Files
Atomizer/docs/protocols/system/SYS_14_NEURAL_ACCELERATION.md
Antoine 96b196de58 feat: Add Zernike GNN surrogate module and M1 mirror V12/V13 studies
This commit introduces the GNN-based surrogate for Zernike mirror optimization
and the M1 mirror study progression from V12 (GNN validation) to V13 (pure NSGA-II).

## GNN Surrogate Module (optimization_engine/gnn/)

New module for Graph Neural Network surrogate prediction of mirror deformations:

- `polar_graph.py`: PolarMirrorGraph - fixed 3000-node polar grid structure
- `zernike_gnn.py`: ZernikeGNN with design-conditioned message passing
- `differentiable_zernike.py`: GPU-accelerated Zernike fitting and objectives
- `train_zernike_gnn.py`: ZernikeGNNTrainer with multi-task loss
- `gnn_optimizer.py`: ZernikeGNNOptimizer for turbo mode (~900k trials/hour)
- `extract_displacement_field.py`: OP2 to HDF5 field extraction
- `backfill_field_data.py`: Extract fields from existing FEA trials

Key innovation: Design-conditioned convolutions that modulate message passing
based on structural design parameters, enabling accurate field prediction.

## M1 Mirror Studies

### V12: GNN Field Prediction + FEA Validation
- Zernike GNN trained on V10/V11 FEA data (238 samples)
- Turbo mode: 5000 GNN predictions → top candidates → FEA validation
- Calibration workflow for GNN-to-FEA error correction
- Scripts: run_gnn_turbo.py, validate_gnn_best.py, compute_full_calibration.py

### V13: Pure NSGA-II FEA (Ground Truth)
- Seeds 217 FEA trials from V11+V12
- Pure multi-objective NSGA-II without any surrogate
- Establishes ground-truth Pareto front for GNN accuracy evaluation
- Narrowed blank_backface_angle range to [4.0, 5.0]

## Documentation Updates

- SYS_14: Added Zernike GNN section with architecture diagrams
- CLAUDE.md: Added GNN module reference and quick start
- V13 README: Study documentation with seeding strategy

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-10 08:44:04 -05:00

20 KiB
Raw Blame History

SYS_14: Neural Network Acceleration

Overview

Atomizer provides neural network surrogate acceleration enabling 100-1000x faster optimization by replacing expensive FEA evaluations with instant neural predictions.

Two approaches available:

  1. MLP Surrogate (Simple, integrated) - 4-layer MLP trained on FEA data, runs within study
  2. GNN Field Predictor (Advanced) - Graph neural network for full field predictions

Key Innovation: Train once on FEA data, then explore 5,000-50,000+ designs in the time it takes to run 50 FEA trials.


When to Use

Trigger Action
>50 trials needed Consider neural acceleration
"neural", "surrogate", "NN" mentioned Load this protocol
"fast", "acceleration", "speed" needed Suggest neural acceleration
Training data available Enable surrogate

Quick Reference

Performance Comparison:

Metric Traditional FEA Neural Network Improvement
Time per evaluation 10-30 minutes 4.5 milliseconds 2,000-500,000x
Trials per hour 2-6 800,000+ 1000x
Design exploration ~50 designs ~50,000 designs 1000x

Model Types:

Model Purpose Use When
MLP Surrogate Direct objective prediction Simple studies, quick setup
Field Predictor GNN Full displacement/stress fields Need field visualization
Parametric Predictor GNN Direct objective prediction Complex geometry, need accuracy
Ensemble Uncertainty quantification Need confidence bounds

Overview

The MLP (Multi-Layer Perceptron) surrogate is a simple but effective neural network that predicts objectives directly from design parameters. It's integrated into the study workflow via run_nn_optimization.py.

Architecture

Input Layer (N design variables)
    ↓
Linear(N, 64) + ReLU + BatchNorm + Dropout(0.1)
    ↓
Linear(64, 128) + ReLU + BatchNorm + Dropout(0.1)
    ↓
Linear(128, 128) + ReLU + BatchNorm + Dropout(0.1)
    ↓
Linear(128, 64) + ReLU + BatchNorm + Dropout(0.1)
    ↓
Linear(64, M objectives)

Parameters: ~34,000 trainable

Workflow Modes

1. Standard Hybrid Mode (--all)

Run all phases sequentially:

python run_nn_optimization.py --all

Phases:

  1. Export: Extract training data from existing FEA trials
  2. Train: Train MLP surrogate (300 epochs default)
  3. NN-Optimize: Run 1000 NN trials with NSGA-II
  4. Validate: Validate top 10 candidates with FEA

2. Hybrid Loop Mode (--hybrid-loop)

Iterative refinement:

python run_nn_optimization.py --hybrid-loop --iterations 5 --nn-trials 500

Each iteration:

  1. Train/retrain surrogate from current FEA data
  2. Run NN optimization
  3. Validate top candidates with FEA
  4. Add validated results to training set
  5. Repeat until convergence (max error < 5%)

Aggressive single-best validation:

python run_nn_optimization.py --turbo --nn-trials 5000 --batch-size 100 --retrain-every 10

Strategy:

  • Run NN in small batches (100 trials)
  • Validate ONLY the single best candidate with FEA
  • Add to training data immediately
  • Retrain surrogate every N FEA validations
  • Repeat until total NN budget exhausted

Example: 5,000 NN trials with batch=100 → 50 FEA validations in ~12 minutes

Configuration

{
  "neural_acceleration": {
    "enabled": true,
    "min_training_points": 50,
    "auto_train": true,
    "epochs": 300,
    "validation_split": 0.2,
    "nn_trials": 1000,
    "validate_top_n": 10,
    "model_file": "surrogate_best.pt",
    "separate_nn_database": true
  }
}

Important: separate_nn_database: true stores NN trials in nn_study.db instead of study.db to avoid overloading the dashboard with thousands of NN-only results.

Typical Accuracy

Objective Expected Error
Mass 1-5%
Stress 1-4%
Stiffness 5-15%

Output Files

2_results/
├── study.db                    # Main FEA + validated results (dashboard)
├── nn_study.db                 # NN-only results (not in dashboard)
├── surrogate_best.pt           # Trained model weights
├── training_data.json          # Normalized training data
├── nn_optimization_state.json  # NN optimization state
├── nn_pareto_front.json        # NN-predicted Pareto front
├── validation_report.json      # FEA validation results
└── turbo_report.json           # Turbo mode results (if used)

Zernike GNN (Mirror Optimization)

Overview

The Zernike GNN is a specialized Graph Neural Network for mirror surface optimization. Unlike the MLP surrogate that predicts objectives directly, the Zernike GNN predicts the full displacement field, then computes Zernike coefficients and objectives via differentiable layers.

Why GNN over MLP for Zernike?

  1. Spatial awareness: GNN learns smooth deformation fields via message passing
  2. Correct relative computation: Predicts fields, then subtracts (like FEA)
  3. Multi-task learning: Field + objective supervision
  4. Physics-informed: Edge structure respects mirror geometry

Architecture

Design Variables [11]
      │
      ▼
Design Encoder [11 → 128]
      │
      └──────────────────┐
                         │
Node Features            │
[r, θ, x, y]             │
      │                  │
      ▼                  │
Node Encoder             │
[4 → 128]                │
      │                  │
      └─────────┬────────┘
                │
                ▼
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ Design-Conditioned          │
│ Message Passing (× 6)       │
│                             │
│ • Polar-aware edges         │
│ • Design modulates messages │
│ • Residual connections      │
└─────────────┬───────────────┘
              │
              ▼
Per-Node Decoder [128 → 4]
              │
              ▼
Z-Displacement Field [3000, 4]
(one value per node per subcase)
              │
              ▼
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ DifferentiableZernikeFit    │
│ (GPU-accelerated)           │
└─────────────┬───────────────┘
              │
              ▼
Zernike Coefficients → Objectives

Module Structure

optimization_engine/gnn/
├── __init__.py              # Public API
├── polar_graph.py           # PolarMirrorGraph - fixed polar grid
├── zernike_gnn.py           # ZernikeGNN model (design-conditioned conv)
├── differentiable_zernike.py # GPU Zernike fitting & objective layers
├── extract_displacement_field.py # OP2 → HDF5 field extraction
├── train_zernike_gnn.py     # ZernikeGNNTrainer pipeline
├── gnn_optimizer.py         # ZernikeGNNOptimizer for turbo mode
└── backfill_field_data.py   # Extract fields from existing trials

Training Workflow

# Step 1: Extract displacement fields from FEA trials
python -m optimization_engine.gnn.backfill_field_data V11

# Step 2: Train GNN on extracted data
python -m optimization_engine.gnn.train_zernike_gnn V11 V12 --epochs 200

# Step 3: Run GNN-accelerated optimization
python run_gnn_turbo.py --trials 5000

Key Classes

Class Purpose
PolarMirrorGraph Fixed 3000-node polar grid for mirror surface
ZernikeGNN Main model with design-conditioned message passing
DifferentiableZernikeFit GPU-accelerated Zernike coefficient computation
ZernikeObjectiveLayer Compute rel_rms objectives from coefficients
ZernikeGNNTrainer Complete training pipeline with multi-task loss
ZernikeGNNOptimizer Turbo optimization with GNN predictions

Calibration

GNN predictions require calibration against FEA ground truth. Use the full FEA dataset (not just validation samples) for robust calibration:

# compute_full_calibration.py
# Computes calibration factors: GNN_pred * factor ≈ FEA_truth
calibration_factors = {
    'rel_filtered_rms_40_vs_20': 1.15,  # GNN underpredicts by ~15%
    'rel_filtered_rms_60_vs_20': 1.08,
    'mfg_90_optician_workload': 0.95,   # GNN overpredicts by ~5%
}

Performance

Metric FEA Zernike GNN
Time per eval 8-10 min 4 ms
Trials per hour 6-7 900,000
Typical accuracy Ground truth 5-15% error

GNN Field Predictor (Generic)

Core Components

Component File Purpose
BDF/OP2 Parser neural_field_parser.py Convert NX files to neural format
Data Validator validate_parsed_data.py Physics and quality checks
Field Predictor field_predictor.py GNN for full field prediction
Parametric Predictor parametric_predictor.py GNN for direct objectives
Physics Loss physics_losses.py Physics-informed training
Neural Surrogate neural_surrogate.py Integration with Atomizer
Neural Runner runner_with_neural.py Optimization with NN acceleration

Workflow Diagram

Traditional:
Design → NX Model → Mesh → Solve (30 min) → Results → Objective

Neural (after training):
Design → Neural Network (4.5 ms) → Results → Objective

Neural Model Types

1. Field Predictor GNN

Use Case: When you need full field predictions (stress distribution, deformation shape).

Input Features (12D per node):
├── Node coordinates (x, y, z)
├── Material properties (E, nu, rho)
├── Boundary conditions (fixed/free per DOF)
└── Load information (force magnitude, direction)

GNN Layers (6 message passing):
├── MeshGraphConv (custom for FEA topology)
├── Layer normalization
├── ReLU activation
└── Dropout (0.1)

Output (per node):
├── Displacement (6 DOF: Tx, Ty, Tz, Rx, Ry, Rz)
└── Von Mises stress (1 value)

Parameters: ~718,221 trainable

Use Case: Direct optimization objective prediction (fastest option).

Design Parameters (ND) → Design Encoder (MLP) → GNN Backbone → Scalar Heads

Output (objectives):
├── mass (grams)
├── frequency (Hz)
├── max_displacement (mm)
└── max_stress (MPa)

Parameters: ~500,000 trainable

3. Ensemble Models

Use Case: Uncertainty quantification.

  1. Train 3-5 models with different random seeds
  2. At inference, run all models
  3. Use mean for prediction, std for uncertainty
  4. High uncertainty → trigger FEA validation

Training Pipeline

Step 1: Collect Training Data

Enable export in workflow config:

{
  "training_data_export": {
    "enabled": true,
    "export_dir": "atomizer_field_training_data/my_study"
  }
}

Output structure:

atomizer_field_training_data/my_study/
├── trial_0001/
│   ├── input/model.bdf       # Nastran input
│   ├── output/model.op2      # Binary results
│   └── metadata.json         # Design params + objectives
├── trial_0002/
│   └── ...
└── study_summary.json

Recommended: 100-500 FEA samples for good generalization.

Step 2: Parse to Neural Format

cd atomizer-field
python batch_parser.py ../atomizer_field_training_data/my_study

Creates HDF5 + JSON files per trial.

Step 3: Train Model

Parametric Predictor (recommended):

python train_parametric.py \
  --train_dir ../training_data/parsed \
  --val_dir ../validation_data/parsed \
  --epochs 200 \
  --hidden_channels 128 \
  --num_layers 4

Field Predictor:

python train.py \
  --train_dir ../training_data/parsed \
  --epochs 200 \
  --model FieldPredictorGNN \
  --hidden_channels 128 \
  --num_layers 6 \
  --physics_loss_weight 0.3

Step 4: Validate

python validate.py --checkpoint runs/my_model/checkpoint_best.pt

Expected output:

Validation Results:
├── Mean Absolute Error: 2.3% (mass), 1.8% (frequency)
├── R² Score: 0.987
├── Inference Time: 4.5ms ± 0.8ms
└── Physics Violations: 0.2%

Step 5: Deploy

{
  "neural_surrogate": {
    "enabled": true,
    "model_checkpoint": "atomizer-field/runs/my_model/checkpoint_best.pt",
    "confidence_threshold": 0.85
  }
}

Configuration

Full Neural Configuration Example

{
  "study_name": "bracket_neural_optimization",

  "surrogate_settings": {
    "enabled": true,
    "model_type": "parametric_gnn",
    "model_path": "models/bracket_surrogate.pt",
    "confidence_threshold": 0.85,
    "validation_frequency": 10,
    "fallback_to_fea": true
  },

  "training_data_export": {
    "enabled": true,
    "export_dir": "atomizer_field_training_data/bracket_study",
    "export_bdf": true,
    "export_op2": true,
    "export_fields": ["displacement", "stress"]
  },

  "neural_optimization": {
    "initial_fea_trials": 50,
    "neural_trials": 5000,
    "retraining_interval": 500,
    "uncertainty_threshold": 0.15
  }
}

Configuration Parameters

Parameter Type Default Description
enabled bool false Enable neural surrogate
model_type string "parametric_gnn" Model architecture
model_path string - Path to trained model
confidence_threshold float 0.85 Min confidence for predictions
validation_frequency int 10 FEA validation every N trials
fallback_to_fea bool true Use FEA when uncertain

Hybrid FEA/Neural Workflow

Phase 1: FEA Exploration (50-100 trials)

  • Run standard FEA optimization
  • Export training data automatically
  • Build landscape understanding

Phase 2: Neural Training

  • Parse collected data
  • Train parametric predictor
  • Validate accuracy

Phase 3: Neural Acceleration (1000s of trials)

  • Use neural network for rapid exploration
  • Periodic FEA validation
  • Retrain if distribution shifts

Phase 4: FEA Refinement (10-20 trials)

  • Validate top candidates with FEA
  • Ensure results are physically accurate
  • Generate final Pareto front

Adaptive Iteration Loop

For complex optimizations, use iterative refinement:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Iteration 1:                                                    │
│  ┌──────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐       │
│  │ Initial FEA  │ -> │ Train NN     │ -> │ NN Search    │       │
│  │ (50-100)     │    │ Surrogate    │    │ (1000 trials)│       │
│  └──────────────┘    └──────────────┘    └──────────────┘       │
│                                                 │                │
│  Iteration 2+:                                  ▼                │
│  ┌──────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐       │
│  │ Validate Top │ -> │ Retrain NN   │ -> │ NN Search    │       │
│  │ NN with FEA  │    │ with new data│    │ (1000 trials)│       │
│  └──────────────┘    └──────────────┘    └──────────────┘       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Adaptive Configuration

{
  "adaptive_settings": {
    "enabled": true,
    "initial_fea_trials": 50,
    "nn_trials_per_iteration": 1000,
    "fea_validation_per_iteration": 5,
    "max_iterations": 10,
    "convergence_threshold": 0.01,
    "retrain_epochs": 100
  }
}

Convergence Criteria

Stop when:

  • No improvement for 2-3 consecutive iterations
  • Reached FEA budget limit
  • Objective improvement < 1% threshold

Output Files

studies/my_study/3_results/
├── adaptive_state.json      # Current iteration state
├── surrogate_model.pt       # Trained neural network
└── training_history.json    # NN training metrics

Loss Functions

Data Loss (MSE)

Standard prediction error:

data_loss = MSE(predicted, target)

Physics Loss

Enforce physical constraints:

physics_loss = (
    equilibrium_loss +      # Force balance
    boundary_loss +         # BC satisfaction
    compatibility_loss      # Strain compatibility
)

Combined Training

total_loss = data_loss + 0.3 * physics_loss

Physics loss weight typically 0.1-0.5.


Uncertainty Quantification

Ensemble Method

# Run N models
predictions = [model_i(x) for model_i in ensemble]

# Statistics
mean_prediction = np.mean(predictions)
uncertainty = np.std(predictions)

# Decision
if uncertainty > threshold:
    # Use FEA instead
    result = run_fea(x)
else:
    result = mean_prediction

Confidence Thresholds

Uncertainty Action
< 5% Use neural prediction
5-15% Use neural, flag for validation
> 15% Fall back to FEA

Troubleshooting

Symptom Cause Solution
High prediction error Insufficient training data Collect more FEA samples
Out-of-distribution warnings Design outside training range Retrain with expanded range
Slow inference Large mesh Use parametric predictor instead
Physics violations Low physics loss weight Increase physics_loss_weight

Cross-References


Implementation Files

atomizer-field/
├── neural_field_parser.py       # BDF/OP2 parsing
├── field_predictor.py           # Field GNN
├── parametric_predictor.py      # Parametric GNN
├── train.py                     # Field training
├── train_parametric.py          # Parametric training
├── validate.py                  # Model validation
├── physics_losses.py            # Physics-informed loss
└── batch_parser.py              # Batch data conversion

optimization_engine/
├── neural_surrogate.py          # Atomizer integration
└── runner_with_neural.py        # Neural runner

Version History

Version Date Changes
2.1 2025-12-10 Added Zernike GNN section for mirror optimization
2.0 2025-12-06 Added MLP Surrogate with Turbo Mode
1.0 2025-12-05 Initial consolidation from neural docs