- Add validation framework (config, model, results, study validators) - Add Claude Code skills (create-study, run-optimization, generate-report, troubleshoot, analyze-model) - Add Atomizer Dashboard (React frontend + FastAPI backend) - Reorganize docs into structured directories (00-09) - Add neural surrogate modules and training infrastructure - Add multi-objective optimization support 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.1 KiB
NX File Modifications Required for Drone Gimbal Arm Study
Overview
The study uses the same beam model as simple_beam_optimization but requires modifications to:
- Add modal analysis (frequency extraction)
- Update loading conditions for the 850g camera payload
- Ensure material properties match Al 7075-T6
Critical Modifications
1. Simulation File (Beam_sim1.sim)
REQUIRED: Add Modal Analysis Solution
You need to add a second solution for modal analysis:
-
Open
Beam_sim1.simin NX Simcenter -
Create New Solution:
- Solution Type:
SOL 103 - Normal Modes - Name:
modal_analysis - Number of modes:
10(we only need the first, but calculate more for safety) - Frequency range:
0-500 Hz
- Solution Type:
-
Use Same Mesh as the static solution
- Link to existing FEM file:
Beam_fem1.fem
- Link to existing FEM file:
-
Boundary Conditions: Use same constraints as static analysis
- Fixed constraint at base (same as static)
- No loads needed for modal (it finds natural frequencies)
2. Static Analysis Modifications
Update Load Magnitude:
The existing static analysis load needs to represent the 850g camera payload:
- Open Solution 1 (static analysis)
- Modify Force Magnitude:
- Old value: (whatever is currently there)
- New value:
8.34 N(850g × 9.81 m/s²) - Direction: Downward (negative Y or Z depending on your coordinate system)
- Location: Tip of beam (where camera attaches)
Note: 120 MPa stress limit provides safety factor of 2.3 on 6061-T6 yield strength (276 MPa)
3. Material Properties
Verify Material is Al 6061-T6:
-
Open Part File:
Beam.prt -
Check Material Assignment:
- Material:
Aluminum 6061-T6 - Yield Strength: ~276 MPa
- Young's Modulus: ~68.9 GPa
- Density: ~2700 kg/m³
- Poisson's Ratio: ~0.33
- Material:
-
If not Al 6061-T6, update material assignment to match drone application requirements
4. Results Configuration
Ensure these results are requested:
For Static Solution (Solution 1):
- Displacement (VECTOR, all components)
- von Mises Stress
- Mass properties
For Modal Solution (Solution 2):
- Natural frequencies
- Mode shapes (optional, for visualization)
What You DON'T Need to Change
The parametric design variables are already set up correctly in the beam model:
beam_half_core_thickness(20-30mm)beam_face_thickness(1-3mm)holes_diameter(180-280mm)hole_count(8-14)
These parameters will be automatically updated by the optimization loop.
Verification Steps
Before running optimization, verify:
-
Two Solutions Exist:
Solution 1: Static Analysis (SOL 101) - displacement and stress Solution 2: Modal Analysis (SOL 103) - natural frequencies -
Load is Correct:
- Static load = 8.34 N downward at tip
-
Material is Al 7075-T6
-
Both solutions solve successfully with baseline parameters:
beam_half_core_thickness = 25mm beam_face_thickness = 2mm holes_diameter = 230mm hole_count = 11
Quick Test
Run a manual solve with baseline parameters to verify:
Expected Results (approximate):
- Mass: ~140-150g
- Max Displacement: ~1-2 mm
- Max Stress: ~80-100 MPa
- First Frequency: ~120-140 Hz
If these are wildly different, check your setup.
Extraction Configuration
The optimization engine will extract:
- Mass: From Solution 1 mass properties
- Displacement: Maximum displacement magnitude from Solution 1
- Stress: Maximum von Mises stress from Solution 1
- Frequency: First natural frequency (mode 1) from Solution 2
All extraction is automated - you just need to ensure the solutions are configured correctly.
Optional Enhancements
If you want more realistic results:
-
Add Gravity Load:
- Apply -9.81 m/s² gravity in addition to tip load
- Represents arm's own weight during flight
-
Add Damping to modal analysis:
- Structural damping ratio: ~0.02 (2%)
- More realistic frequency response
-
Refine Mesh at stress concentrations:
- Around holes
- At base constraint
- Better stress accuracy
But these are NOT required for the optimization to run successfully.