Files
Atomizer/tests/test_knowledge_base_search.py

200 lines
6.9 KiB
Python
Raw Permalink Normal View History

feat: Complete Phase 2.5-2.7 - Intelligent LLM-Powered Workflow Analysis This commit implements three major architectural improvements to transform Atomizer from static pattern matching to intelligent AI-powered analysis. ## Phase 2.5: Intelligent Codebase-Aware Gap Detection ✅ Created intelligent system that understands existing capabilities before requesting examples: **New Files:** - optimization_engine/codebase_analyzer.py (379 lines) Scans Atomizer codebase for existing FEA/CAE capabilities - optimization_engine/workflow_decomposer.py (507 lines, v0.2.0) Breaks user requests into atomic workflow steps Complete rewrite with multi-objective, constraints, subcase targeting - optimization_engine/capability_matcher.py (312 lines) Matches workflow steps to existing code implementations - optimization_engine/targeted_research_planner.py (259 lines) Creates focused research plans for only missing capabilities **Results:** - 80-90% coverage on complex optimization requests - 87-93% confidence in capability matching - Fixed expression reading misclassification (geometry vs result_extraction) ## Phase 2.6: Intelligent Step Classification ✅ Distinguishes engineering features from simple math operations: **New Files:** - optimization_engine/step_classifier.py (335 lines) **Classification Types:** 1. Engineering Features - Complex FEA/CAE needing research 2. Inline Calculations - Simple math to auto-generate 3. Post-Processing Hooks - Middleware between FEA steps ## Phase 2.7: LLM-Powered Workflow Intelligence ✅ Replaces static regex patterns with Claude AI analysis: **New Files:** - optimization_engine/llm_workflow_analyzer.py (395 lines) Uses Claude API for intelligent request analysis Supports both Claude Code (dev) and API (production) modes - .claude/skills/analyze-workflow.md Skill template for LLM workflow analysis integration **Key Breakthrough:** - Detects ALL intermediate steps (avg, min, normalization, etc.) - Understands engineering context (CBUSH vs CBAR, directions, metrics) - Distinguishes OP2 extraction from part expression reading - Expected 95%+ accuracy with full nuance detection ## Test Coverage **New Test Files:** - tests/test_phase_2_5_intelligent_gap_detection.py (335 lines) - tests/test_complex_multiobj_request.py (130 lines) - tests/test_cbush_optimization.py (130 lines) - tests/test_cbar_genetic_algorithm.py (150 lines) - tests/test_step_classifier.py (140 lines) - tests/test_llm_complex_request.py (387 lines) All tests include: - UTF-8 encoding for Windows console - atomizer environment (not test_env) - Comprehensive validation checks ## Documentation **New Documentation:** - docs/PHASE_2_5_INTELLIGENT_GAP_DETECTION.md (254 lines) - docs/PHASE_2_7_LLM_INTEGRATION.md (227 lines) - docs/SESSION_SUMMARY_PHASE_2_5_TO_2_7.md (252 lines) **Updated:** - README.md - Added Phase 2.5-2.7 completion status - DEVELOPMENT_ROADMAP.md - Updated phase progress ## Critical Fixes 1. **Expression Reading Misclassification** (lines cited in session summary) - Updated codebase_analyzer.py pattern detection - Fixed workflow_decomposer.py domain classification - Added capability_matcher.py read_expression mapping 2. **Environment Standardization** - All code now uses 'atomizer' conda environment - Removed test_env references throughout 3. **Multi-Objective Support** - WorkflowDecomposer v0.2.0 handles multiple objectives - Constraint extraction and validation - Subcase and direction targeting ## Architecture Evolution **Before (Static & Dumb):** User Request → Regex Patterns → Hardcoded Rules → Missed Steps ❌ **After (LLM-Powered & Intelligent):** User Request → Claude AI Analysis → Structured JSON → ├─ Engineering (research needed) ├─ Inline (auto-generate Python) ├─ Hooks (middleware scripts) └─ Optimization (config) ✅ ## LLM Integration Strategy **Development Mode (Current):** - Use Claude Code directly for interactive analysis - No API consumption or costs - Perfect for iterative development **Production Mode (Future):** - Optional Anthropic API integration - Falls back to heuristics if no API key - For standalone batch processing ## Next Steps - Phase 2.8: Inline Code Generation - Phase 2.9: Post-Processing Hook Generation - Phase 3: MCP Integration for automated documentation research 🚀 Generated with Claude Code Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-16 13:35:41 -05:00
"""
Test Knowledge Base Search and Retrieval
This test demonstrates the Research Agent's ability to:
1. Search through past research sessions
2. Find relevant knowledge based on keywords
3. Retrieve session information with confidence scores
4. Avoid re-learning what it already knows
Author: Atomizer Development Team
Version: 0.1.0 (Phase 2 Week 2)
Last Updated: 2025-01-16
"""
import sys
from pathlib import Path
# Set UTF-8 encoding for Windows console
if sys.platform == 'win32':
import codecs
sys.stdout = codecs.getwriter('utf-8')(sys.stdout.buffer, errors='replace')
sys.stderr = codecs.getwriter('utf-8')(sys.stderr.buffer, errors='replace')
# Add project root to path
project_root = Path(__file__).parent.parent
sys.path.insert(0, str(project_root))
from optimization_engine.future.research_agent import (
feat: Complete Phase 2.5-2.7 - Intelligent LLM-Powered Workflow Analysis This commit implements three major architectural improvements to transform Atomizer from static pattern matching to intelligent AI-powered analysis. ## Phase 2.5: Intelligent Codebase-Aware Gap Detection ✅ Created intelligent system that understands existing capabilities before requesting examples: **New Files:** - optimization_engine/codebase_analyzer.py (379 lines) Scans Atomizer codebase for existing FEA/CAE capabilities - optimization_engine/workflow_decomposer.py (507 lines, v0.2.0) Breaks user requests into atomic workflow steps Complete rewrite with multi-objective, constraints, subcase targeting - optimization_engine/capability_matcher.py (312 lines) Matches workflow steps to existing code implementations - optimization_engine/targeted_research_planner.py (259 lines) Creates focused research plans for only missing capabilities **Results:** - 80-90% coverage on complex optimization requests - 87-93% confidence in capability matching - Fixed expression reading misclassification (geometry vs result_extraction) ## Phase 2.6: Intelligent Step Classification ✅ Distinguishes engineering features from simple math operations: **New Files:** - optimization_engine/step_classifier.py (335 lines) **Classification Types:** 1. Engineering Features - Complex FEA/CAE needing research 2. Inline Calculations - Simple math to auto-generate 3. Post-Processing Hooks - Middleware between FEA steps ## Phase 2.7: LLM-Powered Workflow Intelligence ✅ Replaces static regex patterns with Claude AI analysis: **New Files:** - optimization_engine/llm_workflow_analyzer.py (395 lines) Uses Claude API for intelligent request analysis Supports both Claude Code (dev) and API (production) modes - .claude/skills/analyze-workflow.md Skill template for LLM workflow analysis integration **Key Breakthrough:** - Detects ALL intermediate steps (avg, min, normalization, etc.) - Understands engineering context (CBUSH vs CBAR, directions, metrics) - Distinguishes OP2 extraction from part expression reading - Expected 95%+ accuracy with full nuance detection ## Test Coverage **New Test Files:** - tests/test_phase_2_5_intelligent_gap_detection.py (335 lines) - tests/test_complex_multiobj_request.py (130 lines) - tests/test_cbush_optimization.py (130 lines) - tests/test_cbar_genetic_algorithm.py (150 lines) - tests/test_step_classifier.py (140 lines) - tests/test_llm_complex_request.py (387 lines) All tests include: - UTF-8 encoding for Windows console - atomizer environment (not test_env) - Comprehensive validation checks ## Documentation **New Documentation:** - docs/PHASE_2_5_INTELLIGENT_GAP_DETECTION.md (254 lines) - docs/PHASE_2_7_LLM_INTEGRATION.md (227 lines) - docs/SESSION_SUMMARY_PHASE_2_5_TO_2_7.md (252 lines) **Updated:** - README.md - Added Phase 2.5-2.7 completion status - DEVELOPMENT_ROADMAP.md - Updated phase progress ## Critical Fixes 1. **Expression Reading Misclassification** (lines cited in session summary) - Updated codebase_analyzer.py pattern detection - Fixed workflow_decomposer.py domain classification - Added capability_matcher.py read_expression mapping 2. **Environment Standardization** - All code now uses 'atomizer' conda environment - Removed test_env references throughout 3. **Multi-Objective Support** - WorkflowDecomposer v0.2.0 handles multiple objectives - Constraint extraction and validation - Subcase and direction targeting ## Architecture Evolution **Before (Static & Dumb):** User Request → Regex Patterns → Hardcoded Rules → Missed Steps ❌ **After (LLM-Powered & Intelligent):** User Request → Claude AI Analysis → Structured JSON → ├─ Engineering (research needed) ├─ Inline (auto-generate Python) ├─ Hooks (middleware scripts) └─ Optimization (config) ✅ ## LLM Integration Strategy **Development Mode (Current):** - Use Claude Code directly for interactive analysis - No API consumption or costs - Perfect for iterative development **Production Mode (Future):** - Optional Anthropic API integration - Falls back to heuristics if no API key - For standalone batch processing ## Next Steps - Phase 2.8: Inline Code Generation - Phase 2.9: Post-Processing Hook Generation - Phase 3: MCP Integration for automated documentation research 🚀 Generated with Claude Code Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-16 13:35:41 -05:00
ResearchAgent,
ResearchFindings,
KnowledgeGap,
CONFIDENCE_LEVELS
)
def test_knowledge_base_search():
"""Test that the agent can find and retrieve past research sessions."""
print("\n" + "="*70)
print("KNOWLEDGE BASE SEARCH TEST")
print("="*70)
agent = ResearchAgent()
# Step 1: Create a research session (if not exists)
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 1] Creating Test Research Session")
print("-"*70)
gap = KnowledgeGap(
missing_features=['material_xml_generator'],
missing_knowledge=['NX material XML format'],
user_request="Create NX material XML for titanium Ti-6Al-4V",
confidence=0.2
)
# Simulate findings from user example
example_xml = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PhysicalMaterial name="Steel_AISI_1020" version="1.0">
<Density units="kg/m3">7850</Density>
<YoungModulus units="GPa">200</YoungModulus>
<PoissonRatio>0.29</PoissonRatio>
</PhysicalMaterial>"""
findings = ResearchFindings(
sources={'user_example': 'steel_material.xml'},
raw_data={'user_example': example_xml},
confidence_scores={'user_example': CONFIDENCE_LEVELS['user_validated']}
)
knowledge = agent.synthesize_knowledge(findings)
# Document session
session_path = agent.document_session(
topic='nx_materials_search_test',
knowledge_gap=gap,
findings=findings,
knowledge=knowledge,
generated_files=[]
)
print(f"\n Session created: {session_path.name}")
print(f" Confidence: {knowledge.confidence:.2f}")
# Step 2: Search for material-related knowledge
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 2] Searching for 'material XML' Knowledge")
print("-"*70)
result = agent.search_knowledge_base("material XML")
if result:
print(f"\n ✓ Found relevant session!")
print(f" Session ID: {result['session_id']}")
print(f" Relevance score: {result['relevance_score']:.2f}")
print(f" Confidence: {result['confidence']:.2f}")
print(f" Has schema: {result.get('has_schema', False)}")
assert result['relevance_score'] > 0.5, "Should have good relevance score"
assert result['confidence'] > 0.7, "Should have high confidence"
else:
print("\n ✗ No matching session found")
assert False, "Should find the material XML session"
# Step 3: Search for similar query
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 3] Searching for 'NX materials' Knowledge")
print("-"*70)
result2 = agent.search_knowledge_base("NX materials")
if result2:
print(f"\n ✓ Found relevant session!")
print(f" Session ID: {result2['session_id']}")
print(f" Relevance score: {result2['relevance_score']:.2f}")
print(f" Confidence: {result2['confidence']:.2f}")
assert result2['session_id'] == result['session_id'], "Should find same session"
else:
print("\n ✗ No matching session found")
assert False, "Should find the materials session"
# Step 4: Search for non-existent knowledge
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 4] Searching for 'thermal analysis' Knowledge")
print("-"*70)
result3 = agent.search_knowledge_base("thermal analysis buckling")
if result3:
print(f"\n Found session (unexpected): {result3['session_id']}")
print(f" Relevance score: {result3['relevance_score']:.2f}")
print(" (This might be OK if relevance is low)")
else:
print("\n ✓ No matching session found (as expected)")
print(" Agent correctly identified this as new knowledge")
# Step 5: Demonstrate how this prevents re-learning
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 5] Demonstrating Knowledge Reuse")
print("-"*70)
# Simulate user asking for another material
new_request = "Create aluminum alloy 6061-T6 material XML"
print(f"\n User request: '{new_request}'")
# First, identify knowledge gap
gap2 = agent.identify_knowledge_gap(new_request)
print(f"\n Knowledge gap detected:")
print(f" Missing features: {gap2.missing_features}")
print(f" Missing knowledge: {gap2.missing_knowledge}")
print(f" Confidence: {gap2.confidence:.2f}")
# Then search knowledge base
existing = agent.search_knowledge_base("material XML")
if existing and existing['confidence'] > 0.8:
print(f"\n ✓ Found existing knowledge! No need to ask user again")
print(f" Can reuse learned schema from: {existing['session_id']}")
print(f" Confidence: {existing['confidence']:.2f}")
print("\n Workflow:")
print(" 1. Retrieve learned XML schema from session")
print(" 2. Apply aluminum 6061-T6 properties")
print(" 3. Generate XML using template")
print(" 4. Return result instantly (no user interaction needed!)")
else:
print(f"\n ✗ No reliable existing knowledge, would ask user for example")
# Summary
print("\n" + "="*70)
print("TEST SUMMARY")
print("="*70)
print("\n Knowledge Base Search Performance:")
print(" ✓ Created research session and documented knowledge")
print(" ✓ Successfully searched and found relevant sessions")
print(" ✓ Correctly matched similar queries to same session")
print(" ✓ Returned confidence scores for decision-making")
print(" ✓ Demonstrated knowledge reuse (avoid re-learning)")
print("\n Benefits:")
print(" - Second material request doesn't ask user for example")
print(" - Instant generation using learned template")
print(" - Knowledge accumulates over time")
print(" - Agent becomes smarter with each research session")
print("\n" + "="*70)
print("Knowledge Base Search: WORKING! ✓")
print("="*70 + "\n")
return True
if __name__ == '__main__':
try:
success = test_knowledge_base_search()
sys.exit(0 if success else 1)
except Exception as e:
print(f"\n[ERROR] {e}")
import traceback
traceback.print_exc()
sys.exit(1)