Files
Atomizer/hq/handoffs/orch-1771288051-2d112738.json

18 lines
2.7 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
{
"schemaVersion": "1.1",
"runId": "orch-1771288051-2d112738",
"agent": "tech-lead",
"status": "complete",
"result": "## Analytical Heat Sink Thermal Analysis\n\n### Given\n- 4 rectangular fins on 50mm × 50mm base\n- Fin height: 25mm, thickness: 1mm, span: 50mm\n- AL6061-T6: k = 167 W/m·K\n- h = 10 W/m²·K (natural convection), Q = 10W, T_amb = 25°C\n\n### Fin Efficiency\n- Fin parameter: m = √(2h/kt) = √(2×10 / 167×0.001) = √119.76 = 10.94 m⁻¹\n- Corrected fin length (accounts for tip): Lc = L + t/2 = 0.025 + 0.0005 = 0.0255 m\n- mLc = 10.94 × 0.0255 = 0.279\n- **η = tanh(mLc) / mLc = 0.2738 / 0.279 = 0.981 (98.1%)**\n\nThe high efficiency is expected — thin aluminum fins with modest convection yield a nearly isothermal fin.\n\n### Surface Areas\n- Per fin (including tip via corrected length): 2 × 0.0255 × 0.05 = 0.00255 m²\n- Total fin area (4 fins): 4 × 0.00255 = 0.01020 m²\n- Unfinned base area: 0.05² 4×(0.001×0.05) = 0.0025 0.0002 = 0.0023 m²\n- Effective convective area: η·A_fin + A_unfinned = 0.981×0.01020 + 0.0023 = 0.01231 m²\n\n### Thermal Resistance\n- **R_conv = 1 / (h · A_eff) = 1 / (10 × 0.01231) = 8.12 °C/W**\n- Base conduction resistance neglected (base thickness not specified; for typical 2-5mm AL6061 base it would add < 0.01 °C/W — negligible)\n\n### Base Temperature\n- **T_base = T_amb + Q · R_total = 25 + 10 × 8.12 = 106.2°C**\n\n### Summary Table\n| Parameter | Value |\n|-----------|-------|\n| Fin efficiency (η) | 98.1% |\n| Thermal resistance (R) | 8.12 °C/W |\n| Base temperature | 106.2°C |\n| Max fin tip temperature | ~104.9°C (η≈0.981 means ~1.3°C gradient along fin) |\n\n### Notes\n- With only 4 fins the total convective area is small, resulting in high thermal resistance. For lower base temperature, increase fin count (e.g., 10-12 fins with ~3mm spacing would roughly halve R).\n- Natural convection h=10 W/m²·K is reasonable for vertical plates in still air. Actual h depends on orientation and fin spacing (chimney effect).\n- Base conduction spreading resistance is negligible for this geometry but should be checked if heat source is localized.",
"deliverable": {
"type": "analysis",
"title": "4-Fin Heat Sink Analytical Thermal Solution",
"path": null,
"summary": "Fin efficiency 98.1%, thermal resistance 8.12 °C/W, base temperature 106.2°C for 10W load with natural convection"
},
"artifacts": [],
"confidence": "high",
"notes": "Classical extended surface (fin) theory used with corrected fin length for tip convection. Base conduction resistance neglected (not specified). Results are for uniform h assumption; real natural convection h varies with fin spacing and orientation.",
"timestamp": "2026-02-16T19:27:00-05:00"
}