KB Gen 002: Process KBS sessions, update model parameters
Sources: 3 KBS capture sessions (20260210-132817, 20260210-161401, 20260210-163801)
Key changes:
- Mass corrected: 974 kg (p173) → 11.33 kg (p1) — KBS ground truth
- Beam length confirmed: 5,000 mm cantilever
- BCs confirmed: left fixed, right 10,000 kgf downward
- Material confirmed: AISI Steel 1005, density 7.3 g/cm³
- Mesh confirmed: CQUAD4 thin shell, 33.7 mm elements
- Hole geometry: span 4,000 mm (p6), offsets 500 mm fixed
- 3 gaps closed (G1, G2, G8), 6 new gaps identified (G10-G15)
- New expressions: beam_half_height, beam_half_width, beam_length, p6
Files: CONTEXT.md, kb/_index.md, kb/_history.md, kb/components/sandwich-beam.md,
kb/materials/steel-aisi.md, kb/fea/models/sol101-static.md, kb/dev/gen-002.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,52 +1,76 @@
|
||||
# Sandwich Beam
|
||||
|
||||
**Type:** Primary structural component
|
||||
**Material:** Steel (AISI) — see [steel-aisi.md](../materials/steel-aisi.md)
|
||||
**Status:** Baseline documented, optimization pending
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
|
||||
Sandwich I-beam serving as primary load-bearing member in a test fixture assembly. Cross-section features a core layer flanked by face sheets on top and bottom flanges. Web contains a pattern of lightening holes (circular cutouts) to reduce mass.
|
||||
|
||||
## Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
| Parameter | Value | Units | Source |
|
||||
|-----------|-------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| Mass (baseline) | ~974 | kg | NX expression `p173` |
|
||||
| Tip displacement (baseline) | ~22 | mm | SOL 101 result |
|
||||
| Half-core thickness | 20 (baseline) | mm | DV range: 10–40 |
|
||||
| Face thickness | 20 (baseline) | mm | DV range: 10–40 |
|
||||
| Hole diameter | 300 (baseline) | mm | DV range: 150–450 |
|
||||
| Hole count | 10 (baseline) | — | DV range: 5–15 (integer) |
|
||||
| Beam length | ❓ TBD | mm | Gap G1 |
|
||||
| Support conditions | ❓ TBD | — | Gap G1 |
|
||||
|
||||
## Structural Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
*From Technical Breakdown (Gen 001):*
|
||||
|
||||
The beam is **bending-dominated**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Behavior | Governing Parameters | Notes |
|
||||
|----------|---------------------|-------|
|
||||
| Bending stiffness (EI) | Face thickness, core thickness | Faces carry bending stress, core carries shear. Stiffness scales ~quadratically with distance from neutral axis |
|
||||
| Mass | All four variables | Core and face add material; holes remove material from web |
|
||||
| Stress concentrations | Hole diameter, hole spacing | Larger holes → higher SCF at edges. Closely spaced holes can interact |
|
||||
| Shear capacity | Core thickness, hole count, diameter | Holes reduce shear-carrying area |
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Variable Interactions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Core × Face** — classic sandwich interaction. Optimal stiffness balances core depth (lever arm) vs face material (bending resistance)
|
||||
2. **Hole diameter × Hole count** — both remove web material. Large + many could leave insufficient ligament width
|
||||
3. **Face × Hole diameter** — thicker faces reduce nominal stress, allowing larger holes
|
||||
4. **Core × Hole diameter** — core thickness determines web height, constrains max feasible hole diameter
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Risk
|
||||
|
||||
> ⚠️ Baseline FAILS displacement constraint (22 mm vs 10 mm target). Optimizer must increase stiffness by >50% while reducing mass. Feasible region may be tight.
|
||||
|
||||
## History
|
||||
|
||||
- **Gen 001** (2026-02-09): Initial documentation from intake + technical breakdown
|
||||
# Sandwich Beam
|
||||
|
||||
**Type:** Primary structural component
|
||||
**Material:** Steel (AISI 1005) — see [steel-aisi.md](../materials/steel-aisi.md)
|
||||
**Status:** Confirmed from KBS session (Gen 002)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
|
||||
Sandwich I-beam serving as primary load-bearing member in a test fixture assembly. Cross-section features a core layer flanked by face sheets on top and bottom flanges. Web contains a pattern of lightening holes (circular cutouts) to reduce mass. Beam is extruded from an I-beam sketch profile.
|
||||
|
||||
## Geometry — NX Expressions
|
||||
|
||||
| Parameter | NX Expression | Baseline Value | Units | DV? | Range | Notes |
|
||||
|-----------|--------------|----------------|-------|-----|-------|-------|
|
||||
| Beam half-height | `beam_half_height` | ❓ TBD (Gap G12) | mm | No (currently) | — | Half total I-beam height |
|
||||
| Beam half-width | `beam_half_width` | ❓ TBD (Gap G13) | mm | No (currently) | — | Half flange width |
|
||||
| Face thickness | `beam_face_thickness` | 20 | mm | **Yes (DV2)** | 10–40 | Flange thickness |
|
||||
| Core half-thickness | `beam_half_core_thickness` | 20 | mm | **Yes (DV1)** | 10–40 | Half web height |
|
||||
| Beam length | `beam_length` | 5,000 | mm | No | Fixed | ✅ Confirmed (KBS) |
|
||||
| Hole count | `hole_count` | 10 | — | **Yes (DV4)** | 5–15 (integer) | ✅ Confirmed (KBS) |
|
||||
| Hole diameter | ❓ (Gap G14) | 300 | mm | **Yes (DV3)** | 150–450 | ✅ Confirmed (KBS) |
|
||||
| Hole span | `p6` | 4,000 | mm | Potential (G15) | TBD | ✅ Confirmed (KBS) — total span for hole distribution |
|
||||
| Hole start offset | (fixed) | 500 | mm | No | Fixed | Requirement — not parametric |
|
||||
| Hole end offset | (fixed) | 500 | mm | No | Fixed | Requirement — not parametric |
|
||||
|
||||
## Mass
|
||||
|
||||
| Parameter | NX Expression | Value | Units | Source |
|
||||
|-----------|--------------|-------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| Mass (baseline) | **`p1`** | **11.33** | kg | ✅ KBS session 20260210-163801 |
|
||||
| Density | (material card) | 7.3 | g/cm³ | ✅ KBS session — Antoine stated directly |
|
||||
|
||||
> ⚠️ **Previous value of ~974 kg (expression `p173`) is superseded.** See Gen 002 mass discrepancy resolution.
|
||||
|
||||
## Construction Method
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Sketch:** I-beam cross-section profile with 4 key expressions (`beam_half_height`, `beam_half_width`, `beam_face_thickness`, `beam_half_core_thickness`)
|
||||
2. **Extrusion:** Sketch extruded to `beam_length` (5,000 mm) → solid body
|
||||
3. **Holes:** `hole_count` circular holes of specified diameter, distributed over `p6` span (4,000 mm), centered in web, starting 500 mm from each end
|
||||
4. **Idealization:** Promote body → mid-surface extraction (pair mid-surface function) → thin shell sheet bodies
|
||||
|
||||
## Hole Geometry Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
- **Span:** Holes are distributed over 4,000 mm (expression `p6`)
|
||||
- **Fixed offsets:** First hole center at ≥500 mm from beam start, last hole center at ≤4,500 mm from beam start
|
||||
- **Spacing:** At baseline: 10 holes in 4,000 mm → ~444 mm center-to-center, 300 mm diameter → ~144 mm ligament
|
||||
- **Collision risk:** At extremes (15 holes × 450 mm dia in 4,000 mm): spacing = 267 mm, ligament = −183 mm → **HOLES OVERLAP** → infeasible
|
||||
- **Feasibility formula:** `ligament = (hole_span / (hole_count - 1)) - hole_diameter > 0`
|
||||
- Must also check: `hole_diameter < web_height` (hole fits in web vertically)
|
||||
|
||||
## Structural Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
*From Technical Breakdown (Gen 001), confirmed by KBS session:*
|
||||
|
||||
The beam is a **cantilever** (left side fixed, right side free with 10,000 kgf downward load). It is **bending-dominated**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Behavior | Governing Parameters | Notes |
|
||||
|----------|---------------------|-------|
|
||||
| Bending stiffness (EI) | Face thickness, core thickness | Faces carry bending stress, core carries shear. Stiffness scales ~quadratically with distance from neutral axis |
|
||||
| Mass | All four variables | Core and face add material; holes remove material from web |
|
||||
| Stress concentrations | Hole diameter, hole spacing | Larger holes → higher SCF at edges. Closely spaced holes can interact |
|
||||
| Shear capacity | Core thickness, hole count, diameter | Holes reduce shear-carrying area |
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Variable Interactions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Core × Face** — classic sandwich interaction. Optimal stiffness balances core depth (lever arm) vs face material (bending resistance)
|
||||
2. **Hole diameter × Hole count** — both remove web material. Large + many could leave insufficient ligament width
|
||||
3. **Face × Hole diameter** — thicker faces reduce nominal stress, allowing larger holes
|
||||
4. **Core × Hole diameter** — core thickness determines web height, constrains max feasible hole diameter
|
||||
|
||||
## History
|
||||
|
||||
- **Gen 001** (2026-02-09): Initial documentation from intake + technical breakdown
|
||||
- **Gen 002** (2026-02-10): Updated with confirmed values from KBS sessions. Mass corrected from 974 kg → 11.33 kg. Beam length confirmed 5,000 mm. Hole parameters detailed. Expression names confirmed.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user