Files
Atomizer/tests/test_complete_research_workflow.py
Anto01 0a7cca9c6a feat: Complete Phase 2.5-2.7 - Intelligent LLM-Powered Workflow Analysis
This commit implements three major architectural improvements to transform
Atomizer from static pattern matching to intelligent AI-powered analysis.

## Phase 2.5: Intelligent Codebase-Aware Gap Detection 

Created intelligent system that understands existing capabilities before
requesting examples:

**New Files:**
- optimization_engine/codebase_analyzer.py (379 lines)
  Scans Atomizer codebase for existing FEA/CAE capabilities

- optimization_engine/workflow_decomposer.py (507 lines, v0.2.0)
  Breaks user requests into atomic workflow steps
  Complete rewrite with multi-objective, constraints, subcase targeting

- optimization_engine/capability_matcher.py (312 lines)
  Matches workflow steps to existing code implementations

- optimization_engine/targeted_research_planner.py (259 lines)
  Creates focused research plans for only missing capabilities

**Results:**
- 80-90% coverage on complex optimization requests
- 87-93% confidence in capability matching
- Fixed expression reading misclassification (geometry vs result_extraction)

## Phase 2.6: Intelligent Step Classification 

Distinguishes engineering features from simple math operations:

**New Files:**
- optimization_engine/step_classifier.py (335 lines)

**Classification Types:**
1. Engineering Features - Complex FEA/CAE needing research
2. Inline Calculations - Simple math to auto-generate
3. Post-Processing Hooks - Middleware between FEA steps

## Phase 2.7: LLM-Powered Workflow Intelligence 

Replaces static regex patterns with Claude AI analysis:

**New Files:**
- optimization_engine/llm_workflow_analyzer.py (395 lines)
  Uses Claude API for intelligent request analysis
  Supports both Claude Code (dev) and API (production) modes

- .claude/skills/analyze-workflow.md
  Skill template for LLM workflow analysis integration

**Key Breakthrough:**
- Detects ALL intermediate steps (avg, min, normalization, etc.)
- Understands engineering context (CBUSH vs CBAR, directions, metrics)
- Distinguishes OP2 extraction from part expression reading
- Expected 95%+ accuracy with full nuance detection

## Test Coverage

**New Test Files:**
- tests/test_phase_2_5_intelligent_gap_detection.py (335 lines)
- tests/test_complex_multiobj_request.py (130 lines)
- tests/test_cbush_optimization.py (130 lines)
- tests/test_cbar_genetic_algorithm.py (150 lines)
- tests/test_step_classifier.py (140 lines)
- tests/test_llm_complex_request.py (387 lines)

All tests include:
- UTF-8 encoding for Windows console
- atomizer environment (not test_env)
- Comprehensive validation checks

## Documentation

**New Documentation:**
- docs/PHASE_2_5_INTELLIGENT_GAP_DETECTION.md (254 lines)
- docs/PHASE_2_7_LLM_INTEGRATION.md (227 lines)
- docs/SESSION_SUMMARY_PHASE_2_5_TO_2_7.md (252 lines)

**Updated:**
- README.md - Added Phase 2.5-2.7 completion status
- DEVELOPMENT_ROADMAP.md - Updated phase progress

## Critical Fixes

1. **Expression Reading Misclassification** (lines cited in session summary)
   - Updated codebase_analyzer.py pattern detection
   - Fixed workflow_decomposer.py domain classification
   - Added capability_matcher.py read_expression mapping

2. **Environment Standardization**
   - All code now uses 'atomizer' conda environment
   - Removed test_env references throughout

3. **Multi-Objective Support**
   - WorkflowDecomposer v0.2.0 handles multiple objectives
   - Constraint extraction and validation
   - Subcase and direction targeting

## Architecture Evolution

**Before (Static & Dumb):**
User Request → Regex Patterns → Hardcoded Rules → Missed Steps 

**After (LLM-Powered & Intelligent):**
User Request → Claude AI Analysis → Structured JSON →
├─ Engineering (research needed)
├─ Inline (auto-generate Python)
├─ Hooks (middleware scripts)
└─ Optimization (config) 

## LLM Integration Strategy

**Development Mode (Current):**
- Use Claude Code directly for interactive analysis
- No API consumption or costs
- Perfect for iterative development

**Production Mode (Future):**
- Optional Anthropic API integration
- Falls back to heuristics if no API key
- For standalone batch processing

## Next Steps

- Phase 2.8: Inline Code Generation
- Phase 2.9: Post-Processing Hook Generation
- Phase 3: MCP Integration for automated documentation research

🚀 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-16 13:35:41 -05:00

235 lines
8.2 KiB
Python

"""
Test Complete Research Workflow
This test demonstrates the full end-to-end research workflow:
1. Detect knowledge gap
2. Create research plan
3. Execute interactive research (with user example)
4. Synthesize knowledge
5. Design feature specification
6. Document research session
Author: Atomizer Development Team
Version: 0.1.0 (Phase 2)
Last Updated: 2025-01-16
"""
import sys
import os
from pathlib import Path
# Set UTF-8 encoding for Windows console
if sys.platform == 'win32':
import codecs
sys.stdout = codecs.getwriter('utf-8')(sys.stdout.buffer, errors='replace')
sys.stderr = codecs.getwriter('utf-8')(sys.stderr.buffer, errors='replace')
# Add project root to path
project_root = Path(__file__).parent.parent
sys.path.insert(0, str(project_root))
from optimization_engine.research_agent import (
ResearchAgent,
CONFIDENCE_LEVELS
)
def test_complete_workflow():
"""Test complete research workflow from gap detection to feature design."""
print("\n" + "="*70)
print("COMPLETE RESEARCH WORKFLOW TEST")
print("="*70)
agent = ResearchAgent()
# Step 1: Detect Knowledge Gap
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 1] Detect Knowledge Gap")
print("-"*70)
user_request = "Create NX material XML for titanium Ti-6Al-4V"
print(f"\nUser request: \"{user_request}\"")
gap = agent.identify_knowledge_gap(user_request)
print(f"\n Analysis:")
print(f" Missing features: {gap.missing_features}")
print(f" Missing knowledge: {gap.missing_knowledge}")
print(f" Confidence: {gap.confidence:.2f}")
print(f" Research needed: {gap.research_needed}")
assert gap.research_needed, "Should detect that research is needed"
print("\n [PASS] Knowledge gap detected")
# Step 2: Create Research Plan
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 2] Create Research Plan")
print("-"*70)
plan = agent.create_research_plan(gap)
print(f"\n Research plan created with {len(plan.steps)} steps:")
for step in plan.steps:
action = step['action']
priority = step['priority']
expected_conf = step.get('expected_confidence', 0)
print(f" Step {step['step']}: {action} (priority: {priority}, confidence: {expected_conf:.2f})")
assert len(plan.steps) > 0, "Research plan should have steps"
assert plan.steps[0]['action'] == 'ask_user_for_example', "First step should ask user"
print("\n [PASS] Research plan created")
# Step 3: Execute Interactive Research
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 3] Execute Interactive Research")
print("-"*70)
# Simulate user providing example XML
example_xml = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PhysicalMaterial name="Steel_AISI_1020" version="1.0">
<Density units="kg/m3">7850</Density>
<YoungModulus units="GPa">200</YoungModulus>
<PoissonRatio>0.29</PoissonRatio>
<ThermalExpansion units="1/K">1.17e-05</ThermalExpansion>
<YieldStrength units="MPa">295</YieldStrength>
<UltimateTensileStrength units="MPa">420</UltimateTensileStrength>
</PhysicalMaterial>"""
print("\n User provides example XML (steel material)")
# Execute research with user response
user_responses = {1: example_xml} # Response to step 1
findings = agent.execute_interactive_research(plan, user_responses)
print(f"\n Findings collected:")
print(f" Sources: {list(findings.sources.keys())}")
print(f" Confidence scores: {findings.confidence_scores}")
assert 'user_example' in findings.sources, "Should have user example in findings"
assert findings.confidence_scores['user_example'] == CONFIDENCE_LEVELS['user_validated'], \
"User example should have highest confidence"
print("\n [PASS] Research executed and findings collected")
# Step 4: Synthesize Knowledge
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 4] Synthesize Knowledge")
print("-"*70)
knowledge = agent.synthesize_knowledge(findings)
print(f"\n Knowledge synthesized:")
print(f" Overall confidence: {knowledge.confidence:.2f}")
print(f" Patterns extracted: {len(knowledge.patterns)}")
if knowledge.schema and 'xml_structure' in knowledge.schema:
xml_schema = knowledge.schema['xml_structure']
print(f" XML root element: {xml_schema['root_element']}")
print(f" Required fields: {len(xml_schema['required_fields'])}")
assert knowledge.confidence > 0.8, "Should have high confidence with user-validated example"
assert knowledge.schema is not None, "Should have extracted schema"
print("\n [PASS] Knowledge synthesized")
# Step 5: Design Feature
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 5] Design Feature Specification")
print("-"*70)
feature_name = "nx_material_generator"
feature_spec = agent.design_feature(knowledge, feature_name)
print(f"\n Feature specification created:")
print(f" Feature ID: {feature_spec['feature_id']}")
print(f" Name: {feature_spec['name']}")
print(f" Category: {feature_spec['category']}")
print(f" Subcategory: {feature_spec['subcategory']}")
print(f" Lifecycle stage: {feature_spec['lifecycle_stage']}")
print(f" Implementation file: {feature_spec['implementation']['file_path']}")
print(f" Number of inputs: {len(feature_spec['interface']['inputs'])}")
print(f" Number of outputs: {len(feature_spec['interface']['outputs'])}")
assert feature_spec['feature_id'] == feature_name, "Feature ID should match requested name"
assert 'implementation' in feature_spec, "Should have implementation details"
assert 'interface' in feature_spec, "Should have interface specification"
assert 'metadata' in feature_spec, "Should have metadata"
assert feature_spec['metadata']['confidence'] == knowledge.confidence, \
"Feature metadata should include confidence score"
print("\n [PASS] Feature specification designed")
# Step 6: Document Session
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 6] Document Research Session")
print("-"*70)
session_path = agent.document_session(
topic='nx_materials_complete_workflow',
knowledge_gap=gap,
findings=findings,
knowledge=knowledge,
generated_files=[
feature_spec['implementation']['file_path'],
'knowledge_base/templates/material_xml_template.py'
]
)
print(f"\n Session documented at:")
print(f" {session_path}")
# Verify session files
required_files = ['user_question.txt', 'sources_consulted.txt',
'findings.md', 'decision_rationale.md']
for file_name in required_files:
file_path = session_path / file_name
if file_path.exists():
print(f" [OK] {file_name}")
else:
print(f" [MISSING] {file_name}")
assert False, f"Required file {file_name} not created"
print("\n [PASS] Research session documented")
# Step 7: Validate with User (placeholder test)
print("\n" + "-"*70)
print("[Step 7] Validate with User")
print("-"*70)
validation_result = agent.validate_with_user(feature_spec)
print(f"\n Validation result: {validation_result}")
print(" (Placeholder - would be interactive in real implementation)")
assert isinstance(validation_result, bool), "Validation should return boolean"
print("\n [PASS] Validation method working")
# Summary
print("\n" + "="*70)
print("COMPLETE WORKFLOW TEST PASSED!")
print("="*70)
print("\n Summary:")
print(f" Knowledge gap detected: {gap.user_request}")
print(f" Research plan steps: {len(plan.steps)}")
print(f" Findings confidence: {knowledge.confidence:.2f}")
print(f" Feature designed: {feature_spec['feature_id']}")
print(f" Session documented: {session_path.name}")
print("\n Research Agent is fully functional!")
print(" Ready for:")
print(" - Interactive LLM integration")
print(" - Web search integration (Phase 2 Week 2)")
print(" - Feature code generation")
print(" - Knowledge base retrieval")
return True
if __name__ == '__main__':
try:
success = test_complete_workflow()
sys.exit(0 if success else 1)
except Exception as e:
print(f"\n[ERROR] {e}")
import traceback
traceback.print_exc()
sys.exit(1)