Atomizer/docs/04_USER_GUIDES/hybrid_mode.md

Hybrid LLM Mode Guide

Recommended Mode for Development | Phase 3.2 Architecture | November 18, 2025

What is Hybrid Mode?

Hybrid Mode (Mode 2) gives you 90% of the automation with 10% of the complexity. It's the sweet spot between manual configuration and full LLM autonomy.

Why Hybrid Mode?

• ✅ No API Key Required - Use Claude Code/Desktop instead of Claude API
• ✅ 90% Automation - Auto-generates extractors, calculations, and hooks
• ✅ Full Transparency - You see and approve the workflow JSON
• ✅ Production Ready - Uses centralized library system
• ✅ Easy to Upgrade - Can enable full API mode later

How It Works

The Workflow

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HYBRID MODE - 90% Automation, No API Key                    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

1. YOU + CLAUDE CODE:
   ├─ Describe optimization in natural language
   └─ Claude helps create workflow JSON
        ↓
2. SAVE workflow JSON:
   ├─ llm_workflow_config.json
   └─ Contains: design vars, objectives, constraints
        ↓
3. LLMOptimizationRunner:
   ├─ Auto-generates extractors (pyNastran)
   ├─ Auto-generates calculations
   ├─ Auto-generates hooks
   ├─ Adds to core library (deduplication!)
   └─ Runs optimization loop (Optuna)
        ↓
4. RESULTS:
   ├─ optimization_results.json (best design)
   ├─ optimization_history.json (all trials)
   ├─ extractors_manifest.json (what was used)
   └─ Study folder stays clean!

Step-by-Step: Your First Hybrid Optimization

Step 1: Describe Your Optimization to Claude

Example conversation with Claude Code:

YOU: I want to optimize a bracket design.
     - Design variables: wall_thickness (1-5mm), fillet_radius (2-8mm)
     - Objective: minimize mass
     - Constraints: max_stress < 200 MPa, max_displacement < 0.5mm
     - I have a Beam.prt file and Beam_sim1.sim file ready

CLAUDE: I'll help you create the workflow JSON...

Step 2: Claude Creates Workflow JSON

Claude will generate a file like this:

{
  "study_name": "bracket_optimization",
  "optimization_request": "Minimize mass while keeping stress below 200 MPa and displacement below 0.5mm",

  "design_variables": [
    {
      "parameter": "wall_thickness",
      "bounds": [1, 5],
      "description": "Bracket wall thickness in mm"
    },
    {
      "parameter": "fillet_radius",
      "bounds": [2, 8],
      "description": "Fillet radius in mm"
    }
  ],

  "objectives": [
    {
      "name": "mass",
      "goal": "minimize",
      "weight": 1.0,
      "extraction": {
        "action": "extract_mass",
        "domain": "result_extraction",
        "params": {
          "result_type": "mass",
          "metric": "total"
        }
      }
    }
  ],

  "constraints": [
    {
      "name": "max_stress_limit",
      "type": "less_than",
      "threshold": 200,
      "extraction": {
        "action": "extract_von_mises_stress",
        "domain": "result_extraction",
        "params": {
          "result_type": "stress",
          "metric": "max"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "name": "max_displacement_limit",
      "type": "less_than",
      "threshold": 0.5,
      "extraction": {
        "action": "extract_displacement",
        "domain": "result_extraction",
        "params": {
          "result_type": "displacement",
          "metric": "max"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Step 3: Save and Review

Save the JSON to your study directory:

studies/
  bracket_optimization/
    1_setup/
      model/
        Bracket.prt           # Your NX model
        Bracket_sim1.sim      # Your FEM setup
      workflow_config.json    # ← SAVE HERE

IMPORTANT: Review the JSON before running! Check:

• ✅ Design variable names match your NX expressions
• ✅ Bounds are in correct units (mm not m!)
• ✅ Extraction actions match available OP2 results

Step 4: Run LLMOptimizationRunner

Now the magic happens - 90% automation kicks in:

from pathlib import Path
from optimization_engine.llm_optimization_runner import LLMOptimizationRunner

# Point to your files
study_dir = Path("studies/bracket_optimization")
workflow_json = study_dir / "1_setup/workflow_config.json"
prt_file = study_dir / "1_setup/model/Bracket.prt"
sim_file = study_dir / "1_setup/model/Bracket_sim1.sim"
output_dir = study_dir / "2_substudies/optimization_run_001"

# Create runner
runner = LLMOptimizationRunner(
    llm_workflow_file=workflow_json,
    prt_file=prt_file,
    sim_file=sim_file,
    output_dir=output_dir,
    n_trials=20
)

# Run optimization (this is where automation happens!)
study = runner.run()

print(f"Best design found:")
print(f"  wall_thickness: {study.best_params['wall_thickness']:.2f} mm")
print(f"  fillet_radius: {study.best_params['fillet_radius']:.2f} mm")
print(f"  mass: {study.best_value:.4f} kg")

Step 5: What Gets Auto-Generated

During the run, the system automatically:

1. Analyzes OP2 structure (pyNastran research agent)
2. Generates extractors and adds to core library:

   optimization_engine/extractors/
     ├── extract_mass.py              ← Generated!
     ├── extract_von_mises_stress.py  ← Generated!
     └── extract_displacement.py      ← Generated!
   

3. Creates study manifest (no code pollution!):

   2_substudies/optimization_run_001/
     └── extractors_manifest.json     ← References only
   

4. Runs optimization loop with Optuna
5. Saves full audit trail:

   2_substudies/optimization_run_001/
     ├── llm_workflow_config.json     ← What you specified
     ├── extractors_manifest.json     ← What was used
     ├── optimization_results.json    ← Best design
     └── optimization_history.json    ← All trials
   

Real Example: Beam Optimization

Let's walk through the existing beam optimization:

Natural Language Request

"I want to optimize a sandwich beam. Design variables are core thickness (20-30mm), face thickness (1-3mm), hole diameter (180-280mm), and number of holes (8-14). Minimize weight while keeping displacement under 2mm."

Claude Creates JSON

{
  "study_name": "simple_beam_optimization",
  "optimization_request": "Minimize weight subject to max displacement < 2mm",

  "design_variables": [
    {"parameter": "beam_half_core_thickness", "bounds": [20, 30]},
    {"parameter": "beam_face_thickness", "bounds": [1, 3]},
    {"parameter": "holes_diameter", "bounds": [180, 280]},
    {"parameter": "hole_count", "bounds": [8, 14]}
  ],

  "objectives": [
    {
      "name": "mass",
      "goal": "minimize",
      "weight": 1.0,
      "extraction": {
        "action": "extract_mass",
        "domain": "result_extraction",
        "params": {"result_type": "mass", "metric": "total"}
      }
    }
  ],

  "constraints": [
    {
      "name": "max_displacement_limit",
      "type": "less_than",
      "threshold": 2.0,
      "extraction": {
        "action": "extract_displacement",
        "domain": "result_extraction",
        "params": {"result_type": "displacement", "metric": "max"}
      }
    }
  ]
}

Run Script

from pathlib import Path
from optimization_engine.llm_optimization_runner import LLMOptimizationRunner

study_dir = Path("studies/simple_beam_optimization")
runner = LLMOptimizationRunner(
    llm_workflow_file=study_dir / "1_setup/workflow_config.json",
    prt_file=study_dir / "1_setup/model/Beam.prt",
    sim_file=study_dir / "1_setup/model/Beam_sim1.sim",
    output_dir=study_dir / "2_substudies/test_run",
    n_trials=20
)

study = runner.run()

Results After 20 Trials

Best design found:
  beam_half_core_thickness: 27.3 mm
  beam_face_thickness: 2.1 mm
  holes_diameter: 245.2 mm
  hole_count: 11
  mass: 1.234 kg (45% reduction!)
  max_displacement: 1.87 mm (within limit)

Study Folder (Clean!)

2_substudies/test_run/
├── extractors_manifest.json     # Just references
├── llm_workflow_config.json     # What you wanted
├── optimization_results.json    # Best design
└── optimization_history.json    # All 20 trials

Advanced: Extractor Library Reuse

The beauty of centralized library system:

First Optimization Run

# First beam optimization
runner1 = LLMOptimizationRunner(...)
runner1.run()

# Creates:
# optimization_engine/extractors/extract_mass.py
# optimization_engine/extractors/extract_displacement.py

Second Optimization Run (Different Study!)

# Different bracket optimization (but same extractions!)
runner2 = LLMOptimizationRunner(...)
runner2.run()

# REUSES existing extractors!
# No duplicate code generated
# Study folder stays clean

The system automatically detects identical extraction functionality and reuses code from the core library.

Comparison: Three Modes

Feature	Manual Mode	Hybrid Mode	Full LLM Mode
API Key Required	❌ No	❌ No	✅ Yes
Automation Level	0% (you code)	90% (auto-gen)	100% (NL only)
Extractor Generation	Manual	✅ Auto	✅ Auto
Hook Generation	Manual	✅ Auto	✅ Auto
Core Library	Manual	✅ Auto	✅ Auto
Transparency	Full	Full	High
Development Speed	Slow	Fast	Fastest
Production Ready	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	⚠️ Alpha
Recommended For	Complex custom	Most users	Future

Troubleshooting

Issue: "Expression not found in NX model"

Problem: Design variable name doesn't match NX expression name

Solution:

1. Open your .prt file in NX
2. Tools → Expression → check exact names
3. Update workflow JSON with exact names

Example:

// WRONG
"parameter": "thickness"

// RIGHT (must match NX exactly)
"parameter": "beam_half_core_thickness"

Issue: "No mass results in OP2"

Problem: OP2 file doesn't contain mass data

Solution:

1. Check what's actually in the OP2:

from pyNastran.op2.op2 import OP2
model = OP2()
model.read_op2('path/to/results.op2')
print(dir(model))  # See available results

2. Use available result type instead (e.g., von Mises stress, displacement)

Issue: "Extractor generation failed"

Problem: pyNastran research agent couldn't figure out extraction pattern

Solution:

1. Check optimization_engine/knowledge_base/ for available patterns
2. Manually create extractor in optimization_engine/extractors/
3. Reference it in workflow JSON using existing action name

Issue: "Parameter values too extreme"

Problem: Design variables using wrong range (0.2-1.0 instead of 20-30)

Fixed: This was the bug we fixed on Nov 17! Make sure you're using latest code.

Verify:

# Check bounds parsing in llm_optimization_runner.py
if 'bounds' in var_config:
    var_min, var_max = var_config['bounds']  # Should use this!

Tips for Success

1. Start Small

• First run: 5-10 trials to verify everything works
• Check results, review auto-generated extractors
• Then scale up to 50-100 trials

2. Verify Units

• NX expressions: Check Tools → Expression
• Workflow JSON: Match units exactly
• Common mistake: mm vs m, kg vs g

3. Use Existing Examples

• studies/simple_beam_optimization/ - Working example
• Copy the structure, modify workflow JSON
• Reuse proven patterns

4. Review Auto-Generated Code

# After first run, check what was generated:
from optimization_engine.extractor_library import ExtractorLibrary

library = ExtractorLibrary()
print(library.get_library_summary())

5. Leverage Deduplication

• Same extraction across studies? Library reuses code!
• No need to regenerate extractors
• Study folders stay clean automatically

Next Steps

Ready to Test?

1. ✅ Read this guide
2. ✅ Review beam optimization example
3. ✅ Create your workflow JSON with Claude's help
4. ✅ Run your first optimization!

Want Full Automation?

When you're ready for Full LLM Mode (Mode 3):

1. Set up Claude API key
2. Use natural language requests (no JSON needed!)
3. System creates workflow JSON automatically
4. Everything else identical to Hybrid Mode

Questions?

• Check docs/ARCHITECTURE_REFACTOR_NOV17.md for library system details
• Review optimization_engine/llm_optimization_runner.py for implementation
• Run E2E test: python tests/test_phase_3_2_e2e.py

---

Status: Production Ready ✅ Mode: Hybrid (90% Automation) API Required: No Testing: E2E tests passing (18/18 checks) Architecture: Centralized library with deduplication

Ready to revolutionize your optimization workflow! 🚀