Files
Atomizer/examples/bracket/bracket_sim1-solution_1_Solution_Monitor_Graphs.html

196 lines
5.9 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

<!DOCTYPE html>
<!-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet -->
<html>
<head>
<title>Solution Monitor Graphs</title>
<script type = "text/javascript">
var isPluginLoaded = false;
function PluginLoaded() {
isPluginLoaded = true;
}
</script>
<script src = "plotly-latest.min.js" onload="PluginLoaded()"></script>
feat: Implement complete FEM regeneration workflow This commit completes the optimization loop infrastructure by implementing the full FEM regeneration workflow based on the user's working journal. ## Changes ### FEM Regeneration Workflow (solve_simulation.py) - Added STEP 1: Switch to Bracket.prt and update geometry - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make Bracket.prt active - Calls UpdateManager.DoUpdate() to rebuild CAD geometry with new expressions - Added STEP 2: Switch to Bracket_fem1 and update FE model - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make FEM active - Calls fEModel1.UpdateFemodel() to regenerate FEM with updated geometry - Added STEP 3: Switch back to sim part before solving - Close and reopen .sim file to force reload from disk ### Enhanced Journal Output (nx_solver.py) - Display journal stdout output for debugging - Shows all journal steps: geometry update, FEM regeneration, solve, save - Helps verify workflow execution ### Verification Tools - Added verify_parametric_link.py journal to check expression dependencies - Added FEM_REGENERATION_STATUS.md documenting the complete status ## Status ### ✅ Fully Functional Components 1. Parameter updates - nx_updater.py modifies .prt expressions 2. NX solver - ~4s per solve via journal 3. Result extraction - pyNastran reads .op2 files 4. History tracking - saves to JSON/CSV 5. Optimization loop - Optuna explores parameter space 6. **FEM regeneration workflow** - Journal executes all steps successfully ### ❌ Remaining Issue: Expressions Not Linked to Geometry The optimization returns identical stress values (197.89 MPa) for all trials because the Bracket.prt expressions are not referenced by any geometry features. Evidence: - Journal verification shows FEM update steps execute successfully - Feature dependency check shows no features reference the expressions - All optimization infrastructure is working correctly The code is ready - waiting for Bracket.prt to have its expressions properly linked to the geometry features in NX. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-15 12:43:31 -05:00
<script src = "file:///C:/Program Files/Siemens/Simcenter3D_2412/nxcae_extras/tmg/js/plotly-latest.min.js" onload="PluginLoaded()"></script>
<script src = "https://cdn.plot.ly/plotly-latest.min.js" onload="PluginLoaded()"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id = 'Sparse Matrix Solver'></div>
<script>
var xData = [
feat: Implement complete FEM regeneration workflow This commit completes the optimization loop infrastructure by implementing the full FEM regeneration workflow based on the user's working journal. ## Changes ### FEM Regeneration Workflow (solve_simulation.py) - Added STEP 1: Switch to Bracket.prt and update geometry - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make Bracket.prt active - Calls UpdateManager.DoUpdate() to rebuild CAD geometry with new expressions - Added STEP 2: Switch to Bracket_fem1 and update FE model - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make FEM active - Calls fEModel1.UpdateFemodel() to regenerate FEM with updated geometry - Added STEP 3: Switch back to sim part before solving - Close and reopen .sim file to force reload from disk ### Enhanced Journal Output (nx_solver.py) - Display journal stdout output for debugging - Shows all journal steps: geometry update, FEM regeneration, solve, save - Helps verify workflow execution ### Verification Tools - Added verify_parametric_link.py journal to check expression dependencies - Added FEM_REGENERATION_STATUS.md documenting the complete status ## Status ### ✅ Fully Functional Components 1. Parameter updates - nx_updater.py modifies .prt expressions 2. NX solver - ~4s per solve via journal 3. Result extraction - pyNastran reads .op2 files 4. History tracking - saves to JSON/CSV 5. Optimization loop - Optuna explores parameter space 6. **FEM regeneration workflow** - Journal executes all steps successfully ### ❌ Remaining Issue: Expressions Not Linked to Geometry The optimization returns identical stress values (197.89 MPa) for all trials because the Bracket.prt expressions are not referenced by any geometry features. Evidence: - Journal verification shows FEM update steps execute successfully - Feature dependency check shows no features reference the expressions - All optimization infrastructure is working correctly The code is ready - waiting for Bracket.prt to have its expressions properly linked to the geometry features in NX. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-15 12:43:31 -05:00
[1,13,26,40,53,65,70,80,87,97,105,110,121,130,138,144,150,158,164,180,186,188]
];
var yData = [
feat: Implement complete FEM regeneration workflow This commit completes the optimization loop infrastructure by implementing the full FEM regeneration workflow based on the user's working journal. ## Changes ### FEM Regeneration Workflow (solve_simulation.py) - Added STEP 1: Switch to Bracket.prt and update geometry - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make Bracket.prt active - Calls UpdateManager.DoUpdate() to rebuild CAD geometry with new expressions - Added STEP 2: Switch to Bracket_fem1 and update FE model - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make FEM active - Calls fEModel1.UpdateFemodel() to regenerate FEM with updated geometry - Added STEP 3: Switch back to sim part before solving - Close and reopen .sim file to force reload from disk ### Enhanced Journal Output (nx_solver.py) - Display journal stdout output for debugging - Shows all journal steps: geometry update, FEM regeneration, solve, save - Helps verify workflow execution ### Verification Tools - Added verify_parametric_link.py journal to check expression dependencies - Added FEM_REGENERATION_STATUS.md documenting the complete status ## Status ### ✅ Fully Functional Components 1. Parameter updates - nx_updater.py modifies .prt expressions 2. NX solver - ~4s per solve via journal 3. Result extraction - pyNastran reads .op2 files 4. History tracking - saves to JSON/CSV 5. Optimization loop - Optuna explores parameter space 6. **FEM regeneration workflow** - Journal executes all steps successfully ### ❌ Remaining Issue: Expressions Not Linked to Geometry The optimization returns identical stress values (197.89 MPa) for all trials because the Bracket.prt expressions are not referenced by any geometry features. Evidence: - Journal verification shows FEM update steps execute successfully - Feature dependency check shows no features reference the expressions - All optimization infrastructure is working correctly The code is ready - waiting for Bracket.prt to have its expressions properly linked to the geometry features in NX. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-15 12:43:31 -05:00
[33,279,561,858,1137,1395,1665,1950,2223,2508,2850,3066,3333,3603,3894,4251,4458,4764,5016,5271,5586,5829]
];
var colors = ['rgba( 12, 36, 97,1.0)','rgba(106,176, 76,1.0)','rgba(179, 57, 57,1.0)',
'rgba(250,152, 58,1.0)','rgba(115,115,115,1.0)','rgba( 49,130,189,1.0)','rgba(189,189,189,1.0)'];
var colors2 = ['rgba( 12, 36, 97,0.5)','rgba(106,176, 76,0.5)','rgba(179, 57, 57,0.5)',
'rgba(250,152, 58,0.5)','rgba(115,115,115,0.5)','rgba( 49,130,189,0.5)','rgba(189,189,189,0.5)'];
var lineSize = [2, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2];
var labels = [''];
var data = [];
for (var i = 0; i < xData.length; i++) {
var result = {
x: xData[i],
y : yData[i],
type : 'scatter',
showlegend: true,
legendgroup: labels[i],
mode : 'lines',
name : labels[i],
line : {
color: colors[i],
width : lineSize[i]
}
};
var result2 = {
feat: Implement complete FEM regeneration workflow This commit completes the optimization loop infrastructure by implementing the full FEM regeneration workflow based on the user's working journal. ## Changes ### FEM Regeneration Workflow (solve_simulation.py) - Added STEP 1: Switch to Bracket.prt and update geometry - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make Bracket.prt active - Calls UpdateManager.DoUpdate() to rebuild CAD geometry with new expressions - Added STEP 2: Switch to Bracket_fem1 and update FE model - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make FEM active - Calls fEModel1.UpdateFemodel() to regenerate FEM with updated geometry - Added STEP 3: Switch back to sim part before solving - Close and reopen .sim file to force reload from disk ### Enhanced Journal Output (nx_solver.py) - Display journal stdout output for debugging - Shows all journal steps: geometry update, FEM regeneration, solve, save - Helps verify workflow execution ### Verification Tools - Added verify_parametric_link.py journal to check expression dependencies - Added FEM_REGENERATION_STATUS.md documenting the complete status ## Status ### ✅ Fully Functional Components 1. Parameter updates - nx_updater.py modifies .prt expressions 2. NX solver - ~4s per solve via journal 3. Result extraction - pyNastran reads .op2 files 4. History tracking - saves to JSON/CSV 5. Optimization loop - Optuna explores parameter space 6. **FEM regeneration workflow** - Journal executes all steps successfully ### ❌ Remaining Issue: Expressions Not Linked to Geometry The optimization returns identical stress values (197.89 MPa) for all trials because the Bracket.prt expressions are not referenced by any geometry features. Evidence: - Journal verification shows FEM update steps execute successfully - Feature dependency check shows no features reference the expressions - All optimization infrastructure is working correctly The code is ready - waiting for Bracket.prt to have its expressions properly linked to the geometry features in NX. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-15 12:43:31 -05:00
x: [xData[i][0], xData[i][21]],
y : [yData[i][0], yData[i][21]],
type : 'scatter',
showlegend: false,
legendgroup: labels[i],
mode : 'markers',
name : '',
hoverinfo : 'skip',
marker : {
color: colors2[i],
size : 12
}
};
data.push(result, result2);
}
var layout = {
height : 900,
width : 1200,
xaxis : {
showline: true,
showgrid : false,
zeroline : false,
showticklabels : true,
linecolor : 'rgb(204,204,204)',
linewidth : 2,
autotick : true,
ticks : 'outside',
tickcolor : 'rgb(204,204,204)',
tickwidth : 2,
ticklen : 5,
tickfont : {
family: 'Arial',
size : 12,
color : 'rgb(82, 82, 82)'
}
},
yaxis: {
showline: true,
showgrid : false,
zeroline : false,
showticklabels : true,
linecolor : 'rgb(204,204,204)',
linewidth : 2,
autotick : true,
ticks : 'outside',
tickcolor : 'rgb(204,204,204)',
tickwidth : 2,
ticklen : 5,
tickfont : {
family: 'Arial',
size : 12,
color : 'rgb(82, 82, 82)'
},
},
autosize : false,
margin : {
autoexpand: true,
l : 100,
r : 150,
t : 110
},
annotations : [
{
xref: 'paper',
yref : 'paper',
x : 0.0,
y : 1.05,
xanchor : 'left',
yanchor : 'bottom',
text : 'Sparse Matrix Solver',
font : {
family: 'Arial',
size : 30,
color : 'rgb(37,37,37)'
},
showarrow : false
},
{
xref: 'paper',
yref : 'paper',
x : 0.5,
y : -0.1,
xanchor : 'center',
yanchor : 'top',
text : 'Supernode',
showarrow : false,
font : {
family: 'Arial',
size : 22,
color : 'rgb(150,150,150)'
}
}
]
};
for (var i = 0; i < xData.length; i++) {
var result = {
xref: 'paper',
x : 0.05,
y : yData[i][0],
text : yData[i][0],
xanchor : 'right',
yanchor : 'middle',
showarrow : false,
clicktoshow : 'onout',
font : {
family: 'Arial',
size : 16,
color : 'black'
}
};
var result2 = {
xref: 'paper',
x : 0.95,
feat: Implement complete FEM regeneration workflow This commit completes the optimization loop infrastructure by implementing the full FEM regeneration workflow based on the user's working journal. ## Changes ### FEM Regeneration Workflow (solve_simulation.py) - Added STEP 1: Switch to Bracket.prt and update geometry - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make Bracket.prt active - Calls UpdateManager.DoUpdate() to rebuild CAD geometry with new expressions - Added STEP 2: Switch to Bracket_fem1 and update FE model - Uses SetActiveDisplay() to make FEM active - Calls fEModel1.UpdateFemodel() to regenerate FEM with updated geometry - Added STEP 3: Switch back to sim part before solving - Close and reopen .sim file to force reload from disk ### Enhanced Journal Output (nx_solver.py) - Display journal stdout output for debugging - Shows all journal steps: geometry update, FEM regeneration, solve, save - Helps verify workflow execution ### Verification Tools - Added verify_parametric_link.py journal to check expression dependencies - Added FEM_REGENERATION_STATUS.md documenting the complete status ## Status ### ✅ Fully Functional Components 1. Parameter updates - nx_updater.py modifies .prt expressions 2. NX solver - ~4s per solve via journal 3. Result extraction - pyNastran reads .op2 files 4. History tracking - saves to JSON/CSV 5. Optimization loop - Optuna explores parameter space 6. **FEM regeneration workflow** - Journal executes all steps successfully ### ❌ Remaining Issue: Expressions Not Linked to Geometry The optimization returns identical stress values (197.89 MPa) for all trials because the Bracket.prt expressions are not referenced by any geometry features. Evidence: - Journal verification shows FEM update steps execute successfully - Feature dependency check shows no features reference the expressions - All optimization infrastructure is working correctly The code is ready - waiting for Bracket.prt to have its expressions properly linked to the geometry features in NX. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-15 12:43:31 -05:00
y : yData[i][21],
text : yData[i][21],
xanchor : 'left',
yanchor : 'middle',
font : {
family: 'Arial',
size : 16,
color : 'black'
},
showarrow : false,
clicktoshow : 'onout'
};
layout.annotations.push(result, result2);
}
var config = {responsive: true,
displaylogo: false};
Plotly.newPlot('Sparse Matrix Solver', data, layout, config);
</script>
<div class="plotly" id="plotly">
<span onclick="document.getElementById('plotly').style.display='none'" class='none'>&times; </span>
<p>The Javascript file required for visualization is not located<br>
in the current directory.Please follow the link:<br>
<a href="https://cdn.plot.ly/plotly-latest.min.js" target="_blank">plotly-latest.min.js</a></p>
Click Control + S and save it to the current directory.
</div>
<script>
if (!isPluginLoaded) {
document.getElementById('plotly').style.margin="10px 10% 60px 50%";
}
else {
document.getElementById('plotly').style.display='none';
}
</script>
</body>
</html>