Files
Atomizer/projects/hydrotech-beam/kb/_index.md

4.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Knowledge Base — Hydrotech Beam

Project: Hydrotech Beam Structural Optimization Generation: 002 Last updated: 2026-02-10


Overview

I-beam optimization for a test fixture. Steel (AISI 1005) cantilever beam with lightening holes in the web. Goal: minimize mass from 1,133.01 kg baseline while meeting displacement (≤ 10 mm) and stress (≤ 130 MPa) constraints.

Key confirmed parameters (Gen 002 + Introspection):

  • Beam length: 5,000 mm (beam_lenght ⚠️ typo in NX), cantilever — left fixed, right loaded
  • Load: 10,000 kgf downward at free end
  • Baseline mass: 1,133.01 kg (expression p173: body_property147.mass)
  • DV baselines: face=21.504mm, core=25.162mm, holes_dia=300mm, hole_count=10
  • Material: AISI Steel 1005 (density 7.3 g/cm³)
  • Mesh: CQUAD4 thin shell, 33.7 mm element size

Components

Component File Status
Sandwich Beam sandwich-beam.md Updated Gen 002

Materials

Material File Status
Steel AISI 1005 steel-aisi.md Updated Gen 002

FEA

Model File Status
Static Analysis (SOL 101) fea/models/sol101-static.md Updated Gen 002 — BCs confirmed, baseline run needed

Generations

Gen Date Summary
001 2026-02-09 Initial KB from intake + technical breakdown
002 2026-02-10 KBS session processing — confirmed geometry, BCs, mesh, material, mass correction

Gap Tracker

CLOSED

# Item Resolution Closed In
G1 Beam length and support conditions 5,000 mm cantilever (left fixed, right free) Gen 002
G2 Loading definition 10,000 kgf point load, downward (Y), at free end Gen 002
G8 Mesh type and density CQUAD4 thin shell, 33.7 mm element size (67.4/2) Gen 002

🟡 PARTIALLY RESOLVED

# Item Known Remaining
G5 Hole geometric feasibility Span = 4,000 mm, offsets = 500 mm fixed. Baseline: 10 holes × 300 mm → ~144 mm ligament (OK) Need collision check at DV extremes. 15 × 450 mm WILL overlap. Need feasibility constraint.
G9 Stress allowable basis AISI 1005 yield ~285 MPa. 130 MPa → SF ≈ 2.2 Need confirmation that 130 MPa limit still applies to updated model.

STILL OPEN (from Gen 001)

# Item Why It Matters Priority
G3 Displacement measurement location Which node(s)? Which DOF? Magnitude or component? High
G4 Stress constraint scope Whole model? Exclude supports? Hole edges? High
G6 Result sensors in Beam_sim1.sim Determines extractor approach Medium
G7 NX parametric rebuild reliability Untested across DV range Medium

🆕 NEW GAPS (from Gen 002)

# Item Why It Matters Priority
G10 Baseline displacement re-verification 22 mm was from old model state (974 kg). True model is 11.33 kg — displacement likely different. High
G11 Baseline stress value Never measured. Essential for optimization setup. High
G12 beam_half_height starting value Expression exists but value not captured from KBS screenshots Medium
G13 beam_half_width starting value Expression exists but value not captured from KBS screenshots Medium
G14 Hole diameter expression name Need exact NX expression name (not just the value 300) Medium
G15 p6 (hole_span) as potential DV Antoine suggested it could be optimized. Decision needed. Medium

Open Tasks

  1. Run baseline SOL 101 — get fresh displacement and stress values (G10, G11)
  2. NX model introspection — extract all expression names/values, check sensors (G6, G12, G13, G14)
  3. Corner-case testing — verify NX rebuild at DV extremes (G7)
  4. Geometric feasibility constraint — implement hole collision check (G5)
  5. Update atomizer_spec_draft.json — mass expression p1, baseline 11.33 kg
  6. Decision on p6 as DV — consult Manager/CEO (G15)