Anto01
ed6874092f
- Remove all .sync-conflict-* files - Remove temp _temp_part_properties.json files - Add USER_GUIDE.md - Add dashboard docs (Executive, Technical, Operations, Master Plan) - Add playbooks (DOE, NX_REAL_RUN, SYNCTHING_RECOVERY) - Update iteration results Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Hydrotech Beam — Executive Dashboard
|
|
|
|
Last updated (UTC): 2026-02-14T22:24:29
|
|
Source: `studies/01_doe_landscape/results/doe_summary.json` + `doe_results.csv`
|
|
|
|
## CEO 60-second view
|
|
- **Phase:** DOE Phase 1 (LHS)
|
|
- **Gate status:** ❌ **BLOCKED** (Phase 1 → Phase 2)
|
|
- **Total trials:** 51
|
|
- **Solved:** 39 (**76.5%**, below 80% gate)
|
|
- **Geo-infeasible:** 12
|
|
- **Fully feasible designs:** 0 (gate requires ≥5)
|
|
|
|
## Top signals
|
|
- ✅ Mass extraction now looks real (no NaN in solved rows)
|
|
- ✅ Syncthing cleanup completed (active conflict files archived)
|
|
- ⚠️ Displacement constraint is the blocker (0/39 displacement-feasible at 10 mm)
|
|
- ⚠️ DOE→TPE gate cannot pass with current limits/bounds
|
|
|
|
## Decision hotlist (CEO)
|
|
1. **Approve next constraint strategy**:
|
|
- Option A (recommended): exploratory rerun at **20 mm** displacement
|
|
- Option B: keep 10 mm and tighten design bounds for stiffness
|
|
2. **Approve TPE entry rule** (with strict gate or conditional gate)
|
|
|
|
## Recommendation (current)
|
|
Proceed with **Option A** for exploration (20 mm), then tighten toward 10 mm in staged optimization.
|
|
|
|
## KPI snapshot
|
|
- Solve success rate: **76.5%**
|
|
- Feasibility rate (full): **0.0%**
|
|
- Best solved mass: **686.289 kg** (not fully feasible)
|
|
- Best trial ID by mass: **26**
|