feat: Implement Study Organization System (Organization v2.0)

Reorganized simple_beam_optimization study and created templates for future
studies following best practices for clarity, chronology, and self-documentation.

## Study Reorganization (simple_beam_optimization)

**New Directory Structure**:
```
studies/simple_beam_optimization/
├── 1_setup/                    # Pre-optimization setup
│   ├── model/                  # Reference CAD/FEM model
│   └── benchmarking/           # Baseline validation results
├── 2_substudies/               # Optimization runs (numbered chronologically)
│   ├── 01_initial_exploration/
│   ├── 02_validation_3d_3trials/
│   ├── 03_validation_4d_3trials/
│   └── 04_full_optimization_50trials/
└── 3_reports/                  # Study-level analysis
    └── COMPREHENSIVE_BENCHMARK_RESULTS.md
```

**Key Changes**:
1. **Numbered Substudies**: 01_, 02_, 03_, 04_ indicate chronological order
2. **Reorganized Setup**: model/ and benchmarking/ moved to 1_setup/
3. **Centralized Reports**: Study-level docs moved to 3_reports/
4. **Substudy Documentation**: Each substudy has README.md explaining purpose/results

## Updated Metadata

**study_metadata.json** (v2.0):
- Tracks all 4 substudies with creation date, status, purpose
- Includes result summaries (best objective, feasible count)
- Documents new organization version

**Substudies Documented**:
- 01_initial_exploration - Initial design space exploration
- 02_validation_3d_3trials - Validate 3D parameter updates
- 03_validation_4d_3trials - Validate 4D updates including hole_count
- 04_full_optimization_50trials - Full 50-trial optimization

## Templates for Future Studies

**templates/study_template/** - Complete study structure:
- README.md template with study overview format
- study_metadata.json template with v2.0 schema
- Pre-created 1_setup/, 2_substudies/, 3_reports/ directories

**templates/substudy_README_template.md** - Standardized substudy documentation:
- Purpose and hypothesis
- Configuration changes from previous run
- Expected vs actual results
- Validation checklist
- Lessons learned
- Next steps

**templates/HOW_TO_CREATE_A_STUDY.md** - Complete guide:
- Quick start (9 steps from template to first run)
- Substudy workflow
- Directory structure reference
- Naming conventions
- Best practices
- Troubleshooting guide
- Examples

## Benefits

**Clarity**:
- Numbered substudies show chronological progression (01 → 02 → 03 → 04)
- Clear separation: setup vs. optimization runs vs. analysis
- Self-documenting via substudy READMEs

**Discoverability**:
- study_metadata.json provides complete substudy registry
- Each substudy README explains what was tested and why
- Easy to find results for specific runs

**Scalability**:
- Works for small studies (3 substudies) or large studies (50+)
- Chronological numbering scales to 99 substudies
- Template system makes new studies quick to set up

**Reproducibility**:
- Each substudy documents configuration changes
- Purpose and results clearly stated
- Lessons learned captured for future reference

## Implementation Details

**reorganize_study.py** - Migration script:
- Handles locked files gracefully
- Moves files to new structure
- Provides clear progress reporting
- Safe to run multiple times

**Organization Version**: 2.0
- Tracked in study_metadata.json
- Future studies will use this structure by default
- Existing studies can migrate or keep current structure

## Files Added

- templates/study_template/ - Complete study template
- templates/substudy_README_template.md - Substudy documentation template
- templates/HOW_TO_CREATE_A_STUDY.md - Comprehensive creation guide
- reorganize_study.py - Migration script for existing studies

## Files Reorganized (simple_beam_optimization)

**Moved to 1_setup/**:
- model/ → 1_setup/model/ (CAD/FEM reference files)
- substudies/benchmarking/ → 1_setup/benchmarking/
- baseline_validation.json → 1_setup/

**Renamed and Moved to 2_substudies/**:
- substudies/initial_exploration/ → 2_substudies/01_initial_exploration/
- substudies/validation_3trials/ → 2_substudies/02_validation_3d_3trials/
- substudies/validation_4d_3trials/ → 2_substudies/03_validation_4d_3trials/
- substudies/full_optimization_50trials/ → 2_substudies/04_full_optimization_50trials/

**Moved to 3_reports/**:
- COMPREHENSIVE_BENCHMARK_RESULTS.md → 3_reports/

**Substudy-Specific Docs** (moved to substudy directories):
- OPTIMIZATION_RESULTS_50TRIALS.md → 2_substudies/04_full_optimization_50trials/OPTIMIZATION_RESULTS.md

## Documentation Created

Each substudy now has README.md documenting:
- **01_initial_exploration**: Initial exploration purpose
- **02_validation_3d_3trials**: 3D parameter update validation
- **03_validation_4d_3trials**: hole_count validation success
- **04_full_optimization_50trials**: Full results, no feasible designs found

## Next Steps

**For Future Studies**:
1. Copy templates/study_template/
2. Follow templates/HOW_TO_CREATE_A_STUDY.md
3. Use numbered substudies (01_, 02_, ...)
4. Document each substudy with README.md

**For Existing Studies**:
- Can migrate using reorganize_study.py
- Or apply organization v2.0 to new substudies only
- See docs/STUDY_ORGANIZATION.md for migration guide

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2025-11-17 19:20:45 -05:00
parent 91e2d7a120
commit fe2ef9be6d
306 changed files with 3207 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
# Comprehensive Benchmark Analysis - Simple Beam Optimization
**Date**: 2025-11-17
**Study**: simple_beam_optimization
**Model**: Beam.prt (CQUAD4 shell elements)
## 🔍 Complete Results Analysis
### Expression Discovery (via .exp export)
**Total Expressions**: 30 (100% captured with seamless .exp export!)
**Key Design Variables**:
- `beam_half_core_thickness`: 20.0 mm
- `beam_face_thickness`: 20.0 mm
- `holes_diameter`: 300.0 mm
- `hole_count`: 10 (unitless)
**Mass Expression**:
- `p173`: **973.968 kg**
### OP2 File Analysis
**File**: beam_sim1-solution_1.op2
**Available Results**:
| Result Type | Status | Subcases | Notes |
|-------------|--------|----------|-------|
| Displacement | ✅ YES | [1] | Max: 22.12 mm at node 5186 |
| Stress | ✅ YES | [1] | Max von Mises: 131.507 MPa at element 454 |
| Strain | ❌ NO | - | Not configured in NX simulation |
| Element Forces | ❌ NO | - | Not configured in NX simulation |
| SPC Forces | ✅ YES | [1] | Reaction forces at constraints |
**Element Types**: CQUAD4 (shell elements, 9782 elements)
### F06 File Analysis
**File**: beam_sim1-solution_1.f06
**Available Results**:
- ❌ NO displacement output
- ❌ NO stress output
- ❌ NO strain output
- ❌ NO force output
**Conclusion**: F06 file does not contain tabular results. All usable results are in OP2.
## 📊 Baseline Performance
**Current Design**:
- beam_half_core_thickness = 20 mm
- beam_face_thickness = 20 mm
- holes_diameter = 300 mm
- hole_count = 10
**Measured Results**:
- **Max Displacement**: 22.12 mm (exceeds 10mm target!)
- **Max von Mises Stress**: 131.507 MPa (at element 454)
- **Mass**: 973.97 kg
## 🎯 Available Optimization Objectives
Based on what's actually in the output files:
### Can Optimize NOW:
1. **Displacement** (from OP2)
- Minimize max displacement
- Constrain to < 10mm
- Current: 22.12 mm (VIOLATES constraint!)
2. **Stress** (from OP2)
- Minimize max von Mises stress
- Current: 131.507 MPa
- Element type: CQUAD4 (shells)
3. **Mass** (from p173 expression)
- Minimize weight
- Current: 973.97 kg
4. **SPC Forces** (from OP2)
- Reaction forces at constraints
- Could be used as objective or constraint
### Cannot Optimize (yet):
1. **Strain** - Not in output files
2. **Element Forces** - Not in output files
## 📝 Recommended Configuration
**Full Multi-Objective Optimization (All 3 objectives available NOW!)**
```json
{
"extractors": [
{
"name": "max_displacement",
"action": "extract_displacement"
},
{
"name": "max_stress",
"action": "extract_solid_stress"
},
{
"name": "mass",
"action": "extract_expression",
"parameters": {
"expression_name": "p173"
}
}
],
"objectives": [
{
"name": "minimize_displacement",
"extractor": "max_displacement",
"goal": "minimize",
"weight": 0.33
},
{
"name": "minimize_stress",
"extractor": "max_stress",
"goal": "minimize",
"weight": 0.33
},
{
"name": "minimize_mass",
"extractor": "mass",
"goal": "minimize",
"weight": 0.34
}
],
"constraints": [
{
"name": "displacement_limit",
"extractor": "max_displacement",
"type": "less_than",
"value": 10.0
}
]
}
```
## ✅ What Works
- ✅ Expression gathering (30/30 expressions captured seamlessly!)
- ✅ Displacement extraction from OP2 (max: 22.12 mm)
- ✅ Stress extraction from OP2 (max von Mises: 131.507 MPa) **FIXED!**
- ✅ Mass extraction from expressions (p173: 973.97 kg)
- ✅ Proper unit system handling (MN-MM → MPa conversion)
- ✅ SPC forces available if needed
- ✅ Load from folder settings working
- ✅ FEM file loading working
## 🔄 Next Steps
**Immediate (Ready to start!)**:
1. Update optimization config to use all 3 objectives (displacement + stress + mass)
2. Run validation trials to test complete pipeline
3. If successful, run full optimization (50 trials)
**Baseline to Beat**:
- Displacement: 22.12 mm → target < 10 mm
- Stress: 131.507 MPa → minimize
- Mass: 973.97 kg → minimize