Phase 3 implements automated OP2 extraction code generation using pyNastran documentation research. This completes the zero-manual-coding pipeline for FEA optimization workflows. Key Features: - PyNastranResearchAgent for automated OP2 code generation - Documentation research via WebFetch integration - 3 core extraction patterns (displacement, stress, force) - Knowledge base architecture for learned patterns - Successfully tested on real OP2 files Phase 2.9 Integration: - Updated HookGenerator with lifecycle hook generation - Added POST_CALCULATION hook point to hooks.py - Created post_calculation/ plugin directory - Generated hooks integrate seamlessly with HookManager New Files: - optimization_engine/pynastran_research_agent.py (600+ lines) - optimization_engine/hook_generator.py (800+ lines) - optimization_engine/inline_code_generator.py - optimization_engine/plugins/post_calculation/ - tests/test_lifecycle_hook_integration.py - docs/SESSION_SUMMARY_PHASE_3.md - docs/SESSION_SUMMARY_PHASE_2_9.md - docs/SESSION_SUMMARY_PHASE_2_8.md - docs/HOOK_ARCHITECTURE.md Modified Files: - README.md - Added Phase 3 completion status - optimization_engine/plugins/hooks.py - Added POST_CALCULATION hook Test Results: - Phase 3 research agent: PASSED - Real OP2 extraction: PASSED (max_disp=0.362mm) - Lifecycle hook integration: PASSED Generated with Claude Code Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 KiB
Session Summary: Phase 2.9 - Post-Processing Hook Generator
Date: 2025-01-16 Phases Completed: Phase 2.9 ✅ Duration: Continued from Phase 2.8 session
What We Built Today
Phase 2.9: Post-Processing Hook Generator ✅
Files Created:
- optimization_engine/hook_generator.py - 760+ lines
- docs/SESSION_SUMMARY_PHASE_2_9.md - This document
Key Achievement: ✅ Auto-generates standalone Python hook scripts for post-processing operations ✅ Handles weighted objectives, custom formulas, constraint checks, and comparisons ✅ Complete I/O handling with JSON inputs/outputs ✅ Fully executable middleware scripts ready for optimization loops
Supported Hook Types:
- Weighted Objective: Combine multiple metrics with custom weights
- Custom Formula: Apply arbitrary formulas to inputs
- Constraint Check: Validate constraints and calculate violations
- Comparison: Calculate ratios, differences, percentage changes
Example Input → Output:
# LLM Phase 2.7 Output:
{
"action": "weighted_objective",
"description": "Combine normalized stress (70%) and displacement (30%)",
"params": {
"inputs": ["norm_stress", "norm_disp"],
"weights": [0.7, 0.3],
"objective": "minimize"
}
}
# Phase 2.9 Generated Hook Script:
"""
Weighted Objective Function Hook
Auto-generated by Atomizer Phase 2.9
Combine normalized stress (70%) and displacement (30%)
Inputs: norm_stress, norm_disp
Weights: 0.7, 0.3
Formula: 0.7 * norm_stress + 0.3 * norm_disp
Objective: minimize
"""
import sys
import json
from pathlib import Path
def weighted_objective(norm_stress, norm_disp):
"""Calculate weighted objective from multiple inputs."""
result = 0.7 * norm_stress + 0.3 * norm_disp
return result
def main():
"""Main entry point for hook execution."""
# Read inputs from JSON file
input_file = Path(sys.argv[1])
with open(input_file, 'r') as f:
inputs = json.load(f)
norm_stress = inputs.get("norm_stress")
norm_disp = inputs.get("norm_disp")
# Calculate weighted objective
result = weighted_objective(norm_stress, norm_disp)
# Write output
output_file = input_file.parent / "weighted_objective_result.json"
with open(output_file, 'w') as f:
json.dump({
"weighted_objective": result,
"objective_type": "minimize",
"inputs_used": {"norm_stress": norm_stress, "norm_disp": norm_disp},
"formula": "0.7 * norm_stress + 0.3 * norm_disp"
}, f, indent=2)
print(f"Weighted objective calculated: {result:.6f}")
return result
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Test Results
Phase 2.9 Hook Generator:
Test Hook Generation:
1. Combine normalized stress (70%) and displacement (30%)
Script: hook_weighted_objective_norm_stress_norm_disp.py
Type: weighted_objective
Inputs: norm_stress, norm_disp
Outputs: weighted_objective
✅ PASS
2. Calculate safety factor
Script: hook_custom_safety_factor.py
Type: custom_formula
Inputs: max_stress, yield_strength
Outputs: safety_factor
✅ PASS
3. Compare min force to average
Script: hook_compare_min_to_avg_ratio.py
Type: comparison
Inputs: min_force, avg_force
Outputs: min_to_avg_ratio
✅ PASS
4. Check if stress is below yield
Script: hook_constraint_yield_constraint.py
Type: constraint_check
Inputs: max_stress, yield_strength
Outputs: yield_constraint, yield_constraint_satisfied, yield_constraint_violation
✅ PASS
Executable Test (Weighted Objective):
Input JSON:
{
"norm_stress": 0.75,
"norm_disp": 0.64
}
Execution:
$ python hook_weighted_objective_norm_stress_norm_disp.py test_input.json
Weighted objective calculated: 0.717000
Result saved to: weighted_objective_result.json
Output JSON:
{
"weighted_objective": 0.717,
"objective_type": "minimize",
"inputs_used": {
"norm_stress": 0.75,
"norm_disp": 0.64
},
"formula": "0.7 * norm_stress + 0.3 * norm_disp"
}
Verification: 0.7 * 0.75 + 0.3 * 0.64 = 0.525 + 0.192 = 0.717 ✅
Architecture Evolution
Before Phase 2.9:
LLM detects: "weighted combination of stress and displacement"
↓
Manual hook script writing required ❌
↓
Write Python, handle I/O, test
↓
Integrate with optimization loop
After Phase 2.9:
LLM detects: "weighted combination of stress and displacement"
↓
Phase 2.9 Hook Generator ✅
↓
Complete Python script with I/O handling
↓
Ready to execute immediately!
Integration with Existing Phases
Phase 2.7 (LLM Analyzer) → Phase 2.9 (Hook Generator)
# Phase 2.7 Output:
analysis = {
"post_processing_hooks": [
{
"action": "weighted_objective",
"description": "Combine stress (70%) and displacement (30%)",
"params": {
"inputs": ["norm_stress", "norm_disp"],
"weights": [0.7, 0.3],
"objective": "minimize"
}
}
]
}
# Phase 2.9 Processing:
from optimization_engine.hook_generator import HookGenerator
generator = HookGenerator()
hooks = generator.generate_batch(analysis['post_processing_hooks'])
# Save hooks to optimization study
for hook in hooks:
script_path = generator.save_hook_to_file(hook, "studies/my_study/hooks/")
# Result: Executable hook scripts ready for optimization loop!
Key Design Decisions
1. Standalone Executable Scripts
Each hook is a complete, self-contained Python script:
- No dependencies on Atomizer core
- Can be executed independently for testing
- Easy to debug and validate
2. JSON-Based I/O
All inputs and outputs use JSON:
- Easy to serialize/deserialize
- Compatible with any language/tool
- Human-readable for debugging
3. Error Handling
Generated hooks validate all inputs:
norm_stress = inputs.get("norm_stress")
if norm_stress is None:
print(f"Error: Required input 'norm_stress' not found")
sys.exit(1)
4. Hook Registry
Automatically generates a registry documenting all hooks:
{
"hooks": [
{
"name": "hook_weighted_objective_norm_stress_norm_disp.py",
"type": "weighted_objective",
"description": "Combine normalized stress (70%) and displacement (30%)",
"inputs": ["norm_stress", "norm_disp"],
"outputs": ["weighted_objective"]
}
]
}
Hook Types in Detail
1. Weighted Objective Hooks
Purpose: Combine multiple objectives with custom weights
Example Use Case: "I want to minimize a combination of 70% stress and 30% displacement"
Generated Code Features:
- Dynamic weight application
- Multiple input handling
- Objective type tracking (minimize/maximize)
2. Custom Formula Hooks
Purpose: Apply arbitrary mathematical formulas
Example Use Case: "Calculate safety factor as yield_strength / max_stress"
Generated Code Features:
- Custom formula evaluation
- Variable name inference
- Output naming based on formula
3. Constraint Check Hooks
Purpose: Validate engineering constraints
Example Use Case: "Ensure stress is below yield strength"
Generated Code Features:
- Boolean satisfaction flag
- Violation magnitude calculation
- Threshold comparison
4. Comparison Hooks
Purpose: Calculate ratios, differences, percentages
Example Use Case: "Compare minimum force to average force"
Generated Code Features:
- Multiple comparison operations (ratio, difference, percent)
- Automatic operation detection
- Clean output naming
Files Modified/Created
New Files:
optimization_engine/hook_generator.py(760+ lines)docs/SESSION_SUMMARY_PHASE_2_9.mdgenerated_hooks/directory with 4 test hooks + registry
Generated Test Hooks:
hook_weighted_objective_norm_stress_norm_disp.pyhook_custom_safety_factor.pyhook_compare_min_to_avg_ratio.pyhook_constraint_yield_constraint.pyhook_registry.json
Success Metrics
Phase 2.9 Success Criteria:
- ✅ Auto-generates functional hook scripts
- ✅ Correct I/O handling with JSON
- ✅ Integrates seamlessly with Phase 2.7 output
- ✅ Generates executable, standalone scripts
- ✅ Multiple hook types supported
Code Quality:
- ✅ Clean, readable generated code
- ✅ Proper error handling
- ✅ Complete documentation in docstrings
- ✅ Self-contained (no external dependencies)
Real-World Example: CBAR Optimization
User Request:
"Extract element forces in Z direction from CBAR elements, calculate average, find minimum, then create an objective that minimizes the ratio of min to average. Use genetic algorithm to optimize CBAR stiffness in X direction."
Phase 2.7 LLM Analysis:
{
"engineering_features": [
{
"action": "extract_1d_element_forces",
"domain": "result_extraction",
"params": {"element_types": ["CBAR"], "direction": "Z"}
},
{
"action": "update_cbar_stiffness",
"domain": "fea_properties",
"params": {"property": "stiffness_x"}
}
],
"inline_calculations": [
{"action": "calculate_average", "params": {"input": "forces_z"}},
{"action": "find_minimum", "params": {"input": "forces_z"}}
],
"post_processing_hooks": [
{
"action": "comparison",
"description": "Calculate min/avg ratio",
"params": {
"inputs": ["min_force", "avg_force"],
"operation": "ratio",
"output_name": "min_to_avg_ratio"
}
}
]
}
Phase 2.8 Generated Code (Inline):
# Calculate average of extracted forces
avg_forces_z = sum(forces_z) / len(forces_z)
# Find minimum force value
min_forces_z = min(forces_z)
Phase 2.9 Generated Hook Script:
# hook_compare_min_to_avg_ratio.py
def compare_ratio(min_force, avg_force):
"""Compare values using ratio."""
result = min_force / avg_force
return result
# (Full I/O handling, error checking, JSON serialization included)
Complete Workflow:
- Extract CBAR forces from OP2 →
forces_z = [10.5, 12.3, 8.9, 11.2, 9.8] - Phase 2.8 inline: Calculate avg and min →
avg = 10.54, min = 8.9 - Phase 2.9 hook: Calculate ratio →
min_to_avg_ratio = 0.844 - Optimization uses ratio as objective to minimize
All code auto-generated! No manual scripting required!
Integration with Optimization Loop
Typical Workflow:
Optimization Trial N
↓
1. Update FEA parameters (NX journal)
↓
2. Run FEA solve (NX Nastran)
↓
3. Extract results (OP2 reader)
↓
4. **Phase 2.8: Inline calculations**
avg_stress = sum(stresses) / len(stresses)
norm_stress = avg_stress / 200.0
↓
5. **Phase 2.9: Post-processing hook**
python hook_weighted_objective.py trial_N_results.json
→ weighted_objective = 0.717
↓
6. Report objective to Optuna
↓
7. Optuna suggests next trial parameters
↓
Repeat
Next Steps
Immediate (Next Session):
-
⏳ Phase 3: pyNastran Documentation Integration
- Use WebFetch to access pyNastran docs
- Build automated research for OP2 extraction
- Create pattern library for result extraction operations
-
⏳ Phase 3.5: NXOpen Pattern Library
- Implement journal learning system
- Extract patterns from recorded NX journals
- Store in knowledge base for reuse
Short Term:
- Integrate Phase 2.8 + 2.9 with optimization runner
- Test end-to-end workflow with real FEA cases
- Build knowledge base for common FEA operations
- Implement Python introspection for NXOpen
Medium Term (Phase 4-6):
- Code generation for complex FEA features (Phase 4)
- Analysis & decision support (Phase 5)
- Automated reporting (Phase 6)
Conclusion
Phase 2.9 delivers on the promise of zero manual scripting for post-processing operations:
- ✅ LLM understands the request (Phase 2.7)
- ✅ Identifies post-processing needs (Phase 2.7)
- ✅ Auto-generates complete hook scripts (Phase 2.9)
- ✅ Ready to execute in optimization loop
Combined with Phase 2.8:
- Inline calculations: Auto-generated ✅
- Post-processing hooks: Auto-generated ✅
- Custom objectives: Auto-generated ✅
- Constraints: Auto-generated ✅
The system now writes middleware code autonomously!
🚀 Phases 2.8-2.9 Complete: Full code generation for simple operations and custom workflows!
Environment
- Python Environment:
test_env(c:/Users/antoi/anaconda3/envs/test_env) - Testing: All Phase 2.9 tests passing ✅
- Generated Hooks: 4 hook scripts + registry
- Execution Test: Weighted objective hook verified working (0.7 * 0.75 + 0.3 * 0.64 = 0.717) ✅