27 lines
982 B
Markdown
27 lines
982 B
Markdown
|
# Study 03 — Robustness Checks
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Type:** Parametric — Specific Scenarios
|
|||
|
|
**Runs:** 8
|
|||
|
|
**Model:** Uses both .sim setups (CBUSH for K tests, displacement for correlated tests)
|
|||
|
|
**Prerequisite:** Complete Studies 01 and 02 first (needs knee values)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## What This Does
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Tests scenarios that the simple sweeps can't capture:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. **One-soft-point (3 runs):** What if one support is 10× softer than the rest?
|
|||
|
|
2. **Combined compliance (3 runs):** Both vertical and lateral at knee values simultaneously
|
|||
|
|
3. **Correlated displacement (2 runs):** All verticals move together (frame bending mode simulation)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Before Running
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Update `atomizer_spec.json` with actual knee values from Study 02:
|
|||
|
|
- Replace `KNEE` placeholders with K_vert_knee and K_lat_knee values
|
|||
|
|
- Replace `KNEE/10` with knee/10, `KNEE/2` with knee/2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Output
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Interaction factor: is combined ΔWFE > sum of individual?
|
|||
|
|
- Worst-case single soft point identification
|
|||
|
|
- Correlated vs independent displacement comparison
|