chore(hq): daily sync 2026-02-16
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
## 📝 Condensation: Mirror Substrate Material Trade Study Review
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-02-16
|
||||
**Channel:** #engineering
|
||||
**Thread:** N/A
|
||||
**Participants:** Webster, Auditor
|
||||
|
||||
### Context
|
||||
A trade study was performed by Webster (orch-1771210952) to select a substrate material for a 500mm space telescope mirror, comparing SiC, ULE, and Zerodur. The study was subsequently challenged by Auditor (orch-1771211034).
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision
|
||||
The initial trade study and its recommendation of Zerodur are **invalidated**. A new, more comprehensive study is required before a decision can be made.
|
||||
|
||||
### Rationale
|
||||
The audit identified critical flaws in the original analysis:
|
||||
1. **Incorrect Operating Temperature:** The study was based on a 20°C environment, whereas the mirror will operate at cryogenic temperatures (<100K). This fundamental error invalidates the material performance comparison.
|
||||
2. **Omission of Key Material:** The study failed to include Beryllium, a flight-proven material used in critical space telescopes like JWST.
|
||||
3. **Incomplete Criteria:** The analysis lacked manufacturability, cost, and lead time considerations.
|
||||
|
||||
### Action Items
|
||||
- [ ] Re-run the trade study using correct cryogenic temperature parameters (<100K).
|
||||
- [ ] Include Beryllium in the material comparison.
|
||||
- [ ] Add manufacturability, cost, and lead time to the evaluation criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
### Supersedes
|
||||
- Webster's initial research findings and recommendation (orch-1771210952).
|
||||
22
hq/hq/projects/TEMPLATE-CONTEXT.md
Normal file
22
hq/hq/projects/TEMPLATE-CONTEXT.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
# Project Context: [Project Name]
|
||||
**Last updated:** [date] by Secretary
|
||||
|
||||
## Current State
|
||||
- Phase: [current phase]
|
||||
- Active: [what's being worked on]
|
||||
- Blocked: [blockers, or "Nothing"]
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Decisions (most recent first)
|
||||
1. [YYYY-MM-DD] [Decision] — [one-line rationale]
|
||||
|
||||
## Active Constraints
|
||||
- [constraint 1]
|
||||
|
||||
## Superseded Decisions
|
||||
- *(none yet)*
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Contacts
|
||||
- [name] — [role/relevance]
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
- [link to spec, channel, etc.]
|
||||
16
hq/hq/projects/sim-test/CONTEXT.md
Normal file
16
hq/hq/projects/sim-test/CONTEXT.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
# Project Context: sim-test
|
||||
**Last updated:** 2026-02-16 by Secretary
|
||||
|
||||
## Current State
|
||||
- **Phase:** Design / Analysis
|
||||
- **Active:** Material selection for the primary mirror.
|
||||
- **Blocked:** Material selection is blocked pending a valid trade study.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Decisions (most recent first)
|
||||
1. **2026-02-16:** Initial mirror material trade study was invalidated due to incorrect temperature parameters and incomplete material comparison. A new study is required.
|
||||
|
||||
## Active Constraints
|
||||
- Mirror must perform reliably at cryogenic temperatures (<100K).
|
||||
|
||||
## Superseded Decisions
|
||||
- ~~**2026-02-15:** Zerodur recommended for mirror substrate.~~ → Replaced by the requirement for a new trade study (2026-02-16).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user