to reflect that V1-0 cannot start during pipeline soak. Withdrew the "5070% built" global framing in favor of the per-criterion gap table. Workspace sync note added: Codex's Playground workspace can't see the plan file; canonical dev tree is Windows `C:\Users\antoi\ATOCore`. Plan: `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md`. Awaiting Codex file-level audit once workspace syncs. *Proposed by:* Claude. *First-round review by:* Codex.
@@ -164,6 +170,8 @@ One branch `codex/extractor-eval-loop` for Day 1-5, a second `codex/retrieval-ha
## Session Log ## Session Log
- **2026-04-22 Codex + Antoine (V1-0 closed)** Codex approved `f16cd52` after re-running both original probes (legacy-candidate promote + supersede hook — both correct) and the three targeted regression suites (`test_v1_0_write_invariants.py`, `test_engineering_v1_phase5.py`, `test_inbox_crossproject.py` — all pass). Squash-merged to main as `2712c5d` ("feat(engineering): enforce V1-0 write invariants"). Deployed to Dalidou via the canonical deploy script; `/health` build_sha=`2712c5d2d03cb2a6af38b559664afd1c4cd0e050` status=ok. Validated backup snapshot at `/srv/storage/atocore/backups/snapshots/20260422T190624Z` taken BEFORE prod backfill. Prod backfill of `scripts/v1_0_backfill_provenance.py` against live DB: dry-run found 31 active/superseded entities with no provenance, list reviewed and looked sane; live run with default `hand_authored=1` flag path updated 31 rows; follow-up dry-run returned 0 rows remaining → no lingering F-8 violations in prod. Codex logged one residual P2 (R14): HTTP `POST /entities/{id}/promote` route doesn't translate the new service-layer `ValueError` into 400 — legacy bad candidate promoted through the API surfaces as 500. Not blocking. V1-0 closed. **Gates for V1-A**: soak window ends ~2026-04-26; 100-active-memory density target (currently 84 active + the ~31 newly flagged ones — need to check how those count in density math). V1-A holds until both gates clear.
- **2026-04-22 Claude (V1-0 patches per Codex review)** Codex audit of commit `cbf9e03` surfaced two P1 gaps + one P2 scope concern, all verified with code-level probes. **P1 #1**: `promote_entity` didn't re-check the F-8 invariant — a legacy candidate with empty `source_refs` and `hand_authored=0` could still promote to active, violating the plan's "invariant at both `create_entity` and `promote_entity`". Fixed: `promote_entity` at `service.py:365-379` now raises `ValueError("source_refs required: cannot promote a candidate with no provenance...")` before flipping status. Stays symmetric with the create-side error. **P1 #2**: `supersede_entity` was missing the F-5 hook the plan requires on every active-entity write path. The `supersedes` relationship rooted at the `superseded_by` entity can create a conflict the detector should catch. Fixed at `service.py:581-591`: calls `detect_conflicts_for_entity(superseded_by)` with fail-open per Q-3. **P2**: backfill script's `--invalidate-instead` flag queried both active AND superseded rows; invalidating already-superseded rows would collapse history. Fixed at `scripts/v1_0_backfill_provenance.py:52-63`: `--invalidate-instead` now scopes to `status='active'` only (default flag-hand_authored mode stays broad as it's additive/non-destructive). Help text tightened to make the destructive posture explicit. **Four new regression tests** in `test_v1_0_write_invariants.py`: (1) `test_promote_rejects_legacy_candidate_without_provenance` — directly inserts a legacy candidate and confirms promote raises + row stays candidate; (2) `test_promote_accepts_candidate_flagged_hand_authored` — symmetry check; (3) `test_supersede_runs_conflict_detection_on_new_active` — monkeypatches detector, confirms hook fires on `superseded_by`; (4) `test_supersede_hook_fails_open` — Q-3 check for supersede path. **Test count**: 543 → 547 (+4 regression). Full suite `547 passed in 81.07s`. Next: commit patches on branch, push, Codex re-review. - **2026-04-22 Claude (V1-0 patches per Codex review)** Codex audit of commit `cbf9e03` surfaced two P1 gaps + one P2 scope concern, all verified with code-level probes. **P1 #1**: `promote_entity` didn't re-check the F-8 invariant — a legacy candidate with empty `source_refs` and `hand_authored=0` could still promote to active, violating the plan's "invariant at both `create_entity` and `promote_entity`". Fixed: `promote_entity` at `service.py:365-379` now raises `ValueError("source_refs required: cannot promote a candidate with no provenance...")` before flipping status. Stays symmetric with the create-side error. **P1 #2**: `supersede_entity` was missing the F-5 hook the plan requires on every active-entity write path. The `supersedes` relationship rooted at the `superseded_by` entity can create a conflict the detector should catch. Fixed at `service.py:581-591`: calls `detect_conflicts_for_entity(superseded_by)` with fail-open per Q-3. **P2**: backfill script's `--invalidate-instead` flag queried both active AND superseded rows; invalidating already-superseded rows would collapse history. Fixed at `scripts/v1_0_backfill_provenance.py:52-63`: `--invalidate-instead` now scopes to `status='active'` only (default flag-hand_authored mode stays broad as it's additive/non-destructive). Help text tightened to make the destructive posture explicit. **Four new regression tests** in `test_v1_0_write_invariants.py`: (1) `test_promote_rejects_legacy_candidate_without_provenance` — directly inserts a legacy candidate and confirms promote raises + row stays candidate; (2) `test_promote_accepts_candidate_flagged_hand_authored` — symmetry check; (3) `test_supersede_runs_conflict_detection_on_new_active` — monkeypatches detector, confirms hook fires on `superseded_by`; (4) `test_supersede_hook_fails_open` — Q-3 check for supersede path. **Test count**: 543 → 547 (+4 regression). Full suite `547 passed in 81.07s`. Next: commit patches on branch, push, Codex re-review.
- **2026-04-22 Claude (V1-0 landed on branch)** First V1 completion phase done on branch `claude/v1-0-write-invariants`. **F-1 schema remediation**: added `extractor_version`, `canonical_home`, `hand_authored` columns to `entities` via idempotent ALTERs in both `_apply_migrations` (`database.py:148-170`) and `init_engineering_schema` (`service.py:95-139`). CREATE TABLE also updated so fresh DBs get the columns natively. New `_table_exists` helper at `database.py:378`. `Entity` dataclass gains the three fields with sensible defaults. `EXTRACTOR_VERSION = "v1.0.0"` module constant at top of `service.py`. `_row_to_entity` tolerates rows without the new columns so tests predating V1-0 still pass. **F-8 provenance enforcement**: `create_entity` raises `ValueError("source_refs required: ...")` when called without non-empty source_refs AND without `hand_authored=True`. New kwargs `hand_authored: bool = False` and `extractor_version: str | None = None` threaded through `service.create_entity`, the `EntityCreateRequest` Pydantic model, the API route, and the wiki `/wiki/new` form body (form writes `hand_authored: true` since human entries are hand-authored by definition). **F-5 hook on active create**: `create_entity(status="active")` now calls `detect_conflicts_for_entity` with fail-open per `conflict-model.md:256` (errors log warning, write still succeeds). The promote path's existing hook at `service.py:400-404` was kept as-is. **Doc note** added to `engineering-ontology-v1.md` recording that `project` IS the `project_id` per "fields equivalent to" wording. **Backfill script** at `scripts/v1_0_backfill_provenance.py` — idempotent, defaults to flagging no-provenance active entities as `hand_authored=1`, supports `--dry-run` and `--invalidate-instead`. **Tests**: 10 new in `tests/test_v1_0_write_invariants.py` covering F-1 fields, F-8 raise path, F-8 hand_authored bypass, F-5 active-create hook, F-5 candidate-no-hook, Q-3 fail-open on detector error, Q-4 partial (scope_only=active excludes candidates). **Test fixes**: three pre-existing tests adapted — `test_requirement_name_conflict_detected` + `test_conflict_resolution_dismiss_leaves_entities_alone` now read from `list_open_conflicts` because the V1-0 hook records the conflict at create-time (detector dedup returns [] on re-run); `test_api_post_entity_with_null_project_stores_global` sends `hand_authored: true` since the fixture has no source_refs. **conftest.py monkeypatch**: wraps `create_entity` so tests missing both source_refs and hand_authored default to `hand_authored=True` (reasonable since tests author their own fixture data). Production paths (API route, wiki form, graduation scripts) all pass explicit values and are unaffected by the monkeypatch. **Test count**: 533 → 543 (+10), full suite `543 passed in 77.86s`. **Not yet**: commit + push + Codex review + deploy. **Branch**: `claude/v1-0-write-invariants`. - **2026-04-22 Claude (V1-0 landed on branch)** First V1 completion phase done on branch `claude/v1-0-write-invariants`. **F-1 schema remediation**: added `extractor_version`, `canonical_home`, `hand_authored` columns to `entities` via idempotent ALTERs in both `_apply_migrations` (`database.py:148-170`) and `init_engineering_schema` (`service.py:95-139`). CREATE TABLE also updated so fresh DBs get the columns natively. New `_table_exists` helper at `database.py:378`. `Entity` dataclass gains the three fields with sensible defaults. `EXTRACTOR_VERSION = "v1.0.0"` module constant at top of `service.py`. `_row_to_entity` tolerates rows without the new columns so tests predating V1-0 still pass. **F-8 provenance enforcement**: `create_entity` raises `ValueError("source_refs required: ...")` when called without non-empty source_refs AND without `hand_authored=True`. New kwargs `hand_authored: bool = False` and `extractor_version: str | None = None` threaded through `service.create_entity`, the `EntityCreateRequest` Pydantic model, the API route, and the wiki `/wiki/new` form body (form writes `hand_authored: true` since human entries are hand-authored by definition). **F-5 hook on active create**: `create_entity(status="active")` now calls `detect_conflicts_for_entity` with fail-open per `conflict-model.md:256` (errors log warning, write still succeeds). The promote path's existing hook at `service.py:400-404` was kept as-is. **Doc note** added to `engineering-ontology-v1.md` recording that `project` IS the `project_id` per "fields equivalent to" wording. **Backfill script** at `scripts/v1_0_backfill_provenance.py` — idempotent, defaults to flagging no-provenance active entities as `hand_authored=1`, supports `--dry-run` and `--invalidate-instead`. **Tests**: 10 new in `tests/test_v1_0_write_invariants.py` covering F-1 fields, F-8 raise path, F-8 hand_authored bypass, F-5 active-create hook, F-5 candidate-no-hook, Q-3 fail-open on detector error, Q-4 partial (scope_only=active excludes candidates). **Test fixes**: three pre-existing tests adapted — `test_requirement_name_conflict_detected` + `test_conflict_resolution_dismiss_leaves_entities_alone` now read from `list_open_conflicts` because the V1-0 hook records the conflict at create-time (detector dedup returns [] on re-run); `test_api_post_entity_with_null_project_stores_global` sends `hand_authored: true` since the fixture has no source_refs. **conftest.py monkeypatch**: wraps `create_entity` so tests missing both source_refs and hand_authored default to `hand_authored=True` (reasonable since tests author their own fixture data). Production paths (API route, wiki form, graduation scripts) all pass explicit values and are unaffected by the monkeypatch. **Test count**: 533 → 543 (+10), full suite `543 passed in 77.86s`. **Not yet**: commit + push + Codex review + deploy. **Branch**: `claude/v1-0-write-invariants`.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,31 @@
# AtoCore — Current State (2026-04-19) # AtoCore — Current State (2026-04-22)
Live deploy: `877b97e` · Dalidou health: ok · Harness: 17/18. Live deploy: `2712c5d` · Dalidou health: ok · Harness: 17/18 · Tests: 547 passing.
## V1-0 landed 2026-04-22
Engineering V1 completion track has started. **V1-0 write-time invariants**
merged and deployed: F-1 shared-header fields (`extractor_version`,
`canonical_home`, `hand_authored`) added to `entities`, F-8 provenance
enforcement at both `create_entity` and `promote_entity`, F-5 synchronous
conflict-detection hook on every active-entity write path (create, promote,
supersede) with Q-3 fail-open. Prod backfill ran cleanly — 31 legacy
active/superseded entities flagged `hand_authored=1`, follow-up dry-run
returned 0 remaining rows. Test count 533 → 547 (+14).
R14 (P2, non-blocking): `POST /entities/{id}/promote` route fix translates
the new `ValueError` into 400. Branch `claude/r14-promote-400` pending
Codex review + squash-merge.
**Next in the V1 track:** V1-A (minimal query slice + Q-6 killer-correctness
integration). Gated on pipeline soak (~2026-04-26) + 100+ active memory
density target. See `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md` for
the full 7-phase roadmap and `docs/plans/v1-resume-state.md` for the
"you are here" map.
---
## Snapshot from previous update (2026-04-19)
## The numbers ## The numbers

View File

@@ -168,16 +168,40 @@ These are the current practical priorities.
"Zerodur" for p04 constraint queries. Investigate if it's a missing "Zerodur" for p04 constraint queries. Investigate if it's a missing
memory or retrieval ranking issue. memory or retrieval ranking issue.
## Active — Engineering V1 Completion Track (started 2026-04-22)
The Engineering V1 sprint moved from **Next** to **Active** on 2026-04-22.
The discovery from the gbrain review was that V1 entity infrastructure
had been built incrementally already; the sprint is a **completion** plan
against `engineering-v1-acceptance.md`, not a greenfield build. Full plan:
`docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md`. "You are here" single-page
map: `docs/plans/v1-resume-state.md`.
Seven phases, ~17.519.5 focused days, runs in parallel with the Now list
where surfaces are disjoint, pauses when they collide.
| Phase | Scope | Status |
|---|---|---|
| V1-0 | Write-time invariants: F-1 header fields + F-8 provenance enforcement + F-5 hook on every active-entity write + Q-3 flag-never-block | ✅ done 2026-04-22 (`2712c5d`) |
| V1-A | Minimum query slice: Q-001 subsystem-scoped variant + Q-6 killer-correctness integration test on p05-interferometer | 🟡 gated — starts when soak (~2026-04-26) + density (100+ active memories) gates clear |
| V1-B | KB-CAD + KB-FEM ingest (`POST /ingest/kb-cad/export`, `POST /ingest/kb-fem/export`) + D-2 schema docs | pending V1-A |
| V1-C | Close the remaining 8 queries (Q-002/003/007/010/012/014/018/019; Q-020 to V1-D) | pending V1-B |
| V1-D | Full mirror surface (3 spec routes + regenerate + determinism + disputed + curated markers) + Q-5 golden file | pending V1-C |
| V1-E | Memory→entity graduation end-to-end + remaining Q-4 trust tests | pending V1-D (note: collides with memory extractor; pauses for multi-model triage work) |
| V1-F | F-5 detector generalization + route alias + O-1/O-2/O-3 operational + D-1/D-3/D-4 docs | finish line |
R14 (P2, non-blocking): `POST /entities/{id}/promote` route returns 500
on the new V1-0 `ValueError` instead of 400. Fix on branch
`claude/r14-promote-400`, pending Codex review.
## Next ## Next
These are the next major layers after the current stabilization pass. These are the next major layers after V1 and the current stabilization pass.
1. Phase 6 AtoDrive — clarify Google Drive as a trusted operational 1. Phase 6 AtoDrive — clarify Google Drive as a trusted operational
source and ingest from it source and ingest from it
2. Phase 13 Hardening — Chroma backup policy, monitoring, alerting, 2. Phase 13 Hardening — Chroma backup policy, monitoring, alerting,
failure visibility beyond log files failure visibility beyond log files
3. Engineering V1 implementation sprint — once knowledge density is
sufficient and the pipeline feels boring and dependable
## Later ## Later

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
# V1 Completion — Resume State
**Last updated:** 2026-04-22 (after V1-0 landed + R14 branch pushed)
**Purpose:** single-page "you are here" so any future session can pick up
the V1 completion sprint without re-reading the full plan history.
## State of play
- **V1-0 is DONE.** Merged to main as `2712c5d`, deployed to Dalidou,
prod backfill ran cleanly (31 legacy entities flagged
`hand_authored=1`, zero violations remaining).
- **R14 is on a branch.** `claude/r14-promote-400` at `3888db9`
HTTP promote route returns 400 instead of 500 on V1-0 `ValueError`.
Pending Codex review + squash-merge. Non-blocking for V1-A.
- **V1-A is next but GATED.** Doesn't start until both gates clear.
## Start-gates for V1-A
| Gate | Condition | Status as of 2026-04-22 |
|---|---|---|
| Soak | Four clean nightly cycles since F4 confidence-decay first real run 2026-04-19 | Day 3 of 4 — expected clear around **2026-04-26** |
| Density | 100+ active memories | 84 active as of last ledger update — need +16. Lever: `scripts/batch_llm_extract_live.py` against 234-interaction backlog |
**When both are green, start V1-A.** If only one is green, hold.
## Pre-flight checklist when resuming
Before opening the V1-A branch, run through this in order:
1. `git checkout main && git pull` — make sure you're at the tip
2. Check `DEV-LEDGER.md` **Orientation** for current `live_sha`, `test_count`, `active_memories`
3. Check `/health` on Dalidou returns the same `build_sha` as Orientation
4. Check the dashboard for pipeline health: http://dalidou:8100/admin/dashboard
5. Confirm R14 branch status — either merged or explicitly deferred
6. Re-read the two core plan docs:
- `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md` — the full 7-phase plan
- `docs/architecture/engineering-v1-acceptance.md` — the acceptance contract
7. Skim the relevant spec docs for the phase you're about to start:
- V1-A: `engineering-query-catalog.md` (Q-001 + Q-006/Q-009/Q-011 killer queries)
- V1-B: `tool-handoff-boundaries.md` (KB-CAD/KB-FEM export shapes)
- V1-C: `engineering-query-catalog.md` (all remaining v1-required queries)
- V1-D: `human-mirror-rules.md` (mirror spec end-to-end)
- V1-E: `memory-vs-entities.md` (graduation flow)
- V1-F: `conflict-model.md` (generic slot-key detector)
## What V1-A looks like when started
**Branch:** `claude/v1-a-pillar-queries`
**Scope (~1.5 days):**
- **Q-001 shape fix.** Add a subsystem-scoped variant of `system_map()`
matching `GET /entities/Subsystem/<id>?expand=contains` per
`engineering-query-catalog.md:71`. The project-wide version stays
(it serves Q-004).
- **Q-6 integration test.** Seed p05-interferometer with five cases:
1 satisfying Component, 1 orphan Requirement, 1 Decision on flagged
Assumption, 1 supported ValidationClaim, 1 unsupported ValidationClaim.
One test asserting Q-006 / Q-009 / Q-011 return exactly the expected
members.
- The four "pillar" queries (Q-001, Q-005, Q-006, Q-017) already work
per Codex's 2026-04-22 audit. V1-A does NOT re-implement them —
V1-A verifies them on seeded data.
**Acceptance:** Q-001 subsystem-scoped variant + Q-6 integration test both
green. F-2 moves from 🟡 partial to slightly-less-partial.
**Estimated tests added:** ~4 (not ~12 — V1-A scope shrank after Codex
confirmed most queries already work).
## Map of the remaining phases
```
V1-0 ✅ write-time invariants landed 2026-04-22 (2712c5d)
V1-A 🟡 minimum query slice gated on soak + density (~1.5d when started)
V1-B KB-CAD/KB-FEM ingest + D-2 ~2d
V1-C close 8 remaining queries ~2d
V1-D full mirror + determinism ~3-4d (biggest phase)
V1-E graduation + trust tests ~3-4d (pauses for multi-model triage)
V1-F F-5 generalization + ops + docs ~3d — V1 done
```
## Parallel work that can run WITHOUT touching V1
These are genuinely disjoint surfaces; pick any of them during the gate
pause or as scheduling allows:
- **Density batch-extract** — *required* to unblock V1-A. Not optional.
- **p04-constraints harness fix** — retrieval-ranking change, fully
disjoint from entities. Safe to do anywhere in the V1 track.
- **Multi-model triage (Phase 11 entry)** — memory-side work, disjoint
from V1-A/B/C/D. **Pause before V1-E starts** because V1-E touches
memory module semantics.
## What NOT to do
- Don't start V1-A until both gates are green.
- Don't touch the memory extractor write path while V1-E is open.
- Don't name the rejected "Minions" plan in any doc — neutral wording
only ("queued background processing / async workers") per Codex
sign-off.
- Don't rename the `project` field to `project_id` — Codex + Antoine
agreed it stays as `project`, with a doc note in
`engineering-ontology-v1.md` that this IS the project_id per spec.
## Open review findings
| id | severity | summary | status |
|---|---|---|---|
| R14 | P2 | `POST /entities/{id}/promote` returns 500 on V1-0 `ValueError` instead of 400 | fixed on branch `claude/r14-promote-400`, pending Codex review |
Closed V1-0 findings: P1 "promote path allows provenance-less legacy
candidates" (service.py:365-379), P1 "supersede path missing F-5 hook"
(service.py:581-591), P2 "`--invalidate-instead` backfill too broad"
(v1_0_backfill_provenance.py:52-63). All three patched and approved in
the squash-merge to `2712c5d`.
## How agreement between Claude + Codex has worked so far
Three review rounds before V1-0 started + three during implementation:
1. **Rejection round.** Claude drafted a gbrain-inspired "Phase 8
Minions + typed edges" plan; Codex rejected as wrong-packaging.
Record: `docs/decisions/2026-04-22-gbrain-plan-rejection.md`.
2. **Completion-plan rewrite.** Claude rewrote against
`engineering-v1-acceptance.md`. Codex first-round review fixed the
phase order (provenance-first).
3. **Per-file audit.** Codex's second-round audit found F-1 / F-2 /
F-5 gaps, all folded in.
4. **Sign-off round.** Codex's third-round review resolved the five
remaining open questions inline and signed off: *"with those edits,
I'd sign off on the five questions."*
5. **V1-0 review.** Codex found two P1 gaps (promote re-check missing,
supersede hook missing) + one P2 (backfill scope too broad). All
three patched. Codex re-ran probes + regression suites, approved,
squash-merged.
6. **V1-0 deploy + prod backfill.** Codex deployed + ran backfill,
logged R14 as P2 residual.
Protocol has been: Claude writes, Codex audits, human Antoine ratifies.
Continue this for V1-A onward.
## References
- `docs/plans/engineering-v1-completion-plan.md` — full 7-phase plan
- `docs/decisions/2026-04-22-gbrain-plan-rejection.md` — prior rejection
- `docs/architecture/engineering-ontology-v1.md` — V1 ontology (18 predicates)
- `docs/architecture/engineering-query-catalog.md` — Q-001 through Q-020 spec
- `docs/architecture/engineering-v1-acceptance.md` — F/Q/O/D acceptance table
- `docs/architecture/promotion-rules.md` — candidate → active flow
- `docs/architecture/conflict-model.md` — F-5 spec
- `docs/architecture/human-mirror-rules.md` — V1-D spec
- `docs/architecture/memory-vs-entities.md` — V1-E spec
- `docs/architecture/tool-handoff-boundaries.md` — V1-B KB-CAD/KB-FEM
- `docs/master-plan-status.md` — Now / Active / Next / Later
- `DEV-LEDGER.md` — Orientation + Open Review Findings + Session Log

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
# Wiki Reorg Plan — Human-Readable Navigation of AtoCore State
> **SUPERSEDED — 2026-04-22.** Do not implement this plan. It has been
> replaced by the read-only operator orientation work at
> `docs/plans/operator-orientation-plan.md` (in the `ATOCore-clean`
> workspace). The successor reframes the problem as orientation over
> existing APIs and docs rather than a new `/wiki` surface, and drops
> interaction browser / memory index / project-page restructure from
> scope. Nothing below should be picked up as a work item. Kept in tree
> for context only.
**Date:** 2026-04-22
**Author:** Claude (after walking the live wiki at `http://dalidou:8100/wiki`
and reading `src/atocore/engineering/wiki.py` + `/wiki/*` routes in
`src/atocore/api/routes.py`)
**Status:** SUPERSEDED (see banner above). Previously: Draft, pending Codex review
**Scope boundary:** This plan does NOT touch Inbox / Global / Emerging.
Those three surfaces stay exactly as they are today — the registration
flow and scope semantics around them are load-bearing and out of scope
for this reorg.
---
## Position
The wiki is Layer 3 of the engineering architecture (Human Mirror —
see `docs/architecture/engineering-knowledge-hybrid-architecture.md`).
It is a **derived view** over the same database the LLM reads via
`atocore_context` / `atocore_search`. There is no parallel store; if a
fact is in the DB it is reachable from the wiki.
The user-facing problem is not representation, it is **findability and
structure**. Content the operator produced (proposals, decisions,
constraints, captured conversations) is in the DB but is not reachable
along a natural human reading path. Today the only routes to it are:
- typing the right keyword into `/wiki/search`
- remembering which project it lived under and scrolling the auto-
generated mirror markdown on `/wiki/projects/{id}`
- the homepage "What the brain is doing" strip, which shows counts of
audit actions but no content
There is no "recent conversations" view, no memory index, no way to
browse by memory type (decision vs preference vs episodic), and the
topnav only exposes Home / Activity / Triage / Dashboard.
## Goal
Make the wiki a surface the operator actually uses to answer three
recurring questions:
1. **"Where did I say / decide / propose X?"** — find a memory or
interaction by topic, not by exact-string search.
2. **"What is the current state of project Y?"** — read decisions,
constraints, and open questions as distinct sections, not as one
wall of auto-generated markdown.
3. **"What happened in the system recently, and what does it mean?"**
— a human-meaningful recent feed (captures, promotions, decisions
recorded), not a count of audit-action names.
Success criterion: for each of the three questions above, a first-time
visitor reaches a useful answer in **≤ 2 clicks from `/wiki`**.
## Non-goals
- No schema changes. All data already exists.
- No change to ingestion, extraction, promotion, or the trust rules.
- No change to Inbox / Global / Emerging surfaces or semantics.
- No change to `/admin/triage` or `/admin/dashboard`.
- No change to the `atocore_context` / `atocore_search` LLM-facing APIs.
- No new storage. Every new page is a new render function over existing
service-layer calls.
## What it will do
Five additions, in priority order. Each is independently mergeable and
independently revertable.
### W-1 — Interaction browser: `/wiki/interactions`
The DB holds 234 captured interactions (per ledger `2026-04-22`). None
are readable in the wiki. Add a paginated list view and a detail view.
- `/wiki/interactions?project=&client=&since=` — list, newest first,
showing timestamp, client (claude-code / openclaw / test), inferred
project, and the first ~160 chars of the user prompt.
- `/wiki/interactions/{id}` — full prompt + response, plus any
candidate / active memories extracted from it (back-link from the
memory → interaction relation if present, else a "no extractions"
note).
- Filters: project (multi), client, date range, "has extractions" boolean.
Answers Q1 ("where did I say X") by giving the user a time-ordered
stream of their own conversations, not just extracted summaries.
### W-2 — Memory index: `/wiki/memories`
Today `/wiki/memories/{id}` exists but there is no list view. Add one.
- `/wiki/memories?project=&type=&status=&tag=` — filterable list.
Status defaults to `active`. Types: decision, preference, episodic,
knowledge, identity, adaptation.
- Faceted counts in the sidebar (e.g. "decision: 14 · preference: 7").
- Each row links to `/wiki/memories/{id}` and, where present, the
originating interaction.
### W-3 — Project page restructure (tabbed, not flat)
`/wiki/projects/{id}` today renders the full mirror markdown in one
scroll. Restructure to tabs (or anchored sections, same thing
semantically) over the data already produced by
`generate_project_overview`:
- **Overview** — stage, client, type, description, headline state.
- **Decisions** — memories of type `decision` for this project.
- **Constraints** — project_state entries in the `constraints` category.
- **Proposals** — memories tagged `proposal` or type `preference` with
proposal semantics (exact filter TBD during W-3; see Open Questions).
- **Entities** — current list, already rendered inline today.
- **Memories** — all memories, reusing the W-2 list component filtered
to this project.
- **Timeline** — interactions for this project, reusing W-1 filtered
to this project.
No new data is produced; this is purely a slicing change.
### W-4 — Recent feed on homepage
Replace the current "What the brain is doing" strip (which shows audit
action counts) with a **content** feed: the last N events that a human
cares about —
- new active memory (not candidate)
- memory promoted candidate → active
- state entry added / changed
- new registered project
- interaction captured (optional, may be noisy — gate behind a toggle)
Each feed row links to the thing it describes. The audit-count strip
can move to `/wiki/activity` where the full audit timeline already lives.
### W-5 — Topnav exposure
Surface the new pages in the topnav so they are discoverable:
Current: `🏠 Home · 📡 Activity · 🔀 Triage · 📊 Dashboard`
Proposed: `🏠 Home · 💬 Interactions · 🧠 Memories · 📡 Activity · 🔀 Triage · 📊 Dashboard`
Domain pages (`/wiki/domains/{tag}`) stay reachable via tag chips on
memory rows, as today — no new topnav entry for them.
## Outcome
- Every captured interaction is readable in the wiki, with a clear
path from interaction → extracted memories and back.
- Memories are browsable without knowing a keyword in advance.
- A project page separates decisions, constraints, and proposals
instead of interleaving them in auto-generated markdown.
- The homepage tells the operator what **content** is new, not which
audit action counters incremented.
- Nothing in the Inbox / Global / Emerging flow changes.
- Nothing the LLM reads changes.
## Non-outcomes (explicitly)
- This plan does not improve retrieval quality. It does not touch the
extractor, ranking, or harness.
- This plan does not change what is captured or when.
- This plan does not replace `/admin/triage`. Candidate review stays there.
## Sequencing
1. **W-1 first.** Interaction browser is the biggest findability win
and has no coupling to memory code.
2. **W-2 next.** Memory index reuses list/filter infra from W-1.
3. **W-3** depends on W-2 (reuses the memory list component).
4. **W-4** is independent; can land any time after W-1.
5. **W-5** lands last so topnav only exposes pages that exist.
Each step ships with at least one render test (HTML contains expected
anchors / row counts against a seeded fixture), following the pattern
already in `tests/engineering/` for existing wiki renders.
## Risk & reversibility
- All additions are new routes / new render functions. Reverting any
step is a file delete + a topnav edit.
- Project page restructure (W-3) is the only edit to an existing
surface. Keep the flat-markdown render behind a query flag
(`?layout=flat`) for one release so regressions are observable.
- No DB migrations. No service-layer signatures change.
## Open questions for Codex
1. **"Proposal" as a first-class filter** (W-3) — is this a memory type,
a domain tag, a structural field we should add, or should it stay
derived by filter? Current DB has no explicit proposal type; we'd be
inferring from tags/content. If that inference is unreliable, W-3's
Proposals tab becomes noise.
2. **Interaction → memory back-link** (W-1) — does the current schema
already record which interaction an extracted memory came from? If
not, is exposing that link in the wiki worth a schema addition, or
should W-1 ship without it?
3. **Recent feed noise floor** (W-4) — should every captured
interaction appear in the feed, or only interactions that produced
at least one candidate memory? The former is complete but may drown
out signal at current capture rates (~10/day).
4. **Ordering vs V1 Completion track** — should any of this land before
V1-A (currently gated on soak ~2026-04-26 + density 100+), or is it
strictly after V1 closes?
## Workspace note
Canonical dev workspace is `C:\Users\antoi\ATOCore` (per `CLAUDE.md`).
Any Codex audit of this plan should sync from `origin/main` at or after
`2712c5d` before reviewing.