24 lines
968 B
Plaintext
24 lines
968 B
Plaintext
|
|
||
|
|
The optimization loop is working, but the results show that:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. ✅ Parameter updates are happening in Bracket.prt
|
||
|
|
2. ✅ NX solver is running successfully
|
||
|
|
3. ✅ Results are being extracted from .op2 files
|
||
|
|
4. ✅ Optimization loop completes
|
||
|
|
5. ❌ BUT: All trials return the SAME stress/displacement values
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This indicates that the bracket geometry is NOT actually changing when we update
|
||
|
|
the tip_thickness and support_angle parameters.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The issue is that these expressions exist in Bracket.prt, but they may not be
|
||
|
|
linked to any geometric features (sketches, extrudes, etc.) that define the
|
||
|
|
actual bracket shape.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To fix this, the Bracket.prt file needs to be set up so that:
|
||
|
|
- The 'tip_thickness' expression controls an actual dimension
|
||
|
|
- The 'support_angle' expression controls an actual angle
|
||
|
|
- These dimensions are used in sketches/features to define the geometry
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Without this, changing the expressions has no effect on the mesh or the analysis results.
|
||
|
|
|