Files
Atomizer/projects/hydrotech-beam/kb/fea/models/sol101-static.md
Antoine b88657b00c KB Gen 002: Process KBS sessions, update model parameters
Sources: 3 KBS capture sessions (20260210-132817, 20260210-161401, 20260210-163801)

Key changes:
- Mass corrected: 974 kg (p173) → 11.33 kg (p1) — KBS ground truth
- Beam length confirmed: 5,000 mm cantilever
- BCs confirmed: left fixed, right 10,000 kgf downward
- Material confirmed: AISI Steel 1005, density 7.3 g/cm³
- Mesh confirmed: CQUAD4 thin shell, 33.7 mm elements
- Hole geometry: span 4,000 mm (p6), offsets 500 mm fixed
- 3 gaps closed (G1, G2, G8), 6 new gaps identified (G10-G15)
- New expressions: beam_half_height, beam_half_width, beam_length, p6

Files: CONTEXT.md, kb/_index.md, kb/_history.md, kb/components/sandwich-beam.md,
       kb/materials/steel-aisi.md, kb/fea/models/sol101-static.md, kb/dev/gen-002.md
2026-02-10 21:49:39 +00:00

4.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

SOL 101 — Static Analysis

Simulation: Beam_sim1.sim Solver: NX Nastran SOL 101 (Linear Static) Status: Setup confirmed from KBS session (Gen 002). Baseline run needed.


Setup — Confirmed

Item Value Source Notes
Solution type SOL 101 (Linear Static) KBS session "Solution 1 — static subcase"
Element type CQUAD4 (4-node quad shell) KBS session Confirmed — thin shell collectors
Property type Thin shell KBS session Material inherited from "beam material"
Mesh density Element size = 33.7 mm (67.4 / 2) KBS session Subdivision-based. Future refinement planned.
Idealization Promote body → mid-surface extraction KBS session Pair mid-surface function

Boundary Conditions — Confirmed

BC Location Type Value Source
Fixed constraint Left side of beam (full edge) SPC (all 6 DOF) Fixed KBS session — "left side fixed"
Applied force Right side of beam (free end) Point/edge force 10,000 kgf downward (Y) KBS session — "project requirement"

Loading Details

  • Force magnitude: 10,000 kgf = 98,066.5 N (≈ 98.1 kN)
  • Direction: Downward (Y in model coordinates)
  • Application: Right side (free end) of beam
  • Type: This is a cantilever beam with end loading — classic bending problem

Result Extraction

Output Method Expression/Sensor Status
Mass NX expression p1 (NOT p173) Confirmed — 11.33 kg baseline
Tip displacement Sensor or .f06 parse TBD Gap G3, G6 — need baseline run
Von Mises stress Sensor or .f06 parse TBD Gap G4, G6 — need baseline run

⚠️ Mass expression changed: p1 confirmed in KBS session, replacing previous assumption of p173. Extractor config must be updated.

Mesh Details

Property Value Notes
Element type CQUAD4 4-node quadrilateral, first-order
Element size 33.7 mm 67.4 / 2 — Antoine says refinement is "not for now"
Mesh method Subdivision-based Auto-mesh with size control
Shell formulation Thin shell Mid-surface extracted from solid
Convergence NOT VERIFIED Gap G8 partially closed (type known), but convergence check still needed

Mesh Estimate

  • Beam length 5,000 mm / 33.7 mm ≈ 148 elements along length
  • Perimeter of I-beam cross-section ≈ varies — but total mesh likely 10K50K elements
  • Expected DOF: 60K300K → SOL 101 solve time: seconds to low minutes

Solver Considerations

From Technical Breakdown (Gen 001), updated with KBS data:

  • Linear assumption: With 11.33 kg beam under 98 kN load, deflections may be significant relative to beam dimensions. L/δ ratio needs verification from baseline run.
  • Mesh sensitivity: Stress at hole edges is mesh-dependent. CQUAD4 at 33.7 mm may not fully resolve SCF at 300 mm diameter holes (~28 elements around circumference — probably adequate but needs verification).
  • Mesh morphing vs remesh: Parametric NX models typically remesh on update. Need to confirm behavior across DV range (Gap G7).
  • Runtime estimate: Single beam, CQUAD4 thin shell → likely seconds per evaluation. Very fast.
  • Unit system: NX model uses kg-mm-s (kgf for force). Nastran output stress in kPa → divide by 1000 for MPa.

Validation Checklist

  • Baseline mass matches NX expression p1 (11.33 kg)
  • Baseline displacement measured (was 22 mm at old model state — needs re-verification G10)
  • Baseline stress measured (never had a value — G11)
  • Mesh convergence verified at baseline
  • Mesh quality acceptable at DV range extremes
  • Model rebuilds cleanly at all 4 corners of design space (Gap G7)
  • Stress at hole edges resolved with current mesh density

History

  • Gen 001 (2026-02-09): Initial documentation from technical breakdown. All solver details pending gap resolution.
  • Gen 002 (2026-02-10): Confirmed from KBS session — CQUAD4 thin shell, 33.7 mm element size, cantilever BCs (left fixed, right 10,000 kgf down), mass via p1. Material: AISI 1005.