Files

Anto01 ed6874092f chore: clean hydrotech-beam syncthing conflicts and add new docs

- Remove all .sync-conflict-* files
- Remove temp _temp_part_properties.json files
- Add USER_GUIDE.md
- Add dashboard docs (Executive, Technical, Operations, Master Plan)
- Add playbooks (DOE, NX_REAL_RUN, SYNCTHING_RECOVERY)
- Update iteration results

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-16 12:11:16 -05:00

1.3 KiB

Raw Blame History

Hydrotech Beam — Executive Dashboard

Last updated (UTC): 2026-02-14T22:24:29 Source: studies/01_doe_landscape/results/doe_summary.json + doe_results.csv

CEO 60-second view

Phase: DOE Phase 1 (LHS)
Gate status: ❌ BLOCKED (Phase 1 → Phase 2)
Total trials: 51
Solved: 39 (76.5%, below 80% gate)
Geo-infeasible: 12
Fully feasible designs: 0 (gate requires ≥5)

Top signals

✅ Mass extraction now looks real (no NaN in solved rows)
✅ Syncthing cleanup completed (active conflict files archived)
⚠️ Displacement constraint is the blocker (0/39 displacement-feasible at 10 mm)
⚠️ DOE→TPE gate cannot pass with current limits/bounds

Decision hotlist (CEO)

Approve next constraint strategy:
- Option A (recommended): exploratory rerun at 20 mm displacement
- Option B: keep 10 mm and tighten design bounds for stiffness
Approve TPE entry rule (with strict gate or conditional gate)

Recommendation (current)

Proceed with Option A for exploration (20 mm), then tighten toward 10 mm in staged optimization.

KPI snapshot

Solve success rate: 76.5%
Feasibility rate (full): 0.0%
Best solved mass: 686.289 kg (not fully feasible)
Best trial ID by mass: 26

1.3 KiB Raw Blame History