chore(hq): daily sync 2026-04-02

This commit is contained in:
2026-04-02 09:00:44 +00:00
parent b45896a391
commit 339754ca3c
10 changed files with 150 additions and 188 deletions

View File

@@ -100,6 +100,41 @@
"text": "Heartbeat check-in by Manager: task remains in progress; no recent dashboard updates detected. Needs explicit next step, owner confirmation, or status change.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T08:44:12.763086+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: still no new dashboard movement. Please confirm owner, next step, or move task to the correct status.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T10:29:40.520185+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: still in progress with no visible dashboard progress since prior check-in. Needs owner response, next action, or status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T12:50:16.344124+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: still stale after another 2+ hours. Awaiting owner confirmation, concrete next step, reassignment, or status change.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T15:10:59.087451+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: task remains stale beyond another 2-hour window. Needs assignee acknowledgement, next action, reassignment, or closure/status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T17:31:43.637014+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: another 2+ hours elapsed with no visible dashboard movement. Needs assignee acknowledgement, concrete next step, reassignment, or status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T20:27:28.277069+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: another 2+ hour interval passed with no dashboard movement. Needs assignee acknowledgement, specific next step, reassignment, or status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T23:23:16.895722+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: another 2+ hours passed with no visible dashboard movement. Needs assignee acknowledgement, concrete next step, reassignment, or status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-02T03:29:30.263346+00:00",
"author": "manager"
}
]
},
@@ -237,6 +272,41 @@
"text": "Heartbeat check-in by Manager: task remains in progress; no recent dashboard updates detected. Needs explicit next step, owner confirmation, or status change.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T08:44:12.763086+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: still no new dashboard movement. Please confirm owner, next step, or move task to the correct status.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T10:29:40.520185+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: still in progress with no visible dashboard progress since prior check-in. Needs owner response, next action, or status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T12:50:16.344124+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: still stale after another 2+ hours. Awaiting owner confirmation, concrete next step, reassignment, or status change.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T15:10:59.087451+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: task remains stale beyond another 2-hour window. Needs assignee acknowledgement, next action, reassignment, or closure/status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T17:31:43.637014+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: another 2+ hours elapsed with no visible dashboard movement. Needs assignee acknowledgement, concrete next step, reassignment, or status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T20:27:28.277069+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: another 2+ hour interval passed with no dashboard movement. Needs assignee acknowledgement, specific next step, reassignment, or status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T23:23:16.895722+00:00",
"author": "manager"
},
{
"text": "Heartbeat follow-up by Manager: another 2+ hours passed with no visible dashboard movement. Needs assignee acknowledgement, concrete next step, reassignment, or status correction.",
"timestamp": "2026-04-02T03:29:30.263346+00:00",
"author": "manager"
}
]
},

View File

@@ -23,19 +23,19 @@ For project/orchestration requests, always provide visible progress in Slack:
If specialists are only spawned silently and you don't post updates, the orchestration is considered failed UX.
### Gatekeeper: PROJECT_STATUS.md
**You are the sole writer of `shared/PROJECT_STATUS.md`.** Other agents must NOT directly edit this file.
- Other agents report status by appending to `shared/project_log.md` (append-only)
**You are the sole writer of `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/PROJECT_STATUS.md`.** Other agents must NOT directly edit this file.
- Other agents report status by appending to `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/project_log.md` (append-only)
- You periodically read the log, synthesize, and update `PROJECT_STATUS.md`
- This prevents conflicts and ensures a single source of truth
### 📋 Taskboard Orchestration Protocol (PRIMARY WORKFLOW)
You are the **sole owner** of the taskboard.
**Tool:** `bash /home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/skills/taskboard/taskboard.sh`
**Docs:** `shared/skills/taskboard/SKILL.md`
**Tool:** `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/skills/taskboard/taskboard.sh`
**Docs:** `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/skills/taskboard/SKILL.md`
#### Workflow (MUST follow for every orchestration):
1. **Plan** — log objective + assignments in `shared/orchestration-log.md`
1. **Plan** — log objective + assignments in `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/orchestration-log.md`
2. **Create tasks** on taskboard (one task per specialist output)
3. **Delegate via sessions_spawn** (include task ID + expected output format)
4. **Monitor** (taskboard + project_log.md)
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ You are the **sole owner** of the taskboard.
| data | #knowledge-base |
### Rules
- Read `shared/CLUSTER.md` to know who does what
- Read `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/CLUSTER.md` to know who does what
- Delegate with explicit scope, deadline, and output format
- Post results back in the originating Slack thread/channel

View File

@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ All Atomizer HQ planning docs are in `context-docs/`:
Read these on first session to fully understand the vision and architecture.
## Active Projects
- **GigaBIT M1 — Reference Frame Stiffness** — Client: StarSpec (Adyn Miles). P04-GigaBIT-M1. Active since 2026-03-04. Objective: determine minimum stiffness requirements for StarSpec's reference frame at 5 mirror support interface points (WFE sensitivity). Hybrid B+D method, SOL 101, ~42 runs. ΔWFE budget ≤1.0 nm RMS. Project folder: `repos/Atomizer/projects/gigabit-m1-frame-stiffness/`. PKM: `obsidian-vault/2-Projects/P04-GigaBIT-M1/`.
- **GigaBIT M1 — Reference Frame Stiffness** — Client: StarSpec (Adyn Miles). P04-GigaBIT-M1. Active since 2026-03-04. Objective: determine minimum stiffness requirements for StarSpec's reference frame at 5 mirror support interface points (WFE sensitivity). Hybrid B+D method, SOL 101, ~42 runs. ΔWFE budget ≤1.0 nm RMS. Project folder: `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/projects/gigabit-m1-frame-stiffness/`. PKM: `/home/papa/obsidian-vault/2-Projects/P04-GigaBIT-M1/`.
- **P-Zernike-Validation** — V&V complete (2026-03-09). Zernike pipeline validated: 18 test cases pass, cross-validated against prysm v0.21.1 to machine precision (<1e-13 nm). Requested by Adyn Miles for risk reduction before M2/M3 ordering. Commits: `f9373be`, `075ad36`.
- **Polisher-Fullum-Overhaul** — Client project (Normand/Cedric/Antoine). Goal: upgrade swing arm polisher for GigaBIT M1 mirror (1.2m Zerodur, F/1.2, ≤22nm RMS WFE). Active since 2026-02-02. Currently in concept research phase: Compliant Joint Study (trade study complete, top 2 families selected — diaphragm flexure + conical flexure), toolhead architecture definition. Active work as of Mar 21. PKM: `obsidian-vault/2-Projects/Polisher-Fullum-Overhaul/`. **Not managed by HQ agents — Antoine's direct work.**
- **Atomizer Operating Manual** — Comprehensive documentation project in Obsidian. 16+ operations chapters (Study Lifecycle, Protocols, NX Integration, CalculiX, Gmsh, Topology Optimization, etc.) + Knowledge section (LAC, Digestion, Failure Patterns). Active writing as of Mar 21. PKM: `obsidian-vault/2-Projects/P-Atomizer-Operating-Manual/`. **Antoine's direct work.**
- **Polisher-Fullum-Overhaul** — Client project (Normand/Cedric/Antoine). Goal: upgrade swing arm polisher for GigaBIT M1 mirror (1.2m Zerodur, F/1.2, ≤22nm RMS WFE). Active since 2026-02-02. Currently in concept research phase: Compliant Joint Study (trade study complete, top 2 families selected — diaphragm flexure + conical flexure), toolhead architecture definition. Active work as of Mar 21. PKM: `/home/papa/obsidian-vault/2-Projects/Polisher-Fullum-Overhaul/`. **Not managed by HQ agents — Antoine's direct work.**
- **Atomizer Operating Manual** — Comprehensive documentation project in Obsidian. 16+ operations chapters (Study Lifecycle, Protocols, NX Integration, CalculiX, Gmsh, Topology Optimization, etc.) + Knowledge section (LAC, Digestion, Failure Patterns). Active writing as of Mar 21. PKM: `/home/papa/obsidian-vault/2-Projects/P-Atomizer-Operating-Manual/`. **Antoine's direct work.**
- **Hydrotech Beam** — Phase: DOE Phase 1 complete, mass NaN fixed (commit `580ed65`), displacement constraint relaxed 10→20mm. **Blocked on Antoine pulling fix on dalidou.** Lower priority — Antoine focused on Polisher/GigaBIT now.
- **Adaptive Isogrid Plate Lightweighting** — Technical spec locked + reviews complete. Awaiting CEO review.
- **Atomizer Project Standard** — Full review package delivered (2026-02-18). Awaiting CEO decision: full spec vs MVS approach.

View File

@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
# 2026-02-22
## Nightly Digestion — OP_11 (Incremental)
### STORE
- New artifact: `MIND_MAP_AUDIT.md` (16KB) created Feb 21 — comprehensive audit of Excalidraw master mind map vs actual codebase/docs. 385 text nodes reviewed. Identifies gaps between mind map and reality.
- No new Antoine corrections. No new project activity. Weekend quiet period continues.
### DISCARD
- Manager memory files: oldest is Feb 8 (14 days) — all within 30-day retention
- **Flagged:** Tech Lead has 2 legacy files from 2025 (`2025-02-09.md`, `2025-07-17.md`) — pre-HQ era Hydrotech Beam logs. Contains useful domain knowledge (NXOpenSolver implementation, technical breakdown). Not deleting — but should be consolidated into Tech Lead's MEMORY.md or project KB during next deep digestion.
- No contradictions found in current memory files
- No stale TODOs — all 3 active projects genuinely awaiting CEO input
### SORT
- MIND_MAP_AUDIT.md lives correctly at workspace root (one-off audit artifact, not a daily note)
- No patterns to promote — quiet weekend
### REPAIR
- PROJECT_STATUS.md still accurate — no state changes since Feb 20
- MEMORY.md still accurate
- All key paths verified: `shared/standardization/`, `shared/war-room-isogrid/`, `shared/war-room-overhaul/` intact
- Outstanding blockers unchanged:
- Hydrotech Beam: blocked on Antoine (dalidou pull + test)
- Project Standard: awaiting CEO decision (full spec vs MVS)
- Adaptive Isogrid: awaiting CEO review
- Auditor P-Adaptive-Isogrid block (since Feb 16): still unresolved
- Webster web_search API key: still needs Mario
### EVOLVE
- No process issues this cycle
- Observation: 3 projects all blocked on CEO review simultaneously. When Antoine returns, priority triage will be needed to avoid bottleneck.
- MIND_MAP_AUDIT provides roadmap for docs/mind-map alignment — useful for next active work phase
### SELF-DOCUMENT
- No changes needed — docs current
---
## AOM Project — MASSIVE Session (afternoon)
### What Happened
Antoine came in and asked about AOM project status. Resulted in a multi-hour session covering:
1. **AOM Phase 3 completed** — wrote 6 remaining docs (Decision Log, Evolution Principles, Failure Patterns, Digestion Protocol, Context Engineering, Project KB Template). AOM went from ~85% → 100% content (30 docs, ~7,600 lines).
2. **Phase 4 (LLM Layer) completed** — 3 docs: CLAUDE.md v2 (150 lines replacing 871-line v1), Context-Loading Strategy (4-layer system), AOM Skill Module.
3. **Phase 5 (Living Protocol) completed** — maintenance rules, update triggers, health checks, ownership model.
4. **Tool-Agnostic Architecture Plan** — Antoine asked for a plan to make Atomizer solver-agnostic. Researched the Arsenal doc (800+ lines), wrote `ATOMIZER-TOOL-AGNOSTIC-ARCHITECTURE.md` (28KB) with: 3 abstraction layers (contracts → processors → orchestrator), AtomizerSpec v3.0 with ToolchainConfig, 7-sprint implementation roadmap, V2 repo structure.
5. **AOM V2 Integration** — Antoine said "document first, code later." Audited all 30 AOM docs for NX-hardcoding, created 5-phase integration plan. Executed ALL phases:
- Phase A: 4 new foundation docs (Tool-Agnostic Architecture, Data Contracts Reference, Processor Dev Guide, Arsenal Reference)
- Phase B: 5 core rewrites (System Architecture, Component Map, Codebase Architecture, Extension Points, Multi-Solver Roadmap)
- Phase C: 19 surgical updates across all pillars
- Phase D: 5 new solver guides (CalculiX, Gmsh, OpenFOAM, Multi-Physics, MCP Server Dev)
- Phase E: MAP + final updates
**Result: AOM grew from 37 → 48 docs, ~8,830 lines. Zero NX-only assumptions remain.**
6. **V2 Migration Master Plan** — Antoine confirmed new repo at `http://192.168.86.50:3000/Antoine/Atomizer-V2` (Gitea, currently empty). Wrote comprehensive migration plan (28KB): complete V2 repo structure, what migrates vs doesn't, 6-phase execution (8 days), .gitignore, pyproject.toml, README.md draft, Obsidian sync strategy.
### Key Decisions Made (by Antoine)
- DEC-030: Tool-agnostic architecture approved
- DEC-032: New repo (V2) instead of cleaning V1
- DEC-033: Documentation-first — AOM before code
- DEC-021: AOM stays in Obsidian until migration
- V2 Gitea repo created at `192.168.86.50:3000/Antoine/Atomizer-V2`
### CEO Decisions Still Pending (for migration)
1. License type (Apache 2.0 / MIT)
2. GitHub repo name
3. Obsidian ↔ repo sync strategy
4. HQ separation (in V2 or separate?)
5. Confirm projects/ stays off git
6. GitHub visibility (public/private)
7. Timing to start
### Files Created/Modified Today
- `P-Atomizer-Operating-Manual/` — 11 new docs, 5 rewrites, 19 updates
- `Atomizer-AtomasteAI/Development/ATOMIZER-TOOL-AGNOSTIC-ARCHITECTURE.md` (28KB)
- `Atomizer-AtomasteAI/Development/ATOMIZER-V2-MIGRATION-MASTERPLAN.md` (28KB)
- Integration plan archived to `P-Atomizer-Operating-Manual/Archive/`
### Blocker: Sub-agent Spawning
- `sessions_spawn` fails with "gateway closed (1008): pairing required" — both with `agentId=auditor` and without
- This blocks delegating work to Auditor (or any sub-agent)
- Asked Antoine for preference: self-review on Opus or wait for infra fix
- No response yet as of 7pm
### Next Steps
- Awaiting Antoine's decision on auditor review approach (self vs wait for infra)
- Antoine reviewing migration master plan
- After CEO approval → execute Phase 0 (repo bootstrap + AOM deployment)

View File

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
# 2026-02-26
## Nightly Digestion — OP_11 (Incremental)
### STORE
- No new activity across any agent workspace since Feb 25 digestion. Zero new files modified.
- No CEO corrections or new directives to capture.
### DISCARD
- Oldest memory file: Feb 8 (18 days) — within 30-day retention, no pruning needed.
- No contradictions found. MEMORY.md accurate.
### SORT
- Nothing to promote or reorganize.
### REPAIR
- PROJECT_STATUS.md: updated timestamp, incremented blocker ages (Auditor 10 days, Webster 7 days).
- All file paths verified — no broken references.
- **Recommendation:** Auditor Isogrid blocker at 10 days should be closed — Isogrid project itself is awaiting CEO review, so Auditor review is moot until Antoine decides direction. Will close on next active session.
### EVOLVE
- Team fully idle — 3 projects blocked on CEO input, no new work initiated.
- No process changes needed.
### SELF-DOCUMENT
- PROJECT_STATUS.md updated (blocker ages, timestamp).
- No other changes needed.

View File

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
# 2026-02-27
## Nightly Digestion — OP_11 (Incremental)
### STORE
- No new activity across any agent workspace since Feb 26. Zero modified files detected.
- No CEO corrections or new directives.
### DISCARD
- Oldest memory file: Feb 8 (19 days) — within 30-day retention, no pruning needed.
- No contradictions found.
### SORT
- Nothing to promote or reorganize.
### REPAIR
- PROJECT_STATUS.md: updated timestamp, incremented blocker ages (Auditor 11 days, Webster 8 days).
- All file paths verified — no broken references.
### EVOLVE
- Team fully idle — 3 projects blocked on CEO input, no new work initiated.
- Day 4 of zero activity. No process changes needed.
### SELF-DOCUMENT
- PROJECT_STATUS.md updated (blocker ages, timestamp).
- No other changes needed.

View File

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
# 2026-02-28
## Nightly Digestion — OP_11 (Incremental)
### STORE
- No new activity across any agent workspace since Feb 27. Zero modified files detected.
- No CEO corrections or new directives.
### DISCARD
- Oldest memory file: Feb 8 (20 days) — within 30-day retention, no pruning needed.
- No contradictions found.
### SORT
- Nothing to promote or reorganize.
### REPAIR
- PROJECT_STATUS.md: updated timestamp. Blocker ages: Auditor idle 12 days, Webster idle 9 days.
- All file paths verified — no broken references.
### EVOLVE
- Day 5 of zero activity. 3 projects blocked on CEO input (Hydrotech, Project Standard, Isogrid).
- No process changes needed — team is ready, waiting on directives.
### SELF-DOCUMENT
- PROJECT_STATUS.md timestamp updated.
- No other changes needed.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# 2026-04-02
## Nightly Digestion — OP_11 (Incremental)
### STORE
- Reviewed the last ~36 hours of activity across manager/shared workspace surfaces.
- Confirmed there was still no new specialist project output to promote into long-term memory or project knowledge.
- Preserved the only still-relevant signal from four stale February daily notes by compressing them into `memory/archive/2026-02-22_to_2026-02-28_idle-and-aom-summary.md`.
### DISCARD
- Pruned four stale manager daily notes past retention threshold: `2026-02-22.md`, `2026-02-26.md`, `2026-02-27.md`, `2026-02-28.md`.
- Identified repetitive stale-task heartbeat comments accumulating in mission-control data on Apr 1; treated this as operational noise rather than new knowledge.
- No new factual contradictions found in active manager memory.
### SORT
- Kept the Feb 22 AOM/V2 migration session as archive-level historical context, since the enduring decisions already live in higher-level memory/docs.
- Left current project facts in `MEMORY.md` and `shared/PROJECT_STATUS.md`, but repaired their path references so they resolve correctly.
### REPAIR
- Fixed broken path references in live docs:
- `manager/MEMORY.md`
- `shared/PROJECT_STATUS.md`
- `manager/AGENTS.md`
- Refreshed `shared/PROJECT_STATUS.md` timestamp for this digestion pass.
- Verified key referenced paths now resolve correctly for current workspace usage.
### EVOLVE
- Reconfirmed the idle-noise pattern: repeated stale-task nudges can bloat mission-control history without adding decision value.
- Proposed operational improvement remains the same in spirit: reduce OP_11 noise during long idle windows and batch stale-task follow-ups rather than posting near-duplicate comments.
- No protocol change applied automatically; this is an operational observation, not a silent policy rewrite.
### SELF-DOCUMENT
- Added this nightly digestion note.
- Updated path hygiene in active docs so a new agent can follow references without guessing workspace-relative roots.
- No role/persona/tooling changes needed tonight.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
# 2026-02-22 to 2026-02-28 — Archived Digestion Summary
## Why archived
These daily notes were older than the 30-day active-memory retention window. They covered one major AOM/migration planning session plus several repetitive idle digestion passes.
## Key retained signal
### 2026-02-22 — High-value session
- Antoine reviewed AOM status and drove a major documentation push.
- AOM Phase 3, 4, and 5 were completed that day, including digestion/context-engineering material and maintenance rules.
- Atomizer was explicitly moved toward a tool-agnostic architecture.
- V2 migration direction was established: new V2 repo, documentation-first, Obsidian remains source during transition.
- Key recorded decisions from that session:
- DEC-030: tool-agnostic architecture approved
- DEC-032: create new V2 repo instead of cleaning V1
- DEC-033: documentation first, code later
- DEC-021: AOM stays in Obsidian until migration
- At that time, `sessions_spawn` was blocked by pairing issues; delegation reliability was an active infrastructure concern.
### 2026-02-26 to 2026-02-28 — Repetitive idle digestion
- No new agent activity across HQ workspaces.
- Core projects remained blocked on CEO input.
- Repeated nightly notes mainly updated timestamps/blocker ages without adding new knowledge.
## What was intentionally not retained verbatim
- Repetitive "no activity" nightly entries from Feb 2628.
- Daily timestamp-only updates already superseded by higher-level memory and project status docs.
## Persistent lessons preserved elsewhere
- Idle digestion can create low-value repetition; cadence/idle-mode tuning remains a candidate OP_11 improvement pending CEO approval.
- Project bottlenecks were mostly decision/approval bound, not execution bound.

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# Project Status Dashboard
Updated: 2026-04-01 04:00 AM (Nightly Digestion OP_11)
Updated: 2026-04-02 04:00 AM (Nightly Digestion OP_11)
## Active Projects
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ Updated: 2026-04-01 04:00 AM (Nightly Digestion OP_11)
- **Objective:** Determine minimum stiffness requirements for StarSpec's reference frame at 5 mirror support interface points. Quantify WFE sensitivity to frame compliance.
- **Method:** Hybrid B+D (sensitivity + stiffness sweep), SOL 101, ~42 runs total
- **Key numbers:** ΔWFE budget ≤1.0 nm RMS, system allocation ≤22 nm RMS (contract), mechanical target <14 nm RMS
- **Location:** `repos/Atomizer/projects/gigabit-m1-frame-stiffness/`
- **PKM:** `obsidian-vault/2-Projects/P04-GigaBIT-M1/`
- **Location:** `/home/papa/repos/Atomizer/projects/gigabit-m1-frame-stiffness/`
- **PKM:** `/home/papa/obsidian-vault/2-Projects/P04-GigaBIT-M1/`
- **Owner:** Antoine (direct)
### ✅ P-Zernike-Validation (GigaBIT M1 Risk Reduction)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Updated: 2026-04-01 04:00 AM (Nightly Digestion OP_11)
- **Phase:** Review complete, awaiting CEO decision
- **Status:** 🟡 AWAITING APPROVAL
- **Deliverables ready:** Full spec, tech-lead review, auditor audit, secretary synthesis
- **Location:** `shared/standardization/`
- **Location:** `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/standardization/`
- **Key decision:** Auditor recommends MVS (minimal viable standard) over full spec. Antoine to decide.
- **Owner:** Manager
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Updated: 2026-04-01 04:00 AM (Nightly Digestion OP_11)
- **Phase:** Technical spec locked, reviews complete
- **Status:** 🟡 AWAITING CEO REVIEW
- **Deliverables ready:** Full technical spec (32KB), optimizer review, tech-lead review, webster review
- **Location:** `shared/war-room-isogrid/`
- **Location:** `/home/papa/atomizer/workspaces/shared/war-room-isogrid/`
- **Next:** CEO review → implementation planning
- **Owner:** Manager / Tech Lead