Phase 2 of restructuring plan: - Rename SYS_16_STUDY_INSIGHTS -> SYS_17_STUDY_INSIGHTS - Rename SYS_17_CONTEXT_ENGINEERING -> SYS_18_CONTEXT_ENGINEERING - Promote Bootstrap V3.0 (Context Engineering) as default - Archive old Bootstrap V2.0 - Create knowledge_base/playbook.json for ACE framework - Add OP_08 (Generate Report) to routing tables - Add SYS_16-18 to protocol tables - Update docs/protocols/README.md to version 1.1 - Update CLAUDE.md with new protocols - Create docs/plans/RESTRUCTURING_PLAN.md for continuation Remaining: Phase 2.8 (Cheatsheet), Phases 3-6 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
554 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
554 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
# SYS_16: Study Insights
|
|
|
|
**Version**: 1.0.0
|
|
**Status**: Active
|
|
**Purpose**: Physics-focused visualizations for FEA optimization results
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
Study Insights provide **physics understanding** of optimization results through interactive 3D visualizations. Unlike the Analysis page (which shows optimizer metrics like convergence and Pareto fronts), Insights answer the question: **"What does this design actually look like?"**
|
|
|
|
### Analysis vs Insights
|
|
|
|
| Aspect | **Analysis** | **Insights** |
|
|
|--------|--------------|--------------|
|
|
| Focus | Optimization performance | Physics understanding |
|
|
| Questions | "Is the optimizer converging?" | "What does the best design look like?" |
|
|
| Data Source | `study.db` (trials, objectives) | Simulation outputs (OP2, mesh, fields) |
|
|
| Typical Plots | Convergence, Pareto, parameters | 3D surfaces, stress contours, mode shapes |
|
|
| When Used | During/after optimization | After specific trial of interest |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Available Insight Types
|
|
|
|
| Type ID | Name | Applicable To | Data Required |
|
|
|---------|------|---------------|---------------|
|
|
| `zernike_dashboard` | **Zernike Dashboard (RECOMMENDED)** | Mirror, optics | OP2 with displacement subcases |
|
|
| `zernike_wfe` | Zernike WFE Analysis | Mirror, optics | OP2 with displacement subcases |
|
|
| `zernike_opd_comparison` | Zernike OPD Method Comparison | Mirror, optics, lateral | OP2 with displacement subcases |
|
|
| `msf_zernike` | MSF Zernike Analysis | Mirror, optics | OP2 with displacement subcases |
|
|
| `stress_field` | Stress Distribution | Structural, bracket, beam | OP2 with stress results |
|
|
| `modal` | Modal Analysis | Vibration, dynamic | OP2 with eigenvalue/eigenvector |
|
|
| `thermal` | Thermal Analysis | Thermo-structural | OP2 with temperature results |
|
|
| `design_space` | Design Space Explorer | All optimization studies | study.db with 5+ trials |
|
|
|
|
### Zernike Method Comparison: Standard vs OPD
|
|
|
|
The Zernike insights now support **two WFE computation methods**:
|
|
|
|
| Method | Description | When to Use |
|
|
|--------|-------------|-------------|
|
|
| **Standard (Z-only)** | Uses only Z-displacement at original (x,y) coordinates | Quick analysis, negligible lateral displacement |
|
|
| **OPD (X,Y,Z)** ← RECOMMENDED | Accounts for lateral (X,Y) displacement via interpolation | Any surface with gravity loads, most rigorous |
|
|
|
|
**How OPD method works**:
|
|
1. Builds interpolator from undeformed BDF mesh geometry
|
|
2. For each deformed node at `(x+dx, y+dy, z+dz)`, interpolates `Z_ideal` at new XY position
|
|
3. Computes `WFE = z_deformed - Z_ideal(x_def, y_def)`
|
|
4. Fits Zernike polynomials to the surface error map
|
|
|
|
**Typical difference**: OPD method gives **8-11% higher** WFE values than Standard (more conservative/accurate).
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Architecture
|
|
|
|
### Module Structure
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
optimization_engine/insights/
|
|
├── __init__.py # Registry and public API
|
|
├── base.py # StudyInsight base class, InsightConfig, InsightResult
|
|
├── zernike_wfe.py # Mirror wavefront error visualization (50 modes)
|
|
├── zernike_opd_comparison.py # OPD vs Standard method comparison (lateral disp. analysis)
|
|
├── msf_zernike.py # MSF band decomposition (100 modes, LSF/MSF/HSF)
|
|
├── stress_field.py # Stress contour visualization
|
|
├── modal_analysis.py # Mode shape visualization
|
|
├── thermal_field.py # Temperature distribution
|
|
└── design_space.py # Parameter-objective exploration
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Class Hierarchy
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
StudyInsight (ABC)
|
|
├── ZernikeDashboardInsight # RECOMMENDED: Unified dashboard with all views
|
|
├── ZernikeWFEInsight # Standard 50-mode WFE analysis (with OPD toggle)
|
|
├── ZernikeOPDComparisonInsight # OPD method comparison (lateral displacement)
|
|
├── MSFZernikeInsight # 100-mode MSF band analysis
|
|
├── StressFieldInsight
|
|
├── ModalInsight
|
|
├── ThermalInsight
|
|
└── DesignSpaceInsight
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Key Classes
|
|
|
|
#### StudyInsight (Base Class)
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
class StudyInsight(ABC):
|
|
insight_type: str # Unique identifier (e.g., 'zernike_wfe')
|
|
name: str # Human-readable name
|
|
description: str # What this insight shows
|
|
applicable_to: List[str] # Study types this applies to
|
|
|
|
def can_generate(self) -> bool:
|
|
"""Check if required data exists."""
|
|
|
|
def generate(self, config: InsightConfig) -> InsightResult:
|
|
"""Generate visualization."""
|
|
|
|
def generate_html(self, trial_id=None, **kwargs) -> Path:
|
|
"""Generate standalone HTML file."""
|
|
|
|
def get_plotly_data(self, trial_id=None, **kwargs) -> dict:
|
|
"""Get Plotly figure for dashboard embedding."""
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### InsightConfig
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
@dataclass
|
|
class InsightConfig:
|
|
trial_id: Optional[int] = None # Which trial to visualize
|
|
colorscale: str = 'Turbo' # Plotly colorscale
|
|
amplification: float = 1.0 # Deformation scale factor
|
|
lighting: bool = True # 3D lighting effects
|
|
output_dir: Optional[Path] = None # Where to save HTML
|
|
extra: Dict[str, Any] = {} # Type-specific config
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### InsightResult
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
@dataclass
|
|
class InsightResult:
|
|
success: bool
|
|
html_path: Optional[Path] = None # Generated HTML file
|
|
plotly_figure: Optional[dict] = None # Figure for dashboard
|
|
summary: Optional[dict] = None # Key metrics
|
|
error: Optional[str] = None # Error message if failed
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
### Python API
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from optimization_engine.insights import get_insight, list_available_insights
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
study_path = Path("studies/my_mirror_study")
|
|
|
|
# List what's available
|
|
available = list_available_insights(study_path)
|
|
for info in available:
|
|
print(f"{info['type']}: {info['name']}")
|
|
|
|
# Generate specific insight
|
|
insight = get_insight('zernike_wfe', study_path)
|
|
if insight and insight.can_generate():
|
|
result = insight.generate()
|
|
print(f"Generated: {result.html_path}")
|
|
print(f"40-20 Filtered RMS: {result.summary['40_vs_20_filtered_rms']:.2f} nm")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### CLI
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# List all insight types
|
|
python -m optimization_engine.insights list
|
|
|
|
# Generate all available insights for a study
|
|
python -m optimization_engine.insights generate studies/my_study
|
|
|
|
# Generate specific insight
|
|
python -m optimization_engine.insights generate studies/my_study --type zernike_wfe
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### With Configuration
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from optimization_engine.insights import get_insight, InsightConfig
|
|
|
|
insight = get_insight('stress_field', study_path)
|
|
config = InsightConfig(
|
|
colorscale='Hot',
|
|
extra={
|
|
'yield_stress': 250, # MPa
|
|
'stress_unit': 'MPa'
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
result = insight.generate(config)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Insight Type Details
|
|
|
|
### 0. Zernike Dashboard (`zernike_dashboard`) - RECOMMENDED
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Unified dashboard with all orientations (40°, 60°, 90°) and MSF band analysis on one page. Light theme, executive summary, and method comparison.
|
|
|
|
**Generates**: 1 comprehensive HTML file with:
|
|
- Executive summary with metric cards (40-20, 60-20, MFG workload)
|
|
- MSF band analysis (LSF/MSF/HSF decomposition)
|
|
- 3D surface plots for each orientation
|
|
- Zernike coefficient bar charts color-coded by band
|
|
|
|
**Configuration**:
|
|
```python
|
|
config = InsightConfig(
|
|
extra={
|
|
'n_modes': 50,
|
|
'filter_low_orders': 4,
|
|
'theme': 'light', # Light theme for reports
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Summary Output**:
|
|
```python
|
|
{
|
|
'40_vs_20_filtered_rms': 6.53, # nm (OPD method)
|
|
'60_vs_20_filtered_rms': 14.21, # nm (OPD method)
|
|
'90_optician_workload': 26.34, # nm (J1-J3 filtered)
|
|
'msf_rss_40': 2.1, # nm (MSF band contribution)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 1. Zernike WFE Analysis (`zernike_wfe`)
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Visualize wavefront error for mirror optimization with Zernike polynomial decomposition. **Now includes Standard/OPD method toggle and lateral displacement maps**.
|
|
|
|
**Generates**: 6 HTML files
|
|
- `zernike_*_40_vs_20.html` - 40° vs 20° relative WFE (with method toggle)
|
|
- `zernike_*_40_lateral.html` - Lateral displacement map for 40°
|
|
- `zernike_*_60_vs_20.html` - 60° vs 20° relative WFE (with method toggle)
|
|
- `zernike_*_60_lateral.html` - Lateral displacement map for 60°
|
|
- `zernike_*_90_mfg.html` - 90° manufacturing (with method toggle)
|
|
- `zernike_*_90_mfg_lateral.html` - Lateral displacement map for 90°
|
|
|
|
**Features**:
|
|
- Toggle buttons to switch between **Standard (Z-only)** and **OPD (X,Y,Z)** methods
|
|
- Toggle between WFE view and **ΔX, ΔY, ΔZ displacement components**
|
|
- Metrics comparison table showing both methods side-by-side
|
|
- Lateral displacement statistics (Max, RMS in µm)
|
|
|
|
**Configuration**:
|
|
```python
|
|
config = InsightConfig(
|
|
amplification=0.5, # Reduce deformation scaling
|
|
colorscale='Turbo',
|
|
extra={
|
|
'n_modes': 50,
|
|
'filter_low_orders': 4, # Remove piston, tip, tilt, defocus
|
|
'disp_unit': 'mm',
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Summary Output**:
|
|
```python
|
|
{
|
|
'40_vs_20_filtered_rms_std': 6.01, # nm (Standard method)
|
|
'40_vs_20_filtered_rms_opd': 6.53, # nm (OPD method)
|
|
'60_vs_20_filtered_rms_std': 12.81, # nm
|
|
'60_vs_20_filtered_rms_opd': 14.21, # nm
|
|
'90_mfg_filtered_rms_std': 24.5, # nm
|
|
'90_mfg_filtered_rms_opd': 26.34, # nm
|
|
'90_optician_workload': 26.34, # nm (J1-J3 filtered)
|
|
'lateral_40_max_um': 0.234, # µm max lateral displacement
|
|
'lateral_60_max_um': 0.312, # µm
|
|
'lateral_90_max_um': 0.089, # µm
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. MSF Zernike Analysis (`msf_zernike`)
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Detailed mid-spatial frequency analysis for telescope mirrors with gravity-induced support print-through.
|
|
|
|
**Generates**: 1 comprehensive HTML file with:
|
|
- Band decomposition table (LSF/MSF/HSF RSS metrics)
|
|
- MSF-only 3D surface visualization
|
|
- Coefficient bar chart color-coded by band
|
|
- Dominant MSF mode identification
|
|
- Mesh resolution analysis
|
|
|
|
**Band Definitions** (for 1.2m class mirror):
|
|
|
|
| Band | Zernike Order | Feature Size | Physical Meaning |
|
|
|------|---------------|--------------|------------------|
|
|
| LSF | n ≤ 10 | > 120 mm | M2 hexapod correctable |
|
|
| MSF | n = 11-50 | 24-109 mm | Support print-through |
|
|
| HSF | n > 50 | < 24 mm | Near mesh resolution limit |
|
|
|
|
**Configuration**:
|
|
```python
|
|
config = InsightConfig(
|
|
extra={
|
|
'n_modes': 100, # Higher than zernike_wfe (100 vs 50)
|
|
'lsf_max': 10, # n ≤ 10 is LSF
|
|
'msf_max': 50, # n = 11-50 is MSF
|
|
'disp_unit': 'mm',
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Analyses Performed**:
|
|
- Absolute WFE at each orientation (40°, 60°, 90°)
|
|
- Relative to 20° (operational reference)
|
|
- Relative to 90° (manufacturing/polishing reference)
|
|
|
|
**Summary Output**:
|
|
```python
|
|
{
|
|
'n_modes': 100,
|
|
'lsf_max_order': 10,
|
|
'msf_max_order': 50,
|
|
'mesh_nodes': 78290,
|
|
'mesh_spacing_mm': 4.1,
|
|
'max_resolvable_order': 157,
|
|
'40deg_vs_20deg_lsf_rss': 12.3, # nm
|
|
'40deg_vs_20deg_msf_rss': 8.7, # nm - KEY METRIC
|
|
'40deg_vs_20deg_total_rss': 15.2, # nm
|
|
'40deg_vs_20deg_msf_pct': 33.0, # % of total in MSF band
|
|
# ... similar for 60deg, 90deg
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**When to Use**:
|
|
- Analyzing support structure print-through
|
|
- Quantifying gravity-induced MSF content
|
|
- Comparing MSF at different orientations
|
|
- Validating mesh resolution is adequate for MSF capture
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 3. Stress Distribution (`stress_field`)
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Visualize Von Mises stress distribution with hot spot identification.
|
|
|
|
**Configuration**:
|
|
```python
|
|
config = InsightConfig(
|
|
colorscale='Hot',
|
|
extra={
|
|
'yield_stress': 250, # MPa - shows safety factor
|
|
'stress_unit': 'MPa',
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Summary Output**:
|
|
```python
|
|
{
|
|
'max_stress': 187.5, # MPa
|
|
'mean_stress': 45.2, # MPa
|
|
'p95_stress': 120.3, # 95th percentile
|
|
'p99_stress': 165.8, # 99th percentile
|
|
'safety_factor': 1.33, # If yield_stress provided
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 4. Modal Analysis (`modal`)
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Visualize natural frequencies and mode shapes.
|
|
|
|
**Configuration**:
|
|
```python
|
|
config = InsightConfig(
|
|
amplification=50.0, # Mode shape scale
|
|
extra={
|
|
'n_modes': 20, # Number of modes to show
|
|
'show_mode': 1, # Which mode shape to display
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Summary Output**:
|
|
```python
|
|
{
|
|
'n_modes': 20,
|
|
'first_frequency_hz': 125.4,
|
|
'frequencies_hz': [125.4, 287.8, 312.5, ...],
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 5. Thermal Analysis (`thermal`)
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Visualize temperature distribution and gradients.
|
|
|
|
**Configuration**:
|
|
```python
|
|
config = InsightConfig(
|
|
colorscale='Thermal',
|
|
extra={
|
|
'temp_unit': 'K', # or 'C', 'F'
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Summary Output**:
|
|
```python
|
|
{
|
|
'max_temp': 423.5, # K
|
|
'min_temp': 293.0, # K
|
|
'mean_temp': 345.2, # K
|
|
'temp_range': 130.5, # K
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 6. Design Space Explorer (`design_space`)
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Visualize parameter-objective relationships from optimization trials.
|
|
|
|
**Configuration**:
|
|
```python
|
|
config = InsightConfig(
|
|
extra={
|
|
'primary_objective': 'filtered_rms', # Color by this objective
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Summary Output**:
|
|
```python
|
|
{
|
|
'n_trials': 100,
|
|
'n_params': 4,
|
|
'n_objectives': 2,
|
|
'best_trial_id': 47,
|
|
'best_params': {'p1': 0.5, 'p2': 1.2, ...},
|
|
'best_values': {'filtered_rms': 45.2, 'mass': 2.34},
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Output Directory
|
|
|
|
Insights are saved to `{study}/3_insights/`:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
studies/my_study/
|
|
├── 1_setup/
|
|
├── 2_results/
|
|
└── 3_insights/ # Created by insights module
|
|
├── zernike_20241220_143022_40_vs_20.html
|
|
├── zernike_20241220_143022_60_vs_20.html
|
|
├── zernike_20241220_143022_90_mfg.html
|
|
├── stress_20241220_143025.html
|
|
└── design_space_20241220_143030.html
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Creating New Insight Types
|
|
|
|
To add a new insight type (power_user+):
|
|
|
|
### 1. Create the insight class
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# optimization_engine/insights/my_insight.py
|
|
|
|
from .base import StudyInsight, InsightConfig, InsightResult, register_insight
|
|
|
|
@register_insight
|
|
class MyInsight(StudyInsight):
|
|
insight_type = "my_insight"
|
|
name = "My Custom Insight"
|
|
description = "Description of what it shows"
|
|
applicable_to = ["structural", "all"]
|
|
|
|
def can_generate(self) -> bool:
|
|
# Check if required data exists
|
|
return self.results_path.exists()
|
|
|
|
def _generate(self, config: InsightConfig) -> InsightResult:
|
|
# Generate visualization
|
|
# ... build Plotly figure ...
|
|
|
|
html_path = config.output_dir / f"my_insight_{timestamp}.html"
|
|
html_path.write_text(fig.to_html(...))
|
|
|
|
return InsightResult(
|
|
success=True,
|
|
html_path=html_path,
|
|
summary={'key_metric': value}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. Register in `__init__.py`
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from .my_insight import MyInsight
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Test
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
python -m optimization_engine.insights list
|
|
# Should show "my_insight" in the list
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Dashboard Integration
|
|
|
|
The Insights tab in the Atomizer Dashboard provides a 3-step workflow:
|
|
|
|
### Step 1: Select Iteration
|
|
- Lists all available iterations (iter1, iter2, etc.) and best_design_archive
|
|
- Shows OP2 file name and modification timestamp
|
|
- Auto-selects "Best Design (Recommended)" if available
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: Choose Insight Type
|
|
- Groups insights by category (Optical, Structural, Thermal, etc.)
|
|
- Shows insight name and description
|
|
- Click to select, then "Generate Insight"
|
|
|
|
### Step 3: View Result
|
|
- Displays summary metrics (RMS values, etc.)
|
|
- Embedded Plotly visualization (if available)
|
|
- "Open Full View" button for multi-file insights (like Zernike WFE)
|
|
- Fullscreen mode for detailed analysis
|
|
|
|
### API Endpoints
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/insights/studies/{id}/iterations # List available iterations
|
|
GET /api/insights/studies/{id}/available # List available insight types
|
|
GET /api/insights/studies/{id}/generated # List previously generated files
|
|
POST /api/insights/studies/{id}/generate/{type} # Generate insight for iteration
|
|
GET /api/insights/studies/{id}/view/{type} # View generated HTML
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Generate Request Body
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"iteration": "best_design_archive", // or "iter5", etc.
|
|
"trial_id": null, // Optional specific trial
|
|
"config": {} // Insight-specific config
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
|
|
| Version | Date | Changes |
|
|
|---------|------|---------|
|
|
| 1.3.0 | 2025-12-22 | Added ZernikeDashboardInsight (unified view), OPD method toggle, lateral displacement maps |
|
|
| 1.2.0 | 2024-12-22 | Dashboard overhaul: 3-step workflow, iteration selection, faster loading |
|
|
| 1.1.0 | 2024-12-21 | Added MSF Zernike Analysis insight (6 insight types) |
|
|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-12-20 | Initial release with 5 insight types |
|