206 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
206 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
# Engineering Knowledge Hybrid Architecture
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
|
|
This note defines how **AtoCore** can evolve into the machine foundation for a **living engineering project knowledge system** while remaining aligned with core AtoCore philosophy.
|
|
|
|
AtoCore remains:
|
|
- the trust engine
|
|
- the memory/context engine
|
|
- the retrieval/context assembly layer
|
|
- the runtime-facing augmentation layer
|
|
|
|
It does **not** become a generic wiki app or a PLM clone.
|
|
|
|
## Core Architectural Thesis
|
|
|
|
AtoCore should act as the **machine truth / context / memory substrate** for project knowledge systems.
|
|
|
|
That substrate can then support:
|
|
- engineering knowledge accumulation
|
|
- human-readable mirrors
|
|
- OpenClaw augmentation
|
|
- future engineering copilots
|
|
- project traceability across design, analysis, manufacturing, and operations
|
|
|
|
## Layer Model
|
|
|
|
### Layer 0 — Raw Artifact Layer
|
|
Examples:
|
|
- CAD exports
|
|
- FEM exports
|
|
- videos / transcripts
|
|
- screenshots
|
|
- PDFs
|
|
- source code
|
|
- spreadsheets
|
|
- reports
|
|
- test data
|
|
|
|
### Layer 1 — AtoCore Core Machine Layer
|
|
Canonical machine substrate.
|
|
|
|
Contains:
|
|
- source registry
|
|
- source chunks
|
|
- embeddings / vector retrieval
|
|
- structured memory
|
|
- trusted project state
|
|
- entity and relationship stores
|
|
- provenance and confidence metadata
|
|
- interactions / retrieval logs / context packs
|
|
|
|
### Layer 2 — Engineering Knowledge Layer
|
|
Domain-specific project model built on top of AtoCore.
|
|
|
|
Represents typed engineering objects such as:
|
|
- Project
|
|
- System
|
|
- Subsystem
|
|
- Component
|
|
- Interface
|
|
- Requirement
|
|
- Constraint
|
|
- Assumption
|
|
- Decision
|
|
- Material
|
|
- Parameter
|
|
- Equation
|
|
- Analysis Model
|
|
- Result
|
|
- Validation Claim
|
|
- Manufacturing Process
|
|
- Test
|
|
- Software Module
|
|
- Vendor
|
|
- Artifact
|
|
|
|
### Layer 3 — Human Mirror
|
|
Derived human-readable support surface.
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
- project overview
|
|
- current state
|
|
- subsystem pages
|
|
- component pages
|
|
- decision log
|
|
- validation summary
|
|
- timeline
|
|
- open questions / risks
|
|
|
|
This layer is **derived** from structured state and approved synthesis. It is not canonical machine truth.
|
|
|
|
### Layer 4 — Runtime / Clients
|
|
Consumers such as:
|
|
- OpenClaw
|
|
- CLI tools
|
|
- dashboards
|
|
- future IDE integrations
|
|
- engineering copilots
|
|
- reporting systems
|
|
- Atomizer / optimization tooling
|
|
|
|
## Non-Negotiable Rule
|
|
|
|
**Human-readable pages are support artifacts. They are not the primary machine truth layer.**
|
|
|
|
Runtime trust order should remain:
|
|
1. trusted current project state
|
|
2. validated structured records
|
|
3. selected reviewed synthesis
|
|
4. retrieved source evidence
|
|
5. historical / low-confidence material
|
|
|
|
## Responsibilities
|
|
|
|
### AtoCore core owns
|
|
- memory CRUD
|
|
- trusted project state CRUD
|
|
- retrieval orchestration
|
|
- context assembly
|
|
- provenance
|
|
- confidence / status
|
|
- conflict flags
|
|
- runtime APIs
|
|
|
|
### Engineering Knowledge Layer owns
|
|
- engineering object taxonomy
|
|
- engineering relationships
|
|
- domain adapters
|
|
- project-specific interpretation logic
|
|
- design / analysis / manufacturing / operations linkage
|
|
|
|
### Human Mirror owns
|
|
- readability
|
|
- navigation
|
|
- overview pages
|
|
- subsystem summaries
|
|
- decision digests
|
|
- human inspection / audit comfort
|
|
|
|
## Update Model
|
|
|
|
New artifacts should not directly overwrite trusted state.
|
|
|
|
Recommended update flow:
|
|
1. ingest source
|
|
2. parse / chunk / register artifact
|
|
3. extract candidate objects / claims / relationships
|
|
4. compare against current trusted state
|
|
5. flag conflicts or supersessions
|
|
6. promote updates only under explicit rules
|
|
7. regenerate affected human-readable pages
|
|
8. log history and provenance
|
|
|
|
## Integration with Existing Knowledge Base System
|
|
|
|
The existing engineering Knowledge Base project can be treated as the first major domain adapter.
|
|
|
|
Bridge targets include:
|
|
- KB-CAD component and architecture pages
|
|
- KB-FEM models / results / validation pages
|
|
- generation history
|
|
- images / transcripts / session captures
|
|
|
|
AtoCore should absorb the structured value of that system, not replace it with plain retrieval.
|
|
|
|
## Suggested First Implementation Scope
|
|
|
|
1. stabilize current AtoCore core behavior
|
|
2. define engineering ontology v1
|
|
3. add minimal entity / relationship support
|
|
4. create a Knowledge Base bridge for existing project structures
|
|
5. generate Human Mirror v1 pages:
|
|
- overview
|
|
- current state
|
|
- decision log
|
|
- subsystem summary
|
|
6. add engineering-aware context assembly for OpenClaw
|
|
|
|
## Why This Is Aligned With AtoCore Philosophy
|
|
|
|
This architecture preserves the original core ideas:
|
|
- owned memory layer
|
|
- owned context assembly
|
|
- machine-human separation
|
|
- provenance and trust clarity
|
|
- portability across runtimes
|
|
- robustness before sophistication
|
|
|
|
## Long-Range Outcome
|
|
|
|
AtoCore can become the substrate for a **knowledge twin** of an engineering project:
|
|
- structure
|
|
- intent
|
|
- rationale
|
|
- validation
|
|
- manufacturing impact
|
|
- operational behavior
|
|
- change history
|
|
- evidence traceability
|
|
|
|
That is significantly more powerful than either:
|
|
- a generic wiki
|
|
- plain document RAG
|
|
- an assistant with only chat memory
|