Antoine
c930728b1c
- 3 studies: sensitivity (Method D), stiffness sweep (Method B), robustness - Atomizer specs with run matrices, Zernike annular OPD extractor - War-room validated hybrid B+D method
27 lines
982 B
Markdown
27 lines
982 B
Markdown
# Study 03 — Robustness Checks
|
||
|
||
**Type:** Parametric — Specific Scenarios
|
||
**Runs:** 8
|
||
**Model:** Uses both .sim setups (CBUSH for K tests, displacement for correlated tests)
|
||
**Prerequisite:** Complete Studies 01 and 02 first (needs knee values)
|
||
|
||
## What This Does
|
||
|
||
Tests scenarios that the simple sweeps can't capture:
|
||
|
||
1. **One-soft-point (3 runs):** What if one support is 10× softer than the rest?
|
||
2. **Combined compliance (3 runs):** Both vertical and lateral at knee values simultaneously
|
||
3. **Correlated displacement (2 runs):** All verticals move together (frame bending mode simulation)
|
||
|
||
## Before Running
|
||
|
||
Update `atomizer_spec.json` with actual knee values from Study 02:
|
||
- Replace `KNEE` placeholders with K_vert_knee and K_lat_knee values
|
||
- Replace `KNEE/10` with knee/10, `KNEE/2` with knee/2
|
||
|
||
## Output
|
||
|
||
- Interaction factor: is combined ΔWFE > sum of individual?
|
||
- Worst-case single soft point identification
|
||
- Correlated vs independent displacement comparison
|