diff --git a/hq/workspaces/manager/MIND_MAP_AUDIT.md b/hq/workspaces/manager/MIND_MAP_AUDIT.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dad05c85 --- /dev/null +++ b/hq/workspaces/manager/MIND_MAP_AUDIT.md @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ +# MIND MAP AUDIT — Atomizer Master Mind Map + +Audit target: `atomizer-master-mind-map.excalidraw` +Audit date: 2026-02-21 +Mind-map text nodes extracted: 385 + +Scope reviewed: +- `atomizer-master-mind-map.excalidraw` (all text extracted) +- `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/` (full directory inventory) +- `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md` +- `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/docs/QUICK_REF.md` +- `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/docs/protocols/` (all files) +- `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/docs/plans/` (all files) +- `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/docs/guides/` (all files) +- `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/optimization_engine/` (all subdirs/files inventoried) +- `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/atomizer-dashboard/` (all subdirs/files inventoried) +- `/home/papa/atomizer/` (HQ workspace + configs + bridges + agent workspaces) +- `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/manager/context-docs/` (all files) + +--- + +## A. COMPLETENESS AUDIT + +### A1) Top-level Atomizer codebase coverage (`/home/papa/repos/Atomizer`) + +| Module | Mind map status | Notes | +|---|---|---| +| `optimization_engine/` | ✅ Present | Strongly represented (Z3 + Z4 + ACE + validation + study mgmt). | +| `docs/` | ⚠️ Present but incomplete | Only high-level protocol names are shown; actual docs are much deeper and include many plans/guides not represented. | +| `hq/` | ⚠️ Present but incomplete | Mind map has "Atomizer HQ" concept, but current implemented cluster reality is not accurately represented. | +| `studies/` | ⚠️ Present but incomplete | Mentioned conceptually as study outputs/archives; actual study folder lifecycle and formats are not mapped. | +| `config/` | ✅ Present | Mentioned via spec/config/sampler/paths. | +| `templates/` | ⚠️ Present but incomplete | Mentioned as "Templates System" but no linkage to actual template registries and CLI/template loaders. | +| `atomizer-dashboard/` | ⚠️ Present but incomplete | Dashboard + Canvas shown, but concrete backend/frontend subsystems are mostly missing. | +| `atomizer_field_training_data/` | ❌ Missing | This training-data corpus is central to neural workflow (`OP_05`) and not explicitly represented as a storage domain. | +| `knowledge_base/` | ⚠️ Present but incomplete | "LAC" is present conceptually; concrete structure/use paths are missing. | +| `examples/` | ❌ Missing | Useful onboarding/validation material not represented. | +| `tools/` | ❌ Missing | Significant tooling area (including MCP/NX tooling) is not represented. | +| `tests/` | ❌ Missing | No explicit test/verification zone despite quality emphasis. | +| `projects/` | ❌ Missing | Active project workspace model is not represented. | +| `mcp-server/` | ❌ Missing | No representation of MCP tool layer. | +| `nx_journals/` | ❌ Missing | NX integration mechanics are shown conceptually but journal assets not represented. | +| `archive/` | ⚠️ Present but incomplete | "History/Archive" concepts appear, but archive code/docs split is not represented. | + +### A2) Optimization engine completeness (`/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/optimization_engine`) + +Directory coverage vs map: +- `19/45` directories are directly represented by name/concept. +- `26/45` are missing as explicit module-level nodes. + +#### ✅ Present and generally accurate +- `core/` (`OptimizationRunner`, Optuna integration, method selection) +- `plugins/` + hook framework +- `study/` (`creator`, `state`, `continuation`, `benchmarking`, `reset`) +- `reporting/` (`results_analyzer`, `landscape_analyzer`, `visualizer`, report generation) +- `context/` (`playbook`, `reflector`, `feedback_loop`, `session_state`, `cache_monitor`, `compaction`) +- `gnn/` (neural/graph functions, polar graph, backfill concepts) +- `intake/`, `interview/`, model introspection concept +- `nx/` execution/manipulation layer +- `validation/` and `validators/` + +#### ⚠️ Present but incomplete/inaccurate +- Hook lifecycle details are incomplete/wrong for current core runner (details in Section B). +- "Inline calculations" and `post_calculation` are shown as default lifecycle; in code this is mainly in the `future/` LLM runner path. +- Neural subsystem is represented conceptually, but many implementation modules are not mapped (`processors/surrogates/*`, `gradient_optimizer.py`, ensemble/auto-trainer stack). +- Spec system is present at concept level, but concrete implementation modules are missing (`config/spec_models.py`, `config/spec_validator.py`, `schemas/atomizer_spec_v2.json`). + +#### ❌ Missing entirely (important) +- `processors/surrogates/` family (`neural_surrogate.py`, `auto_trainer.py`, ensemble/generic/adaptive components) +- `config/spec_models.py`, `config/spec_validator.py`, `config/migrator.py`, `config/setup_wizard.py` +- `utils/` operational modules (`dashboard_db.py`, `realtime_tracking.py`, `study_archiver.py`, `study_cleanup.py`, `trial_manager.py`) +- `model_discovery/` +- `hooks/nx_cad/*` and `hooks/nx_cae/*` granular modules +- `extractors/` concrete breadth is underrepresented (large extractor library beyond a generic "OP2/F06 parsing") + +### A3) Dashboard completeness (`/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/atomizer-dashboard`) + +Directory coverage vs map: +- `18/36` directories represented by concept. +- `18/36` missing. + +#### ✅ Present and accurate +- Dashboard web UI exists (`frontend`) with analytics/monitoring concepts. +- Canvas `SpecRenderer` exists and is central. +- WebSocket real-time streams exist. +- Intake/introspection/spec API layers exist. + +#### ⚠️ Present but incomplete +- Mind map does not capture backend route/service decomposition: + - `backend/api/routes/*` (spec/intake/nx/optimization/context/devloop/etc.) + - `backend/api/services/*` (spec manager, interview engine, nx introspection, session manager) + - `backend/api/websocket/optimization_stream.py` +- Frontend architecture is far richer than the map shows: + - `components/canvas/*` (nodes, panels, palette, visualization) + - `hooks/*` (spec store, websocket, optimization stream, chat/tooling) + - multiple pages (`Studio`, `CanvasView`, `Dashboard`, `Analysis`, `Results`, `Setup`, `Insights`) + +#### ❌ Missing entirely +- Claude Code integration route/services (`routes/claude_code.py`, services around Claude sessions). +- DevLoop UI integration (`components/devloop`, `routes/devloop.py`). +- Intake UI implementation details (`components/intake/*`) beyond generic "file drop" notion. + +### A4) Documentation completeness + +#### Protocol docs (`/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/docs/protocols`) +- All protocol files are effectively missing at file-level in the map. +- The map references OP/SYS identifiers, but does not map the actual protocol corpus structure: + - `operations/OP_01..OP_08` + - `system/SYS_10..SYS_18` + - `extensions/EXT_01..EXT_04` + +Status: ⚠️ Present at label level, ❌ missing at module/file level. + +#### Plans/guides +- `docs/plans/*` and `docs/guides/*` are largely unrepresented as architecture assets. +- These docs include key implementation/reality indicators (Studio plan, introspection plan, unified config, dashboard implementation status, neural workflow guides). + +Status: ❌ Missing as a first-class architecture layer. + +### A5) Agent system completeness (`/home/papa/atomizer` + context docs) + +#### ✅ Present concepts +- OpenClaw multi-agent orchestration concept. +- Job queue and Syncthing bridge concept. +- Trust boundaries / approval gates concept. + +#### ⚠️ Present but inaccurate +- Current production-like state is **8-agent multi-instance cluster** (Discord-heavy), not 13-agent fully active operation. +- Slack-first framing is now mixed/outdated relative to current implemented state. + +#### ❌ Missing entirely +- Discord bridge and multi-instance cluster mechanics: + - `config/openclaw-discord.json` + - `discord-bridge/` implementation + - cluster operational docs (`docs/hq/08-SYSTEM-IMPLEMENTATION-STATUS.md`) +- Mission control / taskboard orchestration system: + - `mission-control/` and `workspaces/shared/taskboard.json` +- Agent workspace protocol surface (`workspaces/*/AGENTS.md`, `TOOLS.md`, `MEMORY.md`, shared skills/protocols) +- Manager founding context-docs are not represented as a roadmap-vs-reality lens. + +--- + +## B. ACCURACY AUDIT + +### B1) Data flow and lifecycle correctness + +#### ⚠️ Trial lifecycle in map is not fully accurate for active core runner +Map shows 10-step lifecycle including `pre_mesh` and `post_calculation` each trial. + +Actual core runner (`optimization_engine/core/runner.py`) executes: +1. `pre_solve` +2. model update +3. `post_mesh` +4. solve +5. `post_solve` +6. extraction +7. `post_extraction` +8. constraints/objective composition +9. `custom_objective` + +Evidence: +- `optimization_engine/core/runner.py:362` +- `optimization_engine/core/runner.py:378` +- `optimization_engine/core/runner.py:395` +- `optimization_engine/core/runner.py:443` +- `optimization_engine/core/runner.py:506` + +`post_calculation` exists mainly in future/LLM path: +- `optimization_engine/future/llm_optimization_runner.py:294` + +Verdict: ⚠️ Partially accurate, but currently overstates default lifecycle behavior. + +### B2) Agent topology claim is outdated/inaccurate + +Map claim: "13 AGENTS (OpenClaw Multi-Agent)" and Slack-centered operation. + +Current implemented config and status indicate **8 agents** and strong Discord routing: +- `config/openclaw-discord.json` agent IDs at lines 19, 29, 38, 47, 56, 65, 74, 83 +- `dashboard/SPEC.md:32` ("8 agents") +- `docs/hq/08-SYSTEM-IMPLEMENTATION-STATUS.md:11` (8 independent OpenClaw processes) + +Verdict: ⚠️ Roadmap intent is represented as current state; should be split into "current" vs "target". + +### B3) Protocol numbering consistency mismatch + +Map references: +- Operations OP_01–OP_11 +- System SYS_10–SYS_20 + +Primary protocol docs in repo (`docs/protocols/README.md`) currently include: +- OP_01..OP_08 +- SYS_10..SYS_18 + +Additional OP_09/10/11 and SYS_19/20 exist in HQ skill/workspace protocol layer under `/home/papa/atomizer/skills/atomizer-protocols/protocols/`. + +Verdict: ⚠️ Partially accurate but conflates primary repo protocol set with HQ extension protocol set. + +### B4) Neural architecture claims are partly aspirational and path-outdated + +- Concepts are directionally right (GNN, hybrid switching, uncertainty, training/export pipeline). +- But some documented file references are stale (e.g., `atomizer-field/...` references; no `atomizer-field` directory in `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer`). +- Performance numbers (4.5ms, 2200x, <3% error) appear as hard facts without direct benchmark provenance in current map. + +Verdict: ⚠️ Good conceptual framing, but should separate verified metrics from target/benchmark claims. + +### B5) Dashboard/Canvas sync claim is mostly accurate + +Map claim: "Spec ↔ Canvas ↔ Backend ↔ Claude, WebSocket real-time updates" + +Evidence in code: +- Spec API + sync route (`backend/api/routes/spec.py`) +- Canvas `SpecRenderer` (`frontend/src/components/canvas/SpecRenderer.tsx`) +- Spec WebSocket hook (`frontend/src/hooks/useSpecWebSocket.ts`) +- Optimization stream websocket (`backend/api/websocket/optimization_stream.py`, `frontend/src/hooks/useOptimizationStream.ts`) + +Verdict: ✅ Accurate at architecture level. + +### B6) Failure mode claims are mixed + +- NX crash continuation: supported by `study/continuation.py` and resume flow. +- Disk optimization protocol: exists (`OP_07`) and utilities (`study_archiver.py`, cleanup modules). +- "Agent failure → circuit breaker (2 retries max)" is not clearly implemented as a concrete engine behavior in inspected runtime code. + +Verdict: ⚠️ Mixed; some claims are real, some are policy/plan-level rather than implemented behavior. + +### B7) Ordering/zone labeling quality issue + +- Z7 appears before Z6 in the canvas text order. + +Verdict: ⚠️ Not a functional bug, but hurts readability and narrative flow. + +--- + +## C. STRUCTURAL CRITIQUE + +### C1) Zone organization quality + +Current map is strong as a single narrative board, but it mixes: +- current implementation +- planned future state +- company operating model +- protocol taxonomy +- performance claims + +in one layer, with no visual distinction. + +This is the main structural weakness. + +### C2) Recommended grouping model + +Use 4 super-layers (with explicit badges): +1. `Runtime (Now)` +2. `Roadmap (Planned)` +3. `Governance/Process` +4. `Interfaces & Data Contracts` + +This prevents roadmap items (13-agent full company, OP/SYS full expansion) from being misread as already live. + +### C3) Flow direction critique + +Left→right is workable for technical flow, but the map currently has at least 3 competing flows: +- optimization data pipeline +- HQ orchestration/agent workflow +- product evolution roadmap + +These should be separated into parallel swimlanes rather than interwoven in one horizontal direction. + +### C4) Missing relationship edges + +Important edges absent or too implicit: +- `AtomizerSpec schema` ↔ `spec_models.py/spec_validator.py` ↔ `dashboard spec APIs` +- `training_data_exporter` ↔ `atomizer_field_training_data/` ↔ `neural_surrogate` +- `mission-control/taskboard` ↔ `agent orchestration` +- `docs/protocols` (canonical) ↔ `skills/atomizer-protocols` (operational overlays) +- `Discord/OpenClaw cluster status docs` ↔ infrastructure zone + +--- + +## D. PROPOSED CHANGES + +1. [ADD] Split each major zone into `NOW` and `TARGET` bands. +2. [ADD] New explicit node group: `Spec Contract Layer` with: + - `optimization_engine/schemas/atomizer_spec_v2.json` + - `optimization_engine/config/spec_models.py` + - `optimization_engine/config/spec_validator.py` + - `atomizer-dashboard/backend/api/routes/spec.py` +3. [ADD] New explicit node group: `Surrogate Runtime Layer` with `processors/surrogates/*` and training/export feedback loop. +4. [ADD] New node group for `Taskboard/Mission Control` (`/home/papa/atomizer/mission-control`, `workspaces/shared/taskboard.json`). +5. [ADD] New `Platform Runtime` block showing current 8-agent OpenClaw multi-instance + Discord bridge reality. +6. [MOVE] Put Z6 before Z7 in board order. +7. [MOVE] Move roadmap phases out of core architecture flow into a dedicated "Evolution" strip. +8. [FIX] Trial lifecycle to match current core runner (or label current one as "LLM/Future path"). +9. [FIX] Agent count/state labeling: "Current: 8 active" and "Target: 13 full company". +10. [FIX] Protocol counts: distinguish canonical repo protocols (`OP_01..08`, `SYS_10..18`) from HQ extension protocols (`OP_09..11`, `SYS_19..20`). +11. [FIX] Replace/annotate stale `atomizer-field` path references with current paths (or mark as external planned module). +12. [FIX] Mark performance numbers as `benchmarked on /` or `target`. +13. [EXPAND] Dashboard architecture with backend route/service and frontend canvas/store/websocket decomposition. +14. [EXPAND] Optimization engine internal packages: `config/`, `processors/`, `utils/`, `validation/validators`. +15. [EXPAND] Infrastructure: include Discord/OpenClaw config files and bridge implementation. +16. [EXPAND] Include tests/quality toolchain as a first-class architecture concern. +17. [REMOVE] Unqualified hard claims that are not code-backed (e.g., specific retry/circuit-breaker behavior) unless source-linked. + +--- + +## E. INNOVATIVE SUGGESTIONS + +1. Add a **"Truth Overlay"**: + - Green border = implemented and source-verified. + - Yellow border = implemented but partial. + - Blue border = planned. + - Red border = known mismatch/debt. + +2. Add a **"Source Pin"** mini-label on each non-trivial node: + - Example: `runner.py:362` or `openclaw-discord.json:19`. + - This turns the map into a navigable architecture index. + +3. Add a **"Time Stamp"** to volatile zones (agents, infra, roadmap): + - `Verified: 2026-02-21`. + +4. Add a **"10-minute onboarding path"** (numbered route): + - 1) Inputs/Spec + - 2) Runner lifecycle + - 3) Dashboard/spec sync + - 4) Neural acceleration path + - 5) HQ orchestration path + +5. Add a **dual-lane architecture**: + - Lane A: Technical optimization runtime + - Lane B: Human/agent orchestration runtime + - Join points explicitly shown (approval gates, deliverables, KB ingestion). + +6. Add a **contract matrix sidebar**: + - File contracts: `atomizer_spec.json`, `study.db`, `history.json`, `model_introspection.json`, report outputs. + - Producer/consumer per contract. + +7. Add a **risk/fragility overlay**: + - Mark components known to be brittle (cross-OS sync, bridge/routing constraints, token/provider dependencies). + +8. Add a **"planned vs decommissioned" marker** for legacy artifacts (old dashboard paths, old bridge assumptions, old protocol doc locations). + +--- + +## Bottom Line + +The map is impressive as a vision artifact, but currently it blends roadmap and reality too aggressively. +As a living architectural blueprint, it needs a strict `Now vs Target` separation, tighter source anchoring, and fuller module coverage in the optimization engine/dashboard/agent runtime layers. diff --git a/hq/workspaces/manager/memory/2026-02-22.md b/hq/workspaces/manager/memory/2026-02-22.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d1fa7006 --- /dev/null +++ b/hq/workspaces/manager/memory/2026-02-22.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +# 2026-02-22 + +## Nightly Digestion — OP_11 (Incremental) + +### STORE +- New artifact: `MIND_MAP_AUDIT.md` (16KB) created Feb 21 — comprehensive audit of Excalidraw master mind map vs actual codebase/docs. 385 text nodes reviewed. Identifies gaps between mind map and reality. +- No new Antoine corrections. No new project activity. Weekend quiet period continues. + +### DISCARD +- Manager memory files: oldest is Feb 8 (14 days) — all within 30-day retention +- **Flagged:** Tech Lead has 2 legacy files from 2025 (`2025-02-09.md`, `2025-07-17.md`) — pre-HQ era Hydrotech Beam logs. Contains useful domain knowledge (NXOpenSolver implementation, technical breakdown). Not deleting — but should be consolidated into Tech Lead's MEMORY.md or project KB during next deep digestion. +- No contradictions found in current memory files +- No stale TODOs — all 3 active projects genuinely awaiting CEO input + +### SORT +- MIND_MAP_AUDIT.md lives correctly at workspace root (one-off audit artifact, not a daily note) +- No patterns to promote — quiet weekend + +### REPAIR +- PROJECT_STATUS.md still accurate — no state changes since Feb 20 +- MEMORY.md still accurate +- All key paths verified: `shared/standardization/`, `shared/war-room-isogrid/`, `shared/war-room-overhaul/` intact +- Outstanding blockers unchanged: + - Hydrotech Beam: blocked on Antoine (dalidou pull + test) + - Project Standard: awaiting CEO decision (full spec vs MVS) + - Adaptive Isogrid: awaiting CEO review + - Auditor P-Adaptive-Isogrid block (since Feb 16): still unresolved + - Webster web_search API key: still needs Mario + +### EVOLVE +- No process issues this cycle +- Observation: 3 projects all blocked on CEO review simultaneously. When Antoine returns, priority triage will be needed to avoid bottleneck. +- MIND_MAP_AUDIT provides roadmap for docs/mind-map alignment — useful for next active work phase + +### SELF-DOCUMENT +- No changes needed — docs current