Files
Atomizer/docs/protocols/system/SYS_17_STUDY_INSIGHTS.md
Anto01 b8a04c62b8 docs: Consolidate documentation and fix protocol numbering (partial)
Phase 2 of restructuring plan:
- Rename SYS_16_STUDY_INSIGHTS -> SYS_17_STUDY_INSIGHTS
- Rename SYS_17_CONTEXT_ENGINEERING -> SYS_18_CONTEXT_ENGINEERING
- Promote Bootstrap V3.0 (Context Engineering) as default
- Archive old Bootstrap V2.0
- Create knowledge_base/playbook.json for ACE framework
- Add OP_08 (Generate Report) to routing tables
- Add SYS_16-18 to protocol tables
- Update docs/protocols/README.md to version 1.1
- Update CLAUDE.md with new protocols
- Create docs/plans/RESTRUCTURING_PLAN.md for continuation

Remaining: Phase 2.8 (Cheatsheet), Phases 3-6

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-07 08:52:07 -05:00

554 lines
16 KiB
Markdown

# SYS_16: Study Insights
**Version**: 1.0.0
**Status**: Active
**Purpose**: Physics-focused visualizations for FEA optimization results
---
## Overview
Study Insights provide **physics understanding** of optimization results through interactive 3D visualizations. Unlike the Analysis page (which shows optimizer metrics like convergence and Pareto fronts), Insights answer the question: **"What does this design actually look like?"**
### Analysis vs Insights
| Aspect | **Analysis** | **Insights** |
|--------|--------------|--------------|
| Focus | Optimization performance | Physics understanding |
| Questions | "Is the optimizer converging?" | "What does the best design look like?" |
| Data Source | `study.db` (trials, objectives) | Simulation outputs (OP2, mesh, fields) |
| Typical Plots | Convergence, Pareto, parameters | 3D surfaces, stress contours, mode shapes |
| When Used | During/after optimization | After specific trial of interest |
---
## Available Insight Types
| Type ID | Name | Applicable To | Data Required |
|---------|------|---------------|---------------|
| `zernike_dashboard` | **Zernike Dashboard (RECOMMENDED)** | Mirror, optics | OP2 with displacement subcases |
| `zernike_wfe` | Zernike WFE Analysis | Mirror, optics | OP2 with displacement subcases |
| `zernike_opd_comparison` | Zernike OPD Method Comparison | Mirror, optics, lateral | OP2 with displacement subcases |
| `msf_zernike` | MSF Zernike Analysis | Mirror, optics | OP2 with displacement subcases |
| `stress_field` | Stress Distribution | Structural, bracket, beam | OP2 with stress results |
| `modal` | Modal Analysis | Vibration, dynamic | OP2 with eigenvalue/eigenvector |
| `thermal` | Thermal Analysis | Thermo-structural | OP2 with temperature results |
| `design_space` | Design Space Explorer | All optimization studies | study.db with 5+ trials |
### Zernike Method Comparison: Standard vs OPD
The Zernike insights now support **two WFE computation methods**:
| Method | Description | When to Use |
|--------|-------------|-------------|
| **Standard (Z-only)** | Uses only Z-displacement at original (x,y) coordinates | Quick analysis, negligible lateral displacement |
| **OPD (X,Y,Z)** ← RECOMMENDED | Accounts for lateral (X,Y) displacement via interpolation | Any surface with gravity loads, most rigorous |
**How OPD method works**:
1. Builds interpolator from undeformed BDF mesh geometry
2. For each deformed node at `(x+dx, y+dy, z+dz)`, interpolates `Z_ideal` at new XY position
3. Computes `WFE = z_deformed - Z_ideal(x_def, y_def)`
4. Fits Zernike polynomials to the surface error map
**Typical difference**: OPD method gives **8-11% higher** WFE values than Standard (more conservative/accurate).
---
## Architecture
### Module Structure
```
optimization_engine/insights/
├── __init__.py # Registry and public API
├── base.py # StudyInsight base class, InsightConfig, InsightResult
├── zernike_wfe.py # Mirror wavefront error visualization (50 modes)
├── zernike_opd_comparison.py # OPD vs Standard method comparison (lateral disp. analysis)
├── msf_zernike.py # MSF band decomposition (100 modes, LSF/MSF/HSF)
├── stress_field.py # Stress contour visualization
├── modal_analysis.py # Mode shape visualization
├── thermal_field.py # Temperature distribution
└── design_space.py # Parameter-objective exploration
```
### Class Hierarchy
```python
StudyInsight (ABC)
ZernikeDashboardInsight # RECOMMENDED: Unified dashboard with all views
ZernikeWFEInsight # Standard 50-mode WFE analysis (with OPD toggle)
ZernikeOPDComparisonInsight # OPD method comparison (lateral displacement)
MSFZernikeInsight # 100-mode MSF band analysis
StressFieldInsight
ModalInsight
ThermalInsight
DesignSpaceInsight
```
### Key Classes
#### StudyInsight (Base Class)
```python
class StudyInsight(ABC):
insight_type: str # Unique identifier (e.g., 'zernike_wfe')
name: str # Human-readable name
description: str # What this insight shows
applicable_to: List[str] # Study types this applies to
def can_generate(self) -> bool:
"""Check if required data exists."""
def generate(self, config: InsightConfig) -> InsightResult:
"""Generate visualization."""
def generate_html(self, trial_id=None, **kwargs) -> Path:
"""Generate standalone HTML file."""
def get_plotly_data(self, trial_id=None, **kwargs) -> dict:
"""Get Plotly figure for dashboard embedding."""
```
#### InsightConfig
```python
@dataclass
class InsightConfig:
trial_id: Optional[int] = None # Which trial to visualize
colorscale: str = 'Turbo' # Plotly colorscale
amplification: float = 1.0 # Deformation scale factor
lighting: bool = True # 3D lighting effects
output_dir: Optional[Path] = None # Where to save HTML
extra: Dict[str, Any] = {} # Type-specific config
```
#### InsightResult
```python
@dataclass
class InsightResult:
success: bool
html_path: Optional[Path] = None # Generated HTML file
plotly_figure: Optional[dict] = None # Figure for dashboard
summary: Optional[dict] = None # Key metrics
error: Optional[str] = None # Error message if failed
```
---
## Usage
### Python API
```python
from optimization_engine.insights import get_insight, list_available_insights
from pathlib import Path
study_path = Path("studies/my_mirror_study")
# List what's available
available = list_available_insights(study_path)
for info in available:
print(f"{info['type']}: {info['name']}")
# Generate specific insight
insight = get_insight('zernike_wfe', study_path)
if insight and insight.can_generate():
result = insight.generate()
print(f"Generated: {result.html_path}")
print(f"40-20 Filtered RMS: {result.summary['40_vs_20_filtered_rms']:.2f} nm")
```
### CLI
```bash
# List all insight types
python -m optimization_engine.insights list
# Generate all available insights for a study
python -m optimization_engine.insights generate studies/my_study
# Generate specific insight
python -m optimization_engine.insights generate studies/my_study --type zernike_wfe
```
### With Configuration
```python
from optimization_engine.insights import get_insight, InsightConfig
insight = get_insight('stress_field', study_path)
config = InsightConfig(
colorscale='Hot',
extra={
'yield_stress': 250, # MPa
'stress_unit': 'MPa'
}
)
result = insight.generate(config)
```
---
## Insight Type Details
### 0. Zernike Dashboard (`zernike_dashboard`) - RECOMMENDED
**Purpose**: Unified dashboard with all orientations (40°, 60°, 90°) and MSF band analysis on one page. Light theme, executive summary, and method comparison.
**Generates**: 1 comprehensive HTML file with:
- Executive summary with metric cards (40-20, 60-20, MFG workload)
- MSF band analysis (LSF/MSF/HSF decomposition)
- 3D surface plots for each orientation
- Zernike coefficient bar charts color-coded by band
**Configuration**:
```python
config = InsightConfig(
extra={
'n_modes': 50,
'filter_low_orders': 4,
'theme': 'light', # Light theme for reports
}
)
```
**Summary Output**:
```python
{
'40_vs_20_filtered_rms': 6.53, # nm (OPD method)
'60_vs_20_filtered_rms': 14.21, # nm (OPD method)
'90_optician_workload': 26.34, # nm (J1-J3 filtered)
'msf_rss_40': 2.1, # nm (MSF band contribution)
}
```
### 1. Zernike WFE Analysis (`zernike_wfe`)
**Purpose**: Visualize wavefront error for mirror optimization with Zernike polynomial decomposition. **Now includes Standard/OPD method toggle and lateral displacement maps**.
**Generates**: 6 HTML files
- `zernike_*_40_vs_20.html` - 40° vs 20° relative WFE (with method toggle)
- `zernike_*_40_lateral.html` - Lateral displacement map for 40°
- `zernike_*_60_vs_20.html` - 60° vs 20° relative WFE (with method toggle)
- `zernike_*_60_lateral.html` - Lateral displacement map for 60°
- `zernike_*_90_mfg.html` - 90° manufacturing (with method toggle)
- `zernike_*_90_mfg_lateral.html` - Lateral displacement map for 90°
**Features**:
- Toggle buttons to switch between **Standard (Z-only)** and **OPD (X,Y,Z)** methods
- Toggle between WFE view and **ΔX, ΔY, ΔZ displacement components**
- Metrics comparison table showing both methods side-by-side
- Lateral displacement statistics (Max, RMS in µm)
**Configuration**:
```python
config = InsightConfig(
amplification=0.5, # Reduce deformation scaling
colorscale='Turbo',
extra={
'n_modes': 50,
'filter_low_orders': 4, # Remove piston, tip, tilt, defocus
'disp_unit': 'mm',
}
)
```
**Summary Output**:
```python
{
'40_vs_20_filtered_rms_std': 6.01, # nm (Standard method)
'40_vs_20_filtered_rms_opd': 6.53, # nm (OPD method)
'60_vs_20_filtered_rms_std': 12.81, # nm
'60_vs_20_filtered_rms_opd': 14.21, # nm
'90_mfg_filtered_rms_std': 24.5, # nm
'90_mfg_filtered_rms_opd': 26.34, # nm
'90_optician_workload': 26.34, # nm (J1-J3 filtered)
'lateral_40_max_um': 0.234, # µm max lateral displacement
'lateral_60_max_um': 0.312, # µm
'lateral_90_max_um': 0.089, # µm
}
```
### 2. MSF Zernike Analysis (`msf_zernike`)
**Purpose**: Detailed mid-spatial frequency analysis for telescope mirrors with gravity-induced support print-through.
**Generates**: 1 comprehensive HTML file with:
- Band decomposition table (LSF/MSF/HSF RSS metrics)
- MSF-only 3D surface visualization
- Coefficient bar chart color-coded by band
- Dominant MSF mode identification
- Mesh resolution analysis
**Band Definitions** (for 1.2m class mirror):
| Band | Zernike Order | Feature Size | Physical Meaning |
|------|---------------|--------------|------------------|
| LSF | n ≤ 10 | > 120 mm | M2 hexapod correctable |
| MSF | n = 11-50 | 24-109 mm | Support print-through |
| HSF | n > 50 | < 24 mm | Near mesh resolution limit |
**Configuration**:
```python
config = InsightConfig(
extra={
'n_modes': 100, # Higher than zernike_wfe (100 vs 50)
'lsf_max': 10, # n ≤ 10 is LSF
'msf_max': 50, # n = 11-50 is MSF
'disp_unit': 'mm',
}
)
```
**Analyses Performed**:
- Absolute WFE at each orientation (40°, 60°, 90°)
- Relative to 20° (operational reference)
- Relative to 90° (manufacturing/polishing reference)
**Summary Output**:
```python
{
'n_modes': 100,
'lsf_max_order': 10,
'msf_max_order': 50,
'mesh_nodes': 78290,
'mesh_spacing_mm': 4.1,
'max_resolvable_order': 157,
'40deg_vs_20deg_lsf_rss': 12.3, # nm
'40deg_vs_20deg_msf_rss': 8.7, # nm - KEY METRIC
'40deg_vs_20deg_total_rss': 15.2, # nm
'40deg_vs_20deg_msf_pct': 33.0, # % of total in MSF band
# ... similar for 60deg, 90deg
}
```
**When to Use**:
- Analyzing support structure print-through
- Quantifying gravity-induced MSF content
- Comparing MSF at different orientations
- Validating mesh resolution is adequate for MSF capture
---
### 3. Stress Distribution (`stress_field`)
**Purpose**: Visualize Von Mises stress distribution with hot spot identification.
**Configuration**:
```python
config = InsightConfig(
colorscale='Hot',
extra={
'yield_stress': 250, # MPa - shows safety factor
'stress_unit': 'MPa',
}
)
```
**Summary Output**:
```python
{
'max_stress': 187.5, # MPa
'mean_stress': 45.2, # MPa
'p95_stress': 120.3, # 95th percentile
'p99_stress': 165.8, # 99th percentile
'safety_factor': 1.33, # If yield_stress provided
}
```
### 4. Modal Analysis (`modal`)
**Purpose**: Visualize natural frequencies and mode shapes.
**Configuration**:
```python
config = InsightConfig(
amplification=50.0, # Mode shape scale
extra={
'n_modes': 20, # Number of modes to show
'show_mode': 1, # Which mode shape to display
}
)
```
**Summary Output**:
```python
{
'n_modes': 20,
'first_frequency_hz': 125.4,
'frequencies_hz': [125.4, 287.8, 312.5, ...],
}
```
### 5. Thermal Analysis (`thermal`)
**Purpose**: Visualize temperature distribution and gradients.
**Configuration**:
```python
config = InsightConfig(
colorscale='Thermal',
extra={
'temp_unit': 'K', # or 'C', 'F'
}
)
```
**Summary Output**:
```python
{
'max_temp': 423.5, # K
'min_temp': 293.0, # K
'mean_temp': 345.2, # K
'temp_range': 130.5, # K
}
```
### 6. Design Space Explorer (`design_space`)
**Purpose**: Visualize parameter-objective relationships from optimization trials.
**Configuration**:
```python
config = InsightConfig(
extra={
'primary_objective': 'filtered_rms', # Color by this objective
}
)
```
**Summary Output**:
```python
{
'n_trials': 100,
'n_params': 4,
'n_objectives': 2,
'best_trial_id': 47,
'best_params': {'p1': 0.5, 'p2': 1.2, ...},
'best_values': {'filtered_rms': 45.2, 'mass': 2.34},
}
```
---
## Output Directory
Insights are saved to `{study}/3_insights/`:
```
studies/my_study/
├── 1_setup/
├── 2_results/
└── 3_insights/ # Created by insights module
├── zernike_20241220_143022_40_vs_20.html
├── zernike_20241220_143022_60_vs_20.html
├── zernike_20241220_143022_90_mfg.html
├── stress_20241220_143025.html
└── design_space_20241220_143030.html
```
---
## Creating New Insight Types
To add a new insight type (power_user+):
### 1. Create the insight class
```python
# optimization_engine/insights/my_insight.py
from .base import StudyInsight, InsightConfig, InsightResult, register_insight
@register_insight
class MyInsight(StudyInsight):
insight_type = "my_insight"
name = "My Custom Insight"
description = "Description of what it shows"
applicable_to = ["structural", "all"]
def can_generate(self) -> bool:
# Check if required data exists
return self.results_path.exists()
def _generate(self, config: InsightConfig) -> InsightResult:
# Generate visualization
# ... build Plotly figure ...
html_path = config.output_dir / f"my_insight_{timestamp}.html"
html_path.write_text(fig.to_html(...))
return InsightResult(
success=True,
html_path=html_path,
summary={'key_metric': value}
)
```
### 2. Register in `__init__.py`
```python
from .my_insight import MyInsight
```
### 3. Test
```bash
python -m optimization_engine.insights list
# Should show "my_insight" in the list
```
---
## Dashboard Integration
The Insights tab in the Atomizer Dashboard provides a 3-step workflow:
### Step 1: Select Iteration
- Lists all available iterations (iter1, iter2, etc.) and best_design_archive
- Shows OP2 file name and modification timestamp
- Auto-selects "Best Design (Recommended)" if available
### Step 2: Choose Insight Type
- Groups insights by category (Optical, Structural, Thermal, etc.)
- Shows insight name and description
- Click to select, then "Generate Insight"
### Step 3: View Result
- Displays summary metrics (RMS values, etc.)
- Embedded Plotly visualization (if available)
- "Open Full View" button for multi-file insights (like Zernike WFE)
- Fullscreen mode for detailed analysis
### API Endpoints
```
GET /api/insights/studies/{id}/iterations # List available iterations
GET /api/insights/studies/{id}/available # List available insight types
GET /api/insights/studies/{id}/generated # List previously generated files
POST /api/insights/studies/{id}/generate/{type} # Generate insight for iteration
GET /api/insights/studies/{id}/view/{type} # View generated HTML
```
### Generate Request Body
```json
{
"iteration": "best_design_archive", // or "iter5", etc.
"trial_id": null, // Optional specific trial
"config": {} // Insight-specific config
}
```
---
## Version History
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---------|------|---------|
| 1.3.0 | 2025-12-22 | Added ZernikeDashboardInsight (unified view), OPD method toggle, lateral displacement maps |
| 1.2.0 | 2024-12-22 | Dashboard overhaul: 3-step workflow, iteration selection, faster loading |
| 1.1.0 | 2024-12-21 | Added MSF Zernike Analysis insight (6 insight types) |
| 1.0.0 | 2024-12-20 | Initial release with 5 insight types |