Anto01
ed6874092f
- Remove all .sync-conflict-* files - Remove temp _temp_part_properties.json files - Add USER_GUIDE.md - Add dashboard docs (Executive, Technical, Operations, Master Plan) - Add playbooks (DOE, NX_REAL_RUN, SYNCTHING_RECOVERY) - Update iteration results Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Hydrotech Beam — Technical Dashboard
Last updated (UTC): 2026-02-14T22:24:29
Source: studies/01_doe_landscape/results/doe_results.csv
Study health
- Trials: 51
- Solved: 39
- Geo-infeasible: 12
- Solve failures: 0
- Full-feasible: 0
Constraint status
- Displacement limit: 10.0 mm
- Stress limit: 130.0 MPa
Observed solved ranges:
- Tip displacement: 11.7788 → 39.4912 mm
- Max von Mises stress: 75.0116 → 398.4295 MPa
Feasibility counts:
- Displacement feasible: 0
- Stress feasible: 23
- Fully feasible: 0
Performance / runtime
- Solve time range (solved): 12.42 s → 59.59 s
- Pattern indicates real NX execution (non-stub timing)
Data quality checks
- Mass NaN (solved): 0 ✅
- Penalty mass (99999): 12 (geo infeasible trials) ✅ expected
- Mixed appended run state: cleared (current clean 51-trial set)
Technical interpretation
- Current geometry space + 10 mm displacement limit appears too restrictive.
- Stress limit is partially satisfiable (23/39), so the primary bottleneck is stiffness/displacement.
Recommended technical next actions
- Run a controlled DOE with displacement limit = 20 mm (exploration mode)
- Identify near-feasible stiff regions
- Launch TPE with penalty + staged tightening toward 10 mm
- Re-run gate check with updated feasible counts