Add persistent knowledge system that enables Atomizer to learn from every session and improve over time. ## New Files - knowledge_base/lac.py: LAC class with optimization memory, session insights, and skill evolution tracking - knowledge_base/__init__.py: Package initialization - .claude/skills/modules/learning-atomizer-core.md: Full LAC skill documentation - docs/07_DEVELOPMENT/ATOMIZER_CLAUDE_CODE_INSTRUCTIONS.md: Master instructions ## Updated Files - CLAUDE.md: Added LAC section, communication style, AVERVS execution framework, error classification, and "Atomizer Claude" identity - 00_BOOTSTRAP.md: Added session startup/closing checklists with LAC integration - 01_CHEATSHEET.md: Added LAC CLI and Python API quick reference - 02_CONTEXT_LOADER.md: Added LAC query section and anti-pattern ## LAC Features - Query similar past optimizations before starting new ones - Record insights (failures, success patterns, workarounds) - Record optimization outcomes for future reference - Suggest protocol improvements based on discoveries - Simple JSONL storage (no database required) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
235 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
235 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
skill_id: SKILL_MODULE_LAC
|
|
version: 1.0
|
|
last_updated: 2025-12-11
|
|
type: module
|
|
code_dependencies:
|
|
- knowledge_base/lac.py
|
|
requires_skills:
|
|
- SKILL_000
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Learning Atomizer Core (LAC) Integration
|
|
|
|
**Version**: 1.0
|
|
**Updated**: 2025-12-11
|
|
**Purpose**: Enable Claude to learn from every session and improve over time.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
LAC is Atomizer's persistent memory system. It stores:
|
|
- **Optimization outcomes** - What methods worked for what problems
|
|
- **Session insights** - Learnings, failures, and workarounds
|
|
- **Skill evolution** - Suggested protocol improvements
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Directory Structure
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
knowledge_base/lac/
|
|
├── optimization_memory/ # What worked for what geometry
|
|
│ ├── bracket.jsonl
|
|
│ ├── beam.jsonl
|
|
│ └── mirror.jsonl
|
|
├── session_insights/ # Learnings from sessions
|
|
│ ├── failure.jsonl
|
|
│ ├── success_pattern.jsonl
|
|
│ ├── user_preference.jsonl
|
|
│ └── protocol_clarification.jsonl
|
|
└── skill_evolution/ # Protocol improvements
|
|
└── suggested_updates.jsonl
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## When to Use LAC
|
|
|
|
### At Session Start
|
|
Query LAC for relevant prior knowledge:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from knowledge_base.lac import get_lac
|
|
|
|
lac = get_lac()
|
|
|
|
# Before starting a bracket optimization
|
|
similar = lac.query_similar_optimizations(
|
|
geometry_type="bracket",
|
|
objectives=["mass"],
|
|
converged_only=True
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Get method recommendation
|
|
rec = lac.get_best_method_for("bracket", n_objectives=1)
|
|
if rec:
|
|
print(f"Recommended: {rec['method']} (success rate: {rec['success_rate']:.0%})")
|
|
|
|
# Get relevant insights
|
|
insights = lac.get_relevant_insights("bracket mass optimization")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### During Session
|
|
Record learnings as they occur:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# Record a failure and its solution
|
|
lac.record_insight(
|
|
category="failure",
|
|
context="Modal analysis with CMA-ES sampler",
|
|
insight="CMA-ES struggles with discrete frequency targets. TPE works better.",
|
|
confidence=0.8,
|
|
tags=["cma-es", "modal", "frequency"]
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Record a success pattern
|
|
lac.record_insight(
|
|
category="success_pattern",
|
|
context="Bracket optimization with 5+ design variables",
|
|
insight="20 startup trials before TPE improves convergence by 30%",
|
|
confidence=0.85,
|
|
tags=["tpe", "startup_trials", "bracket"]
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Record user preference
|
|
lac.record_insight(
|
|
category="user_preference",
|
|
context="Report generation",
|
|
insight="User prefers Pareto plots with actual values instead of normalized",
|
|
confidence=0.9,
|
|
tags=["plotting", "pareto", "reporting"]
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### At Session End
|
|
Record optimization outcomes:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
lac.record_optimization_outcome(
|
|
study_name="bracket_v3",
|
|
geometry_type="bracket",
|
|
method="TPE",
|
|
objectives=["mass"],
|
|
design_vars=4,
|
|
trials=100,
|
|
converged=True,
|
|
convergence_trial=67,
|
|
best_value=2.34,
|
|
notes="Good convergence with 20 startup trials"
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Insight Categories
|
|
|
|
| Category | Use When | Example |
|
|
|----------|----------|---------|
|
|
| `failure` | Something failed and you found the cause | "CMA-ES fails on discrete targets" |
|
|
| `success_pattern` | An approach worked particularly well | "TPE with n_startup=20 converges faster" |
|
|
| `user_preference` | User expressed a preference | "User prefers minimal output" |
|
|
| `protocol_clarification` | A protocol needed interpretation | "SYS_12 unclear on Zernike subcase numbering" |
|
|
| `performance` | Performance-related observation | "GNN inference 100x faster than FEA" |
|
|
| `workaround` | Found a workaround for a known issue | "Load _i.prt before UpdateFemodel()" |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Protocol Update Suggestions
|
|
|
|
When you discover a protocol could be improved:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
lac.suggest_protocol_update(
|
|
protocol="SYS_15_METHOD_SELECTOR.md",
|
|
section="Modal Optimization",
|
|
current_text="Use TPE or CMA-ES for frequency optimization",
|
|
suggested_text="Use TPE for frequency optimization. CMA-ES struggles with discrete frequency targets.",
|
|
reason="Discovered during bracket_modal study - CMA-ES failed to converge"
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Review pending updates:
|
|
```python
|
|
pending = lac.get_pending_updates()
|
|
for p in pending:
|
|
print(f"- {p['protocol']}: {p['reason']}")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## CLI Commands
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# View LAC statistics
|
|
python knowledge_base/lac.py stats
|
|
|
|
# Generate full report
|
|
python knowledge_base/lac.py report
|
|
|
|
# View pending protocol updates
|
|
python knowledge_base/lac.py pending
|
|
|
|
# Query insights for a context
|
|
python knowledge_base/lac.py insights "bracket mass optimization"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Integration with Protocols
|
|
|
|
### Method Selection (SYS_15)
|
|
Before recommending a method, check LAC:
|
|
```python
|
|
rec = lac.get_best_method_for(geometry_type, n_objectives)
|
|
# Use recommendation if available, else fall back to protocol defaults
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Troubleshooting (OP_06)
|
|
Check if this error has been seen before:
|
|
```python
|
|
insights = lac.get_relevant_insights(error_message, categories=["failure", "workaround"])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Study Creation (OP_01)
|
|
Query similar past studies for configuration hints:
|
|
```python
|
|
similar = lac.query_similar_optimizations(geometry_type, objectives)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices
|
|
|
|
1. **Record failures immediately** - Don't wait until session end
|
|
2. **Be specific** - Include enough context to be useful later
|
|
3. **Tag appropriately** - Tags enable better retrieval
|
|
4. **Set confidence** - Low (0.5) for hunches, high (0.9) for verified patterns
|
|
5. **Suggest protocol updates** - Don't just note issues, propose fixes
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example Session Flow
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
SESSION START
|
|
│
|
|
├── Query LAC for similar optimizations
|
|
├── Query LAC for relevant insights
|
|
├── Note any pending protocol updates
|
|
│
|
|
├── [User requests work]
|
|
│
|
|
├── During work:
|
|
│ ├── Encounter issue? → Record to failure.jsonl
|
|
│ ├── Find workaround? → Record to workaround.jsonl
|
|
│ ├── User states preference? → Record to user_preference.jsonl
|
|
│ └── Protocol unclear? → Record to protocol_clarification.jsonl
|
|
│
|
|
└── SESSION END
|
|
├── Record optimization outcome (if optimization ran)
|
|
├── Suggest any protocol updates discovered
|
|
└── Summarize learnings for user
|
|
```
|