Restructure Hydrotech Beam project — KB-integrated layout
New project structure with knowledge base integration: - kb/ with components, materials, fea, dev generations - models/ for reference NX files (golden copies) - studies/ for self-contained optimization campaigns - deliverables/ for final outputs - DECISIONS.md decision log (6 decisions tracked) - BREAKDOWN.md (moved from 1_breakdown/) - Gen 001 created from intake + technical breakdown KB extension file: atomizer/shared/skills/knowledge-base-atomizer-ext.md Refs: DEC-HB-004, DEC-HB-005, DEC-HB-006
This commit is contained in:
46
projects/hydrotech-beam/kb/fea/models/sol101-static.md
Normal file
46
projects/hydrotech-beam/kb/fea/models/sol101-static.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
# SOL 101 — Static Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Simulation:** Beam_sim1.sim
|
||||
**Solver:** NX Nastran SOL 101 (Linear Static)
|
||||
**Status:** Pending gap resolution
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Setup
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Value | Notes |
|
||||
|------|-------|-------|
|
||||
| Solution type | SOL 101 (Linear Static) | Appropriate for this problem |
|
||||
| Element type | ❓ TBD | Gap G8: CQUAD4/CQUAD8 (shell) or CTETRA/CHEXA (solid)? |
|
||||
| Mesh density | ❓ TBD | Gap G8: convergence checked? |
|
||||
| Loading | ❓ TBD | Gap G2: point load? distributed? self-weight? |
|
||||
| BCs | ❓ TBD | Gap G1: cantilever? simply-supported? |
|
||||
|
||||
## Result Extraction
|
||||
|
||||
| Output | Method | Expression/Sensor | Status |
|
||||
|--------|--------|-------------------|--------|
|
||||
| Mass | NX expression | `p173` | ✅ Known |
|
||||
| Tip displacement | ❓ Sensor or .f06 parse | TBD | Gap G3, G6 |
|
||||
| Von Mises stress | ❓ Sensor or .f06 parse | TBD | Gap G4, G6 |
|
||||
|
||||
## Solver Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
*From Technical Breakdown:*
|
||||
|
||||
- **Linear assumption:** 22 mm displacement on likely 2+ m beam → L/δ probably OK. Verify.
|
||||
- **Mesh sensitivity:** Stress at hole edges is mesh-dependent. Need convergence check (Gap G8).
|
||||
- **Mesh morphing vs remesh:** Parametric NX models typically remesh on update. Need to confirm behavior across DV range (Gap G7).
|
||||
- **Runtime estimate:** Single beam, ~10K–100K DOF → probably seconds to low minutes per evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Baseline mass matches NX expression `p173`
|
||||
- [ ] Baseline displacement matches reported ~22 mm
|
||||
- [ ] Mesh convergence verified at baseline
|
||||
- [ ] Mesh quality acceptable at DV range extremes
|
||||
- [ ] Model rebuilds cleanly at all 4 corners of design space
|
||||
|
||||
## History
|
||||
|
||||
- **Gen 001** (2026-02-09): Initial documentation from technical breakdown. All solver details pending gap resolution.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user