chore(hq): daily sync 2026-02-16

hq/.gitignore

@@ -1,40 +1,6 @@
-# Runtime / secrets
 .env
-config/.discord-tokens.env
+*.log
-config/*.env
+job-queue/inbox/*
-instances/*/agents/
+job-queue/outbox/*
-instances/*/env
+job-queue/archive/*
-instances/*/*.db
+!job-queue/*/.gitkeep
-instances/*/*.db-*
-instances/*/*.sqlite
-instances/*/*.sqlite-*
-instances/*/memory/
-instances/*/cron/
-instances/*/*.bak*
-instances/*/update-check.json
-
-# Session data & logs  
-handoffs/*.json
-handoffs/workflows/*/
-logs/**/*.jsonl
-logs/**/*.log
-
-# Python / Node
-.venv/
-node_modules/
-__pycache__/
-
-# Legacy / deprecated
-bridge/
-discord-bridge/
-docker-compose.yml
-
-# OS
-.DS_Store
-*.swp
-
-# Browser/runtime state
-instances/*/browser/
-instances/*/canvas/
-instances/*/devices/
-instances/*/identity/

hq/config/.discord-tokens.env

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# Atomizer-HQ Discord Bot Tokens — KEEP SECRET
+DISCORD_TOKEN_MANAGER=MTQ3MTg2NTQ3OTA1MTM0NjAwMw.GfLrsO.Ksikd8xoXQjtO7XcBCKRSA7wnaDzDdSPsfv6SY
+DISCORD_TOKEN_TECH_LEAD=MTQ3MTg2OTU3NDU0NTgwMTMzOA.G0pCcW.WwHEXYHVrmLfrSzqzQSFNE1tShcIFx8xWfPXjc
+DISCORD_TOKEN_SECRETARY=MTQ3MTg3MjA0Nzg4NTA1ODE0MQ.GQfpHt.Qfk2v17aUCxoOgZlPgMLBxm16dFfk64nX0yQvg
+DISCORD_TOKEN_AUDITOR=MTQ3MTg3MjYyNTMxNDYyNzU5NQ.GQSaoW.9vSoyHXe7u99EuCZXyGSbT1ANQGjtdS_Ydn_cI
+DISCORD_TOKEN_OPTIMIZER=MTQ3MTg3MjkwNTgwNDY0ODQ3MA.GwP13e.g3rUo6xhmY1NinvxV8t7PCcrtKmQFg5cJgfrqo
+DISCORD_TOKEN_STUDY_BUILDER=MTQ3MTg3MzUzNTkxODk5NzUyNQ.GgKAMg.k5Rgdln5xKTNPDgjFgpdJsRFICaMBNvHA54N1o
+DISCORD_TOKEN_NX_EXPERT=MTQ3MTg3Mzg3NjY5Nzk0MDAxOA.GUZRfQ.BF7nJn_L6jDqf9khZFGuv3I-lXK7ch5n5Nex5U
+DISCORD_TOKEN_WEBSTER=MTQ3MTg3NDE3NDU4OTk5Mjk2MQ.GwfRD7.GVX3D69IjHh3Ha7fCqgoYv2OVuUe0xX89SuuC0

hq/config/atomizer-discord.env

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# Environment variables for Atomizer-HQ Discord Gateway
+# Source the tokens
+DISCORD_TOKEN_MANAGER=MTQ3MTg2NTQ3OTA1MTM0NjAwMw.GfLrsO.Ksikd8xoXQjtO7XcBCKRSA7wnaDzDdSPsfv6SY
+DISCORD_TOKEN_TECH_LEAD=MTQ3MTg2OTU3NDU0NTgwMTMzOA.G0pCcW.WwHEXYHVrmLfrSzqzQSFNE1tShcIFx8xWfPXjc
+DISCORD_TOKEN_SECRETARY=MTQ3MTg3MjA0Nzg4NTA1ODE0MQ.GQfpHt.Qfk2v17aUCxoOgZlPgMLBxm16dFfk64nX0yQvg
+DISCORD_TOKEN_AUDITOR=MTQ3MTg3MjYyNTMxNDYyNzU5NQ.GQSaoW.9vSoyHXe7u99EuCZXyGSbT1ANQGjtdS_Ydn_cI
+DISCORD_TOKEN_OPTIMIZER=MTQ3MTg3MjkwNTgwNDY0ODQ3MA.GwP13e.g3rUo6xhmY1NinvxV8t7PCcrtKmQFg5cJgfrqo
+DISCORD_TOKEN_STUDY_BUILDER=MTQ3MTg3MzUzNTkxODk5NzUyNQ.GgKAMg.k5Rgdln5xKTNPDgjFgpdJsRFICaMBNvHA54N1o
+DISCORD_TOKEN_NX_EXPERT=MTQ3MTg3Mzg3NjY5Nzk0MDAxOA.GUZRfQ.BF7nJn_L6jDqf9khZFGuv3I-lXK7ch5n5Nex5U
+DISCORD_TOKEN_WEBSTER=MTQ3MTg3NDE3NDU4OTk5Mjk2MQ.GwfRD7.GVX3D69IjHh3Ha7fCqgoYv2OVuUe0xX89SuuC0

hq/docker-compose.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+version: "3.8"
+
+services:
+  atomizer-gateway:
+    image: clawdbot:local
+    container_name: atomizer-gateway
+    restart: unless-stopped
+    ports:
+      - "18790:18789"
+    environment:
+      - CLAWDBOT_CONFIG_PATH=/config/clawdbot.json
+      - CLAWDBOT_STATE_DIR=/state
+      - SLACK_BOT_TOKEN=${SLACK_BOT_TOKEN}
+      - SLACK_APP_TOKEN=${SLACK_APP_TOKEN}
+      - ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=${ANTHROPIC_API_KEY}
+      - OPENAI_API_KEY=${OPENAI_API_KEY}
+      - GOOGLE_API_KEY=${GOOGLE_API_KEY}
+      - CLAWDBOT_GATEWAY_TOKEN=${GATEWAY_TOKEN}
+    volumes:
+      # Config
+      - ./config/clawdbot.json:/config/clawdbot.json:ro
+      # State (sessions, auth, etc.)
+      - atomizer-state:/state
+      # Agent workspaces
+      - ./workspaces/manager:/workspaces/manager
+      - ./workspaces/secretary:/workspaces/secretary
+      - ./workspaces/technical-lead:/workspaces/technical-lead
+      # Shared skills (available to all agents)
+      - ./skills/atomizer-company:/state/skills/atomizer-company:ro
+      - ./skills/atomizer-protocols:/state/skills/atomizer-protocols:ro
+      # Job queue (Syncthing ↔ Windows)
+      - ./job-queue:/job-queue
+      # Shared resources
+      - ./shared:/shared:ro
+      # Atomizer repo (read-only)
+      - /home/papa/repos/Atomizer:/repos/Atomizer:ro
+      # PKM (read-only)
+      - /home/papa/obsidian-vault:/obsidian-vault:ro
+    networks:
+      - atomizer-net
+
+volumes:
+  atomizer-state:
+
+networks:
+  atomizer-net:
+    driver: bridge

hq/handoffs/orch-1771167994-4aeb20ae.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771167994-4aeb20ae",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The mean CTE of Zerodur Class 0 is 0 ± 0.020 × 10⁻⁶/K (±20 ppb/K) over the 0°C to 50°C range, which encompasses the requested 20-25°C window.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "The value provided is the mean CTE for the 0-50°C range as defined by Schott's standard classification. Instantaneous CTE at exactly 20-25°C is consistent with this tolerance.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T10:07:30-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771168199-2382f2a0.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771168199-2382f2a0",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The density (specific gravity) of Ohara Clearceram-Z HS is 2.55 g/cm³.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Space Materials Database lists Specific Gravity as 2.55 for Clearceram-Z. Manufacturer documents treat the series (Regular, HS, EX) as having the same fundamental physical properties outside of CTE tuning.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T10:14:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771168677-6fea1132.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771168677-6fea1132",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Test received and acknowledged by Webster. Systems nominal.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Standard orchestration test.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T10:17:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771168688-54ec5949.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771168688-54ec5949",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The Young's modulus of Zerodur is approximately 90.3 GPa at room temperature.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Source: Schott Zerodur Technical Data. Standard value is 90.3 GPa (9.03 x 10^10 Pa).",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T10:18:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771168991-4baf8c6a.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771168991-4baf8c6a",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Here are the main differences between Zerodur and Clearceram-Z HS for astronomical mirror substrates:\n\n*   **CTE Uniformity:** Zerodur generally offers tighter catalog extremes (e.g., Class 0 EXTREME at 0 ± 0.007 ppm/K) with guaranteed homogeneity, whereas Clearceram-Z HS is specified slightly looser (0.0 ± 0.020 ppm/K) but demonstrates excellent large-blank consistency and lot-to-lot reproducibility.\n*   **Polishing & Workability:** Both achieve sub-nanometer roughness (Clearceram-Z HS reports ~0.15 nm RMS). Clearceram-Z HS emphasizes reduced microcrack propagation during machining, which can improve yield for complex lightweighted structures.\n*   **Long-Term Stability:** Zerodur has a longer history of published multi-decade mechanical reliability data (tens of years under stress). Clearceram-Z HS highlights strong thermal/chemical process stability (e.g., minimal change after 650°C heat treatment) but has less public long-term drift data.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Both materials are top-tier glass-ceramics. Zerodur is the legacy standard with more historical data; Clearceram-Z HS is a strong competitor with excellent machinability and thermal stability.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T10:25:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176737-8c14d6cf.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176737-8c14d6cf",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "failed",
+  "result": null,
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "low",
+  "notes": "web_search tool failed due to a missing Brave API key. I am unable to access the internet to find the density of Zerodur.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T12:32:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176764-bdc8168e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176764-bdc8168e",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The density of Zerodur is 2.53 g/cm³.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Source: Multiple online technical data sheets from Schott AG and optics suppliers.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T17:32:52Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176807-6aed85d7.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176807-6aed85d7",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Clearceram-Z has a Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) of 0.02 μstrain/°C (in the range -60 to 160 °C) and a density (specific gravity) of 2.55.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "medium",
+  "notes": "The values are for the standard 'Clearceram-Z' grade, as the specific 'HS' grade datasheet was not found. The properties are expected to be very similar.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T17:34:25.000Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176838-52dc0c1b.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176838-52dc0c1b",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "blocked",
+  "result": "Could not retrieve CTE and density for Clearceram-Z HS.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "low",
+  "notes": "The primary data source appears to be a PDF file (https://oharacorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/clearerem.pdf). My current tools are unable to parse PDF files to extract the required data. I was also unable to find the data in a standard HTML or text format.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T12:35:45-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176887-7b1ef1b5.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176887-7b1ef1b5",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "partial",
+  "result": "No specific material was identified in the task. The question asks 'Is this material suitable?' but no material name, grade, or properties were provided. Without knowing the material in question, a proper suitability assessment cannot be made. For reference, common astronomical mirror substrate materials include: (1) Borosilicate glass (Pyrex/Schott Borofloat) — good for amateur mirrors up to ~400mm, low CTE (~3.3e-6/K), affordable; (2) Zerodur — near-zero CTE (~0.05e-6/K), excellent thermal stability, preferred for precision optics; (3) Fused silica/quartz — very low CTE (~0.55e-6/K), excellent but expensive; (4) Cervit — similar to Zerodur, discontinued but found in vintage blanks. Key criteria for a 250mm mirror substrate: CTE < 5e-6/K (lower is better), good polishability, adequate stiffness (E > 60 GPa typical), homogeneity, and thermal diffusivity sufficient to equilibrate within ~1 hour at operating temperature. Please resubmit with the specific material identified.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "low",
+  "notes": "Task did not specify which material to assess. 'This material' implies context from a prior step that was not passed through. Recommend re-running with explicit material identification.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T12:34:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176908-4e9ed358.json

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176908-4e9ed358",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The CTE of Clearceram-Z HS is 0.0 ± 0.2 x 10⁻⁷ /°C and the density is 2.55 g/cm³.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "medium",
+  "notes": "The density value was inferred from a table on the Raytek Optics website that appeared to have a copy/paste error, listing the density value in the specific heat row. The value is consistent with the standard grade of Clearceram-Z.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T12:36:00.000Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176934-8f12b912.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176934-8f12b912",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "partial",
+  "result": "CTE for Clearceram-Z HS is 0.0 ± 0.2 x 10⁻⁷ /°C. Density information was not found.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "medium",
+  "notes": "I was able to find the CTE for Clearceram-Z HS in a PDF document from the manufacturer, Ohara. However, I was unable to find the density. I encountered several technical difficulties, including the inability to extract text from PDF files due to tool limitations and being blocked by web application firewalls on several websites. The information I found is from a reliable source, but it is incomplete.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T17:39:00Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176953-bf2b4cf7.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176953-bf2b4cf7",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Clearceram-Z HS has a Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) of 0.0 ± 0.2 x 10⁻⁷ /°C and a density of 2.55 g/cm³.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Data retrieved from internal memory, which should be verified against a primary source if used for critical applications.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T12:35:00Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771176970-59fbf28b.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771176970-59fbf28b",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Clearceram-Z HS has a Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) of 0.0 ± 0.2 x 10⁻⁷ /°C and a density of 2.55 g/cm³.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Information retrieved from internal memory, which should be verified if high-stakes decision-making is involved.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T12:39:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771177871-d315d021.json

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771177871-d315d021",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The thermal conductivity of Zerodur is 1.46 W/(m·K) at 20°C.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Source: SCHOTT AG, via PGO-Online (https://www.pgo-online.com/intl/zerodur.html)",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T12:51:55-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771177893-2dbc4ec8.json

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771177893-2dbc4ec8",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The Poisson ratio of Zerodur is 0.243.\n\nSource: https://markoptics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Schott-Zerodur.pdf",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "The official Schott datasheet provides a value of 0.243. Other optical vendors round this to 0.24.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T12:51:55-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771178662-b5e7ac42.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771178662-b5e7ac42",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) for Corning ULE glass (Code 7972) is 0 ± 30 ppb/°C over the temperature range of 5°C to 35°C. This can also be expressed as 0 ± 0.03 x 10⁻⁶ /°C. Source: Corning ULE® 7972 Datasheet (https://www.spacematdb.com/spacemat/manudatasheets/ulebro91106.pdf)",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "The value is specified for a 5°C to 35°C range, which includes the requested 20-25°C range.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:04:51Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771178697-ea346f4d.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771178697-ea346f4d",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS. The stated CTE of 0 ± 30 ppb/°C (0 ± 0.03 × 10⁻⁶/°C) for Corning ULE 7972 over 5–35°C is accurate and consistent with Corning's published specifications. The source URL (spacematdb.com) hosts a legitimate copy of the Corning datasheet dated August 2006. Key concerns and missing context: (1) The ±30 ppb/°C is the SPECIFICATION LIMIT, not a measurement — actual blanks are graded and can be much tighter (e.g., Grade A: 0 ± 10 ppb/°C in the critical zone). For precision applications, specify the grade. (2) The 5–35°C range is the standard qualification range. Outside this range, CTE behavior is parabolic — ULE has a crossover temperature (typically ~20°C) where CTE = 0, and CTE grows quadratically away from it. For cryogenic or elevated-temperature use, this spec does NOT apply. (3) CTE homogeneity varies through the boule — radial and axial CTE gradients exist and matter for large optics. The datasheet addresses this via critical-zone vs. non-critical-zone specifications. (4) The 2006 datasheet is superseded by newer revisions — recommend confirming against current Corning literature, though the fundamental CTE spec has remained stable. (5) For FEA modeling: use the actual measured CTE of your specific blank if available, not just the spec range. The ±30 ppb/°C envelope is too wide for high-fidelity thermal distortion analysis.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "CTE value verified from domain knowledge and source document. Primary caveat: the ±30 ppb/°C is a spec envelope, not a point value — engineering use requires knowing whether you need the spec limit or a measured value for a specific blank/grade.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:05:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771178974-532dd46f.json

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771178974-532dd46f",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The key difference between Ohara Clearceram-Z HS and Schott Zerodur for astronomical mirrors is a trade-off between thermal stability and mechanical strength. Clearceram-Z HS offers superior thermal stability, with a lower coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and better dimensional stability during temperature changes, making it ideal for ground-based telescopes where maintaining a precise figure is critical. Schott Zerodur has higher flexural strength and a long, proven history in space applications (e.g., Hubble), making it the preferred choice for mirrors subjected to high mechanical stress like launch vibrations. Additionally, Clearceram-Z is optically clear, while Zerodur has a yellowish tint. Zerodur is generally more expensive due to its manufacturing complexity and extensive space-flight heritage.",
+  "artifacts": [
+    "https://jundro.io/clearceram-vs-zerodur/",
+    "https://escooptics.com/blogs/news/what-is-low-expansion-glass-zerodur-clearceram-z-and-ule"
+  ],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "The comparison is based on Clearceram-Z; the 'HS' (High Stability) variant is an improved version with even better thermal performance, reinforcing the conclusion. Direct datasheets were difficult to access, but reliable comparison articles were found.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:10:35.000Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771179040-71ffb808.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771179040-71ffb808",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The primary difference between Schott Zerodur and Ohara Clearceram-Z HS for large astronomical mirrors lies in their documented performance history and specific thermal stability characteristics.\n\n*   **Thermal Properties:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a well-documented mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) of 0 ± 0.007 x 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹ (0 to 50 °C). Its CTE homogeneity is also excellent, with documented peak-to-valley variation as low as ±0.0064 x 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** While specific CTE data from primary datasheets was not found in text format, a comparative study on thermal cycling (-40°C to +90°C) indicated it exhibited higher dimensional stability, with deformation of ±0.1 x 10⁻⁶ /°C compared to Zerodur's ±0.2 x 10⁻⁶ /°C under the same test. Ohara claims \"High Homogeneity\" for the material.\n\n*   **Mechanical Properties & Heritage:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a long and proven history in major, large-aperture astronomical projects (e.g., VLT, Keck telescopes). Some sources indicate it has a higher flexural strength, which is advantageous for large structures subject to mechanical stress.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** Is a newer material but was selected for the primary mirror segments of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), indicating it meets the stringent requirements for next-generation extremely large telescopes.\n\n**Conclusion for >200mm Mirrors:**\nFor mirrors over 200mm, both are top-tier materials. Zerodur offers a more extensive operational heritage with a deeply characterized CTE profile. Clearceram-Z HS, based on available data, may offer superior dimensional stability under thermal cycling, making it a strong contender, as evidenced by its selection for the TMT. The choice may depend on the specific operational thermal environment and the value placed on heritage versus potentially higher cycling stability.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "medium",
+  "notes": "Confidence is 'medium' because primary datasheets for both materials could not be parsed from their PDF formats, requiring reliance on reliable secondary sources (university documents, Wikipedia) for Zerodur and a single secondary source for the key Clearceram-Z HS thermal cycling performance data.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:11:58Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771179044-e24fe46e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771179044-e24fe46e",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Technical review found several accuracy issues:\n\n1. FACTUAL ERROR: Hubble's primary mirror uses Corning ULE, NOT Zerodur. This must be corrected. Zerodur space heritage includes Herschel and other missions, but citing Hubble is wrong.\n\n2. MISLEADING — CTE superiority claim: Both Clearceram-Z HS and Zerodur achieve near-zero CTE (±0.02 × 10⁻⁶/K). Neither has clear blanket superiority. The real differentiator is CTE homogeneity across large blanks, which varies by specific procurement spec and blank size.\n\n3. MISLEADING — Flexural strength: Both materials have comparable flexural strength (~90 MPa range). This is not a meaningful discriminator between the two. Neither is chosen for mechanical strength — they're chosen for thermal dimensional stability.\n\n4. MISLEADING — Optical clarity comparison: While factually true (Clearceram-Z is transparent, Zerodur is amber-tinted), this is irrelevant for mirror substrates since mirrors use reflective coatings. Including this for astronomical mirror selection is misleading.\n\n5. QUESTIONABLE — Zerodur preferred for launch vibrations due to strength: Space mirror substrate selection is driven by thermal stability, mass, and manufacturability — not primarily flexural strength. SiC and beryllium are chosen when stiffness-to-weight matters for launch loads.\n\n6. UNVERIFIED — Cost comparison: Pricing is highly context-dependent (blank size, grade, volume). Cannot confirm Zerodur is categorically more expensive.\n\nOVERALL ASSESSMENT: The research contains one clear factual error (Hubble) and several misleading simplifications. Not suitable for engineering use without significant corrections. The framing as a clean trade-off (thermal vs. mechanical) oversimplifies the selection criteria for precision mirror substrates.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Review based on domain expertise. Web search was unavailable for real-time verification of latest datasheets. Core facts (Hubble=ULE, material properties ranges) are well-established. Recommend verifying current Ohara and Schott datasheets for exact CTE class specifications if this feeds into a material selection study.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:10:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771179131-99058b09.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771179131-99058b09",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Technical review of Zerodur vs Clearceram-Z HS research findings:\n\n**VERIFIED ACCURATE:**\n1. Zerodur CTE of 0 ± 0.007 × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹ (0-50°C) — confirmed via Schott product page and Wikipedia. Schott states '0 ± 7 ppb/K'.\n2. Zerodur heritage on VLT and Keck — confirmed. Also used on ELT, GTC, Hobby-Eberly, SOFIA, and others.\n3. Clearceram-Z HS selected for TMT primary mirror segments — well-established fact.\n4. Zerodur CTE homogeneity being excellent — confirmed by Schott ('homogeneous throughout the entire volume').\n\n**CONCERNS / FLAGS:**\n1. **Thermal cycling comparison is suspect.** The claim that Clearceram showed ±0.1 × 10⁻⁶/°C vs Zerodur's ±0.2 × 10⁻⁶/°C 'deformation' under -40 to +90°C cycling is problematic: (a) the units mix 'deformation' with CTE-like notation — dimensionally unclear; (b) the -40 to +90°C range far exceeds typical astronomical operating conditions; (c) no source is cited for this specific comparison study; (d) these numbers would imply both materials have CTEs 1-2 orders of magnitude worse than their rated specs, suggesting they may refer to instantaneous CTE at extreme temperatures rather than mean CTE. This claim should NOT be used for engineering decisions without tracing the original source and understanding what was actually measured.\n2. **Missing: Zerodur is also the ELT mirror material.** The 39m European Extremely Large Telescope uses Zerodur — this is a significant omission that strengthens the Zerodur heritage argument even further.\n3. **Clearceram CTE spec gap.** The findings admit no primary datasheet CTE data was found for Clearceram-Z HS. For engineering use, Ohara's published spec (typically 0 ± 0.02 × 10⁻⁶/°C over 0-50°C for standard grade, tighter for HS) must be obtained directly. You cannot make a material selection without comparable spec-sheet data.\n4. **Flexural strength claim is vague.** 'Some sources indicate higher flexural strength' for Zerodur — this needs quantification. Zerodur typical bending strength is ~76 MPa; Clearceram-Z is comparable. Without numbers, this is not useful for engineering.\n5. **Missing: internal quality / striae / inclusions.** For >200mm mirrors, bulk homogeneity (striae, bubbles, inclusions) matters significantly. Both manufacturers offer grades — this wasn't addressed.\n\n**VERDICT:** The findings are directionally correct but not rigorous enough for engineering material selection. The thermal cycling comparison is the biggest red flag — it appears to conflate different measurement conditions or quantities. The Zerodur specs and heritage claims are solid. The Clearceram claims need primary source verification before use.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Could not verify the specific thermal cycling comparison study (±0.1 vs ±0.2 claim) — web search API was unavailable. Zerodur specs confirmed via Schott website and Wikipedia. TMT/Clearceram selection is well-established. Recommend obtaining Ohara datasheet directly for any engineering use.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:12:55-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771180163-569e1d0d.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771180163-569e1d0d",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The Young's modulus for Invar 36 is typically around 141 GPa (20.5 x 10^6 psi) for annealed material. For cold-rolled strip, it can be slightly higher, around 148 GPa (21.5 x 10^6 psi).",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "The value can vary slightly depending on the material's condition (e.g., annealed vs. cold-rolled). Source: High Temp Metals technical data sheet.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:29:46Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771180191-fd915fe0.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771180191-fd915fe0",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "VERIFICATION OF INVAR 36 YOUNG'S MODULUS VALUES:\n\n1. ANNEALED CONDITION — 141 GPa (20.5 Msi): ACCURATE. This is consistent with established literature. Most reputable sources (Special Metals Corp datasheet, ASM Handbook) report E = 141–144 GPa for annealed Invar 36 at room temperature. The 141 GPa figure is within the accepted range.\n\n2. COLD-ROLLED CONDITION — 148 GPa (21.5 Msi): PLAUSIBLE BUT NEEDS CAUTION. Cold working can slightly increase apparent stiffness due to texture (preferred crystallographic orientation). However, the effect on Young's modulus for Fe-Ni alloys is typically modest (a few percent). 148 GPa is a reasonable upper bound but should be treated as condition-specific, not a general design value.\n\nCONCERNS AND FLAGS:\n- TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE: Invar 36 has an anomalous elastic modulus behavior — E increases with temperature up to ~200°C before decreasing (the Elinvar effect region). For precision applications, the operating temperature range must be specified.\n- MAGNETIC STATE: The elastic properties of Invar are coupled to its magnetic state (magnetostriction/magnetoelastic coupling). In strong magnetic fields, E can shift.\n- ANISOTROPY: Cold-rolled material will have anisotropic properties. The 148 GPa value likely refers to the rolling direction. Transverse values may differ.\n- HEAT TREATMENT SENSITIVITY: The exact E depends on annealing temperature and cooling rate. A stabilization anneal (~315°C for 1hr per 25mm) is standard practice before precision use.\n- MISSING CONTEXT: No Poisson's ratio cited (typically 0.259 for Invar 36). For FEA, both E and nu are needed. Shear modulus G ≈ 56 GPa.\n- SOURCE QUALITY: Values should be traceable to a specific datasheet or standard (ASTM F1684 for Invar 36). Generic handbook values are adequate for preliminary analysis but not for final design of precision instruments.\n\nVERDICT: The values are accurate for general engineering use. For precision optical or metrological applications (which is likely given Atomizer's domain), temperature-dependent properties and material certification data should be used instead of single-point values.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Unable to fetch primary datasheets (MatWeb/Special Metals blocked). Verification based on extensive domain knowledge of Fe-Ni alloys and FEA material property requirements. Values are consistent with ASM and Special Metals published data from my training knowledge. For final design use, recommend obtaining certified mill test report values.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:30:30-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771183865-89c249e8.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+  "runId": "orch-1771183865-89c249e8",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Webster agent is NOT crashed. Investigation found: (1) systemd service openclaw-atomizer@webster.service is active and running, (2) health endpoint at http://127.0.0.1:18828/health returns HTTP 200, (3) UI confirms identity as 'Atomizer Webster'. No restart was needed. The premise of the task appears to be incorrect — webster is fully operational.",
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "No action taken since webster was already running and healthy. If there was a transient crash, it has already self-recovered before this investigation.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T14:31:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771210952-29c3e57d.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.1",
+  "runId": "orch-1771210952-29c3e57d",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "### Material Properties for 500mm Space Telescope Mirror Substrate\n\nThis table compares key physical properties of Silicon Carbide (SiC), Corning ULE® 7972, and SCHOTT ZERODUR® for a space telescope mirror operating at 20°C ± 5°C.\n\n| Property                               | SiC (Silicon Carbide) | ULE® (Corning 7972) | ZERODUR® (SCHOTT) | Units                      |\n| :------------------------------------- | :-------------------- | :------------------ | :---------------- | :------------------------- |\n| Thermal Conductivity                   | 120                   | 1.31                | 1.46              | W/(m·K)                    |\n| CTE (Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) | 4.0                   | 0 ± 0.03            | 0 ± 0.02          | x 10⁻⁶ /K at 20°C          |\n| Density                                | 3.1                   | 2.21                | 2.53              | g/cm³                      |\n| Young's Modulus                        | 410                   | 67.6                | 90.3              | GPa                        |\n| Specific Stiffness (E/ρ)               | 132.3                 | 30.6                | 35.7              | GPa/(g/cm³)                |\n\n### Summary of Findings:\n\n*   **Silicon Carbide (SiC):** Exhibits exceptionally high thermal conductivity and specific stiffness, making it ideal for applications where rapid thermal stabilization and high structural rigidity at low weight are critical. However, its CTE is significantly higher than the other two materials, which could be a disadvantage if the thermal control system is not precise.\n*   **ULE® and ZERODUR®:** Both are ultra-low expansion materials, making them the standard for high-stability optical systems. Their CTEs are near zero in the operating temperature range, minimizing thermal deformation. Zerodur has a slight edge in CTE control and a higher specific stiffness compared to ULE. ULE has a slightly lower density.\n*   **Conclusion:** For a space telescope where thermal stability is paramount, ULE® and ZERODUR® are superior choices due to their near-zero CTE. Between the two, ZERODUR® offers slightly better stiffness. SiC would be chosen if thermal conductivity and overall stiffness-to-weight were the primary drivers over absolute thermal stability.",
+  "deliverable": {
+    "type": "analysis",
+    "title": "Comparison of Mirror Substrate Materials (SiC, ULE, Zerodur)",
+    "path": null,
+    "summary": "A comparison table and analysis of thermal conductivity, CTE, density, and specific stiffness for SiC, ULE, and Zerodur."
+  },
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "Data for SiC and ZERODUR® was sourced from manufacturer datasheets. Data for ULE® was compiled from reliable web search snippets as direct datasheet access was restricted.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T22:03:25.000Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771211034-1f21416d.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.1",
+  "runId": "orch-1771211034-1f21416d",
+  "agent": "auditor",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "🥊 **CHALLENGE REPORT — Webster's Material Comparison (orch-1771211034-1f21416d)**\n\n**Work Reviewed:** `orch-1771210952-29c3e57d` — A comparison table and analysis of thermal conductivity, CTE, density, and specific stiffness for SiC, ULE, and Zerodur for a 500mm space telescope mirror.\n\n## Challenges\n\n### 🔴 Critical Finding: Flawed Operating Temperature Assumption\n*   **What they said:** The analysis was performed for an operating temperature of 20°C ± 5°C.\n*   **My challenge:** This is a standard terrestrial, laboratory environment temperature, not a realistic operating temperature for a high-precision space telescope. Space-based optical systems typically operate at cryogenic temperatures (e.g., < 100K) to minimize thermal noise and ensure dimensional stability. Material properties, especially the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE), change dramatically between room temperature and cryogenic temperatures. An analysis at 20°C is irrelevant and misleading for this application.\n*   **What they should consider:** The first step must be to define the actual mission operating temperature range. The entire analysis is invalid if the temperature premise is wrong. All material properties must be re-fetched for the correct cryogenic temperature range.\n*   **Severity:** 🔴 **Critical**\n\n### 🟡 Major Finding: Incomplete Material Trade Space\n*   **What they said:** The comparison included Silicon Carbide (SiC), ULE®, and ZERODUR®.\n*   **My challenge:** The analysis is missing a key, flight-proven material for space mirrors: **Beryllium (Be)**. Beryllium has an exceptionally high specific stiffness (E/ρ) that often makes it the material of choice for weight-critical applications, such as the primary mirrors of the James Webb Space Telescope. A comprehensive trade study must include it.\n*   **What they should consider:** Add Beryllium (e.g., grades I-70H or O-30) to the comparison. If it is excluded for a specific reason (e.g., cost, toxicity, manufacturing constraints), that rationale must be documented.\n*   **Severity:** 🟡 **Major**\n\n### 🟢 Minor Finding: Narrow Scope of Comparison\n*   **What they said:** The comparison focused on four key physical properties.\n*   **My challenge:** While these properties are crucial, they do not provide a complete picture for a manufacturing program. Factors such as manufacturability (polishing time, achievable surface figure), coating compatibility, procurement lead time, and cost are significant drivers in the final material selection.\n*   **What they should consider:** Add a qualitative section discussing these other discriminating factors to provide a more balanced recommendation.\n*   **Severity:** 🟢 **Minor**\n\n## Overall Assessment\n\nWebster's analysis is well-structured for the question that was implicitly asked, but it fails to challenge the premise. The underlying assumption of a 20°C operating temperature is critically flawed for a space telescope application, rendering the current conclusion and the 'high' confidence rating unjustified. The work must be redone based on correct mission parameters.\n\n## Recommendations\n\n1.  **HALT:** Do not proceed with the current results. They are misleading.\n2.  **VALIDATE:** Determine the correct mission operating temperature range from the project's system requirements.\n3.  **RE-RUN:** Perform the entire material property data collection and analysis using the correct (likely cryogenic) temperature range.\n4.  **EXPAND:** Include Beryllium in the trade study to ensure all viable options are considered.\n5.  **ENRICH:** Supplement the quantitative analysis with a qualitative discussion of manufacturability, cost, and schedule risks.",
+  "deliverable": {
+    "type": "review",
+    "title": "Challenge Report: Webster's Space Mirror Material Analysis",
+    "path": null,
+    "summary": "A critical review of webster's material comparison, flagging a flawed temperature assumption and incomplete material set."
+  },
+  "artifacts": [],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "The primary finding is that the analysis was conducted at room temperature (20°C), which is not a valid assumption for a space telescope. This invalidates the current conclusions.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-15T22:04:00-05:00"
+}

hq/handoffs/orch-1771211090-bef4bc63.json

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": "1.1",
+  "runId": "orch-1771211090-bef4bc63",
+  "agent": "secretary",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Successfully condensed the mirror material trade study and the subsequent audit. The initial study was found to be invalid due to incorrect temperature parameters. A new study has been tasked. Created condensation document and project CONTEXT.md.",
+  "deliverable": {
+    "type": "document",
+    "title": "Condensation of Mirror Substrate Material Trade Study",
+    "path": "/home/papa/atomizer/hq/condensations/2026-02-16-mirror-substrate-material-trade.md",
+    "summary": "Formal record of the decision to invalidate the initial mirror material study and require a new one under cryogenic conditions."
+  },
+  "artifacts": [
+    "/home/papa/atomizer/hq/projects/sim-test/CONTEXT.md"
+  ],
+  "confidence": "high",
+  "notes": "The original research from Webster should not be used for any further decisions.",
+  "timestamp": "2026-02-16T03:05:14Z"
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771178662-8433f771/research.json

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "step_id": "research",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) for Corning ULE glass (Code 7972) is 0 \u00b1 30 ppb/\u00b0C over the temperature range of 5\u00b0C to 35\u00b0C. This can also be expressed as 0 \u00b1 0.03 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C. Source: Corning ULE\u00ae 7972 Datasheet (https://www.spacematdb.com/spacemat/manudatasheets/ulebro91106.pdf)",
+  "notes": "The value is specified for a 5\u00b0C to 35\u00b0C range, which includes the requested 20-25\u00b0C range.",
+  "run": {
+    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+    "runId": "orch-1771178662-b5e7ac42",
+    "agent": "webster",
+    "status": "complete",
+    "result": "The Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) for Corning ULE glass (Code 7972) is 0 \u00b1 30 ppb/\u00b0C over the temperature range of 5\u00b0C to 35\u00b0C. This can also be expressed as 0 \u00b1 0.03 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C. Source: Corning ULE\u00ae 7972 Datasheet (https://www.spacematdb.com/spacemat/manudatasheets/ulebro91106.pdf)",
+    "artifacts": [],
+    "confidence": "high",
+    "notes": "The value is specified for a 5\u00b0C to 35\u00b0C range, which includes the requested 20-25\u00b0C range.",
+    "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:04:51Z",
+    "latencyMs": 35497,
+    "workflowRunId": "wf-1771178662-8433f771",
+    "stepId": "research",
+    "exitCode": 0
+  },
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:04:22.139644+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:04:57.732486+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 35.593
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771178662-8433f771/summary.json

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+{
+  "status": "complete",
+  "workflow": "Quick Research",
+  "workflow_file": "/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/workflows/quick-research.yaml",
+  "workflow_run_id": "wf-1771178662-8433f771",
+  "caller": "manager",
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:04:22.139023+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:05:31.641365+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 69.502,
+  "timeout_s": 1800,
+  "inputs": {
+    "query": "What is the CTE of Corning ULE glass at 20-25\u00b0C? Provide the value with units and source."
+  },
+  "state": {
+    "research": "complete",
+    "validate": "complete"
+  },
+  "results": {
+    "research": {
+      "step_id": "research",
+      "agent": "webster",
+      "status": "complete",
+      "result": "The Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) for Corning ULE glass (Code 7972) is 0 \u00b1 30 ppb/\u00b0C over the temperature range of 5\u00b0C to 35\u00b0C. This can also be expressed as 0 \u00b1 0.03 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C. Source: Corning ULE\u00ae 7972 Datasheet (https://www.spacematdb.com/spacemat/manudatasheets/ulebro91106.pdf)",
+      "notes": "The value is specified for a 5\u00b0C to 35\u00b0C range, which includes the requested 20-25\u00b0C range.",
+      "run": {
+        "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+        "runId": "orch-1771178662-b5e7ac42",
+        "agent": "webster",
+        "status": "complete",
+        "result": "The Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) for Corning ULE glass (Code 7972) is 0 \u00b1 30 ppb/\u00b0C over the temperature range of 5\u00b0C to 35\u00b0C. This can also be expressed as 0 \u00b1 0.03 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C. Source: Corning ULE\u00ae 7972 Datasheet (https://www.spacematdb.com/spacemat/manudatasheets/ulebro91106.pdf)",
+        "artifacts": [],
+        "confidence": "high",
+        "notes": "The value is specified for a 5\u00b0C to 35\u00b0C range, which includes the requested 20-25\u00b0C range.",
+        "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:04:51Z",
+        "latencyMs": 35497,
+        "workflowRunId": "wf-1771178662-8433f771",
+        "stepId": "research",
+        "exitCode": 0
+      },
+      "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:04:22.139644+00:00",
+      "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:04:57.732486+00:00",
+      "duration_s": 35.593
+    },
+    "validate": {
+      "step_id": "validate",
+      "agent": "tech-lead",
+      "status": "complete",
+      "result": "VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS. The stated CTE of 0 \u00b1 30 ppb/\u00b0C (0 \u00b1 0.03 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C) for Corning ULE 7972 over 5\u201335\u00b0C is accurate and consistent with Corning's published specifications. The source URL (spacematdb.com) hosts a legitimate copy of the Corning datasheet dated August 2006. Key concerns and missing context: (1) The \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C is the SPECIFICATION LIMIT, not a measurement \u2014 actual blanks are graded and can be much tighter (e.g., Grade A: 0 \u00b1 10 ppb/\u00b0C in the critical zone). For precision applications, specify the grade. (2) The 5\u201335\u00b0C range is the standard qualification range. Outside this range, CTE behavior is parabolic \u2014 ULE has a crossover temperature (typically ~20\u00b0C) where CTE = 0, and CTE grows quadratically away from it. For cryogenic or elevated-temperature use, this spec does NOT apply. (3) CTE homogeneity varies through the boule \u2014 radial and axial CTE gradients exist and matter for large optics. The datasheet addresses this via critical-zone vs. non-critical-zone specifications. (4) The 2006 datasheet is superseded by newer revisions \u2014 recommend confirming against current Corning literature, though the fundamental CTE spec has remained stable. (5) For FEA modeling: use the actual measured CTE of your specific blank if available, not just the spec range. The \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C envelope is too wide for high-fidelity thermal distortion analysis.",
+      "notes": "CTE value verified from domain knowledge and source document. Primary caveat: the \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C is a spec envelope, not a point value \u2014 engineering use requires knowing whether you need the spec limit or a measured value for a specific blank/grade.",
+      "run": {
+        "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+        "runId": "orch-1771178697-ea346f4d",
+        "agent": "tech-lead",
+        "status": "complete",
+        "result": "VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS. The stated CTE of 0 \u00b1 30 ppb/\u00b0C (0 \u00b1 0.03 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C) for Corning ULE 7972 over 5\u201335\u00b0C is accurate and consistent with Corning's published specifications. The source URL (spacematdb.com) hosts a legitimate copy of the Corning datasheet dated August 2006. Key concerns and missing context: (1) The \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C is the SPECIFICATION LIMIT, not a measurement \u2014 actual blanks are graded and can be much tighter (e.g., Grade A: 0 \u00b1 10 ppb/\u00b0C in the critical zone). For precision applications, specify the grade. (2) The 5\u201335\u00b0C range is the standard qualification range. Outside this range, CTE behavior is parabolic \u2014 ULE has a crossover temperature (typically ~20\u00b0C) where CTE = 0, and CTE grows quadratically away from it. For cryogenic or elevated-temperature use, this spec does NOT apply. (3) CTE homogeneity varies through the boule \u2014 radial and axial CTE gradients exist and matter for large optics. The datasheet addresses this via critical-zone vs. non-critical-zone specifications. (4) The 2006 datasheet is superseded by newer revisions \u2014 recommend confirming against current Corning literature, though the fundamental CTE spec has remained stable. (5) For FEA modeling: use the actual measured CTE of your specific blank if available, not just the spec range. The \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C envelope is too wide for high-fidelity thermal distortion analysis.",
+        "artifacts": [],
+        "confidence": "high",
+        "notes": "CTE value verified from domain knowledge and source document. Primary caveat: the \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C is a spec envelope, not a point value \u2014 engineering use requires knowing whether you need the spec limit or a measured value for a specific blank/grade.",
+        "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:05:00-05:00",
+        "latencyMs": 33777,
+        "workflowRunId": "wf-1771178662-8433f771",
+        "stepId": "validate",
+        "exitCode": 0
+      },
+      "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:04:57.733555+00:00",
+      "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:05:31.640599+00:00",
+      "duration_s": 33.907
+    }
+  },
+  "result_dir": "/home/papa/atomizer/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771178662-8433f771",
+  "notifications": {
+    "on_complete": "Research complete"
+  }
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771178662-8433f771/validate.json

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "step_id": "validate",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS. The stated CTE of 0 \u00b1 30 ppb/\u00b0C (0 \u00b1 0.03 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C) for Corning ULE 7972 over 5\u201335\u00b0C is accurate and consistent with Corning's published specifications. The source URL (spacematdb.com) hosts a legitimate copy of the Corning datasheet dated August 2006. Key concerns and missing context: (1) The \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C is the SPECIFICATION LIMIT, not a measurement \u2014 actual blanks are graded and can be much tighter (e.g., Grade A: 0 \u00b1 10 ppb/\u00b0C in the critical zone). For precision applications, specify the grade. (2) The 5\u201335\u00b0C range is the standard qualification range. Outside this range, CTE behavior is parabolic \u2014 ULE has a crossover temperature (typically ~20\u00b0C) where CTE = 0, and CTE grows quadratically away from it. For cryogenic or elevated-temperature use, this spec does NOT apply. (3) CTE homogeneity varies through the boule \u2014 radial and axial CTE gradients exist and matter for large optics. The datasheet addresses this via critical-zone vs. non-critical-zone specifications. (4) The 2006 datasheet is superseded by newer revisions \u2014 recommend confirming against current Corning literature, though the fundamental CTE spec has remained stable. (5) For FEA modeling: use the actual measured CTE of your specific blank if available, not just the spec range. The \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C envelope is too wide for high-fidelity thermal distortion analysis.",
+  "notes": "CTE value verified from domain knowledge and source document. Primary caveat: the \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C is a spec envelope, not a point value \u2014 engineering use requires knowing whether you need the spec limit or a measured value for a specific blank/grade.",
+  "run": {
+    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+    "runId": "orch-1771178697-ea346f4d",
+    "agent": "tech-lead",
+    "status": "complete",
+    "result": "VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS. The stated CTE of 0 \u00b1 30 ppb/\u00b0C (0 \u00b1 0.03 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C) for Corning ULE 7972 over 5\u201335\u00b0C is accurate and consistent with Corning's published specifications. The source URL (spacematdb.com) hosts a legitimate copy of the Corning datasheet dated August 2006. Key concerns and missing context: (1) The \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C is the SPECIFICATION LIMIT, not a measurement \u2014 actual blanks are graded and can be much tighter (e.g., Grade A: 0 \u00b1 10 ppb/\u00b0C in the critical zone). For precision applications, specify the grade. (2) The 5\u201335\u00b0C range is the standard qualification range. Outside this range, CTE behavior is parabolic \u2014 ULE has a crossover temperature (typically ~20\u00b0C) where CTE = 0, and CTE grows quadratically away from it. For cryogenic or elevated-temperature use, this spec does NOT apply. (3) CTE homogeneity varies through the boule \u2014 radial and axial CTE gradients exist and matter for large optics. The datasheet addresses this via critical-zone vs. non-critical-zone specifications. (4) The 2006 datasheet is superseded by newer revisions \u2014 recommend confirming against current Corning literature, though the fundamental CTE spec has remained stable. (5) For FEA modeling: use the actual measured CTE of your specific blank if available, not just the spec range. The \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C envelope is too wide for high-fidelity thermal distortion analysis.",
+    "artifacts": [],
+    "confidence": "high",
+    "notes": "CTE value verified from domain knowledge and source document. Primary caveat: the \u00b130 ppb/\u00b0C is a spec envelope, not a point value \u2014 engineering use requires knowing whether you need the spec limit or a measured value for a specific blank/grade.",
+    "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:05:00-05:00",
+    "latencyMs": 33777,
+    "workflowRunId": "wf-1771178662-8433f771",
+    "stepId": "validate",
+    "exitCode": 0
+  },
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:04:57.733555+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:05:31.640599+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 33.907
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771178974-24ce4440/research.json

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+{
+  "step_id": "research",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The key difference between Ohara Clearceram-Z HS and Schott Zerodur for astronomical mirrors is a trade-off between thermal stability and mechanical strength. Clearceram-Z HS offers superior thermal stability, with a lower coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and better dimensional stability during temperature changes, making it ideal for ground-based telescopes where maintaining a precise figure is critical. Schott Zerodur has higher flexural strength and a long, proven history in space applications (e.g., Hubble), making it the preferred choice for mirrors subjected to high mechanical stress like launch vibrations. Additionally, Clearceram-Z is optically clear, while Zerodur has a yellowish tint. Zerodur is generally more expensive due to its manufacturing complexity and extensive space-flight heritage.",
+  "notes": "The comparison is based on Clearceram-Z; the 'HS' (High Stability) variant is an improved version with even better thermal performance, reinforcing the conclusion. Direct datasheets were difficult to access, but reliable comparison articles were found.",
+  "run": {
+    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+    "runId": "orch-1771178974-532dd46f",
+    "agent": "webster",
+    "status": "complete",
+    "result": "The key difference between Ohara Clearceram-Z HS and Schott Zerodur for astronomical mirrors is a trade-off between thermal stability and mechanical strength. Clearceram-Z HS offers superior thermal stability, with a lower coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and better dimensional stability during temperature changes, making it ideal for ground-based telescopes where maintaining a precise figure is critical. Schott Zerodur has higher flexural strength and a long, proven history in space applications (e.g., Hubble), making it the preferred choice for mirrors subjected to high mechanical stress like launch vibrations. Additionally, Clearceram-Z is optically clear, while Zerodur has a yellowish tint. Zerodur is generally more expensive due to its manufacturing complexity and extensive space-flight heritage.",
+    "artifacts": [
+      "https://jundro.io/clearceram-vs-zerodur/",
+      "https://escooptics.com/blogs/news/what-is-low-expansion-glass-zerodur-clearceram-z-and-ule"
+    ],
+    "confidence": "high",
+    "notes": "The comparison is based on Clearceram-Z; the 'HS' (High Stability) variant is an improved version with even better thermal performance, reinforcing the conclusion. Direct datasheets were difficult to access, but reliable comparison articles were found.",
+    "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:10:35.000Z",
+    "latencyMs": 69684,
+    "workflowRunId": "wf-1771178974-24ce4440",
+    "stepId": "research",
+    "exitCode": 0
+  },
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:09:34.820984+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:10:44.604172+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 69.783
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771178974-24ce4440/summary.json

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+{
+  "status": "complete",
+  "workflow": "Quick Research",
+  "workflow_file": "/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/workflows/quick-research.yaml",
+  "workflow_run_id": "wf-1771178974-24ce4440",
+  "caller": "manager",
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:09:34.820376+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:11:18.144792+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 103.324,
+  "timeout_s": 1800,
+  "inputs": {
+    "query": "What are the key differences between Ohara Clearceram-Z HS and Schott Zerodur for astronomical mirror substrates over 200mm aperture?"
+  },
+  "state": {
+    "research": "complete",
+    "validate": "complete"
+  },
+  "results": {
+    "research": {
+      "step_id": "research",
+      "agent": "webster",
+      "status": "complete",
+      "result": "The key difference between Ohara Clearceram-Z HS and Schott Zerodur for astronomical mirrors is a trade-off between thermal stability and mechanical strength. Clearceram-Z HS offers superior thermal stability, with a lower coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and better dimensional stability during temperature changes, making it ideal for ground-based telescopes where maintaining a precise figure is critical. Schott Zerodur has higher flexural strength and a long, proven history in space applications (e.g., Hubble), making it the preferred choice for mirrors subjected to high mechanical stress like launch vibrations. Additionally, Clearceram-Z is optically clear, while Zerodur has a yellowish tint. Zerodur is generally more expensive due to its manufacturing complexity and extensive space-flight heritage.",
+      "notes": "The comparison is based on Clearceram-Z; the 'HS' (High Stability) variant is an improved version with even better thermal performance, reinforcing the conclusion. Direct datasheets were difficult to access, but reliable comparison articles were found.",
+      "run": {
+        "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+        "runId": "orch-1771178974-532dd46f",
+        "agent": "webster",
+        "status": "complete",
+        "result": "The key difference between Ohara Clearceram-Z HS and Schott Zerodur for astronomical mirrors is a trade-off between thermal stability and mechanical strength. Clearceram-Z HS offers superior thermal stability, with a lower coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and better dimensional stability during temperature changes, making it ideal for ground-based telescopes where maintaining a precise figure is critical. Schott Zerodur has higher flexural strength and a long, proven history in space applications (e.g., Hubble), making it the preferred choice for mirrors subjected to high mechanical stress like launch vibrations. Additionally, Clearceram-Z is optically clear, while Zerodur has a yellowish tint. Zerodur is generally more expensive due to its manufacturing complexity and extensive space-flight heritage.",
+        "artifacts": [
+          "https://jundro.io/clearceram-vs-zerodur/",
+          "https://escooptics.com/blogs/news/what-is-low-expansion-glass-zerodur-clearceram-z-and-ule"
+        ],
+        "confidence": "high",
+        "notes": "The comparison is based on Clearceram-Z; the 'HS' (High Stability) variant is an improved version with even better thermal performance, reinforcing the conclusion. Direct datasheets were difficult to access, but reliable comparison articles were found.",
+        "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:10:35.000Z",
+        "latencyMs": 69684,
+        "workflowRunId": "wf-1771178974-24ce4440",
+        "stepId": "research",
+        "exitCode": 0
+      },
+      "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:09:34.820984+00:00",
+      "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:10:44.604172+00:00",
+      "duration_s": 69.783
+    },
+    "validate": {
+      "step_id": "validate",
+      "agent": "tech-lead",
+      "status": "complete",
+      "result": "Technical review found several accuracy issues:\n\n1. FACTUAL ERROR: Hubble's primary mirror uses Corning ULE, NOT Zerodur. This must be corrected. Zerodur space heritage includes Herschel and other missions, but citing Hubble is wrong.\n\n2. MISLEADING \u2014 CTE superiority claim: Both Clearceram-Z HS and Zerodur achieve near-zero CTE (\u00b10.02 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/K). Neither has clear blanket superiority. The real differentiator is CTE homogeneity across large blanks, which varies by specific procurement spec and blank size.\n\n3. MISLEADING \u2014 Flexural strength: Both materials have comparable flexural strength (~90 MPa range). This is not a meaningful discriminator between the two. Neither is chosen for mechanical strength \u2014 they're chosen for thermal dimensional stability.\n\n4. MISLEADING \u2014 Optical clarity comparison: While factually true (Clearceram-Z is transparent, Zerodur is amber-tinted), this is irrelevant for mirror substrates since mirrors use reflective coatings. Including this for astronomical mirror selection is misleading.\n\n5. QUESTIONABLE \u2014 Zerodur preferred for launch vibrations due to strength: Space mirror substrate selection is driven by thermal stability, mass, and manufacturability \u2014 not primarily flexural strength. SiC and beryllium are chosen when stiffness-to-weight matters for launch loads.\n\n6. UNVERIFIED \u2014 Cost comparison: Pricing is highly context-dependent (blank size, grade, volume). Cannot confirm Zerodur is categorically more expensive.\n\nOVERALL ASSESSMENT: The research contains one clear factual error (Hubble) and several misleading simplifications. Not suitable for engineering use without significant corrections. The framing as a clean trade-off (thermal vs. mechanical) oversimplifies the selection criteria for precision mirror substrates.",
+      "notes": "Review based on domain expertise. Web search was unavailable for real-time verification of latest datasheets. Core facts (Hubble=ULE, material properties ranges) are well-established. Recommend verifying current Ohara and Schott datasheets for exact CTE class specifications if this feeds into a material selection study.",
+      "run": {
+        "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+        "runId": "orch-1771179044-e24fe46e",
+        "agent": "tech-lead",
+        "status": "complete",
+        "result": "Technical review found several accuracy issues:\n\n1. FACTUAL ERROR: Hubble's primary mirror uses Corning ULE, NOT Zerodur. This must be corrected. Zerodur space heritage includes Herschel and other missions, but citing Hubble is wrong.\n\n2. MISLEADING \u2014 CTE superiority claim: Both Clearceram-Z HS and Zerodur achieve near-zero CTE (\u00b10.02 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/K). Neither has clear blanket superiority. The real differentiator is CTE homogeneity across large blanks, which varies by specific procurement spec and blank size.\n\n3. MISLEADING \u2014 Flexural strength: Both materials have comparable flexural strength (~90 MPa range). This is not a meaningful discriminator between the two. Neither is chosen for mechanical strength \u2014 they're chosen for thermal dimensional stability.\n\n4. MISLEADING \u2014 Optical clarity comparison: While factually true (Clearceram-Z is transparent, Zerodur is amber-tinted), this is irrelevant for mirror substrates since mirrors use reflective coatings. Including this for astronomical mirror selection is misleading.\n\n5. QUESTIONABLE \u2014 Zerodur preferred for launch vibrations due to strength: Space mirror substrate selection is driven by thermal stability, mass, and manufacturability \u2014 not primarily flexural strength. SiC and beryllium are chosen when stiffness-to-weight matters for launch loads.\n\n6. UNVERIFIED \u2014 Cost comparison: Pricing is highly context-dependent (blank size, grade, volume). Cannot confirm Zerodur is categorically more expensive.\n\nOVERALL ASSESSMENT: The research contains one clear factual error (Hubble) and several misleading simplifications. Not suitable for engineering use without significant corrections. The framing as a clean trade-off (thermal vs. mechanical) oversimplifies the selection criteria for precision mirror substrates.",
+        "artifacts": [],
+        "confidence": "high",
+        "notes": "Review based on domain expertise. Web search was unavailable for real-time verification of latest datasheets. Core facts (Hubble=ULE, material properties ranges) are well-established. Recommend verifying current Ohara and Schott datasheets for exact CTE class specifications if this feeds into a material selection study.",
+        "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:10:00-05:00",
+        "latencyMs": 33437,
+        "workflowRunId": "wf-1771178974-24ce4440",
+        "stepId": "validate",
+        "exitCode": 0
+      },
+      "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:10:44.604850+00:00",
+      "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:11:18.144194+00:00",
+      "duration_s": 33.539
+    }
+  },
+  "result_dir": "/home/papa/atomizer/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771178974-24ce4440",
+  "notifications": {
+    "on_complete": "Research complete"
+  }
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771178974-24ce4440/validate.json

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "step_id": "validate",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Technical review found several accuracy issues:\n\n1. FACTUAL ERROR: Hubble's primary mirror uses Corning ULE, NOT Zerodur. This must be corrected. Zerodur space heritage includes Herschel and other missions, but citing Hubble is wrong.\n\n2. MISLEADING \u2014 CTE superiority claim: Both Clearceram-Z HS and Zerodur achieve near-zero CTE (\u00b10.02 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/K). Neither has clear blanket superiority. The real differentiator is CTE homogeneity across large blanks, which varies by specific procurement spec and blank size.\n\n3. MISLEADING \u2014 Flexural strength: Both materials have comparable flexural strength (~90 MPa range). This is not a meaningful discriminator between the two. Neither is chosen for mechanical strength \u2014 they're chosen for thermal dimensional stability.\n\n4. MISLEADING \u2014 Optical clarity comparison: While factually true (Clearceram-Z is transparent, Zerodur is amber-tinted), this is irrelevant for mirror substrates since mirrors use reflective coatings. Including this for astronomical mirror selection is misleading.\n\n5. QUESTIONABLE \u2014 Zerodur preferred for launch vibrations due to strength: Space mirror substrate selection is driven by thermal stability, mass, and manufacturability \u2014 not primarily flexural strength. SiC and beryllium are chosen when stiffness-to-weight matters for launch loads.\n\n6. UNVERIFIED \u2014 Cost comparison: Pricing is highly context-dependent (blank size, grade, volume). Cannot confirm Zerodur is categorically more expensive.\n\nOVERALL ASSESSMENT: The research contains one clear factual error (Hubble) and several misleading simplifications. Not suitable for engineering use without significant corrections. The framing as a clean trade-off (thermal vs. mechanical) oversimplifies the selection criteria for precision mirror substrates.",
+  "notes": "Review based on domain expertise. Web search was unavailable for real-time verification of latest datasheets. Core facts (Hubble=ULE, material properties ranges) are well-established. Recommend verifying current Ohara and Schott datasheets for exact CTE class specifications if this feeds into a material selection study.",
+  "run": {
+    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+    "runId": "orch-1771179044-e24fe46e",
+    "agent": "tech-lead",
+    "status": "complete",
+    "result": "Technical review found several accuracy issues:\n\n1. FACTUAL ERROR: Hubble's primary mirror uses Corning ULE, NOT Zerodur. This must be corrected. Zerodur space heritage includes Herschel and other missions, but citing Hubble is wrong.\n\n2. MISLEADING \u2014 CTE superiority claim: Both Clearceram-Z HS and Zerodur achieve near-zero CTE (\u00b10.02 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/K). Neither has clear blanket superiority. The real differentiator is CTE homogeneity across large blanks, which varies by specific procurement spec and blank size.\n\n3. MISLEADING \u2014 Flexural strength: Both materials have comparable flexural strength (~90 MPa range). This is not a meaningful discriminator between the two. Neither is chosen for mechanical strength \u2014 they're chosen for thermal dimensional stability.\n\n4. MISLEADING \u2014 Optical clarity comparison: While factually true (Clearceram-Z is transparent, Zerodur is amber-tinted), this is irrelevant for mirror substrates since mirrors use reflective coatings. Including this for astronomical mirror selection is misleading.\n\n5. QUESTIONABLE \u2014 Zerodur preferred for launch vibrations due to strength: Space mirror substrate selection is driven by thermal stability, mass, and manufacturability \u2014 not primarily flexural strength. SiC and beryllium are chosen when stiffness-to-weight matters for launch loads.\n\n6. UNVERIFIED \u2014 Cost comparison: Pricing is highly context-dependent (blank size, grade, volume). Cannot confirm Zerodur is categorically more expensive.\n\nOVERALL ASSESSMENT: The research contains one clear factual error (Hubble) and several misleading simplifications. Not suitable for engineering use without significant corrections. The framing as a clean trade-off (thermal vs. mechanical) oversimplifies the selection criteria for precision mirror substrates.",
+    "artifacts": [],
+    "confidence": "high",
+    "notes": "Review based on domain expertise. Web search was unavailable for real-time verification of latest datasheets. Core facts (Hubble=ULE, material properties ranges) are well-established. Recommend verifying current Ohara and Schott datasheets for exact CTE class specifications if this feeds into a material selection study.",
+    "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:10:00-05:00",
+    "latencyMs": 33437,
+    "workflowRunId": "wf-1771178974-24ce4440",
+    "stepId": "validate",
+    "exitCode": 0
+  },
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:10:44.604850+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:11:18.144194+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 33.539
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771179039-4342f14b/research.json

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "step_id": "research",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The primary difference between Schott Zerodur and Ohara Clearceram-Z HS for large astronomical mirrors lies in their documented performance history and specific thermal stability characteristics.\n\n*   **Thermal Properties:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a well-documented mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) of 0 \u00b1 0.007 x 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9 (0 to 50 \u00b0C). Its CTE homogeneity is also excellent, with documented peak-to-valley variation as low as \u00b10.0064 x 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** While specific CTE data from primary datasheets was not found in text format, a comparative study on thermal cycling (-40\u00b0C to +90\u00b0C) indicated it exhibited higher dimensional stability, with deformation of \u00b10.1 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C compared to Zerodur's \u00b10.2 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C under the same test. Ohara claims \"High Homogeneity\" for the material.\n\n*   **Mechanical Properties & Heritage:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a long and proven history in major, large-aperture astronomical projects (e.g., VLT, Keck telescopes). Some sources indicate it has a higher flexural strength, which is advantageous for large structures subject to mechanical stress.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** Is a newer material but was selected for the primary mirror segments of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), indicating it meets the stringent requirements for next-generation extremely large telescopes.\n\n**Conclusion for >200mm Mirrors:**\nFor mirrors over 200mm, both are top-tier materials. Zerodur offers a more extensive operational heritage with a deeply characterized CTE profile. Clearceram-Z HS, based on available data, may offer superior dimensional stability under thermal cycling, making it a strong contender, as evidenced by its selection for the TMT. The choice may depend on the specific operational thermal environment and the value placed on heritage versus potentially higher cycling stability.",
+  "notes": "Confidence is 'medium' because primary datasheets for both materials could not be parsed from their PDF formats, requiring reliance on reliable secondary sources (university documents, Wikipedia) for Zerodur and a single secondary source for the key Clearceram-Z HS thermal cycling performance data.",
+  "run": {
+    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+    "runId": "orch-1771179040-71ffb808",
+    "agent": "webster",
+    "status": "complete",
+    "result": "The primary difference between Schott Zerodur and Ohara Clearceram-Z HS for large astronomical mirrors lies in their documented performance history and specific thermal stability characteristics.\n\n*   **Thermal Properties:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a well-documented mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) of 0 \u00b1 0.007 x 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9 (0 to 50 \u00b0C). Its CTE homogeneity is also excellent, with documented peak-to-valley variation as low as \u00b10.0064 x 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** While specific CTE data from primary datasheets was not found in text format, a comparative study on thermal cycling (-40\u00b0C to +90\u00b0C) indicated it exhibited higher dimensional stability, with deformation of \u00b10.1 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C compared to Zerodur's \u00b10.2 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C under the same test. Ohara claims \"High Homogeneity\" for the material.\n\n*   **Mechanical Properties & Heritage:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a long and proven history in major, large-aperture astronomical projects (e.g., VLT, Keck telescopes). Some sources indicate it has a higher flexural strength, which is advantageous for large structures subject to mechanical stress.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** Is a newer material but was selected for the primary mirror segments of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), indicating it meets the stringent requirements for next-generation extremely large telescopes.\n\n**Conclusion for >200mm Mirrors:**\nFor mirrors over 200mm, both are top-tier materials. Zerodur offers a more extensive operational heritage with a deeply characterized CTE profile. Clearceram-Z HS, based on available data, may offer superior dimensional stability under thermal cycling, making it a strong contender, as evidenced by its selection for the TMT. The choice may depend on the specific operational thermal environment and the value placed on heritage versus potentially higher cycling stability.",
+    "artifacts": [],
+    "confidence": "medium",
+    "notes": "Confidence is 'medium' because primary datasheets for both materials could not be parsed from their PDF formats, requiring reliance on reliable secondary sources (university documents, Wikipedia) for Zerodur and a single secondary source for the key Clearceram-Z HS thermal cycling performance data.",
+    "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:11:58Z",
+    "latencyMs": 91219,
+    "workflowRunId": "wf-1771179039-4342f14b",
+    "stepId": "research",
+    "exitCode": 0
+  },
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:10:39.965205+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:12:11.311811+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 91.347
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771179039-4342f14b/summary.json

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+{
+  "status": "complete",
+  "workflow": "Quick Research",
+  "workflow_file": "/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/workflows/quick-research.yaml",
+  "workflow_run_id": "wf-1771179039-4342f14b",
+  "caller": "manager",
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:10:39.964627+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:13:08.997055+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 149.032,
+  "timeout_s": 1800,
+  "inputs": {
+    "query": "What are the key differences between Ohara Clearceram-Z HS and Schott Zerodur for astronomical mirror substrates over 200mm aperture?"
+  },
+  "state": {
+    "research": "complete",
+    "validate": "complete"
+  },
+  "results": {
+    "research": {
+      "step_id": "research",
+      "agent": "webster",
+      "status": "complete",
+      "result": "The primary difference between Schott Zerodur and Ohara Clearceram-Z HS for large astronomical mirrors lies in their documented performance history and specific thermal stability characteristics.\n\n*   **Thermal Properties:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a well-documented mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) of 0 \u00b1 0.007 x 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9 (0 to 50 \u00b0C). Its CTE homogeneity is also excellent, with documented peak-to-valley variation as low as \u00b10.0064 x 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** While specific CTE data from primary datasheets was not found in text format, a comparative study on thermal cycling (-40\u00b0C to +90\u00b0C) indicated it exhibited higher dimensional stability, with deformation of \u00b10.1 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C compared to Zerodur's \u00b10.2 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C under the same test. Ohara claims \"High Homogeneity\" for the material.\n\n*   **Mechanical Properties & Heritage:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a long and proven history in major, large-aperture astronomical projects (e.g., VLT, Keck telescopes). Some sources indicate it has a higher flexural strength, which is advantageous for large structures subject to mechanical stress.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** Is a newer material but was selected for the primary mirror segments of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), indicating it meets the stringent requirements for next-generation extremely large telescopes.\n\n**Conclusion for >200mm Mirrors:**\nFor mirrors over 200mm, both are top-tier materials. Zerodur offers a more extensive operational heritage with a deeply characterized CTE profile. Clearceram-Z HS, based on available data, may offer superior dimensional stability under thermal cycling, making it a strong contender, as evidenced by its selection for the TMT. The choice may depend on the specific operational thermal environment and the value placed on heritage versus potentially higher cycling stability.",
+      "notes": "Confidence is 'medium' because primary datasheets for both materials could not be parsed from their PDF formats, requiring reliance on reliable secondary sources (university documents, Wikipedia) for Zerodur and a single secondary source for the key Clearceram-Z HS thermal cycling performance data.",
+      "run": {
+        "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+        "runId": "orch-1771179040-71ffb808",
+        "agent": "webster",
+        "status": "complete",
+        "result": "The primary difference between Schott Zerodur and Ohara Clearceram-Z HS for large astronomical mirrors lies in their documented performance history and specific thermal stability characteristics.\n\n*   **Thermal Properties:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a well-documented mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) of 0 \u00b1 0.007 x 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9 (0 to 50 \u00b0C). Its CTE homogeneity is also excellent, with documented peak-to-valley variation as low as \u00b10.0064 x 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** While specific CTE data from primary datasheets was not found in text format, a comparative study on thermal cycling (-40\u00b0C to +90\u00b0C) indicated it exhibited higher dimensional stability, with deformation of \u00b10.1 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C compared to Zerodur's \u00b10.2 x 10\u207b\u2076 /\u00b0C under the same test. Ohara claims \"High Homogeneity\" for the material.\n\n*   **Mechanical Properties & Heritage:**\n    *   **Zerodur:** Has a long and proven history in major, large-aperture astronomical projects (e.g., VLT, Keck telescopes). Some sources indicate it has a higher flexural strength, which is advantageous for large structures subject to mechanical stress.\n    *   **Clearceram-Z HS:** Is a newer material but was selected for the primary mirror segments of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), indicating it meets the stringent requirements for next-generation extremely large telescopes.\n\n**Conclusion for >200mm Mirrors:**\nFor mirrors over 200mm, both are top-tier materials. Zerodur offers a more extensive operational heritage with a deeply characterized CTE profile. Clearceram-Z HS, based on available data, may offer superior dimensional stability under thermal cycling, making it a strong contender, as evidenced by its selection for the TMT. The choice may depend on the specific operational thermal environment and the value placed on heritage versus potentially higher cycling stability.",
+        "artifacts": [],
+        "confidence": "medium",
+        "notes": "Confidence is 'medium' because primary datasheets for both materials could not be parsed from their PDF formats, requiring reliance on reliable secondary sources (university documents, Wikipedia) for Zerodur and a single secondary source for the key Clearceram-Z HS thermal cycling performance data.",
+        "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:11:58Z",
+        "latencyMs": 91219,
+        "workflowRunId": "wf-1771179039-4342f14b",
+        "stepId": "research",
+        "exitCode": 0
+      },
+      "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:10:39.965205+00:00",
+      "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:12:11.311811+00:00",
+      "duration_s": 91.347
+    },
+    "validate": {
+      "step_id": "validate",
+      "agent": "tech-lead",
+      "status": "complete",
+      "result": "Technical review of Zerodur vs Clearceram-Z HS research findings:\n\n**VERIFIED ACCURATE:**\n1. Zerodur CTE of 0 \u00b1 0.007 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9 (0-50\u00b0C) \u2014 confirmed via Schott product page and Wikipedia. Schott states '0 \u00b1 7 ppb/K'.\n2. Zerodur heritage on VLT and Keck \u2014 confirmed. Also used on ELT, GTC, Hobby-Eberly, SOFIA, and others.\n3. Clearceram-Z HS selected for TMT primary mirror segments \u2014 well-established fact.\n4. Zerodur CTE homogeneity being excellent \u2014 confirmed by Schott ('homogeneous throughout the entire volume').\n\n**CONCERNS / FLAGS:**\n1. **Thermal cycling comparison is suspect.** The claim that Clearceram showed \u00b10.1 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C vs Zerodur's \u00b10.2 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C 'deformation' under -40 to +90\u00b0C cycling is problematic: (a) the units mix 'deformation' with CTE-like notation \u2014 dimensionally unclear; (b) the -40 to +90\u00b0C range far exceeds typical astronomical operating conditions; (c) no source is cited for this specific comparison study; (d) these numbers would imply both materials have CTEs 1-2 orders of magnitude worse than their rated specs, suggesting they may refer to instantaneous CTE at extreme temperatures rather than mean CTE. This claim should NOT be used for engineering decisions without tracing the original source and understanding what was actually measured.\n2. **Missing: Zerodur is also the ELT mirror material.** The 39m European Extremely Large Telescope uses Zerodur \u2014 this is a significant omission that strengthens the Zerodur heritage argument even further.\n3. **Clearceram CTE spec gap.** The findings admit no primary datasheet CTE data was found for Clearceram-Z HS. For engineering use, Ohara's published spec (typically 0 \u00b1 0.02 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C over 0-50\u00b0C for standard grade, tighter for HS) must be obtained directly. You cannot make a material selection without comparable spec-sheet data.\n4. **Flexural strength claim is vague.** 'Some sources indicate higher flexural strength' for Zerodur \u2014 this needs quantification. Zerodur typical bending strength is ~76 MPa; Clearceram-Z is comparable. Without numbers, this is not useful for engineering.\n5. **Missing: internal quality / striae / inclusions.** For >200mm mirrors, bulk homogeneity (striae, bubbles, inclusions) matters significantly. Both manufacturers offer grades \u2014 this wasn't addressed.\n\n**VERDICT:** The findings are directionally correct but not rigorous enough for engineering material selection. The thermal cycling comparison is the biggest red flag \u2014 it appears to conflate different measurement conditions or quantities. The Zerodur specs and heritage claims are solid. The Clearceram claims need primary source verification before use.",
+      "notes": "Could not verify the specific thermal cycling comparison study (\u00b10.1 vs \u00b10.2 claim) \u2014 web search API was unavailable. Zerodur specs confirmed via Schott website and Wikipedia. TMT/Clearceram selection is well-established. Recommend obtaining Ohara datasheet directly for any engineering use.",
+      "run": {
+        "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+        "runId": "orch-1771179131-99058b09",
+        "agent": "tech-lead",
+        "status": "complete",
+        "result": "Technical review of Zerodur vs Clearceram-Z HS research findings:\n\n**VERIFIED ACCURATE:**\n1. Zerodur CTE of 0 \u00b1 0.007 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9 (0-50\u00b0C) \u2014 confirmed via Schott product page and Wikipedia. Schott states '0 \u00b1 7 ppb/K'.\n2. Zerodur heritage on VLT and Keck \u2014 confirmed. Also used on ELT, GTC, Hobby-Eberly, SOFIA, and others.\n3. Clearceram-Z HS selected for TMT primary mirror segments \u2014 well-established fact.\n4. Zerodur CTE homogeneity being excellent \u2014 confirmed by Schott ('homogeneous throughout the entire volume').\n\n**CONCERNS / FLAGS:**\n1. **Thermal cycling comparison is suspect.** The claim that Clearceram showed \u00b10.1 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C vs Zerodur's \u00b10.2 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C 'deformation' under -40 to +90\u00b0C cycling is problematic: (a) the units mix 'deformation' with CTE-like notation \u2014 dimensionally unclear; (b) the -40 to +90\u00b0C range far exceeds typical astronomical operating conditions; (c) no source is cited for this specific comparison study; (d) these numbers would imply both materials have CTEs 1-2 orders of magnitude worse than their rated specs, suggesting they may refer to instantaneous CTE at extreme temperatures rather than mean CTE. This claim should NOT be used for engineering decisions without tracing the original source and understanding what was actually measured.\n2. **Missing: Zerodur is also the ELT mirror material.** The 39m European Extremely Large Telescope uses Zerodur \u2014 this is a significant omission that strengthens the Zerodur heritage argument even further.\n3. **Clearceram CTE spec gap.** The findings admit no primary datasheet CTE data was found for Clearceram-Z HS. For engineering use, Ohara's published spec (typically 0 \u00b1 0.02 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C over 0-50\u00b0C for standard grade, tighter for HS) must be obtained directly. You cannot make a material selection without comparable spec-sheet data.\n4. **Flexural strength claim is vague.** 'Some sources indicate higher flexural strength' for Zerodur \u2014 this needs quantification. Zerodur typical bending strength is ~76 MPa; Clearceram-Z is comparable. Without numbers, this is not useful for engineering.\n5. **Missing: internal quality / striae / inclusions.** For >200mm mirrors, bulk homogeneity (striae, bubbles, inclusions) matters significantly. Both manufacturers offer grades \u2014 this wasn't addressed.\n\n**VERDICT:** The findings are directionally correct but not rigorous enough for engineering material selection. The thermal cycling comparison is the biggest red flag \u2014 it appears to conflate different measurement conditions or quantities. The Zerodur specs and heritage claims are solid. The Clearceram claims need primary source verification before use.",
+        "artifacts": [],
+        "confidence": "high",
+        "notes": "Could not verify the specific thermal cycling comparison study (\u00b10.1 vs \u00b10.2 claim) \u2014 web search API was unavailable. Zerodur specs confirmed via Schott website and Wikipedia. TMT/Clearceram selection is well-established. Recommend obtaining Ohara datasheet directly for any engineering use.",
+        "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:12:55-05:00",
+        "latencyMs": 57539,
+        "workflowRunId": "wf-1771179039-4342f14b",
+        "stepId": "validate",
+        "exitCode": 0
+      },
+      "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:12:11.313004+00:00",
+      "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:13:08.996320+00:00",
+      "duration_s": 57.683
+    }
+  },
+  "result_dir": "/home/papa/atomizer/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771179039-4342f14b",
+  "notifications": {
+    "on_complete": "Research complete"
+  }
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771179039-4342f14b/validate.json

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "step_id": "validate",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "Technical review of Zerodur vs Clearceram-Z HS research findings:\n\n**VERIFIED ACCURATE:**\n1. Zerodur CTE of 0 \u00b1 0.007 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9 (0-50\u00b0C) \u2014 confirmed via Schott product page and Wikipedia. Schott states '0 \u00b1 7 ppb/K'.\n2. Zerodur heritage on VLT and Keck \u2014 confirmed. Also used on ELT, GTC, Hobby-Eberly, SOFIA, and others.\n3. Clearceram-Z HS selected for TMT primary mirror segments \u2014 well-established fact.\n4. Zerodur CTE homogeneity being excellent \u2014 confirmed by Schott ('homogeneous throughout the entire volume').\n\n**CONCERNS / FLAGS:**\n1. **Thermal cycling comparison is suspect.** The claim that Clearceram showed \u00b10.1 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C vs Zerodur's \u00b10.2 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C 'deformation' under -40 to +90\u00b0C cycling is problematic: (a) the units mix 'deformation' with CTE-like notation \u2014 dimensionally unclear; (b) the -40 to +90\u00b0C range far exceeds typical astronomical operating conditions; (c) no source is cited for this specific comparison study; (d) these numbers would imply both materials have CTEs 1-2 orders of magnitude worse than their rated specs, suggesting they may refer to instantaneous CTE at extreme temperatures rather than mean CTE. This claim should NOT be used for engineering decisions without tracing the original source and understanding what was actually measured.\n2. **Missing: Zerodur is also the ELT mirror material.** The 39m European Extremely Large Telescope uses Zerodur \u2014 this is a significant omission that strengthens the Zerodur heritage argument even further.\n3. **Clearceram CTE spec gap.** The findings admit no primary datasheet CTE data was found for Clearceram-Z HS. For engineering use, Ohara's published spec (typically 0 \u00b1 0.02 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C over 0-50\u00b0C for standard grade, tighter for HS) must be obtained directly. You cannot make a material selection without comparable spec-sheet data.\n4. **Flexural strength claim is vague.** 'Some sources indicate higher flexural strength' for Zerodur \u2014 this needs quantification. Zerodur typical bending strength is ~76 MPa; Clearceram-Z is comparable. Without numbers, this is not useful for engineering.\n5. **Missing: internal quality / striae / inclusions.** For >200mm mirrors, bulk homogeneity (striae, bubbles, inclusions) matters significantly. Both manufacturers offer grades \u2014 this wasn't addressed.\n\n**VERDICT:** The findings are directionally correct but not rigorous enough for engineering material selection. The thermal cycling comparison is the biggest red flag \u2014 it appears to conflate different measurement conditions or quantities. The Zerodur specs and heritage claims are solid. The Clearceram claims need primary source verification before use.",
+  "notes": "Could not verify the specific thermal cycling comparison study (\u00b10.1 vs \u00b10.2 claim) \u2014 web search API was unavailable. Zerodur specs confirmed via Schott website and Wikipedia. TMT/Clearceram selection is well-established. Recommend obtaining Ohara datasheet directly for any engineering use.",
+  "run": {
+    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+    "runId": "orch-1771179131-99058b09",
+    "agent": "tech-lead",
+    "status": "complete",
+    "result": "Technical review of Zerodur vs Clearceram-Z HS research findings:\n\n**VERIFIED ACCURATE:**\n1. Zerodur CTE of 0 \u00b1 0.007 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076 K\u207b\u00b9 (0-50\u00b0C) \u2014 confirmed via Schott product page and Wikipedia. Schott states '0 \u00b1 7 ppb/K'.\n2. Zerodur heritage on VLT and Keck \u2014 confirmed. Also used on ELT, GTC, Hobby-Eberly, SOFIA, and others.\n3. Clearceram-Z HS selected for TMT primary mirror segments \u2014 well-established fact.\n4. Zerodur CTE homogeneity being excellent \u2014 confirmed by Schott ('homogeneous throughout the entire volume').\n\n**CONCERNS / FLAGS:**\n1. **Thermal cycling comparison is suspect.** The claim that Clearceram showed \u00b10.1 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C vs Zerodur's \u00b10.2 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C 'deformation' under -40 to +90\u00b0C cycling is problematic: (a) the units mix 'deformation' with CTE-like notation \u2014 dimensionally unclear; (b) the -40 to +90\u00b0C range far exceeds typical astronomical operating conditions; (c) no source is cited for this specific comparison study; (d) these numbers would imply both materials have CTEs 1-2 orders of magnitude worse than their rated specs, suggesting they may refer to instantaneous CTE at extreme temperatures rather than mean CTE. This claim should NOT be used for engineering decisions without tracing the original source and understanding what was actually measured.\n2. **Missing: Zerodur is also the ELT mirror material.** The 39m European Extremely Large Telescope uses Zerodur \u2014 this is a significant omission that strengthens the Zerodur heritage argument even further.\n3. **Clearceram CTE spec gap.** The findings admit no primary datasheet CTE data was found for Clearceram-Z HS. For engineering use, Ohara's published spec (typically 0 \u00b1 0.02 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076/\u00b0C over 0-50\u00b0C for standard grade, tighter for HS) must be obtained directly. You cannot make a material selection without comparable spec-sheet data.\n4. **Flexural strength claim is vague.** 'Some sources indicate higher flexural strength' for Zerodur \u2014 this needs quantification. Zerodur typical bending strength is ~76 MPa; Clearceram-Z is comparable. Without numbers, this is not useful for engineering.\n5. **Missing: internal quality / striae / inclusions.** For >200mm mirrors, bulk homogeneity (striae, bubbles, inclusions) matters significantly. Both manufacturers offer grades \u2014 this wasn't addressed.\n\n**VERDICT:** The findings are directionally correct but not rigorous enough for engineering material selection. The thermal cycling comparison is the biggest red flag \u2014 it appears to conflate different measurement conditions or quantities. The Zerodur specs and heritage claims are solid. The Clearceram claims need primary source verification before use.",
+    "artifacts": [],
+    "confidence": "high",
+    "notes": "Could not verify the specific thermal cycling comparison study (\u00b10.1 vs \u00b10.2 claim) \u2014 web search API was unavailable. Zerodur specs confirmed via Schott website and Wikipedia. TMT/Clearceram selection is well-established. Recommend obtaining Ohara datasheet directly for any engineering use.",
+    "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:12:55-05:00",
+    "latencyMs": 57539,
+    "workflowRunId": "wf-1771179039-4342f14b",
+    "stepId": "validate",
+    "exitCode": 0
+  },
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:12:11.313004+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:13:08.996320+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 57.683
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771180163-49f868ac/research.json

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "step_id": "research",
+  "agent": "webster",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "The Young's modulus for Invar 36 is typically around 141 GPa (20.5 x 10^6 psi) for annealed material. For cold-rolled strip, it can be slightly higher, around 148 GPa (21.5 x 10^6 psi).",
+  "notes": "The value can vary slightly depending on the material's condition (e.g., annealed vs. cold-rolled). Source: High Temp Metals technical data sheet.",
+  "run": {
+    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+    "runId": "orch-1771180163-569e1d0d",
+    "agent": "webster",
+    "status": "complete",
+    "result": "The Young's modulus for Invar 36 is typically around 141 GPa (20.5 x 10^6 psi) for annealed material. For cold-rolled strip, it can be slightly higher, around 148 GPa (21.5 x 10^6 psi).",
+    "artifacts": [],
+    "confidence": "high",
+    "notes": "The value can vary slightly depending on the material's condition (e.g., annealed vs. cold-rolled). Source: High Temp Metals technical data sheet.",
+    "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:29:46Z",
+    "latencyMs": 27786,
+    "workflowRunId": "wf-1771180163-49f868ac",
+    "stepId": "research",
+    "exitCode": 0
+  },
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:29:23.361620+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:29:51.273466+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 27.912
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771180163-49f868ac/summary.json

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+{
+  "status": "complete",
+  "workflow": "Quick Research",
+  "workflow_file": "/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/workflows/quick-research.yaml",
+  "workflow_run_id": "wf-1771180163-49f868ac",
+  "caller": "manager",
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:29:23.361236+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:30:34.741239+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 71.38,
+  "timeout_s": 1800,
+  "inputs": {
+    "query": "What is the Young's modulus of Invar 36?"
+  },
+  "state": {
+    "research": "complete",
+    "validate": "complete"
+  },
+  "results": {
+    "research": {
+      "step_id": "research",
+      "agent": "webster",
+      "status": "complete",
+      "result": "The Young's modulus for Invar 36 is typically around 141 GPa (20.5 x 10^6 psi) for annealed material. For cold-rolled strip, it can be slightly higher, around 148 GPa (21.5 x 10^6 psi).",
+      "notes": "The value can vary slightly depending on the material's condition (e.g., annealed vs. cold-rolled). Source: High Temp Metals technical data sheet.",
+      "run": {
+        "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+        "runId": "orch-1771180163-569e1d0d",
+        "agent": "webster",
+        "status": "complete",
+        "result": "The Young's modulus for Invar 36 is typically around 141 GPa (20.5 x 10^6 psi) for annealed material. For cold-rolled strip, it can be slightly higher, around 148 GPa (21.5 x 10^6 psi).",
+        "artifacts": [],
+        "confidence": "high",
+        "notes": "The value can vary slightly depending on the material's condition (e.g., annealed vs. cold-rolled). Source: High Temp Metals technical data sheet.",
+        "timestamp": "2026-02-15T18:29:46Z",
+        "latencyMs": 27786,
+        "workflowRunId": "wf-1771180163-49f868ac",
+        "stepId": "research",
+        "exitCode": 0
+      },
+      "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:29:23.361620+00:00",
+      "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:29:51.273466+00:00",
+      "duration_s": 27.912
+    },
+    "validate": {
+      "step_id": "validate",
+      "agent": "tech-lead",
+      "status": "complete",
+      "result": "VERIFICATION OF INVAR 36 YOUNG'S MODULUS VALUES:\n\n1. ANNEALED CONDITION \u2014 141 GPa (20.5 Msi): ACCURATE. This is consistent with established literature. Most reputable sources (Special Metals Corp datasheet, ASM Handbook) report E = 141\u2013144 GPa for annealed Invar 36 at room temperature. The 141 GPa figure is within the accepted range.\n\n2. COLD-ROLLED CONDITION \u2014 148 GPa (21.5 Msi): PLAUSIBLE BUT NEEDS CAUTION. Cold working can slightly increase apparent stiffness due to texture (preferred crystallographic orientation). However, the effect on Young's modulus for Fe-Ni alloys is typically modest (a few percent). 148 GPa is a reasonable upper bound but should be treated as condition-specific, not a general design value.\n\nCONCERNS AND FLAGS:\n- TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE: Invar 36 has an anomalous elastic modulus behavior \u2014 E increases with temperature up to ~200\u00b0C before decreasing (the Elinvar effect region). For precision applications, the operating temperature range must be specified.\n- MAGNETIC STATE: The elastic properties of Invar are coupled to its magnetic state (magnetostriction/magnetoelastic coupling). In strong magnetic fields, E can shift.\n- ANISOTROPY: Cold-rolled material will have anisotropic properties. The 148 GPa value likely refers to the rolling direction. Transverse values may differ.\n- HEAT TREATMENT SENSITIVITY: The exact E depends on annealing temperature and cooling rate. A stabilization anneal (~315\u00b0C for 1hr per 25mm) is standard practice before precision use.\n- MISSING CONTEXT: No Poisson's ratio cited (typically 0.259 for Invar 36). For FEA, both E and nu are needed. Shear modulus G \u2248 56 GPa.\n- SOURCE QUALITY: Values should be traceable to a specific datasheet or standard (ASTM F1684 for Invar 36). Generic handbook values are adequate for preliminary analysis but not for final design of precision instruments.\n\nVERDICT: The values are accurate for general engineering use. For precision optical or metrological applications (which is likely given Atomizer's domain), temperature-dependent properties and material certification data should be used instead of single-point values.",
+      "notes": "Unable to fetch primary datasheets (MatWeb/Special Metals blocked). Verification based on extensive domain knowledge of Fe-Ni alloys and FEA material property requirements. Values are consistent with ASM and Special Metals published data from my training knowledge. For final design use, recommend obtaining certified mill test report values.",
+      "run": {
+        "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+        "runId": "orch-1771180191-fd915fe0",
+        "agent": "tech-lead",
+        "status": "complete",
+        "result": "VERIFICATION OF INVAR 36 YOUNG'S MODULUS VALUES:\n\n1. ANNEALED CONDITION \u2014 141 GPa (20.5 Msi): ACCURATE. This is consistent with established literature. Most reputable sources (Special Metals Corp datasheet, ASM Handbook) report E = 141\u2013144 GPa for annealed Invar 36 at room temperature. The 141 GPa figure is within the accepted range.\n\n2. COLD-ROLLED CONDITION \u2014 148 GPa (21.5 Msi): PLAUSIBLE BUT NEEDS CAUTION. Cold working can slightly increase apparent stiffness due to texture (preferred crystallographic orientation). However, the effect on Young's modulus for Fe-Ni alloys is typically modest (a few percent). 148 GPa is a reasonable upper bound but should be treated as condition-specific, not a general design value.\n\nCONCERNS AND FLAGS:\n- TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE: Invar 36 has an anomalous elastic modulus behavior \u2014 E increases with temperature up to ~200\u00b0C before decreasing (the Elinvar effect region). For precision applications, the operating temperature range must be specified.\n- MAGNETIC STATE: The elastic properties of Invar are coupled to its magnetic state (magnetostriction/magnetoelastic coupling). In strong magnetic fields, E can shift.\n- ANISOTROPY: Cold-rolled material will have anisotropic properties. The 148 GPa value likely refers to the rolling direction. Transverse values may differ.\n- HEAT TREATMENT SENSITIVITY: The exact E depends on annealing temperature and cooling rate. A stabilization anneal (~315\u00b0C for 1hr per 25mm) is standard practice before precision use.\n- MISSING CONTEXT: No Poisson's ratio cited (typically 0.259 for Invar 36). For FEA, both E and nu are needed. Shear modulus G \u2248 56 GPa.\n- SOURCE QUALITY: Values should be traceable to a specific datasheet or standard (ASTM F1684 for Invar 36). Generic handbook values are adequate for preliminary analysis but not for final design of precision instruments.\n\nVERDICT: The values are accurate for general engineering use. For precision optical or metrological applications (which is likely given Atomizer's domain), temperature-dependent properties and material certification data should be used instead of single-point values.",
+        "artifacts": [],
+        "confidence": "high",
+        "notes": "Unable to fetch primary datasheets (MatWeb/Special Metals blocked). Verification based on extensive domain knowledge of Fe-Ni alloys and FEA material property requirements. Values are consistent with ASM and Special Metals published data from my training knowledge. For final design use, recommend obtaining certified mill test report values.",
+        "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:30:30-05:00",
+        "latencyMs": 43336,
+        "workflowRunId": "wf-1771180163-49f868ac",
+        "stepId": "validate",
+        "exitCode": 0
+      },
+      "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:29:51.274992+00:00",
+      "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:30:34.740511+00:00",
+      "duration_s": 43.466
+    }
+  },
+  "result_dir": "/home/papa/atomizer/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771180163-49f868ac",
+  "notifications": {
+    "on_complete": "Research complete"
+  }
+}

hq/handoffs/workflows/wf-1771180163-49f868ac/validate.json

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "step_id": "validate",
+  "agent": "tech-lead",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "result": "VERIFICATION OF INVAR 36 YOUNG'S MODULUS VALUES:\n\n1. ANNEALED CONDITION \u2014 141 GPa (20.5 Msi): ACCURATE. This is consistent with established literature. Most reputable sources (Special Metals Corp datasheet, ASM Handbook) report E = 141\u2013144 GPa for annealed Invar 36 at room temperature. The 141 GPa figure is within the accepted range.\n\n2. COLD-ROLLED CONDITION \u2014 148 GPa (21.5 Msi): PLAUSIBLE BUT NEEDS CAUTION. Cold working can slightly increase apparent stiffness due to texture (preferred crystallographic orientation). However, the effect on Young's modulus for Fe-Ni alloys is typically modest (a few percent). 148 GPa is a reasonable upper bound but should be treated as condition-specific, not a general design value.\n\nCONCERNS AND FLAGS:\n- TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE: Invar 36 has an anomalous elastic modulus behavior \u2014 E increases with temperature up to ~200\u00b0C before decreasing (the Elinvar effect region). For precision applications, the operating temperature range must be specified.\n- MAGNETIC STATE: The elastic properties of Invar are coupled to its magnetic state (magnetostriction/magnetoelastic coupling). In strong magnetic fields, E can shift.\n- ANISOTROPY: Cold-rolled material will have anisotropic properties. The 148 GPa value likely refers to the rolling direction. Transverse values may differ.\n- HEAT TREATMENT SENSITIVITY: The exact E depends on annealing temperature and cooling rate. A stabilization anneal (~315\u00b0C for 1hr per 25mm) is standard practice before precision use.\n- MISSING CONTEXT: No Poisson's ratio cited (typically 0.259 for Invar 36). For FEA, both E and nu are needed. Shear modulus G \u2248 56 GPa.\n- SOURCE QUALITY: Values should be traceable to a specific datasheet or standard (ASTM F1684 for Invar 36). Generic handbook values are adequate for preliminary analysis but not for final design of precision instruments.\n\nVERDICT: The values are accurate for general engineering use. For precision optical or metrological applications (which is likely given Atomizer's domain), temperature-dependent properties and material certification data should be used instead of single-point values.",
+  "notes": "Unable to fetch primary datasheets (MatWeb/Special Metals blocked). Verification based on extensive domain knowledge of Fe-Ni alloys and FEA material property requirements. Values are consistent with ASM and Special Metals published data from my training knowledge. For final design use, recommend obtaining certified mill test report values.",
+  "run": {
+    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
+    "runId": "orch-1771180191-fd915fe0",
+    "agent": "tech-lead",
+    "status": "complete",
+    "result": "VERIFICATION OF INVAR 36 YOUNG'S MODULUS VALUES:\n\n1. ANNEALED CONDITION \u2014 141 GPa (20.5 Msi): ACCURATE. This is consistent with established literature. Most reputable sources (Special Metals Corp datasheet, ASM Handbook) report E = 141\u2013144 GPa for annealed Invar 36 at room temperature. The 141 GPa figure is within the accepted range.\n\n2. COLD-ROLLED CONDITION \u2014 148 GPa (21.5 Msi): PLAUSIBLE BUT NEEDS CAUTION. Cold working can slightly increase apparent stiffness due to texture (preferred crystallographic orientation). However, the effect on Young's modulus for Fe-Ni alloys is typically modest (a few percent). 148 GPa is a reasonable upper bound but should be treated as condition-specific, not a general design value.\n\nCONCERNS AND FLAGS:\n- TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE: Invar 36 has an anomalous elastic modulus behavior \u2014 E increases with temperature up to ~200\u00b0C before decreasing (the Elinvar effect region). For precision applications, the operating temperature range must be specified.\n- MAGNETIC STATE: The elastic properties of Invar are coupled to its magnetic state (magnetostriction/magnetoelastic coupling). In strong magnetic fields, E can shift.\n- ANISOTROPY: Cold-rolled material will have anisotropic properties. The 148 GPa value likely refers to the rolling direction. Transverse values may differ.\n- HEAT TREATMENT SENSITIVITY: The exact E depends on annealing temperature and cooling rate. A stabilization anneal (~315\u00b0C for 1hr per 25mm) is standard practice before precision use.\n- MISSING CONTEXT: No Poisson's ratio cited (typically 0.259 for Invar 36). For FEA, both E and nu are needed. Shear modulus G \u2248 56 GPa.\n- SOURCE QUALITY: Values should be traceable to a specific datasheet or standard (ASTM F1684 for Invar 36). Generic handbook values are adequate for preliminary analysis but not for final design of precision instruments.\n\nVERDICT: The values are accurate for general engineering use. For precision optical or metrological applications (which is likely given Atomizer's domain), temperature-dependent properties and material certification data should be used instead of single-point values.",
+    "artifacts": [],
+    "confidence": "high",
+    "notes": "Unable to fetch primary datasheets (MatWeb/Special Metals blocked). Verification based on extensive domain knowledge of Fe-Ni alloys and FEA material property requirements. Values are consistent with ASM and Special Metals published data from my training knowledge. For final design use, recommend obtaining certified mill test report values.",
+    "timestamp": "2026-02-15T13:30:30-05:00",
+    "latencyMs": 43336,
+    "workflowRunId": "wf-1771180163-49f868ac",
+    "stepId": "validate",
+    "exitCode": 0
+  },
+  "started_at": "2026-02-15T18:29:51.274992+00:00",
+  "finished_at": "2026-02-15T18:30:34.740511+00:00",
+  "duration_s": 43.466
+}

hq/hq/condensations/2026-02-16-mirror-substrate-material-trade.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+## 📝 Condensation: Mirror Substrate Material Trade Study Review
+**Date:** 2026-02-16
+**Channel:** #engineering
+**Thread:** N/A
+**Participants:** Webster, Auditor
+
+### Context
+A trade study was performed by Webster (orch-1771210952) to select a substrate material for a 500mm space telescope mirror, comparing SiC, ULE, and Zerodur. The study was subsequently challenged by Auditor (orch-1771211034).
+
+### Decision
+The initial trade study and its recommendation of Zerodur are **invalidated**. A new, more comprehensive study is required before a decision can be made.
+
+### Rationale
+The audit identified critical flaws in the original analysis:
+1.  **Incorrect Operating Temperature:** The study was based on a 20°C environment, whereas the mirror will operate at cryogenic temperatures (<100K). This fundamental error invalidates the material performance comparison.
+2.  **Omission of Key Material:** The study failed to include Beryllium, a flight-proven material used in critical space telescopes like JWST.
+3.  **Incomplete Criteria:** The analysis lacked manufacturability, cost, and lead time considerations.
+
+### Action Items
+- [ ] Re-run the trade study using correct cryogenic temperature parameters (<100K).
+- [ ] Include Beryllium in the material comparison.
+- [ ] Add manufacturability, cost, and lead time to the evaluation criteria.
+
+### Supersedes
+- Webster's initial research findings and recommendation (orch-1771210952).

hq/hq/projects/TEMPLATE-CONTEXT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# Project Context: [Project Name]
+**Last updated:** [date] by Secretary
+
+## Current State
+- Phase: [current phase]
+- Active: [what's being worked on]
+- Blocked: [blockers, or "Nothing"]
+
+## Key Decisions (most recent first)
+1. [YYYY-MM-DD] [Decision] — [one-line rationale]
+
+## Active Constraints
+- [constraint 1]
+
+## Superseded Decisions
+- *(none yet)*
+
+## Key Contacts
+- [name] — [role/relevance]
+
+## References
+- [link to spec, channel, etc.]

hq/hq/projects/sim-test/CONTEXT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# Project Context: sim-test
+**Last updated:** 2026-02-16 by Secretary
+
+## Current State
+- **Phase:** Design / Analysis
+- **Active:** Material selection for the primary mirror.
+- **Blocked:** Material selection is blocked pending a valid trade study.
+
+## Key Decisions (most recent first)
+1.  **2026-02-16:** Initial mirror material trade study was invalidated due to incorrect temperature parameters and incomplete material comparison. A new study is required.
+
+## Active Constraints
+- Mirror must perform reliably at cryogenic temperatures (<100K).
+
+## Superseded Decisions
+- ~~**2026-02-15:** Zerodur recommended for mirror substrate.~~ → Replaced by the requirement for a new trade study (2026-02-16).

hq/instances/auditor/cron/jobs.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/auditor/cron/jobs.json.bak

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/auditor/devices/paired.json

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+{
+  "8c1e44393c844822a8a5129b69e12c9ebdd8bf93a51eebbfa0c5405c673130d0": {
+    "deviceId": "8c1e44393c844822a8a5129b69e12c9ebdd8bf93a51eebbfa0c5405c673130d0",
+    "publicKey": "fejk4Um31-XMqj58QkHSPd4DepfwG1RfvAgc0pcioe8",
+    "platform": "linux",
+    "clientId": "cli",
+    "clientMode": "cli",
+    "role": "operator",
+    "roles": [
+      "operator"
+    ],
+    "scopes": [
+      "operator.admin",
+      "operator.approvals",
+      "operator.pairing"
+    ],
+    "tokens": {
+      "operator": {
+        "token": "266c2f244dc4453cb621f7fe9b04c82b",
+        "role": "operator",
+        "scopes": [
+          "operator.admin",
+          "operator.approvals",
+          "operator.pairing"
+        ],
+        "createdAtMs": 1771083769964,
+        "lastUsedAtMs": 1771211076766
+      }
+    },
+    "createdAtMs": 1771083769964,
+    "approvedAtMs": 1771083769964
+  }
+}

hq/instances/auditor/devices/pending.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{}

hq/instances/auditor/env

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_PORT=18812

hq/instances/auditor/identity/device-auth.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "8c1e44393c844822a8a5129b69e12c9ebdd8bf93a51eebbfa0c5405c673130d0",
+  "tokens": {
+    "operator": {
+      "token": "266c2f244dc4453cb621f7fe9b04c82b",
+      "role": "operator",
+      "scopes": [
+        "operator.admin",
+        "operator.approvals",
+        "operator.pairing"
+      ],
+      "updatedAtMs": 1771211076776
+    }
+  }
+}

hq/instances/auditor/identity/device.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "8c1e44393c844822a8a5129b69e12c9ebdd8bf93a51eebbfa0c5405c673130d0",
+  "publicKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\nMCowBQYDK2VwAyEAfejk4Um31+XMqj58QkHSPd4DepfwG1RfvAgc0pcioe8=\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n",
+  "privateKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----\nMC4CAQAwBQYDK2VwBCIEIP4KzGQVG2NLIN0Sn8qdfpJUP/+z11Su0LNLvqcucqdc\n-----END PRIVATE KEY-----\n",
+  "createdAtMs": 1771083769933
+}

hq/instances/auditor/openclaw.json

@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
   },
   "hooks": {
     "enabled": true,
-    "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}",
+    "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1",
     "allowRequestSessionKey": true,
     "allowedSessionKeyPrefixes": [
       "agent:",
@@ -217,11 +217,11 @@
     "mode": "local",
     "bind": "loopback",
     "auth": {
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     },
     "remote": {
       "url": "ws://127.0.0.1:18812",
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     }
   },
   "skills": {

hq/instances/auditor/update-check.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "lastCheckedAt": "2026-02-15T20:42:12.545Z",
+  "lastNotifiedVersion": "2026.2.14",
+  "lastNotifiedTag": "latest"
+}

hq/instances/manager/.openclaw/identity/device-auth.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "19df1a6af503f7540765d5640ca6f0c85cf7fdb32ec33ef029878f1f05e37827",
+  "tokens": {
+    "operator": {
+      "token": "4b9eec2c8b7d4bf880a482951f5791b7",
+      "role": "operator",
+      "scopes": [
+        "operator.admin",
+        "operator.approvals",
+        "operator.pairing"
+      ],
+      "updatedAtMs": 1771115284656
+    }
+  }
+}

hq/instances/manager/.openclaw/identity/device.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "19df1a6af503f7540765d5640ca6f0c85cf7fdb32ec33ef029878f1f05e37827",
+  "publicKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\nMCowBQYDK2VwAyEAKs86bSka8YGeyRrzn1l/geS+LJTjgMzEPgNJLVilweM=\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n",
+  "privateKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----\nMC4CAQAwBQYDK2VwBCIEIKYgmW/aukhjZiBUmuV1gjFr7X4ccTW3eaEWPxgo02+1\n-----END PRIVATE KEY-----\n",
+  "createdAtMs": 1771115284433
+}

hq/instances/manager/.openclaw/openclaw.json

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+{
+  "messages": {
+    "ackReactionScope": "group-mentions"
+  },
+  "agents": {
+    "defaults": {
+      "maxConcurrent": 4,
+      "subagents": {
+        "maxConcurrent": 8
+      },
+      "compaction": {
+        "mode": "safeguard"
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "talk": {
+    "apiKey": "sk_d8aa4795f7124ed052fa7de66a28a7739b8bb82789c2f398"
+  },
+  "wizard": {
+    "lastRunAt": "2026-02-15T00:28:05.182Z",
+    "lastRunVersion": "2026.2.12",
+    "lastRunCommand": "doctor",
+    "lastRunMode": "local"
+  },
+  "meta": {
+    "lastTouchedVersion": "2026.2.12",
+    "lastTouchedAt": "2026-02-15T00:28:05.243Z"
+  }
+}

hq/instances/manager/cron/jobs.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/manager/cron/jobs.json.bak

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/manager/devices/paired.json

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+{
+  "84c346672e1521e33c9ef72cda3d141689ec443008da786b7cb5910053640c33": {
+    "deviceId": "84c346672e1521e33c9ef72cda3d141689ec443008da786b7cb5910053640c33",
+    "publicKey": "R9ckbOaTvIzdV4-JGOQjCFGdOh_cOJD1CD9jp0p7X7k",
+    "platform": "linux",
+    "clientId": "cli",
+    "clientMode": "cli",
+    "role": "operator",
+    "roles": [
+      "operator"
+    ],
+    "scopes": [
+      "operator.admin",
+      "operator.approvals",
+      "operator.pairing"
+    ],
+    "tokens": {
+      "operator": {
+        "token": "97dc1fe3641742f5923fe7c5ede21751",
+        "role": "operator",
+        "scopes": [
+          "operator.admin",
+          "operator.approvals",
+          "operator.pairing"
+        ],
+        "createdAtMs": 1771083738383,
+        "lastUsedAtMs": 1771177015735
+      }
+    },
+    "createdAtMs": 1771083738383,
+    "approvedAtMs": 1771083738383
+  }
+}

hq/instances/manager/devices/pending.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{}

hq/instances/manager/env

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_PORT=18800

hq/instances/manager/identity/device-auth.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "84c346672e1521e33c9ef72cda3d141689ec443008da786b7cb5910053640c33",
+  "tokens": {
+    "operator": {
+      "token": "97dc1fe3641742f5923fe7c5ede21751",
+      "role": "operator",
+      "scopes": [
+        "operator.admin",
+        "operator.approvals",
+        "operator.pairing"
+      ],
+      "updatedAtMs": 1771177015752
+    }
+  }
+}

hq/instances/manager/identity/device.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "84c346672e1521e33c9ef72cda3d141689ec443008da786b7cb5910053640c33",
+  "publicKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\nMCowBQYDK2VwAyEAR9ckbOaTvIzdV4+JGOQjCFGdOh/cOJD1CD9jp0p7X7k=\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n",
+  "privateKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----\nMC4CAQAwBQYDK2VwBCIEIHAPhhhmTzddtgLJyJtUn82Bxp9ZuELCR73f0DNmgBIf\n-----END PRIVATE KEY-----\n",
+  "createdAtMs": 1771083738340
+}

hq/instances/manager/openclaw.json

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
   },
   "hooks": {
     "enabled": true,
-    "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}",
+    "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1",
     "allowRequestSessionKey": true,
     "allowedSessionKeyPrefixes": [
       "agent:",
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
       "commands": {
         "native": false
       },
-      "token": "${DISCORD_TOKEN}",
+      "token": "MTQ3MTg2NTQ3OTA1MTM0NjAwMw.GfLrsO.Ksikd8xoXQjtO7XcBCKRSA7wnaDzDdSPsfv6SY",
       "groupPolicy": "allowlist",
       "dm": {
         "enabled": true,
@@ -222,8 +222,8 @@
       "mode": "socket",
       "webhookPath": "/slack/events",
       "enabled": true,
-      "botToken": "${SLACK_BOT_TOKEN}",
+      "botToken": "xoxb-10470305040052-10460352291747-t1rf0tPohZyniT7LGlfkHcTc",
-      "appToken": "${SLACK_APP_TOKEN}",
+      "appToken": "xapp-1-A0ADM99RSLV-10460354049203-72848191ab9a849e61e1bf8c15d4240d4cf2fd1d8f6dd45bd41c5678f0ed4b52",
       "userTokenReadOnly": true,
       "allowBots": false,
       "requireMention": false,
@@ -280,11 +280,11 @@
     "mode": "local",
     "bind": "loopback",
     "auth": {
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     },
     "remote": {
       "url": "ws://127.0.0.1:18800",
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     }
   },
   "skills": {

hq/instances/manager/openclaw.json.bak

@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+{
+  "meta": {
+    "lastTouchedVersion": "2026.2.12",
+    "lastTouchedAt": "2026-02-15T01:07:40.257Z"
+  },
+  "logging": {
+    "level": "trace",
+    "file": "/tmp/openclaw/atomizer-manager.log",
+    "redactSensitive": "tools"
+  },
+  "agents": {
+    "defaults": {
+      "model": {
+        "primary": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6"
+      },
+      "skipBootstrap": true,
+      "bootstrapMaxChars": 25000,
+      "userTimezone": "America/Toronto",
+      "typingIntervalSeconds": 4,
+      "typingMode": "instant",
+      "maxConcurrent": 4,
+      "subagents": {
+        "maxConcurrent": 4
+      },
+      "compaction": {
+        "mode": "safeguard",
+        "memoryFlush": {
+          "enabled": true
+        }
+      },
+      "contextPruning": {
+        "mode": "cache-ttl",
+        "ttl": "15m",
+        "keepLastAssistants": 3,
+        "softTrimRatio": 0.6,
+        "hardClearRatio": 0.8,
+        "minPrunableToolChars": 2000
+      }
+    },
+    "list": [
+      {
+        "id": "main",
+        "default": true,
+        "name": "Atomizer Manager",
+        "workspace": "/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/manager",
+        "model": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6",
+        "identity": {
+          "name": "Atomizer Manager",
+          "theme": "Senior engineering manager. Orchestrates, delegates, enforces protocols. Decisive and strategic.",
+          "emoji": "\ud83c\udfaf"
+        },
+        "groupChat": {
+          "mentionPatterns": [
+            "@manager",
+            "@Manager",
+            "\ud83c\udfaf"
+          ]
+        },
+        "subagents": {
+          "allowAgents": [
+            "*"
+          ]
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "messages": {
+    "responsePrefix": "[{identity.name}] ",
+    "queue": {
+      "mode": "collect",
+      "debounceMs": 2000,
+      "cap": 20
+    },
+    "inbound": {
+      "debounceMs": 3000
+    },
+    "ackReaction": "",
+    "ackReactionScope": "group-mentions"
+  },
+  "commands": {
+    "native": "auto",
+    "nativeSkills": "auto"
+  },
+  "hooks": {
+    "enabled": true,
+    "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1",
+    "allowRequestSessionKey": true,
+    "allowedSessionKeyPrefixes": [
+      "agent:",
+      "hook:"
+    ],
+    "allowedAgentIds": [
+      "*"
+    ]
+  },
+  "channels": {
+    "discord": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "commands": {
+        "native": false
+      },
+      "token": "MTQ3MTg2NTQ3OTA1MTM0NjAwMw.GfLrsO.Ksikd8xoXQjtO7XcBCKRSA7wnaDzDdSPsfv6SY",
+      "groupPolicy": "allowlist",
+      "dm": {
+        "enabled": true,
+        "policy": "allowlist",
+        "allowFrom": [
+          "719982779793932419"
+        ]
+      },
+      "guilds": {
+        "1471858733452890132": {
+          "requireMention": true,
+          "users": [
+            "719982779793932419"
+          ],
+          "channels": {
+            "general": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "ceo-office": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "announcements": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "daily-standup": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "technical": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "code-review": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "fea-analysis": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "nx-cad": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "task-board": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "meeting-notes": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "reports": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "research": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "science": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "active-projects": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "knowledge-base": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "lessons-learned": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "agent-logs": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "inter-agent": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "it-ops": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "hydrotech-beam": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "lab": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "configuration-management": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "dl-manager": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            },
+            "project-dashboard": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "slack": {
+      "mode": "socket",
+      "webhookPath": "/slack/events",
+      "enabled": true,
+      "botToken": "xoxb-10470305040052-10460352291747-t1rf0tPohZyniT7LGlfkHcTc",
+      "appToken": "xapp-1-A0ADM99RSLV-10460354049203-72848191ab9a849e61e1bf8c15d4240d4cf2fd1d8f6dd45bd41c5678f0ed4b52",
+      "userTokenReadOnly": true,
+      "allowBots": false,
+      "requireMention": false,
+      "groupPolicy": "allowlist",
+      "historyLimit": 50,
+      "reactionNotifications": "all",
+      "thread": {
+        "historyScope": "thread",
+        "inheritParent": true
+      },
+      "actions": {
+        "reactions": true,
+        "messages": true,
+        "pins": true,
+        "memberInfo": true,
+        "emojiList": true
+      },
+      "dm": {
+        "enabled": true,
+        "policy": "allowlist",
+        "allowFrom": [
+          "U0AE3J9MDND"
+        ]
+      },
+      "channels": {
+        "C0AEJV13TEU": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0ADJALL61Z": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AD9F7LYNB": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AE4CESCC9": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AEB39CE5U": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "talk": {
+    "apiKey": "sk_d8aa4795f7124ed052fa7de66a28a7739b8bb82789c2f398"
+  },
+  "gateway": {
+    "port": 18800,
+    "mode": "local",
+    "bind": "loopback",
+    "auth": {
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
+    },
+    "remote": {
+      "url": "ws://127.0.0.1:18800",
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
+    }
+  },
+  "skills": {
+    "load": {
+      "extraDirs": [
+        "/home/papa/atomizer/skills"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "plugins": {
+    "entries": {
+      "discord": {
+        "enabled": true
+      },
+      "slack": {
+        "enabled": true
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}

hq/instances/manager/openclaw.json.bak.1

@@ -0,0 +1,282 @@
+{
+  "logging": {
+    "level": "trace",
+    "file": "/tmp/openclaw/atomizer-manager.log",
+    "redactSensitive": "tools"
+  },
+  "agents": {
+    "defaults": {
+      "model": {
+        "primary": "openai-codex/gpt-5.3-codex"
+      },
+      "skipBootstrap": true,
+      "bootstrapMaxChars": 25000,
+      "userTimezone": "America/Toronto",
+      "typingIntervalSeconds": 4,
+      "typingMode": "instant",
+      "maxConcurrent": 4,
+      "subagents": {
+        "maxConcurrent": 4
+      }
+    },
+    "list": [
+      {
+        "id": "main",
+        "default": true,
+        "name": "Atomizer Manager",
+        "workspace": "/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/manager",
+        "model": "openai-codex/gpt-5.3-codex",
+        "identity": {
+          "name": "Atomizer Manager",
+          "theme": "Senior engineering manager. Orchestrates, delegates, enforces protocols. Decisive and strategic.",
+          "emoji": "\ud83c\udfaf"
+        },
+        "groupChat": {
+          "mentionPatterns": [
+            "@manager",
+            "@Manager",
+            "\ud83c\udfaf"
+          ]
+        },
+        "subagents": {
+          "allowAgents": [
+            "*"
+          ]
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "messages": {
+    "responsePrefix": "[{identity.name}] ",
+    "queue": {
+      "mode": "collect",
+      "debounceMs": 2000,
+      "cap": 20
+    },
+    "inbound": {
+      "debounceMs": 3000
+    },
+    "ackReaction": "",
+    "ackReactionScope": "group-mentions"
+  },
+  "commands": {
+    "native": "auto",
+    "nativeSkills": "auto"
+  },
+  "hooks": {
+    "enabled": true,
+    "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1",
+    "allowRequestSessionKey": true,
+    "allowedSessionKeyPrefixes": [
+      "agent:",
+      "hook:"
+    ],
+    "allowedAgentIds": [
+      "*"
+    ]
+  },
+  "channels": {
+    "discord": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "commands": {
+        "native": false
+      },
+      "groupPolicy": "allowlist",
+      "token": "${DISCORD_TOKEN_MANAGER}",
+      "dm": {
+        "enabled": true,
+        "policy": "allowlist",
+        "allowFrom": [
+          "719982779793932419"
+        ]
+      },
+      "guilds": {
+        "1471858733452890132": {
+          "requireMention": true,
+          "users": [
+            "719982779793932419"
+          ],
+          "channels": {
+            "general": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "ceo-office": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "announcements": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "daily-standup": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "technical": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "code-review": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "fea-analysis": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "nx-cad": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "task-board": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "meeting-notes": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "reports": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "research": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "science": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "active-projects": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "knowledge-base": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "lessons-learned": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "agent-logs": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "inter-agent": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "it-ops": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "hydrotech-beam": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "lab": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            },
+            "configuration-management": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": true
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "slack": {
+      "mode": "socket",
+      "webhookPath": "/slack/events",
+      "enabled": true,
+      "botToken": "xoxb-10470305040052-10460352291747-t1rf0tPohZyniT7LGlfkHcTc",
+      "appToken": "xapp-1-A0ADM99RSLV-10460354049203-72848191ab9a849e61e1bf8c15d4240d4cf2fd1d8f6dd45bd41c5678f0ed4b52",
+      "userTokenReadOnly": true,
+      "allowBots": false,
+      "requireMention": false,
+      "groupPolicy": "allowlist",
+      "historyLimit": 50,
+      "reactionNotifications": "all",
+      "thread": {
+        "historyScope": "thread",
+        "inheritParent": true
+      },
+      "actions": {
+        "reactions": true,
+        "messages": true,
+        "pins": true,
+        "memberInfo": true,
+        "emojiList": true
+      },
+      "dm": {
+        "enabled": true,
+        "policy": "allowlist",
+        "allowFrom": [
+          "U0AE3J9MDND"
+        ]
+      },
+      "channels": {
+        "C0AEJV13TEU": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0ADJALL61Z": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AD9F7LYNB": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AE4CESCC9": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AEB39CE5U": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "talk": {
+    "apiKey": "sk_d8aa4795f7124ed052fa7de66a28a7739b8bb82789c2f398"
+  },
+  "gateway": {
+    "port": 18800,
+    "mode": "local",
+    "bind": "loopback",
+    "auth": {
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
+    },
+    "remote": {
+      "url": "ws://127.0.0.1:18800",
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
+    }
+  },
+  "skills": {
+    "load": {
+      "extraDirs": [
+        "/home/papa/atomizer/skills"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "plugins": {
+    "entries": {
+      "discord": {
+        "enabled": true
+      },
+      "slack": {
+        "enabled": true
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "meta": {
+    "lastTouchedVersion": "2026.2.12",
+    "lastTouchedAt": "2026-02-14T16:38:57.436Z"
+  }
+}

hq/instances/manager/openclaw.json.bak.2

@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+{
+  "logging": {
+    "level": "trace",
+    "file": "/tmp/openclaw/atomizer-manager.log",
+    "redactSensitive": "tools"
+  },
+  "agents": {
+    "defaults": {
+      "model": {
+        "primary": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6"
+      },
+      "skipBootstrap": true,
+      "bootstrapMaxChars": 25000,
+      "userTimezone": "America/Toronto",
+      "typingIntervalSeconds": 4,
+      "typingMode": "instant",
+      "maxConcurrent": 4,
+      "subagents": {
+        "maxConcurrent": 4
+      }
+    },
+    "list": [
+      {
+        "id": "main",
+        "default": true,
+        "name": "Atomizer Manager",
+        "workspace": "/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/manager",
+        "model": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6",
+        "identity": {
+          "name": "Atomizer Manager",
+          "theme": "Senior engineering manager. Orchestrates, delegates, enforces protocols. Decisive and strategic.",
+          "emoji": "\ud83c\udfaf"
+        },
+        "groupChat": {
+          "mentionPatterns": [
+            "@manager",
+            "@Manager",
+            "\ud83c\udfaf"
+          ]
+        },
+        "subagents": {
+          "allowAgents": [
+            "*"
+          ]
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "messages": {
+    "responsePrefix": "[{identity.name}] ",
+    "queue": {
+      "mode": "collect",
+      "debounceMs": 2000,
+      "cap": 20
+    },
+    "inbound": {
+      "debounceMs": 3000
+    },
+    "ackReaction": "",
+    "ackReactionScope": "group-mentions"
+  },
+  "commands": {
+    "native": "auto",
+    "nativeSkills": "auto"
+  },
+  "hooks": {
+    "enabled": true,
+    "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1",
+    "allowRequestSessionKey": true,
+    "allowedSessionKeyPrefixes": [
+      "agent:",
+      "hook:"
+    ],
+    "allowedAgentIds": [
+      "*"
+    ]
+  },
+  "channels": {
+    "discord": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "commands": {
+        "native": false
+      },
+      "groupPolicy": "allowlist",
+      "token": "${DISCORD_TOKEN_MANAGER}",
+      "dm": {
+        "enabled": true,
+        "policy": "allowlist",
+        "allowFrom": [
+          "719982779793932419"
+        ]
+      },
+      "guilds": {
+        "1471858733452890132": {
+          "requireMention": false,
+          "users": [
+            "719982779793932419"
+          ],
+          "channels": {
+            "ceo-office": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            },
+            "announcements": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            },
+            "daily-standup": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            },
+            "active-projects": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            },
+            "agent-logs": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            },
+            "inter-agent": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            },
+            "general": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            },
+            "hydrotech-beam": {
+              "allow": true,
+              "requireMention": false
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "slack": {
+      "mode": "socket",
+      "webhookPath": "/slack/events",
+      "enabled": true,
+      "botToken": "xoxb-10470305040052-10460352291747-t1rf0tPohZyniT7LGlfkHcTc",
+      "appToken": "xapp-1-A0ADM99RSLV-10460354049203-72848191ab9a849e61e1bf8c15d4240d4cf2fd1d8f6dd45bd41c5678f0ed4b52",
+      "userTokenReadOnly": true,
+      "allowBots": false,
+      "requireMention": false,
+      "groupPolicy": "allowlist",
+      "historyLimit": 50,
+      "reactionNotifications": "all",
+      "thread": {
+        "historyScope": "thread",
+        "inheritParent": true
+      },
+      "actions": {
+        "reactions": true,
+        "messages": true,
+        "pins": true,
+        "memberInfo": true,
+        "emojiList": true
+      },
+      "dm": {
+        "enabled": true,
+        "policy": "allowlist",
+        "allowFrom": [
+          "U0AE3J9MDND"
+        ]
+      },
+      "channels": {
+        "C0AEJV13TEU": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0ADJALL61Z": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AD9F7LYNB": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AE4CESCC9": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        },
+        "C0AEB39CE5U": {
+          "allow": true,
+          "requireMention": false
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "gateway": {
+    "port": 18800,
+    "mode": "local",
+    "bind": "loopback",
+    "auth": {
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
+    },
+    "remote": {
+      "url": "ws://127.0.0.1:18800",
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
+    }
+  },
+  "skills": {
+    "load": {
+      "extraDirs": [
+        "/home/papa/atomizer/skills"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "plugins": {
+    "entries": {
+      "discord": {
+        "enabled": true
+      },
+      "slack": {
+        "enabled": true
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "talk": {
+    "apiKey": "sk_d8aa4795f7124ed052fa7de66a28a7739b8bb82789c2f398"
+  }
+}

hq/instances/manager/update-check.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "lastCheckedAt": "2026-02-15T17:13:25.568Z",
+  "lastNotifiedVersion": "2026.2.14",
+  "lastNotifiedTag": "latest"
+}

hq/instances/nx-expert/cron/jobs.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/nx-expert/cron/jobs.json.bak

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/nx-expert/env

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_PORT=18824

hq/instances/nx-expert/openclaw.json

@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
   },
   "hooks": {
     "enabled": true,
-    "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}",
+    "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1",
     "allowRequestSessionKey": true,
     "allowedSessionKeyPrefixes": [
       "agent:",
@@ -217,11 +217,11 @@
     "mode": "local",
     "bind": "loopback",
     "auth": {
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     },
     "remote": {
       "url": "ws://127.0.0.1:18824",
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     }
   },
   "skills": {

hq/instances/nx-expert/update-check.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "lastCheckedAt": "2026-02-14T13:54:45.783Z",
+  "lastNotifiedVersion": "2026.2.13",
+  "lastNotifiedTag": "latest"
+}

hq/instances/optimizer/cron/jobs.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/optimizer/cron/jobs.json.bak

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/optimizer/devices/paired.json

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+{
+  "b37d0899686161eea4515f7c59d36f875de30b80e30236119067655238d920fd": {
+    "deviceId": "b37d0899686161eea4515f7c59d36f875de30b80e30236119067655238d920fd",
+    "publicKey": "vBuKXBCdvM0VJ1yg9Mydmh7tQzEjic9L1GwhQ_w1Rrg",
+    "platform": "linux",
+    "clientId": "cli",
+    "clientMode": "cli",
+    "role": "operator",
+    "roles": [
+      "operator"
+    ],
+    "scopes": [
+      "operator.admin",
+      "operator.approvals",
+      "operator.pairing"
+    ],
+    "tokens": {
+      "operator": {
+        "token": "d3ed19d5f143466db08fc47693ef1121",
+        "role": "operator",
+        "scopes": [
+          "operator.admin",
+          "operator.approvals",
+          "operator.pairing"
+        ],
+        "createdAtMs": 1771083768041,
+        "lastUsedAtMs": 1771120758737
+      }
+    },
+    "createdAtMs": 1771083768040,
+    "approvedAtMs": 1771083768040
+  }
+}

hq/instances/optimizer/devices/pending.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{}

hq/instances/optimizer/env

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_PORT=18816

hq/instances/optimizer/identity/device-auth.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "b37d0899686161eea4515f7c59d36f875de30b80e30236119067655238d920fd",
+  "tokens": {
+    "operator": {
+      "token": "d3ed19d5f143466db08fc47693ef1121",
+      "role": "operator",
+      "scopes": [
+        "operator.admin",
+        "operator.approvals",
+        "operator.pairing"
+      ],
+      "updatedAtMs": 1771120758747
+    }
+  }
+}

hq/instances/optimizer/identity/device.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "b37d0899686161eea4515f7c59d36f875de30b80e30236119067655238d920fd",
+  "publicKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\nMCowBQYDK2VwAyEAvBuKXBCdvM0VJ1yg9Mydmh7tQzEjic9L1GwhQ/w1Rrg=\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n",
+  "privateKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----\nMC4CAQAwBQYDK2VwBCIEIOC89NY6pTuwDTSfHzB0okQdmEwSk3YKm51eYiBh+Jo0\n-----END PRIVATE KEY-----\n",
+  "createdAtMs": 1771083768008
+}

hq/instances/optimizer/openclaw.json

@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
   },
   "hooks": {
     "enabled": true,
-    "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}",
+    "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1",
     "allowRequestSessionKey": true,
     "allowedSessionKeyPrefixes": [
       "agent:",
@@ -217,11 +217,11 @@
     "mode": "local",
     "bind": "loopback",
     "auth": {
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     },
     "remote": {
       "url": "ws://127.0.0.1:18816",
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     }
   },
   "skills": {

hq/instances/optimizer/update-check.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "lastCheckedAt": "2026-02-14T13:54:41.272Z",
+  "lastNotifiedVersion": "2026.2.13",
+  "lastNotifiedTag": "latest"
+}

hq/instances/secretary/cron/jobs.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/secretary/cron/jobs.json.bak

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "jobs": []
+}

hq/instances/secretary/devices/paired.json

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+{
+  "5b8eb09786f8b9cd617a1f96b42fb479d73c6fc421b168aa47124a4d74595dc3": {
+    "deviceId": "5b8eb09786f8b9cd617a1f96b42fb479d73c6fc421b168aa47124a4d74595dc3",
+    "publicKey": "lNlX0xhSVQGvufMKYuLx1C2Ed0lS9uK22f6N4MmOoPU",
+    "platform": "linux",
+    "clientId": "cli",
+    "clientMode": "cli",
+    "role": "operator",
+    "roles": [
+      "operator"
+    ],
+    "scopes": [
+      "operator.admin",
+      "operator.approvals",
+      "operator.pairing"
+    ],
+    "tokens": {
+      "operator": {
+        "token": "b6a85b3c2543407d846acb863d3d0545",
+        "role": "operator",
+        "scopes": [
+          "operator.admin",
+          "operator.approvals",
+          "operator.pairing"
+        ],
+        "createdAtMs": 1771113526822,
+        "lastUsedAtMs": 1771121354308
+      }
+    },
+    "createdAtMs": 1771113526821,
+    "approvedAtMs": 1771113526821
+  }
+}

hq/instances/secretary/devices/pending.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{}

hq/instances/secretary/env

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_PORT=18808

hq/instances/secretary/identity/device-auth.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "5b8eb09786f8b9cd617a1f96b42fb479d73c6fc421b168aa47124a4d74595dc3",
+  "tokens": {
+    "operator": {
+      "token": "b6a85b3c2543407d846acb863d3d0545",
+      "role": "operator",
+      "scopes": [
+        "operator.admin",
+        "operator.approvals",
+        "operator.pairing"
+      ],
+      "updatedAtMs": 1771121354336
+    }
+  }
+}

hq/instances/secretary/identity/device.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "deviceId": "5b8eb09786f8b9cd617a1f96b42fb479d73c6fc421b168aa47124a4d74595dc3",
+  "publicKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\nMCowBQYDK2VwAyEAlNlX0xhSVQGvufMKYuLx1C2Ed0lS9uK22f6N4MmOoPU=\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n",
+  "privateKeyPem": "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----\nMC4CAQAwBQYDK2VwBCIEIBKcz+McFIShhev0zkU/2LDwcn76MtHqmA4dKZNXX4/d\n-----END PRIVATE KEY-----\n",
+  "createdAtMs": 1771113526792
+}

hq/instances/secretary/openclaw.json

@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
   },
   "hooks": {
     "enabled": true,
-    "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}",
+    "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1",
     "allowRequestSessionKey": true,
     "allowedSessionKeyPrefixes": [
       "agent:",
@@ -218,11 +218,11 @@
     "mode": "local",
     "bind": "loopback",
     "auth": {
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     },
     "remote": {
       "url": "ws://127.0.0.1:18808",
-      "token": "${GATEWAY_TOKEN}"
+      "token": "31422bb39bc9e7a4d34f789d8a7cbc582dece8dd170dadd1"
     }
   },
   "skills": {