- Add DEVELOPMENT_ROADMAP.md with 7-phase plan for LLM-driven optimization - Phase 1: Plugin system with lifecycle hooks - Phase 2: Natural language configuration interface - Phase 3: Dynamic code generation for custom objectives - Phase 4: Intelligent analysis and decision support - Phase 5: Automated HTML/PDF reporting - Phase 6: NX MCP server integration - Phase 7: Self-improving feature registry - Update README.md to reflect LLM-native philosophy - Emphasize natural language workflows - Link to development roadmap - Update architecture diagrams - Add future capability examples - Reorganize documentation structure - Move old dev docs to docs/archive/ - Clean up root directory - Preserve all working optimization engine code This sets the foundation for transforming Atomizer into an AI-powered engineering assistant that can autonomously configure optimizations, generate custom analysis code, and provide intelligent recommendations.
24 lines
968 B
Plaintext
24 lines
968 B
Plaintext
|
|
The optimization loop is working, but the results show that:
|
|
|
|
1. ✅ Parameter updates are happening in Bracket.prt
|
|
2. ✅ NX solver is running successfully
|
|
3. ✅ Results are being extracted from .op2 files
|
|
4. ✅ Optimization loop completes
|
|
5. ❌ BUT: All trials return the SAME stress/displacement values
|
|
|
|
This indicates that the bracket geometry is NOT actually changing when we update
|
|
the tip_thickness and support_angle parameters.
|
|
|
|
The issue is that these expressions exist in Bracket.prt, but they may not be
|
|
linked to any geometric features (sketches, extrudes, etc.) that define the
|
|
actual bracket shape.
|
|
|
|
To fix this, the Bracket.prt file needs to be set up so that:
|
|
- The 'tip_thickness' expression controls an actual dimension
|
|
- The 'support_angle' expression controls an actual angle
|
|
- These dimensions are used in sketches/features to define the geometry
|
|
|
|
Without this, changing the expressions has no effect on the mesh or the analysis results.
|
|
|