Reorganized simple_beam_optimization study and created templates for future
studies following best practices for clarity, chronology, and self-documentation.
## Study Reorganization (simple_beam_optimization)
**New Directory Structure**:
```
studies/simple_beam_optimization/
├── 1_setup/ # Pre-optimization setup
│ ├── model/ # Reference CAD/FEM model
│ └── benchmarking/ # Baseline validation results
├── 2_substudies/ # Optimization runs (numbered chronologically)
│ ├── 01_initial_exploration/
│ ├── 02_validation_3d_3trials/
│ ├── 03_validation_4d_3trials/
│ └── 04_full_optimization_50trials/
└── 3_reports/ # Study-level analysis
└── COMPREHENSIVE_BENCHMARK_RESULTS.md
```
**Key Changes**:
1. **Numbered Substudies**: 01_, 02_, 03_, 04_ indicate chronological order
2. **Reorganized Setup**: model/ and benchmarking/ moved to 1_setup/
3. **Centralized Reports**: Study-level docs moved to 3_reports/
4. **Substudy Documentation**: Each substudy has README.md explaining purpose/results
## Updated Metadata
**study_metadata.json** (v2.0):
- Tracks all 4 substudies with creation date, status, purpose
- Includes result summaries (best objective, feasible count)
- Documents new organization version
**Substudies Documented**:
- 01_initial_exploration - Initial design space exploration
- 02_validation_3d_3trials - Validate 3D parameter updates
- 03_validation_4d_3trials - Validate 4D updates including hole_count
- 04_full_optimization_50trials - Full 50-trial optimization
## Templates for Future Studies
**templates/study_template/** - Complete study structure:
- README.md template with study overview format
- study_metadata.json template with v2.0 schema
- Pre-created 1_setup/, 2_substudies/, 3_reports/ directories
**templates/substudy_README_template.md** - Standardized substudy documentation:
- Purpose and hypothesis
- Configuration changes from previous run
- Expected vs actual results
- Validation checklist
- Lessons learned
- Next steps
**templates/HOW_TO_CREATE_A_STUDY.md** - Complete guide:
- Quick start (9 steps from template to first run)
- Substudy workflow
- Directory structure reference
- Naming conventions
- Best practices
- Troubleshooting guide
- Examples
## Benefits
**Clarity**:
- Numbered substudies show chronological progression (01 → 02 → 03 → 04)
- Clear separation: setup vs. optimization runs vs. analysis
- Self-documenting via substudy READMEs
**Discoverability**:
- study_metadata.json provides complete substudy registry
- Each substudy README explains what was tested and why
- Easy to find results for specific runs
**Scalability**:
- Works for small studies (3 substudies) or large studies (50+)
- Chronological numbering scales to 99 substudies
- Template system makes new studies quick to set up
**Reproducibility**:
- Each substudy documents configuration changes
- Purpose and results clearly stated
- Lessons learned captured for future reference
## Implementation Details
**reorganize_study.py** - Migration script:
- Handles locked files gracefully
- Moves files to new structure
- Provides clear progress reporting
- Safe to run multiple times
**Organization Version**: 2.0
- Tracked in study_metadata.json
- Future studies will use this structure by default
- Existing studies can migrate or keep current structure
## Files Added
- templates/study_template/ - Complete study template
- templates/substudy_README_template.md - Substudy documentation template
- templates/HOW_TO_CREATE_A_STUDY.md - Comprehensive creation guide
- reorganize_study.py - Migration script for existing studies
## Files Reorganized (simple_beam_optimization)
**Moved to 1_setup/**:
- model/ → 1_setup/model/ (CAD/FEM reference files)
- substudies/benchmarking/ → 1_setup/benchmarking/
- baseline_validation.json → 1_setup/
**Renamed and Moved to 2_substudies/**:
- substudies/initial_exploration/ → 2_substudies/01_initial_exploration/
- substudies/validation_3trials/ → 2_substudies/02_validation_3d_3trials/
- substudies/validation_4d_3trials/ → 2_substudies/03_validation_4d_3trials/
- substudies/full_optimization_50trials/ → 2_substudies/04_full_optimization_50trials/
**Moved to 3_reports/**:
- COMPREHENSIVE_BENCHMARK_RESULTS.md → 3_reports/
**Substudy-Specific Docs** (moved to substudy directories):
- OPTIMIZATION_RESULTS_50TRIALS.md → 2_substudies/04_full_optimization_50trials/OPTIMIZATION_RESULTS.md
## Documentation Created
Each substudy now has README.md documenting:
- **01_initial_exploration**: Initial exploration purpose
- **02_validation_3d_3trials**: 3D parameter update validation
- **03_validation_4d_3trials**: hole_count validation success
- **04_full_optimization_50trials**: Full results, no feasible designs found
## Next Steps
**For Future Studies**:
1. Copy templates/study_template/
2. Follow templates/HOW_TO_CREATE_A_STUDY.md
3. Use numbered substudies (01_, 02_, ...)
4. Document each substudy with README.md
**For Existing Studies**:
- Can migrate using reorganize_study.py
- Or apply organization v2.0 to new substudies only
- See docs/STUDY_ORGANIZATION.md for migration guide
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.9 KiB
2.9 KiB
Benchmarking Report
Study: simple_beam_optimization Date: 2025-11-17T11:18:28.329069 Validation: ✅ PASSED
Model Introspection
Expressions Found: 30
| Expression | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern_p7 | None | |
| Pattern_p8 | 444.444444444444 | MilliMeter |
| Pattern_p9 | None | MilliMeter |
| Pattern_p10 | 1.0 | |
| Pattern_p11 | 10.0 | MilliMeter |
| Pattern_p12 | 0.0 | MilliMeter |
| beam_face_thickness | 20.0 | MilliMeter |
| beam_half_core_thickness | 20.0 | MilliMeter |
| beam_half_height | 250.0 | MilliMeter |
| beam_half_width | 150.0 | MilliMeter |
| beam_lenght | 5000.0 | MilliMeter |
| hole_count | 10.0 | |
| holes_diameter | 300.0 | MilliMeter |
| p4 | None | MilliMeter |
| p5 | 0.0 | MilliMeter |
| p6 | 4000.0 | MilliMeter |
| p13 | 0.0 | Degrees |
| p19 | 4000.0 | MilliMeter |
| p34 | 4000.0 | MilliMeter |
| p50 | 4000.0 | MilliMeter |
| p119 | 4000.0 | MilliMeter |
| p130 | 10.0 | |
| p132 | 444.444444444444 | MilliMeter |
| p134 | 4000.0 | MilliMeter |
| p135 | 4000.0 | MilliMeter |
| p137 | 1.0 | |
| p139 | 10.0 | MilliMeter |
| p141 | 0.0 | MilliMeter |
| p143 | 0.0 | Degrees |
| p173 | 973.968443678471 | Kilogram |
OP2 Analysis
- Element Types: CQUAD4
- Result Types: displacement, stress
- Subcases: [1]
- Nodes: 0
- Elements: 0
Baseline Performance
No baseline results extracted
Configuration Proposals
Proposed Design Variables
- Pattern_p7: ±20% of None
- Pattern_p8: ±20% of 444.444444444444 MilliMeter
- Pattern_p9: ±20% of None MilliMeter
- Pattern_p10: ±20% of 1.0
- Pattern_p11: ±20% of 10.0 MilliMeter
- Pattern_p12: ±20% of 0.0 MilliMeter
- beam_face_thickness: ±20% of 20.0 MilliMeter
- beam_half_core_thickness: ±20% of 20.0 MilliMeter
- beam_half_height: ±20% of 250.0 MilliMeter
- beam_half_width: ±20% of 150.0 MilliMeter
- beam_lenght: ±20% of 5000.0 MilliMeter
- hole_count: ±20% of 10.0
- holes_diameter: ±20% of 300.0 MilliMeter
- p4: ±20% of None MilliMeter
- p5: ±20% of 0.0 MilliMeter
- p6: ±20% of 4000.0 MilliMeter
- p13: ±20% of 0.0 Degrees
- p19: ±20% of 4000.0 MilliMeter
- p34: ±20% of 4000.0 MilliMeter
- p50: ±20% of 4000.0 MilliMeter
- p119: ±20% of 4000.0 MilliMeter
- p130: ±20% of 10.0
- p132: ±20% of 444.444444444444 MilliMeter
- p134: ±20% of 4000.0 MilliMeter
- p135: ±20% of 4000.0 MilliMeter
- p137: ±20% of 1.0
- p139: ±20% of 10.0 MilliMeter
- p141: ±20% of 0.0 MilliMeter
- p143: ±20% of 0.0 Degrees
- p173: ±20% of 973.968443678471 Kilogram
Proposed Extractors
- extract_displacement: Extract displacement results from OP2 file
- extract_solid_stress: Extract stress from CQUAD4 elements
Proposed Objectives
- max_displacement (minimize or maximize)
- max_von_mises (minimize for safety)